2012 BMW 550iX and MB E550 4-matic
#51
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: S.E Michigan
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 E350
I dont like the trunk spoiler being black but im fine with the diffuser being black. Most cars diffusers are always black. I think it gives the rear bumper more definition
#52
I just bought one of these and have noticed a harshness. Mind you, I avoided the 18" wheels as I new they would be bad and can't even imagine them on certain rough roads. I really don't understand how this large wheel size thing has gotten so out of control. Sure the handling is improved a lot but the risk of wheel and tire damage, Not to mention the dental work you'll need. 17" are even bad.
I think 16" wheels would be the sweet spot for the regular E350's. I just bought this, and frankly, if it continues to bug me (I just noticed it last night) I will sell it and buy something I know is smooth for half the price.
Just reality without cool-aid. These cars carry such a mystique it's hard to get a grip on what's real.
Last edited by mac jones; 11-18-2011 at 01:05 PM.
#53
Super Member
I think that f-10 with the M sport package looks awesome. I love the look of the BMW 5, but because of their continueing reliability problems would never purchase one. For the original poster, go for it on the new E-550. The car is a great all-round performer. Reliable, comfortable, looks great and has an awesome new engine. I think you will be happy with either choice,350 or 550, but on those NY city roads, the airmatic will be a better choice. IMO, I think that MB, AUDI, and BMW middle class vehicles are all very nice and have all good features. BUT, when it comes to reliability, the Mb has proven lately that it will be the vehicle that spends less time in the dealer getting repaired. I love the look of the BMW 5 and the Idrive and screen. I think the Audi interrior is absolutely gorgeous and their stereos are crazy clear. When it comes down to it, I drive a MB and am very happy with my choice.
#54
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
13 Posts
2016 Audi S8 Plus/ 2011 Mercedes e550 4Matic//Gone:1985 500SEL/2000 e320 4Matic/ 2001 e55 Kleeman
Warning OFF topic nit-pick follows:
I just bought one of these and have noticed a harshness. Mind you, I avoided the 18" wheels as I new they would be bad and can't even imagine them on certain rough roads. I really don't understand how this large wheel size thing has gotten so out of control. Sure the handling is improved a lot but the risk of wheel and tire damage, Not to mention the dental work you'll need. 17" are even bad.
I think 16" wheels would be the sweet spot for the regular E350's. I just bought this, and frankly, if it continues to bug me (I just noticed it last night) I will sell it and buy something I know is smooth for half the price.
Just reality without cool-aid. These cars carry such a mystique it's hard to get a grip on what's real.
I just bought one of these and have noticed a harshness. Mind you, I avoided the 18" wheels as I new they would be bad and can't even imagine them on certain rough roads. I really don't understand how this large wheel size thing has gotten so out of control. Sure the handling is improved a lot but the risk of wheel and tire damage, Not to mention the dental work you'll need. 17" are even bad.
I think 16" wheels would be the sweet spot for the regular E350's. I just bought this, and frankly, if it continues to bug me (I just noticed it last night) I will sell it and buy something I know is smooth for half the price.
Just reality without cool-aid. These cars carry such a mystique it's hard to get a grip on what's real.
#55
Very surprising that you think that the e350 with 17 inch rims is a harsh ride. I believe that a majority on this forum would disagree with you. There is always going to be some trade-off between handling and softness of the suspension. If you want a Cadillac of old soft ride, then go buy a Lexus es350 with has a soft ride but drives like crap. The e350's are the best, most solidly built "e" ever. Give the car some time. I think that over time you will come to appreciate its balance. Regards. Ned.
It's funny though. I lived in Germany for quite a while and everyone drives these cars. All the taxis are MB and the roads are horrible.
A bunch of masochists
#56
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
I think BMW just set out to fix what Bangle broke and they did an awfully fine job.
I think the F10 is one of the best designs out there right now (especially with the M-Sport bumpers) It looks better than the 7 series or the 3 series. From a design standpoint BMW has a winner.
I think the F10 is one of the best designs out there right now (especially with the M-Sport bumpers) It looks better than the 7 series or the 3 series. From a design standpoint BMW has a winner.
Bangle helmed some of the ugliest car designs I've seen as well, but he definitely had the talent, it was just about how he chose to apply it. I wish he stayed with BMW, as the F01/F10 showed great promise into how he was about to refine the messes that he created (that oddly revolutionized car design as well).
I agree with you and Stano though. The F10 is a gorgeous design (except for the front IMO, the front to me just looks like BMW decided that they couldn't design anything nice around the EU pedestrian regulations), very classic, elegant, yet still relatively aggressive and dynamic. I find it to be a better balanced, easier to digest design than the W212, a more conservative and possibly more timeless design, but not as interesting or arresting IMO, which is why the W212 generates more interest from me.
Stano: That car looks great. If I had an F10, I would get it setup just like that, meaning, White 535i M-Pack. I'd probably do the same style mods that I have on my W212 as well. I'm on my second W212, and it's really my favorite car for me, but if I move onto another car from this, even though the E is my #1 pick, I'd probably force myself to get the F10 setup the way I want it, to experience something different.
Last edited by K-A; 11-18-2011 at 08:53 PM.
#57
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Volvo S80 T6
Actually, contrary to popular belief, Bangle WAS very much the head designer of the F10! He also was the head designer (obviously) of the F01, which the F10 is a practical twin to. With the F01, he sent Karim Habib to Italy to study Italian Coachwork, which IMO shows very well with the elegant and smooth lines in the F01/F10. Adrian Von Hooydonk was working under Chris Bangle while the F01 and F10 were being Designed, and by the time Bangle resigned, the F10 was already a frozen design. From my understanding/from what I've heard, the new 1-Series might be the first car penned fully under Von Hooydonk's watch.
Bangle helmed some of the ugliest car designs I've seen as well, but he definitely had the talent, it was just about how he chose to apply it. I wish he stayed with BMW, as the F01/F10 showed great promise into how he was about to refine the messes that he created (that oddly revolutionized car design as well).
I agree with you and Stano though. The F10 is a gorgeous design (except for the front IMO, the front to me just looks like BMW decided that they couldn't design anything nice around the EU pedestrian regulations), very classic, elegant, yet still relatively aggressive and dynamic. I find it to be a better balanced, easier to digest design than the W212, a more conservative and possibly more timeless design, but not as interesting or arresting IMO, which is why the W212 generates more interest from me.
Stano: That car looks great. If I had an F10, I would get it setup just like that, meaning, White 535i M-Pack. I'd probably do the same style mods that I have on my W212 as well. I'm on my second W212, and it's really my favorite car for me, but if I move onto another car from this, even though the E is my #1 pick, I'd probably force myself to get the F10 setup the way I want it, to experience something different.
Bangle helmed some of the ugliest car designs I've seen as well, but he definitely had the talent, it was just about how he chose to apply it. I wish he stayed with BMW, as the F01/F10 showed great promise into how he was about to refine the messes that he created (that oddly revolutionized car design as well).
I agree with you and Stano though. The F10 is a gorgeous design (except for the front IMO, the front to me just looks like BMW decided that they couldn't design anything nice around the EU pedestrian regulations), very classic, elegant, yet still relatively aggressive and dynamic. I find it to be a better balanced, easier to digest design than the W212, a more conservative and possibly more timeless design, but not as interesting or arresting IMO, which is why the W212 generates more interest from me.
Stano: That car looks great. If I had an F10, I would get it setup just like that, meaning, White 535i M-Pack. I'd probably do the same style mods that I have on my W212 as well. I'm on my second W212, and it's really my favorite car for me, but if I move onto another car from this, even though the E is my #1 pick, I'd probably force myself to get the F10 setup the way I want it, to experience something different.
Last edited by Tonvic; 11-18-2011 at 10:11 PM.
#58
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
LOL. Not to worry Tonvic, I chose the W212 twice over the F10. I'm mainly posing a hypothetical situation where if I had to get out of my E early, I'd try and "experience something else". To be honest, the E is my cake in this segment, and the only real car that has me lusting for it.... as odd as it sounds, is the Panamera. Too costly, and I still think the E looks better, lol.
You know what your choice must be.. the winning side! Our side!
You know what your choice must be.. the winning side! Our side!
#59
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Volvo S80 T6
LOL. Not to worry Tonvic, I chose the W212 twice over the F10. I'm mainly posing a hypothetical situation where if I had to get out of my E early, I'd try and "experience something else". To be honest, the E is my cake in this segment, and the only real car that has me lusting for it.... as odd as it sounds, is the Panamera. Too costly, and I still think the E looks better, lol.
You know what your choice must be.. the winning side! Our side!
You know what your choice must be.. the winning side! Our side!
Thank you for your advice.
Last edited by Tonvic; 11-18-2011 at 10:20 PM.
#60
Very surprising that you think that the e350 with 17 inch rims is a harsh ride. I believe that a majority on this forum would disagree with you. There is always going to be some trade-off between handling and softness of the suspension. If you want a Cadillac of old soft ride, then go buy a Lexus es350 with has a soft ride but drives like crap. The e350's are the best, most solidly built "e" ever. Give the car some time. I think that over time you will come to appreciate its balance. Regards. Ned.
#61
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
O/T, but ain't it funny how each Board reacts to the "opposing car" when asked a question about which one to consider. Many level headed people in the BMW camp over there even telling you that the E would be the better car for you, but then the notorious fanboys with a genuine hatred toward the competing M-B, with such cheap jabs as "Taxi", etc.
Nice to see that people can side with one car, but still give credit to the other. What people fail to realize, is that if the competing car truly sucks, then liking "your car" better doesn't necessarily mean that "your car" is a great car. Now, if you give props to, and acknowledge the greatness of the "competing car", then how well does that speak about the one that you chose over it?
End O/T.
#62
The 2012 E350 is a pleasant car to drive, & a very peppy engine compared to the 2011 E350. The biggest difference i noticed is the instant power on the new one. The new V6 doesn't have that typical "hesitation before you go" behaviour that they have had since '06. I actually find the power to be adequate to drive....if my wife wanted one.
Many people who come in will say, "I don't think i need to spend the extra $10k for more power", when deciding between the 350 & 550....okay...maybe.
I have now owned 5 E-Classes since i started selling Benzes and just ordered my 6th.
1999 E320 (great car)
2004 E55 AMG (amazing car, currently for sale)
2005 E320 4Matic (nice car, very underpowered)
2007 E550 4Matic (good car)
2011 E550 4Matic (wife's current car...twice the car of the '07)
2012 E550 4Matic (on the way)
Here is my assessment:
The E-Class is the best all-around car we make for someone who wants to be practical, drive a really nice car, and have the ability to carry 4 adults (or put kids in the back). It is my favourite car. Nobody makes a better car for the money (my money, anyway).
The E55 has been the best car i've ever owned. I actually thought i would keep it a lot longer than 3 years...but i have a pending sale on it because i NEED the new 4.6L. It is quite possible that the Airmatic suspension is the best feature on that car (aside from the mind-blowing torque).
Take an E350 out for a drive & go over some rough road, over some speed bumps, etc. Then do that in a 550. No comparison.
The ability to raise the car is a big bonus as well, if you live in an area where you get a lot of snow (i do). You want to put 19 or 20 inch wheels on the car (i do)? The Airmatic makes up for the roughness of riding on rubber bands. You want to lower the car (i do)? 15 minutes with a master tech & you can keep the car within factory specs, but still drop it about an inch. The majority of customers who buy an E are not putting 20's on & slamming the car, but for guys like me who like to tastefully mod, AIRMATIC is extra awesome.
The 550 also comes with real leather, not Artico/MBTex. The ventilated, drive-dynamic, multicontour drivers seat with massage function cannot be ignored either.
If you lease the car, the difference isn't really $10,000 either...cuz you're only paying 40-50% of the price over 3 or 4 years anyway. Youre actually only paying $4-5000 more.
Once you've owned (OWNED, NOT DRIVEN) a car with Airmatic, I think it would be really tough to go back to a regular suspension. There were rumours that the 2012 was going to have regular suspension in it...which is why i snapped up our last 2011 for my wife. I thought the Airmatic was more important than the new engine. Mercedes-Benz tricked me.
Sorry for the long post. I feel like a broken record, puking AIRMATIC all over you.
I would not be buying the 2012 E550 if it didn't have Airmatic, period. I'd step up and get the new CLS.
Dude, get the 550...you will not regret it once you own it.
Many people who come in will say, "I don't think i need to spend the extra $10k for more power", when deciding between the 350 & 550....okay...maybe.
I have now owned 5 E-Classes since i started selling Benzes and just ordered my 6th.
1999 E320 (great car)
2004 E55 AMG (amazing car, currently for sale)
2005 E320 4Matic (nice car, very underpowered)
2007 E550 4Matic (good car)
2011 E550 4Matic (wife's current car...twice the car of the '07)
2012 E550 4Matic (on the way)
Here is my assessment:
The E-Class is the best all-around car we make for someone who wants to be practical, drive a really nice car, and have the ability to carry 4 adults (or put kids in the back). It is my favourite car. Nobody makes a better car for the money (my money, anyway).
The E55 has been the best car i've ever owned. I actually thought i would keep it a lot longer than 3 years...but i have a pending sale on it because i NEED the new 4.6L. It is quite possible that the Airmatic suspension is the best feature on that car (aside from the mind-blowing torque).
Take an E350 out for a drive & go over some rough road, over some speed bumps, etc. Then do that in a 550. No comparison.
The ability to raise the car is a big bonus as well, if you live in an area where you get a lot of snow (i do). You want to put 19 or 20 inch wheels on the car (i do)? The Airmatic makes up for the roughness of riding on rubber bands. You want to lower the car (i do)? 15 minutes with a master tech & you can keep the car within factory specs, but still drop it about an inch. The majority of customers who buy an E are not putting 20's on & slamming the car, but for guys like me who like to tastefully mod, AIRMATIC is extra awesome.
The 550 also comes with real leather, not Artico/MBTex. The ventilated, drive-dynamic, multicontour drivers seat with massage function cannot be ignored either.
If you lease the car, the difference isn't really $10,000 either...cuz you're only paying 40-50% of the price over 3 or 4 years anyway. Youre actually only paying $4-5000 more.
Once you've owned (OWNED, NOT DRIVEN) a car with Airmatic, I think it would be really tough to go back to a regular suspension. There were rumours that the 2012 was going to have regular suspension in it...which is why i snapped up our last 2011 for my wife. I thought the Airmatic was more important than the new engine. Mercedes-Benz tricked me.
Sorry for the long post. I feel like a broken record, puking AIRMATIC all over you.
I would not be buying the 2012 E550 if it didn't have Airmatic, period. I'd step up and get the new CLS.
Dude, get the 550...you will not regret it once you own it.
Thanks!
#64
I don't know the specifics between the sport-tuned and luxury-tuned suspensions, however, the low profile tires on the sport can make a substantial difference in the ride.
#65
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Union County, NJ
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Magnum SRT8 + Magnum R/T
This is a great read for someone on the fence about a 5 or an E. I'll be buying used next year and always wanted an E55. However I worry about the SBC.
On the other hand, it seems from reading on here and Bimmerfest that the 5 is basically a maintenance nightmare waiting to happen.
Constantly having to fix ANY car will make me hate it.
On the other hand, it seems from reading on here and Bimmerfest that the 5 is basically a maintenance nightmare waiting to happen.
Constantly having to fix ANY car will make me hate it.
#66
MBWorld Fanatic!
I think BMW just set out to fix what Bangle broke and they did an awfully fine job.
I think the F10 is one of the best designs out there right now (especially with the M-Sport bumpers) It looks better than the 7 series or the 3 series. From a design standpoint BMW has a winner.
I think the F10 is one of the best designs out there right now (especially with the M-Sport bumpers) It looks better than the 7 series or the 3 series. From a design standpoint BMW has a winner.
The 1, 3, 5, and 7 are synonymous with Short, Tall, Grande, and Venti from Starbucks.
#67
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
That's the problem with "Same sausage, different length", which is BMW's current Design idiom. It gives instant recognition, but maybe it's too "instant". The 7 drivers lose out the most, as you can barely tell a 7 from a 5, and now the 3 looks practically identical to the 5 from the rear and side, just slightly more squared and angular.
What it hampers is the individuality of Design presence when it comes to their models. The SWB 7 is still my favorite BMW Sedan, as even though the F10 looks like a tighter proportioned version of it, the 7 at least looks large and more regal/stately due to that, and retains some road presence over its smaller siblings.
What it hampers is the individuality of Design presence when it comes to their models. The SWB 7 is still my favorite BMW Sedan, as even though the F10 looks like a tighter proportioned version of it, the 7 at least looks large and more regal/stately due to that, and retains some road presence over its smaller siblings.
#68
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Volvo S80 T6
I disagree. My neighbor had a BMW and for months I thought he had a 3-series, it wasn’t until one day when we were both leaving the house at the same time and I was directly behind him that I saw the 535 on the back. If I wasn’t directly behind him or seen the side profile (the 5-series would look longer than a 3) then I wouldn’t have know that he owned a 5-series.
The 1, 3, 5, and 7 are synonymous with Short, Tall, Grande, and Venti from Starbucks.
The 1, 3, 5, and 7 are synonymous with Short, Tall, Grande, and Venti from Starbucks.
#69
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cape Coral
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2011 E550
I remember seeing your post on Bimmerfest and noted the underlying current of looking down on the MB. All the Bimmerfest forums have the tendency of looking down on you if you haven't been "drinking enough of the BMW Kool-aid"
That said, each car has advantages and disadvantages. The MBs advantages and disadvantages come from not being on the bleeding edge of technology as the BMW.
My take on advantages and downsides:
BMW
Technology - side and top view, soft closing doors etc (you didn't specify that your car had the tech package and premium, but it must with the HUD) The nav is head and shoulders above the MB in user friendliness and BMW's iDrive is tied with Audi's MMI for ease of use - something that cannot be said for the COMAND (hell, MB can't even spell Command right )
Handling - along with the electronic gee-whiz damping controls and the big engine, the car will easily out handle the E550 (and possibly the AMG)
Included maintenance - the BMW includes all of the required maintenance including wiper blades and brakes for 4 years/50k. Any added MB maintenance will not include brakes.
MB
Ride - the ride of the MB is far, far better than that of the BMW. Even when fitted with 18" wheels and the Sport pack, the ride is luxurious compared to the quite punishing ride of the M-Sport combined with those outrageously horrible Goodyear LS2 19" "maypop" wheels/tires on anything but the smoothest of roads.
I would NEVER consider a 550i MSport for NY roads. You'll need the wheel and tire insurance - on a very regular basis even if you go to another brand of tire. Ultra low profile and Kabul like roads don't go together.
Comfort - see above
Reliability - MB for the win. As I said in another post, BMW has this unfortunate habit of providing the US market with bleeding edge technology that doesn't play well with US fuels.
The high pressure fuel pump issue which to date isn't resolved (after 5 years) and their introduction of start/stop technology.
The significantly higher failure rate in the US of the HPFP can really only be attributed to US fuels. While other countries have seen HPFP failures, the rate of failure is insignificant in all other countries.
While start/stop technology has been around since the 80's (didn't work well then with carburetors) and has been used for the last few years in Europe very successfully, the effects of start/stop and US fuels on catalytic converters is untested and unknown. Will we have premature catalytic converter failures just outside the emissions warranty (or even within it?) Nobody knows for sure which is one reason why other manufacturers haven't rushed to implement it here. It is a great way to save fuel and pretty seamless to the driver, but the downsides could prove inconvenient at best and expensive at worst.
I've owned pre-Ford Jaguars, Rovers and oddball cars (I owned a GMC Typhoon in Germany with virtually no dealer support even possible)but my 335xi has to be the most unreliable cars I've ever owned. I would love to be able to slide into a 535xi, know where all the controls are, look at all the gee-whiz stuff and marvel at the handling dynamics on a winding country road but the frequent dealer visits over niggling problems that are endemic to BMW and cannot be resolved don't make the ownership experience pleasant.
Let's not even talk about the LS2 19" tires fitted to the 535/550 Sport/M-Sport versions.
I was soooo close to a 2012 5 series - great trade for my 335, good price on the new car and optioned pretty much as I wanted it (white/cinnamon, premium, tech, cold weather [heated everything plus folding seats] and Sport. Sitting in the dealer's office I asked myself "do I really want to do this all over again?" and walked away.
Coming from a Volvo, the OP knows about Volvo problems but not about BMW problems. If he did then he wouldn't consider anything but a base 5 series without any of the fancy doo-dads that'll cause problems down the road - like bigger engines with turbos.
Just a perusal of the two forums speaks volumes. The BMW forums are filled with serious complaints that involve the car breaking down on the side of the road while the MB forums have complaints abouts rattles, squeaks and questions about how to doo stuff that the manual doesn't clearly explain.
Make no mistake, the 5 series is a wonderful car when running properly (just like early English two seater sports cars) and there are many things that I'll miss about BMW - the iDrive, nav and the cruise control with auto braking to keep your set speed even when going down hills but I'd much rather drive a car without that, but also without monthly visits to the dealership.
That said, each car has advantages and disadvantages. The MBs advantages and disadvantages come from not being on the bleeding edge of technology as the BMW.
My take on advantages and downsides:
BMW
Technology - side and top view, soft closing doors etc (you didn't specify that your car had the tech package and premium, but it must with the HUD) The nav is head and shoulders above the MB in user friendliness and BMW's iDrive is tied with Audi's MMI for ease of use - something that cannot be said for the COMAND (hell, MB can't even spell Command right )
Handling - along with the electronic gee-whiz damping controls and the big engine, the car will easily out handle the E550 (and possibly the AMG)
Included maintenance - the BMW includes all of the required maintenance including wiper blades and brakes for 4 years/50k. Any added MB maintenance will not include brakes.
MB
Ride - the ride of the MB is far, far better than that of the BMW. Even when fitted with 18" wheels and the Sport pack, the ride is luxurious compared to the quite punishing ride of the M-Sport combined with those outrageously horrible Goodyear LS2 19" "maypop" wheels/tires on anything but the smoothest of roads.
I would NEVER consider a 550i MSport for NY roads. You'll need the wheel and tire insurance - on a very regular basis even if you go to another brand of tire. Ultra low profile and Kabul like roads don't go together.
Comfort - see above
Reliability - MB for the win. As I said in another post, BMW has this unfortunate habit of providing the US market with bleeding edge technology that doesn't play well with US fuels.
The high pressure fuel pump issue which to date isn't resolved (after 5 years) and their introduction of start/stop technology.
The significantly higher failure rate in the US of the HPFP can really only be attributed to US fuels. While other countries have seen HPFP failures, the rate of failure is insignificant in all other countries.
While start/stop technology has been around since the 80's (didn't work well then with carburetors) and has been used for the last few years in Europe very successfully, the effects of start/stop and US fuels on catalytic converters is untested and unknown. Will we have premature catalytic converter failures just outside the emissions warranty (or even within it?) Nobody knows for sure which is one reason why other manufacturers haven't rushed to implement it here. It is a great way to save fuel and pretty seamless to the driver, but the downsides could prove inconvenient at best and expensive at worst.
I've owned pre-Ford Jaguars, Rovers and oddball cars (I owned a GMC Typhoon in Germany with virtually no dealer support even possible)but my 335xi has to be the most unreliable cars I've ever owned. I would love to be able to slide into a 535xi, know where all the controls are, look at all the gee-whiz stuff and marvel at the handling dynamics on a winding country road but the frequent dealer visits over niggling problems that are endemic to BMW and cannot be resolved don't make the ownership experience pleasant.
Let's not even talk about the LS2 19" tires fitted to the 535/550 Sport/M-Sport versions.
I was soooo close to a 2012 5 series - great trade for my 335, good price on the new car and optioned pretty much as I wanted it (white/cinnamon, premium, tech, cold weather [heated everything plus folding seats] and Sport. Sitting in the dealer's office I asked myself "do I really want to do this all over again?" and walked away.
Coming from a Volvo, the OP knows about Volvo problems but not about BMW problems. If he did then he wouldn't consider anything but a base 5 series without any of the fancy doo-dads that'll cause problems down the road - like bigger engines with turbos.
Just a perusal of the two forums speaks volumes. The BMW forums are filled with serious complaints that involve the car breaking down on the side of the road while the MB forums have complaints abouts rattles, squeaks and questions about how to doo stuff that the manual doesn't clearly explain.
Make no mistake, the 5 series is a wonderful car when running properly (just like early English two seater sports cars) and there are many things that I'll miss about BMW - the iDrive, nav and the cruise control with auto braking to keep your set speed even when going down hills but I'd much rather drive a car without that, but also without monthly visits to the dealership.
#70
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,800
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
10 Posts
1953 300 Adenauer, 1971 300 SEL 6.3, 1975 600, 1978 450 6.9
Uhh, perhaps the after my comment (or should that be coment ) should have bee a giveaway. It looks like you're the only one who didn't get it - sorry.
#71
MBWorld Fanatic!
#72
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Volvo S80 T6
#73
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
13 Posts
2016 Audi S8 Plus/ 2011 Mercedes e550 4Matic//Gone:1985 500SEL/2000 e320 4Matic/ 2001 e55 Kleeman
But the e350 and e550 are the same class just different engines. The point was that the BMW's all look the same across classes at least in his opinion. I wouldn't push this point even if you don't agree with the visual assessment of the BMW's. Regards. Ned.
#74
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Volvo S80 T6
I just said that E350 and E550 look the same from the back. Even to identify C series especially in the dark you have to be close enough to see the numbers on the right. I have no intention to push any points. My apologies if I have touched smb's sensetivities.
#75
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
M-B's actually do the best job currently at walking that fine line between individuality and close relation between their models. The E, C, and S all have completely different taillight shapes and rear designs, yet you instantly know that they're related (kudos to the Design Team for that), even before you see any emblems, etc. The fronts are all related yet individual, as are the sides. BMW's literally have the same design, yet different sizes. Even the 5 and 7 have copy/paste interiors. This I'm sure is by design, i.e BMW wants it this way, and it is a design that works, but as you move up the ladder, it'd be nice to have some instantly-recognizable differentiations as the lower (or even higher) models, IMO.
I was messing around and did this. If you blur out the fronts (which are very similar too, but the size and size of the grilles are bigger giveaways when put side by side), it's easy to confuse the 5 and 7 (I do all the time on the roads):
[
I was messing around and did this. If you blur out the fronts (which are very similar too, but the size and size of the grilles are bigger giveaways when put side by side), it's easy to confuse the 5 and 7 (I do all the time on the roads):
[