CLA 45 AMG (C117) 2013 to 2018

45AMG 12.95 @ 121MPH ... 8000ft above Sea Level!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-30-2015, 01:58 PM
  #1  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
 
Team@Rebellion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Funtington, United Kingdom
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E63 AMG
45AMG 12.95 @ 121MPH ... 8000ft above Sea Level!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPaL...ature=youtu.be

Car ran 13.7 stock, Car is now running Rebellion Automotive Tune and Intake





Old 01-30-2015, 02:08 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Nachtsturm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
At a 118-21mph, you would expect the ET to be much lower. I run similar ET's on RWD and trap 9-13 mph slower than you.

Insight on the run?

That trap speed is very impressive.
Old 01-30-2015, 02:30 PM
  #3  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
 
Team@Rebellion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Funtington, United Kingdom
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E63 AMG
Yes cars on Stock Dunlop tyres so is struggling for traction.

Better tyres are going on then will give a much better ET
Old 01-30-2015, 03:24 PM
  #4  
Member
 
J_Maher_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 WRX
Originally Posted by Matt@Rebellion
Yes cars on Stock Dunlop tyres so is struggling for traction.

Better tyres are going on then will give a much better ET
1.89 60' doesn't seem like he is struggling that much!

I'm actually baffled by this time slip, 120mph trap, 1.89 60', but yet a 12.9 ET. It's like he got out of the hole and sand bagged for a few seconds before getting on it haha

Is he running race gas? I think that might be a record trap speed for our cars if it's legit :
Old 01-30-2015, 03:28 PM
  #5  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
 
Team@Rebellion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Funtington, United Kingdom
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E63 AMG
The car is running a Sunnco 100Ron and Pump 89 Ron mix

His car ran a 118mph Pass on the next run so not a fluke

RaceAmerica official timing too
Old 01-30-2015, 03:38 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Nachtsturm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
Originally Posted by J_Maher_AMG
1.89 60' doesn't seem like he is struggling that much!

I'm actually baffled by this time slip, 120mph trap, 1.89 60', but yet a 12.9 ET. It's like he got out of the hole and sand bagged for a few seconds before getting on it haha

Is he running race gas? I think that might be a record trap speed for our cars if it's legit :
^This
A 1.8-2.o 60" and a 12.9@118-121

Just doesn't make much sense.

Maybe he rolled a tad, and started the clock, the trap is off, or spun for a second on the 1-2 shift.
Old 01-30-2015, 03:42 PM
  #7  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
 
Team@Rebellion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Funtington, United Kingdom
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E63 AMG
It was the cars 3rd outing there and 2nd with race fuel.

He has said it was throwing a traction light changing into second so could have bogged power

Will get new runs with better tires
Old 01-30-2015, 03:43 PM
  #8  
Member
 
J_Maher_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 WRX
Originally Posted by Nachtsturm
^This
A 1.8-2.o 60" and a 12.9@118-121

Just doesn't make much sense.

Maybe he rolled a tad, and started the clock, the trap is off, or spun for a second on the 1-2 shift.
Yes it doesn't add up!! Haha 120mph is like 2010 GTR 1/4 mile traps
Old 01-30-2015, 03:44 PM
  #9  
Member
 
J_Maher_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 WRX
Originally Posted by Matt@Rebellion
It was the cars 3rd outing there and 2nd with race fuel.

He has said it was throwing a traction light changing into second so could have bogged power

Will get new runs with better tires
Should net some interesting results! That would shock a lotttt of people from a highway roll :rofl:
Old 01-30-2015, 03:49 PM
  #10  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
 
Team@Rebellion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Funtington, United Kingdom
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E63 AMG
You joke about GTR's lol

A45 Rebellion Stage 2 (Downpipe, Intake and Tune - Driver + 3 Passengers
GTR 520BHP - Driver Plus 1 Passenger

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SR8T...ature=youtu.be
Old 01-30-2015, 04:12 PM
  #11  
Member
 
J_Maher_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 WRX
Originally Posted by Matt@Rebellion
You joke about GTR's lol

A45 Rebellion Stage 2 (Downpipe, Intake and Tune - Driver + 3 Passengers
GTR 520BHP - Driver Plus 1 Passenger

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SR8T...ature=youtu.be
I don't know what you mean about me joking!?

120mph is literally a 2010 GTR trap, but if this car had huge traction issues, it should walk an older GTR from a roll!
Old 01-30-2015, 04:33 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Fly by night's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 309
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
E class
They need to do something software or whatever to get this car to launch out of the hole. The car is a slug in first gear no matter what mode it's in.

Pedal commander ???
Old 01-30-2015, 04:44 PM
  #13  
Member
 
J_Maher_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 WRX
Originally Posted by Fly by night
They need to do something software or whatever to get this car to launch out of the hole. The car is a slug in first gear no matter what mode it's in.

Pedal commander ???


4.2 seconds to 60mph is by no means a slug... Tires are the limiting factor on this car. Even at stock power levels, the car puts down a mediocre 60 ft time. If the car came with wider rubber, or if someone put some real sticky shoes on it, then you would be seeing sub 4 second 0-60's with stock power level.


Pedal commander does nothing for increasing speed.. Everyone raves about these, but the fact is all it is doing is giving you more throttle... Press the throttle 20%, and you really get more than that with the Pedal Commander.. It's something you can do yourself just by flexing your right ankle a little more. Never did understand people's obsession with such a useless mod.
Old 01-30-2015, 05:19 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Fly by night's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 309
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
E class
Originally Posted by J_Maher_AMG
4.2 seconds to 60mph is by no means a slug... Tires are the limiting factor on this car. Even at stock power levels, the car puts down a mediocre 60 ft time. If the car came with wider rubber, or if someone put some real sticky shoes on it, then you would be seeing sub 4 second 0-60's with stock power level.


Pedal commander does nothing for increasing speed.. Everyone raves about these, but the fact is all it is doing is giving you more throttle... Press the throttle 20%, and you really get more than that with the Pedal Commander.. It's something you can do yourself just by flexing your right ankle a little more. Never did understand people's obsession with such a useless mod.
So a software update and tune some new tires and the car should run properly correct
Old 01-30-2015, 05:33 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Nachtsturm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
Matt, what did the car trap stock on the 13.7 run?
Old 01-30-2015, 05:43 PM
  #16  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
 
Team@Rebellion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Funtington, United Kingdom
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E63 AMG
will get that info for you, a stock early model GTR runs 12.8 at 114mph on that strip. brand new GTR on good tyres ran 12.0 at 129mph
Old 01-31-2015, 08:07 AM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
Iggy Higgins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A45
I would love to see this car replicate a 120+mph trap speed at another track. I say dodgy speed trap on this as cars elsewhere with similar mods are at least 6-7mph slower and that's at sea level too!!!

Just doesn't add up
Old 01-31-2015, 08:30 AM
  #18  
Member
 
dblock110's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C32 AMG
witchcraft
Old 01-31-2015, 01:23 PM
  #19  
Member
 
EDgineered's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 C55 black on black aka DVS C55, 2007 C230 sport silver on black for the boss
Yeah, there is something wrong with the data collection system. Looks like the trap is too far out. 121 is mid 11s all day but the 60ft doesn't show a tone of wheel spin.


http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...ag-Racing.html


http://www.*********.com/content.php...n-the-1-4-mile



http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M4-Timeslip-27178.html


.

Last edited by EDgineered; 01-31-2015 at 01:28 PM.
Old 01-31-2015, 08:21 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Max.H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,682
Received 38 Likes on 37 Posts
E55
Was this in mexico city? 12s is fast at high elevation.
Old 02-02-2015, 04:55 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Originally Posted by Nachtsturm
^This
A 1.8-2.o 60" and a 12.9@118-121

Just doesn't make much sense.

Maybe he rolled a tad, and started the clock, the trap is off, or spun for a second on the 1-2 shift.
Actually, makes total sense. The car was hooking relatively well (look at 60 foot time) , BUT once it did after the 60 foot time, it went strong. In other words, Matt's car would run close to it till a lil less than the 1/8 mile and then after that its lights out for the 5.4 V8 because like a small Turbo 4 tends to do, it gets on its "peak" and really goes. You ringy dingy two stroke motorcycle riders know what I am talking about here. Its torque at the bottom (V8) versus torque at top for the 4 banger.

Years ago, I had an RD 350 and RD 400 Yamaha two stroke twin that ran just like Rebellion's car did. "Sorta" a dog out of hole, BUT once she got on the "pipes", she'd go. Small displacement FI engines tend to do just like the old 2 strokers did.

Last edited by Newzchspy; 02-02-2015 at 04:58 PM.
Old 02-02-2015, 05:00 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Originally Posted by Max.H
Was this in mexico city? 12s is fast at high elevation.
This ^^^, X2, and add to that the thinner air as well and that CLA45 was flying. I'd love to see her at MIR or even RTE 66. (closer to sea level).
Old 02-03-2015, 08:46 AM
  #23  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
 
Team@Rebellion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Funtington, United Kingdom
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E63 AMG
We will be heading to the strip in the UK soon, Just waiting for the Snow to clear lol!
Old 02-03-2015, 11:08 AM
  #24  
Member
 
J_Maher_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 WRX
Originally Posted by Newzchspy
Actually, makes total sense. The car was hooking relatively well (look at 60 foot time) , BUT once it did after the 60 foot time, it went strong. In other words, Matt's car would run close to it till a lil less than the 1/8 mile and then after that its lights out for the 5.4 V8 because like a small Turbo 4 tends to do, it gets on its "peak" and really goes. You ringy dingy two stroke motorcycle riders know what I am talking about here. Its torque at the bottom (V8) versus torque at top for the 4 banger.

Years ago, I had an RD 350 and RD 400 Yamaha two stroke twin that ran just like Rebellion's car did. "Sorta" a dog out of hole, BUT once she got on the "pipes", she'd go. Small displacement FI engines tend to do just like the old 2 strokers did.
How does this make sense?? You just said yourself the car hooked up well, and then posts a 120mph trap speed. It is impossible, to get that kind of 60' time, to trap that high, but yet have such a high ET.

RWD cars with Worse 60' times, and 8-10 mph slower trap speeds, still run in the mid 12's...

I'm starting to think there has to be something wrong with the data collection system as well. No 45 is going to gain 12-13mph trap speed with just a tune and simple bolt ons, and at 8000ft at that!!! Oh, and with how much 'faster' it is trap speed wise, it still ran a slower ET than a Stock 45, even though it had good 60' time and crazy high trap speeds.

Trap speed is certainly off, physics says so lol
Old 02-06-2015, 02:44 PM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Originally Posted by J_Maher_AMG
How does this make sense?? You just said yourself the car hooked up well, and then posts a 120mph trap speed. It is impossible, to get that kind of 60' time, to trap that high, but yet have such a high ET.

RWD cars with Worse 60' times, and 8-10 mph slower trap speeds, still run in the mid 12's...

I'm starting to think there has to be something wrong with the data collection system as well. No 45 is going to gain 12-13mph trap speed with just a tune and simple bolt ons, and at 8000ft at that!!! Oh, and with how much 'faster' it is trap speed wise, it still ran a slower ET than a Stock 45, even though it had good 60' time and crazy high trap speeds.

Trap speed is certainly off, physics says so lol
Where do physics say that?? Enlighten me??


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 45AMG 12.95 @ 121MPH ... 8000ft above Sea Level!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 AM.