DE-staggered clk500
Trending Topics
#9
Member
That's what I did!
I have two full sets of OEM wheels. 2x 7.5", and 2x 8.5". Normally staggered, that would small in front (225x45R17) big in back (245/40R17).
I found that the 245/40R17 tires wear VERY unevenly, with the centers wearing out quickly, wasting lots of expensive miles. The fronts wear out the sides quicker.
My plan is to run 245 tires w/ 8.5" on all corners for the summer, and 225 w/ 7.5" all corners with winter tires. (245 aren't good in winter - too wide.)
For now, to use up my tires, I currently remounted my 225x45 tires onto the 8.5" wheels for the front.
For what it's worth, I tried 255x40R17 on the 8.5" wheels on the front, and they clear, but I think there is some wear on the plastic wall from tight turns with it. It clears the strut just fine.
No doubt, the car handles better with wider tires in the front.
Visually, the 8.5" is probably too wide, in case you care what other people think. 8" would look better on the fronts, but 9.5" would look nicer still in the back. I'm married with kids, so I don't care what other people think of my funny looking wheels.
I have two full sets of OEM wheels. 2x 7.5", and 2x 8.5". Normally staggered, that would small in front (225x45R17) big in back (245/40R17).
I found that the 245/40R17 tires wear VERY unevenly, with the centers wearing out quickly, wasting lots of expensive miles. The fronts wear out the sides quicker.
My plan is to run 245 tires w/ 8.5" on all corners for the summer, and 225 w/ 7.5" all corners with winter tires. (245 aren't good in winter - too wide.)
For now, to use up my tires, I currently remounted my 225x45 tires onto the 8.5" wheels for the front.
For what it's worth, I tried 255x40R17 on the 8.5" wheels on the front, and they clear, but I think there is some wear on the plastic wall from tight turns with it. It clears the strut just fine.
No doubt, the car handles better with wider tires in the front.
Visually, the 8.5" is probably too wide, in case you care what other people think. 8" would look better on the fronts, but 9.5" would look nicer still in the back. I'm married with kids, so I don't care what other people think of my funny looking wheels.
#11
Member
I think 235 would be a better size. 225 on 8.5 looks stretched, but 245 on 8.5 in the front looks getto like. Ideally, I would recommend 235 on 8".
That's what I would do, but I'm not buying new wheels.
That's what I would do, but I'm not buying new wheels.
#12
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: virginia beach
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
clk 500 (wifey's); 350Z roadster (daily driver); 350Z coupe (track car)
There are actually some advantages with a "square" set-up. It creates more neutral handling and you can rotate your tires, both of which are great advantages if you track your car a lot.
Personally though, I do agree that a staggered set-up looks better on an MB.
#14
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New Bedford, MA, USA
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 CLK350 Cabriolet
Exactly why I went to 225/40/18 on all 4 corners. I got tired of replacing 2 tires at a time and never really having a solid new set on the car. Now I can rotate the tires and get maximum life from the entire set.
It will not affect your traction control at all. That would only be a problem if you changed the diameter of your tires.
There are actually some advantages with a "square" set-up. It creates more neutral handling and you can rotate your tires, both of which are great advantages if you track your car a lot.
Personally though, I do agree that a staggered set-up looks better on an MB.
There are actually some advantages with a "square" set-up. It creates more neutral handling and you can rotate your tires, both of which are great advantages if you track your car a lot.
Personally though, I do agree that a staggered set-up looks better on an MB.
#16
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 154
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2014 GL450
It was an option from the factory to mount de-staggered tires and I was interested in being able to rotate the tires but they only offered the 7.5" width. This is what is good about the aftermarket -you can pick whatever fits.
#17
oc500, Do you live in Orange County? Email me at rsc337@yahoo.com. I drive a clk430 thats 3" of the ground! tucking 18"
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: orlando, florida. Dr.Phillips, UCF
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04 CLK 500, 07 GSX-R 750, S 550, 09 Jeep GC
I have a spare set of OEM CLK500 wheels. So I run 245's all the way around.
245/40/17 on all 4's.
245/40/17 on all 4's.
#19
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sparks, NV
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
03 CLK 55 AMG, IMCO muffler/Magnaflow tips, KW V1 coilovers, 19" Petrol Metrix Wheels
wow, i guess you guys dont mind ridiculous tucking in the back.
this is why i usually stay in the amg forum...
this is why i usually stay in the amg forum...
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
#22
I'm just poor white trash! I'm into customs/hot rods/lowriders! If it doesn't drag, it's not low enough. I've done alot of suspension work to make it this low and have factory correct alignment. So it's not exactly a hack job, but it rides a little stiff and tight? I'll probably catch **** for this but I don't care.....
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: virginia beach
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
clk 500 (wifey's); 350Z roadster (daily driver); 350Z coupe (track car)
So I don't think its that hard to understand someone changing to a "square" set up, and I definitely don't think it looks "ridiculous"!!!!!!
#24
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sparks, NV
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
03 CLK 55 AMG, IMCO muffler/Magnaflow tips, KW V1 coilovers, 19" Petrol Metrix Wheels
when the rear wheel of the car is tucked two or three inched into the rear fender it looks ridiculous. Clk's can take up to a 10' rim in back. i am sorry but running 8.5" rims in the back looks silly. part of the reason MB runs a staggered set-up is for traction reasons. more rubber out back means less wheel spin. most CLK's have at least 302hp remember.
i have a front wheel drive VW GTI as well and i can tell you that our cars definitley are not set-up for understeer. if anything i would say they are pretty neutral. drive a Ferrari F430 or 355 and you will feel what understeer feels like.
Rcs i like my cars low too. i pretty much go with one finger gaps at all four corners.
i have a front wheel drive VW GTI as well and i can tell you that our cars definitley are not set-up for understeer. if anything i would say they are pretty neutral. drive a Ferrari F430 or 355 and you will feel what understeer feels like.
Rcs i like my cars low too. i pretty much go with one finger gaps at all four corners.
#25
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 154
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2014 GL450
The CLK's understeer. With some power on in a curve it gets more neutral but the factory is going to sell understeering cars because you won't end up in the center divider if you sneeze.
Running the same width tires front and back makes sense to me but I like driving with the ESP off and the feeling of the car as it goes around a curve with the rear drifting a little.
Cosmetics are a different issue. These days big wheels are fashionable so that's what you gotta do if you want to look up to date
Running the same width tires front and back makes sense to me but I like driving with the ESP off and the feeling of the car as it goes around a curve with the rear drifting a little.
Cosmetics are a different issue. These days big wheels are fashionable so that's what you gotta do if you want to look up to date