CLA 45 AMG (C117) 2013 to 2018

CLA45 AMG: 0-60 - 4.2 1/4mi - 12.7@108.3 Motortrend

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-03-2013, 04:44 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Nachtsturm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
CLA45 AMG: 0-60 - 4.2 1/4mi - 12.7@108.3 Motortrend

Motortrend Tested.


This is officially on my short list of next car. Curb weight is higher than excepected at 3599lbs.

Overall of the video, is they said it meets the AMG criteria, and is a good driver to boot.

0-60 4.2
1/4mi 12.7@108.3

Link to text article:
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...mg_first_test/

Last edited by Nachtsturm; 12-04-2013 at 10:51 AM. Reason: Text article
Old 12-04-2013, 10:53 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Nachtsturm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
Car and driver backs up motortrend's time.

0-60 4.2
1/4mi 12.8@110

Nice to see a healthier trap.

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ic-test-review
Old 12-05-2013, 11:01 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Koru_Kinshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,276
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2018 E63S AMG, 2003 SLK 230 Sport, 2004 SL 600, 2006 SLK 55 AMG, 1998 E320 Wagon
Sounds like the weakness is in the mid-high range. a 4.2 0-60 should garner a better quarter mile time.
Old 12-06-2013, 02:10 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Nachtsturm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
Originally Posted by Koru_Kinshi
Sounds like the weakness is in the mid-high range. a 4.2 0-60 should garner a better quarter mile time.
It is the launch control/traction ability that allows such low 0-60 times. If this car were RWD it would probably run low 13's on street tires.
Old 12-06-2013, 09:21 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Originally Posted by Koru_Kinshi
Sounds like the weakness is in the mid-high range. a 4.2 0-60 should garner a better quarter mile time.
Trap speed v. 0-60 tells me it's like an electric car, great out of hole, but runs out of breath very quickly. With that 0-60, it ought to be closer to a 12.5 at 112-115. It's simply running out of mid range and top end.

Wanna beat a Cla45, just run em from a roll. The advantage of launch control and AWD are gone.

Last edited by Newzchspy; 12-06-2013 at 09:27 PM.
Old 12-06-2013, 09:44 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
kustom2k1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,907
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
03SL55
I guarantee you'll see very low 12 sec 1/4 mile times from a CLA45 in no time.
Old 12-06-2013, 10:52 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
E55, SL63, ML550
Drove one today!! Great handling car!!!!
Old 12-12-2013, 05:25 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Nachtsturm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
Originally Posted by Newzchspy
Trap speed v. 0-60 tells me it's like an electric car, great out of hole, but runs out of breath very quickly. With that 0-60, it ought to be closer to a 12.5 at 112-115. It's simply running out of mid range and top end.

Wanna beat a Cla45, just run em from a roll. The advantage of launch control and AWD are gone.
I don't think we can judge the mid range/top end so hastily.

The traps are healthy, at 108-110. Right there with your old modded C32.
Old 12-13-2013, 02:03 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
jonnyrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2014 CLA 45 AMG; 2012 GLK 350 4MATIC (totaled); 2009 VW GTI (sold)
wow lots of haters on this form….talk is cheap, see you at the street light
Old 12-15-2013, 09:23 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
For a car that has 360hp with 3600lbs I think its a fast trap. Definitely underrated.
Old 12-15-2013, 10:53 PM
  #11  
Member
 
gixxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 148
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Boxster
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
For a car that has 360hp with 3600lbs I think its a fast trap. Definitely underrated.
It's about right. Dual clutch is very fast and less drivetrain loss.
TTRS 3360lbs 360HP Manual ran per R&T
4sec 60mph
12.6@109.6

TTRS S-Tronic (dual clutch euro model)3320lbs per Car and driver
3.6 sec 0-60mph
12.1@113mph
Old 12-16-2013, 03:56 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
msk74717's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CLA45 AMG
Things happening in Australia presently;-

As quoted "A45 with 305kw/550nm from a tune
Hey guys check out what I found on Facebook. You guys reckon it's safe to tune our cla45?"

https://m.facebook.com/pages/Willall...2F251746834570

Willall Racing A45 Phase I package scheduled for public release January 2014.

The most sophisticated and powerful tuning system available for the A45 featuring -

- More power and torque than the competition
- Direct boost control for linear response
- Programmed ignition timing maps
- Improved launch control
- Altered Drive By Wire mapping for improved traffic behaviour
- Calibrated in Australia by Australians for Australian fuel
- Full system safety margins still in place

We have seen 0-100km/h in 3.8 seconds and 0-400m in 11.8 seconds from Vbox. These will be backed up before any official claims are made by one of our test cars at WSID (NSW)

Pricing to be released Jan 2014
Dealer enquiries welcome.

Last edited by msk74717; 12-16-2013 at 05:55 AM.
Old 12-16-2013, 01:56 PM
  #13  
Member
 
ChrisMclass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2014 MB ML63 AMG
I'm impressed with those numbers... Where else will you get stats like that from a $47K MSRP car??
Old 12-16-2013, 04:39 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Originally Posted by Nachtsturm
I don't think we can judge the mid range/top end so hastily.

The traps are healthy, at 108-110. Right there with your old modded C32.
and quicker/faster than your modded CLK55
Old 12-16-2013, 07:31 PM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
HockeyPlayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 38
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2007 Lotus Exige S, 1995 Acura NSX, 2008 Cayman S
Motortrend's time is with 18 inch wheels, i wonder how much slower the 19's are? Probably not much
Old 12-16-2013, 10:19 PM
  #16  
AV1
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AV1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,258
Received 50 Likes on 43 Posts
C204 C250-CDI
Originally Posted by HockeyPlayer
Motortrend's time is with 18 inch wheels, i wonder how much slower the 19's are? Probably not much
No difference at all to worry about with 19's or the added weight of a full features package

Those numbers posted above by msk74717 are of an Australian spec A45 and all Australian spec A45's (and also the CLA45's) come standard with 19's and all the extra features.

Even stock standard or unmodified a lot of Australian magazines have tested the A45 (in the trim outlined above) at mid to low 4's for the 0-100km/h and mid 12's for the 1/4 mile sprints
Old 12-17-2013, 04:22 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Originally Posted by ChrisMclass
I'm impressed with those numbers... Where else will you get stats like that from a $47K MSRP car??
Who's been getting one for $47K?? Closer to $60 K is more like it.
Old 12-17-2013, 04:28 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Nachtsturm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
Originally Posted by Newzchspy
and quicker/faster than your modded CLK55
Exactly.

As fast/faster than modded C32/CLK55 stock. Pretty darn impressive if you ask me.

Especially if you adjust the base price of a 2002 C32 in today's dollars, which would be $67,000!

Faster, AWD, turbo, DCT and over 30 mpg highway for 20k less? Sign me up!

Last edited by Nachtsturm; 12-17-2013 at 04:31 PM.
Old 12-17-2013, 09:50 PM
  #19  
Member
 
ChrisMclass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2014 MB ML63 AMG
Originally Posted by Newzchspy
Who's been getting one for $47K?? Closer to $60 K is more like it.
Ok let me rephrase that, starting at $47K.
Old 12-17-2013, 11:00 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Originally Posted by Nachtsturm
Exactly.

As fast/faster than modded C32/CLK55 stock. Pretty darn impressive if you ask me.

Especially if you adjust the base price of a 2002 C32 in today's dollars, which would be $67,000!

Faster, AWD, turbo, DCT and over 30 mpg highway for 20k less? Sign me up!

Good luck with that! 2014 production is pretty much gone........
Old 12-17-2013, 11:52 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Nachtsturm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
Originally Posted by Newzchspy
Good luck with that! 2014 production is pretty much gone........
From a quick search on auto trader, there are 99 available. I'm sure not all of them are sold.

I'm still kinda curious how the aftermarket will do, and what Audi plans on doing with RS3.
Old 12-18-2013, 01:13 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Originally Posted by Nachtsturm
From a quick search on auto trader, there are 99 available. I'm sure not all of them are sold.

I'm still kinda curious how the aftermarket will do, and what Audi plans on doing with RS3.

Sorry, but I will not be an early adopter of the CLA , just like I wasn't for the 32 or the 55. It's my own mental issue. Given the fact that the 15s will be out probably July, I can certainly wait. Teething pains have always been an issue.

Last edited by Newzchspy; 12-18-2013 at 01:19 PM.
Old 12-22-2013, 01:03 AM
  #23  
Banned
 
trev0006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I need to test drive one soon.
Old 12-22-2013, 09:26 PM
  #24  
OBP
Senior Member
 
OBP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 260
Received 26 Likes on 20 Posts
Lexus SC430, CLS550 4matic, GLK350 4matic, Volvo XC90 T8, E63 S AMG
Test drove one last week. Definitely quick off the mark, I do feel some slight turbo lag but not that different from my M278 equipped 550 4matic. Crackle and pop from the exhaust is really apparent. Interesting sounds for a first drive but will I get tired of it ? Dunno about that. Probably more tossable in corners than my 550 and the turbo-4 has a racy note to it rather than the rumble I get from my 2 V8 engined cars. Those 0-60 numbers are believable - it gets there frenetically fast and the DCT does feel better than my slush box. The one thing I'd say though as I left the dealer lot is that despite the awesome performance, it still has a 4 cylinder feel to it. No bad thing, just different if you're used to V8s.
Old 12-22-2013, 10:08 PM
  #25  
Junior Member
 
frcotting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2014 BMW X1 xDrive35i; 2014 BMW M5 competition
Originally Posted by ChrisMclass
Ok let me rephrase that, starting at $47K.
S4


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: CLA45 AMG: 0-60 - 4.2 1/4mi - 12.7@108.3 Motortrend



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:21 AM.