Dyno charts:2012 CLS 63 & 2012 S63 & C63 modded
08-10-2011, 12:48 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calabasas,Ca
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
12 E63 matte white
Dyno charts:2012 CLS 63 & 2012 S63 & C63 modded
Finally got done breaking in my car. Wanted to see my baseline numbers. I've been going to the same dyno place where insideline did the 2012 S63 with PP (563hp/664 torque). My old C63 which had Singh autosport tune and Kleeman K2 short headers. I will be doing a tune next week and will post the result. My CLS does not have the performance pkg.
2012 CLS 63
2012 S 63
2009 C 63
2012 CLS 63
2012 S 63
2009 C 63
08-10-2011, 04:20 PM
#2
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
a car that gets very poor gas mileage.
Very good numbers. Wow!
I forget what percentage we lose to the drivetrain...I think somewhere in the neighborhood of 15%. I'm sure someone else can correct me.
If so, either your motor is built very well or Mercedes is undercutting their "actual" performance figures again. I believe the latter to be true. Afterall, one of their goals was to avoid the GG tax on this vehicle. I think HP and fuel economy play a role in that. Again, I'm not entirely sure.
Congrats FlyC63.
By the way, where are you getting your motor tuned?
I forget what percentage we lose to the drivetrain...I think somewhere in the neighborhood of 15%. I'm sure someone else can correct me.
If so, either your motor is built very well or Mercedes is undercutting their "actual" performance figures again. I believe the latter to be true. Afterall, one of their goals was to avoid the GG tax on this vehicle. I think HP and fuel economy play a role in that. Again, I'm not entirely sure.
Congrats FlyC63.
By the way, where are you getting your motor tuned?
08-10-2011, 05:25 PM
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calabasas,Ca
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
12 E63 matte white
The % lose depends on each dyno machine. I posted all 3 as they were dyno on the same machine but different days. Just a comparison to show how strong the M157 can be as proven on the S63 when is boosted!
2012 S63 (PP) 537 rwhp 611 tq
2012 CLS 63 (standard) 470 rwhp 477 tq
2009 C63 (modded) 447 rwhp 400 tq
I'll be getting the Singh Autosport tune at Eurorev in Inglewood.
2012 S63 (PP) 537 rwhp 611 tq
2012 CLS 63 (standard) 470 rwhp 477 tq
2009 C63 (modded) 447 rwhp 400 tq
I'll be getting the Singh Autosport tune at Eurorev in Inglewood.
08-10-2011, 05:50 PM
#4
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
a car that gets very poor gas mileage.
Very cool.
Keep us posted and thanks for the figures.
As more and more owners tune their motors, we'll find out if the M157 can produce similar numbers to that S63 with PP.
Keep us posted and thanks for the figures.
As more and more owners tune their motors, we'll find out if the M157 can produce similar numbers to that S63 with PP.
08-12-2011, 08:39 PM
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
9 Posts
C218 CLS63TT PP Edition1, W213 E63S
as i recall, S63 (PP: 563hp/900NM, Normal:636hp,800NM) has more HP than CLS63 (PP:549hp/800NM, Normal: 525hp/700NM)) so he S platform is stronger, thats why it showed more on the dyno.
please give us some feedback after you tune. i think you can squeeze more thn 60rwhp
please give us some feedback after you tune. i think you can squeeze more thn 60rwhp
