Ladies & Gents, the REAL/OFFICIAL 2014 facelift here>>>>
#26
MBWorld Fanatic!
#27
Super Member
Not that passionate about it one way or another. I will miss the quad headlights...
#28
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: GMT -8 hours
Posts: 5,640
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
9 Posts
Mercedes-Benz
Is that a bigger nav screen?
Also, what is the sensor on the side of the bumper? Looks like the extended the bottom trim piece too.
Also, what is the sensor on the side of the bumper? Looks like the extended the bottom trim piece too.
Last edited by Kar don; 12-11-2012 at 03:19 PM.
#29
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,336
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Porsche 991S, Cayenne S, 1972 BMW 3.0CS E9 Coupe
Doing fine. Hope all is well with you.
Hey Petee, how's life up in the tundra? And how's the 997.2 holding up? I did regretfully sell my 993 but it was probably the time to do so (going on 16 years old with the mileage creeping up on it, and I used it to help finance the 991.)
My partner ordered and is now driving a 2013 C-350. After many years owning BMW 3-series models, she made the switch. Partly do to my suggestion and partly due to the fact that she couldn't stomach the new 3-series interior with its pop-up nav screen, etc., and also that she could no longer get a non-turbo 6 cylinder motor (the BMW IL 6 was a great motor.)
She doesn't want a larger car. She doesn't like driving big cars. She wanted a 3-series sized car but with the amenities of a larger premium sedan.
She ordered the C350 'sport' model with all the options including distronic plus with pre-safe brake, active blind spot assist, active lane keeping assist, parktronic, keyless go, leather package, panorama, lighting package with adaptive HIDs, and the multimedia package (same Nav, same color instrument cluster panel, etc..) The MSRP came out to about the same as a base W212. And it has the same 3.5 V6 motor that's in the W212 (and all the other V6 optioned Mercedes models.)
The build quality doesn't seem any different than the W212. It doesn't seem "cheapo" to me. It even shares many of the interior bits from other Mercedes models (Daimler does do parts bin sharing among models.) It has the same steering wheel in the pic above that K-A posted (the W212 sport wheel is the same in the W204.) I'm not so sure that the car is a "cheapo" version of the W212, but simply a smaller version. The center star grille is on all 'sports' models of Mercedes vehicles, as you know. No way around that unless you get the non-sport versions. The center star grille looks 'normal' on the C350 (and with distronic plus there is that gloss black background for the radar.)
btw, her salesperson claims that many owners around here (particularly women) are downsizing to the C350 from W212s and even W221s. Anyway, she seems happy with the car.
My partner ordered and is now driving a 2013 C-350. After many years owning BMW 3-series models, she made the switch. Partly do to my suggestion and partly due to the fact that she couldn't stomach the new 3-series interior with its pop-up nav screen, etc., and also that she could no longer get a non-turbo 6 cylinder motor (the BMW IL 6 was a great motor.)
She doesn't want a larger car. She doesn't like driving big cars. She wanted a 3-series sized car but with the amenities of a larger premium sedan.
She ordered the C350 'sport' model with all the options including distronic plus with pre-safe brake, active blind spot assist, active lane keeping assist, parktronic, keyless go, leather package, panorama, lighting package with adaptive HIDs, and the multimedia package (same Nav, same color instrument cluster panel, etc..) The MSRP came out to about the same as a base W212. And it has the same 3.5 V6 motor that's in the W212 (and all the other V6 optioned Mercedes models.)
The build quality doesn't seem any different than the W212. It doesn't seem "cheapo" to me. It even shares many of the interior bits from other Mercedes models (Daimler does do parts bin sharing among models.) It has the same steering wheel in the pic above that K-A posted (the W212 sport wheel is the same in the W204.) I'm not so sure that the car is a "cheapo" version of the W212, but simply a smaller version. The center star grille is on all 'sports' models of Mercedes vehicles, as you know. No way around that unless you get the non-sport versions. The center star grille looks 'normal' on the C350 (and with distronic plus there is that gloss black background for the radar.)
btw, her salesperson claims that many owners around here (particularly women) are downsizing to the C350 from W212s and even W221s. Anyway, she seems happy with the car.
#31
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 2,925
Received 167 Likes
on
133 Posts
2021 Porsche TTS
It does not seem to flow very well. I was never a big fan of the previous gen E class but this new one seems even worse.
The interior seems to be a step up and taking a lot from the CLS.
I like the CLS much better and August 2013 can't come fast enough.
The interior seems to be a step up and taking a lot from the CLS.
I like the CLS much better and August 2013 can't come fast enough.
#32
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2011 E550 4Matic, 2002 M3 Vert
I don't quite understand all of the negative comments here about the update. It seems that people are focusing on the wagon design and not the sedan design as the wagon design is quite a bit changed if you compare it to the sedan. The sedan basically has the same grill and it also still has the star on the hood. The major differences I can see are the headlights and taillights but beyond that the changes are pretty subtle IMO.
#33
I don't quite understand all of the negative comments here about the update. It seems that people are focusing on the wagon design and not the sedan design as the wagon design is quite a bit changed if you compare it to the sedan. The sedan basically has the same grill and it also still has the star on the hood. The major differences I can see are the headlights and taillights but beyond that the changes are pretty subtle IMO.
then again, beauty is in the eyes of beholder. i do much prefer the new interior design; however, exterior wise, i think W212 got it right the first time in 2009. anything after that before a complete new E comes out is redundant.
#34
this is the Toyota Reiz which came out a few years ago.
mm........
i thought all mercedes tail pipe will start adopting the black series design...... apparently not.
Last edited by leapingpoint; 12-11-2012 at 10:03 PM.
#35
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
14 Posts
MY17 E43 Matte Selenite/Macchiato Beige, MY16 GLE350d Tenorite/Crystal Grey, MY17 B250
It seems that people are focusing on the wagon design and not the sedan design as the wagon design is quite a bit changed if you compare it to the sedan. The sedan basically has the same grill and it also still has the star on the hood. The major differences I can see are the headlights and taillights but beyond that the changes are pretty subtle IMO.
Sedan is shown in luxury styling (Elegance), wagon is shown in AMG sport styling. Both looks will be available from the factory on all non-AMG baumusters (sedan and wagon), it's just a matter of which style(s) MBUSA decides to offer.
#36
Senior Member
So when will these cars hit the North American showrooms? Will it be the fall of next year as usual for a new model year?
#37
Member
There is some good and bad here. Looks like the interior took some parts and styling cues from the CLS. The clock and vents are all CLS.
The exterior is a mixed bag. The headlights are okay, but they should be more angular. The confused creases in back seem poorly thought out. The front airdamn is a little cheesy. The tuck in the middle of the front fascia looks very Acura - and nobody shold be coping Acura these days.
I've owned 3 E-classes and was not thrilled with the 2010 redesign. This update does not make things much better. Which is why I am moving over to a CLS next year.
The exterior is a mixed bag. The headlights are okay, but they should be more angular. The confused creases in back seem poorly thought out. The front airdamn is a little cheesy. The tuck in the middle of the front fascia looks very Acura - and nobody shold be coping Acura these days.
I've owned 3 E-classes and was not thrilled with the 2010 redesign. This update does not make things much better. Which is why I am moving over to a CLS next year.
#38
MBWorld Fanatic!
#39
Out Of Control!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
When you're being outsold, you get aggressive. MB invested heavily in the facelift to make the W/S212 the best in segment once again.
With the luxury and sport differentiation (star on hood vs star in grille), this car should appeal to a much wider audience. It's awkward in photos but it presents nicely in person.
With the luxury and sport differentiation (star on hood vs star in grille), this car should appeal to a much wider audience. It's awkward in photos but it presents nicely in person.
Between the big W212 change, the W204 interior full redesign during the mid-cycle, all new GLK front, all new R-Class front, one thing is clear (to me), M-B designers aren't world class and aren't carrying this historic brand properly. if they were, they wouldn't have to do such drastic "about-faces" time after time, showing no conviction or confidence in their designs. If they "screwed up" before, who's to say this current rendition, or anything else coming out isn't a "screw up" as well?
Idk, I'm just not happy with M-B's management and direction. They look to be frantic amidst BMW and Audi and Porsche who are coasting along with a very clear and precise styling language/vision.
IMO, Gordon Wagener is turning out to be "Chris Bangle Part 2", except unlike Bangle, he hasn't brought anything unique or original to the market-place, and hasn't created a revolution, and frankly isn't being copied.
#40
Out Of Control!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
And again, it's not the facelift I'm upset about in terms of how it looks so much. It looks fine, though IMO it shows more incoherentness within the design teams as angular old-style rear and sides just don't flow with the insanely round and organic front, but I'm just getting more and more over M-B's design management as a whole, and I think people who actually *bought* pre-facelfit E-Classes shouldn't be too happy that from the front of the Sport model (which is all we'll see in the States anyway), the W212 V2 literally can pass as an all-new car from the front. Won't be good for resale.
#41
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,336
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Porsche 991S, Cayenne S, 1972 BMW 3.0CS E9 Coupe
M-B designers aren't world class and aren't carrying this historic brand properly. if they were, they wouldn't have to do such drastic "about-faces" time after time, showing no conviction or confidence in their designs. If they "screwed up" before, who's to say this current rendition, or anything else coming out isn't a "screw up" as well?
It shows some sort of a lack of confidence and conviction, and I'd probably agree with your assessment on that aspect alone.
While the 'same sausage' philosophy might be a negative to some consumers, at least there is a continuity to the brand (I can certainly recognize a BMW, Porsche or Audi on the road.) With Wagener it seems like he wants each model to have its own identity as opposed to an overall brand identity.
#42
Out Of Control!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
It's interesting that they dropped the ponton ("dog haunches") from the rear. There was such publicity about connecting to a "Mercedes design heritage" with those. And now they dropped them? I thought the whole idea was to have their own "Hofmeister Kink" like BMW has done since 1961. I realize that the ponton reference was somewhat polarizing to some people (Jeremy Clarkson certainly bashed it), but wasn't the idea to make a statement with that historical design reference?
It shows some sort of a lack of confidence and conviction, and I'd probably agree with your assessment on that aspect alone.
While the 'same sausage' philosophy might be a negative to some consumers, at least there is a continuity to the brand (I can certainly recognize a BMW, Porsche or Audi on the road.) With Wagener it seems like he wants each model to have its own identity as opposed to an overall brand identity.
It shows some sort of a lack of confidence and conviction, and I'd probably agree with your assessment on that aspect alone.
While the 'same sausage' philosophy might be a negative to some consumers, at least there is a continuity to the brand (I can certainly recognize a BMW, Porsche or Audi on the road.) With Wagener it seems like he wants each model to have its own identity as opposed to an overall brand identity.
You got a 991 BTW? I thought you got a 997 Turbo? I friggin' love the 991. One reason why I want a 911 so much is because Porsche are showing just how a careful and iconic design idiom can keep gaining in popularity. Porsche said that the 991 chassis will live on for like over 10-12+ years of production, if I remember correctly. Gives one a lot of confidence to know that if they decided to keep the car for a very long time, it won't get replaced so soon or anything.
#43
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,336
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Porsche 991S, Cayenne S, 1972 BMW 3.0CS E9 Coupe
You got a 991 BTW? I thought you got a 997 Turbo? I friggin' love the 991. One reason why I want a 911 so much is because Porsche are showing just how a careful and iconic design idiom can keep gaining in popularity. Porsche said that the 991 chassis will live on for like over 10-12+ years of production, if I remember correctly. Gives one a lot of confidence to know that if they decided to keep the car for a very long time, it won't get replaced so soon or anything.
I saw a video somewhere of the 911 body morphed over time from 1963 to today. It really reveals that the design is a true evolution that retained its key iconic features over such a long time. One can dislike the design, but they can't deny that a 911 is a 911 no matter the year it was built.
I noticed you were on Rennlist a while back asking about the 991. I think you'd enjoy owning one and you should seriously consider it. They may be quick but that's not all they are about. You don't have to be a red light boy racer to enjoy them. The chassis and the tactile feel alone is worth the price of admission. And if you do need an adrenaline rush, just go out by yourself up in the canyons when there's no traffic. It's a car that needs no advertising that you can go fast; that's already understood by anybody. Plus you can join the PCA and participate in sanctioned events to get your speed needs taken care of safely and legally.
Bear in mind that space is limited and trips to Home Depot can require advanced planning for alternate transport. Forget Ikea. If you still have your Malibu, then that will work for the times when you can't get something in the back "seats" or in the front "trunk."
And it's totally comfortable for long distance trips. A month long cross country trip with just a backpack in the front trunk and a credit card in your back pocket should be on your bucket list.
#44
Out Of Control!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Both the 997 and the 993 were sold to subsidize the 991. The 991 and the Cayenne work well as two differently purposed vehicles and they are all I need these days.
I saw a video somewhere of the 911 body morphed over time from 1963 to today. It really reveals that the design is a true evolution that retained its key iconic features over such a long time. One can dislike the design, but they can't deny that a 911 is a 911 no matter the year it was built.
I noticed you were on Rennlist a while back asking about the 991. I think you'd enjoy owning one and you should seriously consider it. They may be quick but that's not all they are about. You don't have to be a red light boy racer to enjoy them. The chassis and the tactile feel alone is worth the price of admission. And if you do need an adrenaline rush, just go out by yourself up in the canyons when there's no traffic. It's a car that needs no advertising that you can go fast; that's already understood by anybody. Plus you can join the PCA and participate in sanctioned events to get your speed needs taken care of safely and legally.
Bear in mind that space is limited and trips to Home Depot can require advanced planning for alternate transport. Forget Ikea. If you still have your Malibu, then that will work for the times when you can't get something in the back "seats" or in the front "trunk."
And it's totally comfortable for long distance trips. A month long cross country trip with just a backpack in the front trunk and a credit card in your back pocket should be on your bucket list.
I saw a video somewhere of the 911 body morphed over time from 1963 to today. It really reveals that the design is a true evolution that retained its key iconic features over such a long time. One can dislike the design, but they can't deny that a 911 is a 911 no matter the year it was built.
I noticed you were on Rennlist a while back asking about the 991. I think you'd enjoy owning one and you should seriously consider it. They may be quick but that's not all they are about. You don't have to be a red light boy racer to enjoy them. The chassis and the tactile feel alone is worth the price of admission. And if you do need an adrenaline rush, just go out by yourself up in the canyons when there's no traffic. It's a car that needs no advertising that you can go fast; that's already understood by anybody. Plus you can join the PCA and participate in sanctioned events to get your speed needs taken care of safely and legally.
Bear in mind that space is limited and trips to Home Depot can require advanced planning for alternate transport. Forget Ikea. If you still have your Malibu, then that will work for the times when you can't get something in the back "seats" or in the front "trunk."
And it's totally comfortable for long distance trips. A month long cross country trip with just a backpack in the front trunk and a credit card in your back pocket should be on your bucket list.
It's really the perfect car for me (991). I don't need to be all racer-y with it, but the performance is more than intriguing enough, done by Porsche's engineering excellence and "Black Magic" where somehow they use their horses more efficiently than many other manufacturers. The comfort, and most importantly, generous headroom (impossible to find on a Sports Car for my height), make it a "perfect fit". I want something a little more unconventional next, more "exotic", yet still classy and understated, and most importantly, something timeless.
Last edited by K-A; 12-12-2012 at 06:07 AM.
#45
MBWorld God!
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: 39.515509, -111.549668
Posts: 30,571
Received 3,353 Likes
on
2,807 Posts
2012 CLS63
Both the 997 and the 993 were sold to subsidize the 991. The 991 and the Cayenne work well as two differently purposed vehicles and they are all I need these days.
I saw a video somewhere of the 911 body morphed over time from 1963 to today. It really reveals that the design is a true evolution that retained its key iconic features over such a long time. One can dislike the design, but they can't deny that a 911 is a 911 no matter the year it was built.
I noticed you were on Rennlist a while back asking about the 991. I think you'd enjoy owning one and you should seriously consider it. They may be quick but that's not all they are about. You don't have to be a red light boy racer to enjoy them. The chassis and the tactile feel alone is worth the price of admission. And if you do need an adrenaline rush, just go out by yourself up in the canyons when there's no traffic. It's a car that needs no advertising that you can go fast; that's already understood by anybody. Plus you can join the PCA and participate in sanctioned events to get your speed needs taken care of safely and legally.
Bear in mind that space is limited and trips to Home Depot can require advanced planning for alternate transport. Forget Ikea. If you still have your Malibu, then that will work for the times when you can't get something in the back "seats" or in the front "trunk."
And it's totally comfortable for long distance trips. A month long cross country trip with just a backpack in the front trunk and a credit card in your back pocket should be on your bucket list.
I saw a video somewhere of the 911 body morphed over time from 1963 to today. It really reveals that the design is a true evolution that retained its key iconic features over such a long time. One can dislike the design, but they can't deny that a 911 is a 911 no matter the year it was built.
I noticed you were on Rennlist a while back asking about the 991. I think you'd enjoy owning one and you should seriously consider it. They may be quick but that's not all they are about. You don't have to be a red light boy racer to enjoy them. The chassis and the tactile feel alone is worth the price of admission. And if you do need an adrenaline rush, just go out by yourself up in the canyons when there's no traffic. It's a car that needs no advertising that you can go fast; that's already understood by anybody. Plus you can join the PCA and participate in sanctioned events to get your speed needs taken care of safely and legally.
Bear in mind that space is limited and trips to Home Depot can require advanced planning for alternate transport. Forget Ikea. If you still have your Malibu, then that will work for the times when you can't get something in the back "seats" or in the front "trunk."
And it's totally comfortable for long distance trips. A month long cross country trip with just a backpack in the front trunk and a credit card in your back pocket should be on your bucket list.
#47
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brownsburg, IN
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 s500 Sport
Sad to say, but in my opinion, the classically simple and elegant lines of the W-220 are hard to beat. Even after twelve years, I still receive compliments on the car.
#49
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
14 Posts
MY17 E43 Matte Selenite/Macchiato Beige, MY16 GLE350d Tenorite/Crystal Grey, MY17 B250
That precisely my point. Why trust this design team anymore? They clearly haven't the ability to design timeless cars with proper foresight anymore. While BMW, Porsche and Audi are building an iconic modern design language with core designs that need little changing to keep people interested, thus not rendering mere pre-facelfits "irrelevant", M-B is scrambling to keep up with drastic changes akin to any generic manufacturer, dating cars prematurely.
Between the big W212 change, the W204 interior full redesign during the mid-cycle, all new GLK front, all new R-Class front, one thing is clear (to me), M-B designers aren't world class and aren't carrying this historic brand properly. if they were, they wouldn't have to do such drastic "about-faces" time after time, showing no conviction or confidence in their designs. If they "screwed up" before, who's to say this current rendition, or anything else coming out isn't a "screw up" as well?
Between the big W212 change, the W204 interior full redesign during the mid-cycle, all new GLK front, all new R-Class front, one thing is clear (to me), M-B designers aren't world class and aren't carrying this historic brand properly. if they were, they wouldn't have to do such drastic "about-faces" time after time, showing no conviction or confidence in their designs. If they "screwed up" before, who's to say this current rendition, or anything else coming out isn't a "screw up" as well?
#50
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2011 E350 4Matic T-Modell
I dont like the redesign at all! I dont think the there should be the huge star in the grill unless its a coupe, roadster, or SUV. I also dont like the redesign of the tail lights, the head lights and the new design of radiator grill. It looks just awful!