View Poll Results: 2015 C300 4Matic vs 2010-2011 E Class
2015 C300 4Matic lease
37
37.00%
2010-2011 E Class Purchase
63
63.00%
Voters: 100. You may not vote on this poll
Old E Class vs 2015 C Class
02-19-2015, 07:50 PM
#51
MBWorld Fanatic!
So I got a 2015 C300 as a loaner today and boy what a disappointment that was. The car doesn't even compare my older e350. Yes, the new C has some cool new features like the folding side mirrors and agility control but the rough shifts and suspension are such a let down. I do love the LED lights in the door handles tho....nice!! lol The tablet as the display is uglier in person than I thought IMO. 
I would def go for the older E!!
I would def go for the older E!!
02-19-2015, 07:57 PM
#52
Super Member
There is no substitute for wheelbase. Driving any E after a C and you will know the differeence. Drive an S after driving an E and you will have the same experience. That's how they get you.
02-23-2015, 07:13 PM
#53
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2023 AMG E53
If you're buying/leasing new I would actually just buy a 2015 E-Class.
I was in the same boat and decided on the new C-Class because it just refreshed and looks a lot like the new S-Class class, but don't think it's worth it. You get more car if you can get an E-Class for the same price.
I was in the same boat and decided on the new C-Class because it just refreshed and looks a lot like the new S-Class class, but don't think it's worth it. You get more car if you can get an E-Class for the same price.
02-24-2015, 09:43 PM
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
5 Posts
'03 A4 2.0 Stroker, '14 E63 S AMG, '10 E550, '10 S550, '03 C240
Yes, how true ! If you get beyond the interior sizzle on the W205 and closely examine the fit, finish, quality of materials used, fittings, plastic edges, etc., one can see where the costs have been cut. There is no way that the quality of the W205 comes close to that of a 2014-2015 W212.
MBUSA has employed serious cost cutting for the production of the W205 in Alabama. The QC issues that have arisen are inexcusable for such a premier manufacturer. Sourcing the MBTex seats from Mexico is just one example where the cost accountants overcame any serious efforts for QC. The sloppy fitting of the rear bumpers and tail lights would never have passed final inspection @ a German MB plant.
MBUSA has employed serious cost cutting for the production of the W205 in Alabama. The QC issues that have arisen are inexcusable for such a premier manufacturer. Sourcing the MBTex seats from Mexico is just one example where the cost accountants overcame any serious efforts for QC. The sloppy fitting of the rear bumpers and tail lights would never have passed final inspection @ a German MB plant.
02-24-2015, 11:55 PM
#55
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
6 Posts
2015 E250 BT 4M
I have owned and driven VWs, made both in Mexico and in Germany. IMO, the German made cars have better overall quality and fewer problems. A thorough reading of VW forums would confirm my impressions about the Mexican made models.
Recently, VW had to delay the introduction of its Mexican made MK VII Golf due to QC issues with its initial production, as did Honda with its new Mexican made Fit.
Of course, these kinds of problems are not just occurring in Mexican plants: look at the sloppy assembly of the US made C Class and the Hungarian made CLA ! Mercedes-Benz outsourcing from Germany is not doing its reputation for quality automobiles any favours.
02-25-2015, 12:14 AM
#56
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Corona Del Mar, CA
Posts: 7,042
Received 3,419 Likes
on
1,948 Posts
2020 S560 Sedan, 2019 SL450, 2019 E450 Luxury Trim Wagon, '24 BMW I7 on order...
I'm very interested in this statement you have made and would very much appreciate it if you could tell me where you got this information. I have never heard of S Class cars being made ANYWHERE other than in Germany.
02-25-2015, 01:01 AM
#57
MBWorld Fanatic!
I too haven't heard of any S class manufacture outside Germany.
Mainly DB builds commercial trucks. It does have an assembly plant with Nissan where Infinity vehicles are built.
Mainly DB builds commercial trucks. It does have an assembly plant with Nissan where Infinity vehicles are built.
02-25-2015, 02:01 PM
#58
MBWorld Fanatic!
What I heard is they're for the the Latin and Asian markets.
Most S-Class models, including the W221, are built at the Daimler AG plant in Sindelfingen, Germany and at the Mercedes-Benz-Valdez plant in Santiago Tianguistenco, Mexico. Founded by Daimler Motoren Gesellschaft in 1915, the Sindelfingen plant also produced the model 600 "Grosser Mercedes" and past generations of the S-Class.[31] Previous S-Class models (such as the W126) were built in different locations ranging from Stuttgart to South Africa, but with recent models (such as the W220) production has been concentrated in Sindelfingen and Santiago Tianguistenco. In February 2007, DaimlerChrysler Malaysia's (now, Mercedes Benz Malaysia) plant in Pekan, Pahang began production of S350 (model W221) vehicles and is currently assembling S300, S350L and S500L.[32] In all, some 2.7 million S-Class vehicles have been produced in the past forty years.[33]
Most S-Class models, including the W221, are built at the Daimler AG plant in Sindelfingen, Germany and at the Mercedes-Benz-Valdez plant in Santiago Tianguistenco, Mexico. Founded by Daimler Motoren Gesellschaft in 1915, the Sindelfingen plant also produced the model 600 "Grosser Mercedes" and past generations of the S-Class.[31] Previous S-Class models (such as the W126) were built in different locations ranging from Stuttgart to South Africa, but with recent models (such as the W220) production has been concentrated in Sindelfingen and Santiago Tianguistenco. In February 2007, DaimlerChrysler Malaysia's (now, Mercedes Benz Malaysia) plant in Pekan, Pahang began production of S350 (model W221) vehicles and is currently assembling S300, S350L and S500L.[32] In all, some 2.7 million S-Class vehicles have been produced in the past forty years.[33]
02-25-2015, 02:18 PM
#59
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Corona Del Mar, CA
Posts: 7,042
Received 3,419 Likes
on
1,948 Posts
2020 S560 Sedan, 2019 SL450, 2019 E450 Luxury Trim Wagon, '24 BMW I7 on order...
What I heard is they're for the the Latin and Asian markets.
Most S-Class models, including the W221, are built at the Daimler AG plant in Sindelfingen, Germany and at the Mercedes-Benz-Valdez plant in Santiago Tianguistenco, Mexico. Founded by Daimler Motoren Gesellschaft in 1915, the Sindelfingen plant also produced the model 600 "Grosser Mercedes" and past generations of the S-Class.[31] Previous S-Class models (such as the W126) were built in different locations ranging from Stuttgart to South Africa, but with recent models (such as the W220) production has been concentrated in Sindelfingen and Santiago Tianguistenco. In February 2007, DaimlerChrysler Malaysia's (now, Mercedes Benz Malaysia) plant in Pekan, Pahang began production of S350 (model W221) vehicles and is currently assembling S300, S350L and S500L.[32] In all, some 2.7 million S-Class vehicles have been produced in the past forty years.[33]
Most S-Class models, including the W221, are built at the Daimler AG plant in Sindelfingen, Germany and at the Mercedes-Benz-Valdez plant in Santiago Tianguistenco, Mexico. Founded by Daimler Motoren Gesellschaft in 1915, the Sindelfingen plant also produced the model 600 "Grosser Mercedes" and past generations of the S-Class.[31] Previous S-Class models (such as the W126) were built in different locations ranging from Stuttgart to South Africa, but with recent models (such as the W220) production has been concentrated in Sindelfingen and Santiago Tianguistenco. In February 2007, DaimlerChrysler Malaysia's (now, Mercedes Benz Malaysia) plant in Pekan, Pahang began production of S350 (model W221) vehicles and is currently assembling S300, S350L and S500L.[32] In all, some 2.7 million S-Class vehicles have been produced in the past forty years.[33]
02-25-2015, 03:54 PM
#60
MBWorld Fanatic!
I did a bit of further looking today when I had time and confirmed you views but it looks like the Mexican production goes to central and south American markets and not to the US or Canada.
Do you have info on that?
Do you have info on that?
02-26-2015, 10:39 AM
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2013 ML 550, CLK63 AMG, 2012 E350 4MATIC
So I got a 2015 C300 as a loaner today and boy what a disappointment that was. The car doesn't even compare my older e350. Yes, the new C has some cool new features like the folding side mirrors and agility control but the rough shifts and suspension are such a let down. I do love the LED lights in the door handles tho....nice!! lol The tablet as the display is uglier in person than I thought IMO. I would def go for the older E!!
I would def go for the older E!!My dealer just took my wife's E350 away to replace the wood trim(some pieces faded)...and left me a new c300. wow is that thing pathetic. I've been a fan of MB for awhile, but I can't imagine how they get people to pay a premium price for that vehicle over a toyota.
on a high note, my wife announced today "tell them to keep it!". She wants my E550 so this would free me up to trade the E350 in on ...oh dare I...a CLS63? currently cpo's out there for more about $20k off of sticker with less than 14kmi.
Last edited by schorert1; 02-26-2015 at 10:58 AM.
03-05-2015, 08:05 PM
#62
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2013 E350 Sport Wagon - 4Matic
Was given a 2015 C300 4Matic as loaner today. I have to agree that the E Class not only handles a lot better but simply feels more rigid than its baby brother. The fit of the many interior components were not as good as an E Class, however, I was keen on a lot of the finishes. in summary, I'd go with a older E Class over a new C Class even though there were many features of the C Class which I liked that are not available on a 2013 E Class (not sure if they are available on a 2015)...they include the following:
1) Multi-View Rear View Camera
2) Displaying of song track/artist on the odometer
3) Agility settings which included Eco, Comfort, Sport, Sport Plus, and Individual (customizable)
4) Folding Mirrors
5) Interior design (seat settings, lock/unlock button design with the door handle, silver trim everywhere)
6) I actually liked the bigger Command/Navigation screen (the placement could be argued however I didn't mind it too much)
If I were in your position, I'd buy the E Class mainly for the better handling, extra space, overall higher quality built vehicle, and it's safety ratings.
1) Multi-View Rear View Camera
2) Displaying of song track/artist on the odometer
3) Agility settings which included Eco, Comfort, Sport, Sport Plus, and Individual (customizable)
4) Folding Mirrors
5) Interior design (seat settings, lock/unlock button design with the door handle, silver trim everywhere)
6) I actually liked the bigger Command/Navigation screen (the placement could be argued however I didn't mind it too much)
If I were in your position, I'd buy the E Class mainly for the better handling, extra space, overall higher quality built vehicle, and it's safety ratings.
03-05-2015, 09:24 PM
#63
so to sum it up: this topic is filled with opinions from e class drivers who are butt hurt that their ancient car is not only being replaced by a new E within the next year, but also hurt that the new C is better and more refined than their E.
so far ive only read miniscule, and quite frankly ridiculous comparisons of the C vs E. so the E is more "rigid" or "rides better" than the c? is that the best you can do? the c has a better interior by a nautical mile. full panoramic roof, the latest design language, burmester sound system, interior ambient lighting, 3 inch increase in leg room, the latest tech, newest version of Comand, far more fuel efficient, etc. but i dont see anybody talking about that. wonder why..
and i love when people make fun of the C's "ipad screen" when their E class has a screen the size of a thermostat display. actually if you wanna call the C class screen an "ipad" then i think its only fitting we call the E class screen an "ipod". ancient, discontinued, old, low res, small, and replaced by something newer and better. Sounds familiar. screen aside, the antique interior of the E class is so dated at this point that i would feel "old" sitting in one. in fact i did sit in one before deciding on the C and it was not even a contest in my opinion. oh and for the record my new C was more expensive than a 2014 E, so dont even give me the whole "you're just mad because you cant afford it" spiel.
ill admit that a basic, bone dry w205 C class isnt anything to drool about, but try spending a week in a c400 with almost all interior options, pano roof, leather seats, etc. and then hop into an ancient E class and tell me which is better. i hope "being more rigid" is a strong enough selling point for you, because thats probably the only thing that it beats the new w205 at.
i have a friend who drives a 2012 7 series and he admits my c400 interior is much nicer than his car in every way. car and driver also recently awarded the new c class with the title of "best interior under $60,000".
moral of the story is you should form your own opinion by going to the dealership and seeing for yourself.
so far ive only read miniscule, and quite frankly ridiculous comparisons of the C vs E. so the E is more "rigid" or "rides better" than the c? is that the best you can do? the c has a better interior by a nautical mile. full panoramic roof, the latest design language, burmester sound system, interior ambient lighting, 3 inch increase in leg room, the latest tech, newest version of Comand, far more fuel efficient, etc. but i dont see anybody talking about that. wonder why..
and i love when people make fun of the C's "ipad screen" when their E class has a screen the size of a thermostat display. actually if you wanna call the C class screen an "ipad" then i think its only fitting we call the E class screen an "ipod". ancient, discontinued, old, low res, small, and replaced by something newer and better. Sounds familiar. screen aside, the antique interior of the E class is so dated at this point that i would feel "old" sitting in one. in fact i did sit in one before deciding on the C and it was not even a contest in my opinion. oh and for the record my new C was more expensive than a 2014 E, so dont even give me the whole "you're just mad because you cant afford it" spiel.
ill admit that a basic, bone dry w205 C class isnt anything to drool about, but try spending a week in a c400 with almost all interior options, pano roof, leather seats, etc. and then hop into an ancient E class and tell me which is better. i hope "being more rigid" is a strong enough selling point for you, because thats probably the only thing that it beats the new w205 at.
i have a friend who drives a 2012 7 series and he admits my c400 interior is much nicer than his car in every way. car and driver also recently awarded the new c class with the title of "best interior under $60,000".
moral of the story is you should form your own opinion by going to the dealership and seeing for yourself.
Last edited by c400benz; 03-05-2015 at 09:32 PM.
03-05-2015, 10:20 PM
#64
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Corona Del Mar, CA
Posts: 7,042
Received 3,419 Likes
on
1,948 Posts
2020 S560 Sedan, 2019 SL450, 2019 E450 Luxury Trim Wagon, '24 BMW I7 on order...
There are S Class drivers, E Class drivers, C Class drivers, etc. Every model can't be the newest kid on the block. The fact of the matter is that the W212 is a larger, heavier, safer, more solid car than any C Class, with most every "bug" worked out over it's many years in the line, AND, it's still made in Germany. If those things are important to you, go for a nice, tried and true, solid as a rock, utterly safe and dependable W212. If having the latest interior doo-dads is your thing and you are comfortable in a smaller car, go for the little C Class, as it appears to be a nice, entry level car. I really don't see it as a difficult decision. W212 all the way. My wife just loves her 2010 and a new 2016 is on the way.
Last edited by Streamliner; 03-06-2015 at 09:29 AM.
03-06-2015, 12:26 AM
#65
MBWorld Fanatic!
There are S Class drivers, E Class drivers, C Class drivers, etc. Every model can't be the newest kid on the block. The fact of the matter is that the W212 is a larger, heavier, safer, more solid car than any C Class, with every "bug" worked out over it's many years in the line, AND, it's still made in Germany....
03-06-2015, 09:18 AM
#66
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2013 E350 Sport Wagon - 4Matic
so to sum it up: this topic is filled with opinions from e class drivers who are butt hurt that their ancient car is not only being replaced by a new E within the next year, but also hurt that the new C is better and more refined than their E.
so far ive only read miniscule, and quite frankly ridiculous comparisons of the C vs E. so the E is more "rigid" or "rides better" than the c? is that the best you can do? the c has a better interior by a nautical mile. full panoramic roof, the latest design language, burmester sound system, interior ambient lighting, 3 inch increase in leg room, the latest tech, newest version of Comand, far more fuel efficient, etc. but i dont see anybody talking about that. wonder why..
and i love when people make fun of the C's "ipad screen" when their E class has a screen the size of a thermostat display. actually if you wanna call the C class screen an "ipad" then i think its only fitting we call the E class screen an "ipod". ancient, discontinued, old, low res, small, and replaced by something newer and better. Sounds familiar. screen aside, the antique interior of the E class is so dated at this point that i would feel "old" sitting in one. in fact i did sit in one before deciding on the C and it was not even a contest in my opinion. oh and for the record my new C was more expensive than a 2014 E, so dont even give me the whole "you're just mad because you cant afford it" spiel.
ill admit that a basic, bone dry w205 C class isnt anything to drool about, but try spending a week in a c400 with almost all interior options, pano roof, leather seats, etc. and then hop into an ancient E class and tell me which is better. i hope "being more rigid" is a strong enough selling point for you, because thats probably the only thing that it beats the new w205 at.
i have a friend who drives a 2012 7 series and he admits my c400 interior is much nicer than his car in every way. car and driver also recently awarded the new c class with the title of "best interior under $60,000".
moral of the story is you should form your own opinion by going to the dealership and seeing for yourself.
so far ive only read miniscule, and quite frankly ridiculous comparisons of the C vs E. so the E is more "rigid" or "rides better" than the c? is that the best you can do? the c has a better interior by a nautical mile. full panoramic roof, the latest design language, burmester sound system, interior ambient lighting, 3 inch increase in leg room, the latest tech, newest version of Comand, far more fuel efficient, etc. but i dont see anybody talking about that. wonder why..
and i love when people make fun of the C's "ipad screen" when their E class has a screen the size of a thermostat display. actually if you wanna call the C class screen an "ipad" then i think its only fitting we call the E class screen an "ipod". ancient, discontinued, old, low res, small, and replaced by something newer and better. Sounds familiar. screen aside, the antique interior of the E class is so dated at this point that i would feel "old" sitting in one. in fact i did sit in one before deciding on the C and it was not even a contest in my opinion. oh and for the record my new C was more expensive than a 2014 E, so dont even give me the whole "you're just mad because you cant afford it" spiel.
ill admit that a basic, bone dry w205 C class isnt anything to drool about, but try spending a week in a c400 with almost all interior options, pano roof, leather seats, etc. and then hop into an ancient E class and tell me which is better. i hope "being more rigid" is a strong enough selling point for you, because thats probably the only thing that it beats the new w205 at.
i have a friend who drives a 2012 7 series and he admits my c400 interior is much nicer than his car in every way. car and driver also recently awarded the new c class with the title of "best interior under $60,000".
moral of the story is you should form your own opinion by going to the dealership and seeing for yourself.
Regarding the handling, that is where I was the most disappointed in the new C. Even in Sport Plus it felt very loose....much more unstable than my E which feels very tight. Also, at complete stops, I could feel a slight vibration (engine I assume) and the vehicle only had ~4,000 miles. In summary, my E handles much better (even though it's much larger...wagon) and doesn't vibrate at full stops). Once and if these issues are resolved, the C would be a vehicle one should consider if they are looking for a compact luxury vehicle. However, I do think it's overpriced.
03-06-2015, 10:44 AM
#67
MBWorld Fanatic!
The vibration you felt @ stops was likely the ECO. I've been in a new C300 all week while my 550 is at the dealer. ECO works ok, but takes a little getting used to. Actually not a bad car at all, only complaint is it lacks power. Handling and road manners are pretty good IMO. With that said, I'd take my 5 y/o E over this C in a heartbeat. Would like to try the C400 to compare tho. Cheers
Maybe I wasn't clear in my initial post. I also agree that the new C Class' interior leaves something to be desired for current E Class owners. It is very nice! However, that doesn't change the fact that it is much smaller than the E (even though it's fairly larger than the previous C). That may not be important to some though. For me, that's a big deal.
Regarding the handling, that is where I was the most disappointed in the new C. Even in Sport Plus it felt very loose....much more unstable than my E which feels very tight. Also, at complete stops, I could feel a slight vibration (engine I assume) and the vehicle only had ~4,000 miles. In summary, my E handles much better (even though it's much larger...wagon) and doesn't vibrate at full stops). Once and if these issues are resolved, the C would be a vehicle one should consider if they are looking for a compact luxury vehicle. However, I do think it's overpriced.
Regarding the handling, that is where I was the most disappointed in the new C. Even in Sport Plus it felt very loose....much more unstable than my E which feels very tight. Also, at complete stops, I could feel a slight vibration (engine I assume) and the vehicle only had ~4,000 miles. In summary, my E handles much better (even though it's much larger...wagon) and doesn't vibrate at full stops). Once and if these issues are resolved, the C would be a vehicle one should consider if they are looking for a compact luxury vehicle. However, I do think it's overpriced.
03-06-2015, 12:07 PM
#68
MBWorld Fanatic!
The vibration you felt @ stops was likely the ECO. I've been in a new C300 all week while my 550 is at the dealer. ECO works ok, but takes a little getting used to. Actually not a bad car at all, only complaint is it lacks power. Handling and road manners are pretty good IMO. With that said, I'd take my 5 y/o E over this C in a heartbeat. Would like to try the C400 to compare tho. Cheers
The reason why ultra luxury cars have V8/10/12s is not only for power its also for comfort.
When sitting at a stop the time between the 4 engine ignitions will be more noticeable to someone who is used to 6 or more.
I don't think ECO has anything to do with any perceived vibration.
ECO only cuts the engine off when stopped and that's all it does. ECO slows the rate of fuel injection when you accelerate and the transmission will always seek the higher gear. It will not and should not have any effect on how the engine runs.
03-06-2015, 12:24 PM
#69
MBWorld Fanatic!
The fact that your loaded C400 costs more than a no option E350... LMAO.
How about you try to find a loaded E400 and tell us what is the price difference between that and your C400.
Anyway I do agree that a new, modern, and updated C class with a warranty is much better that a old, outdated E class without a Warranty.
But at the end of the day, a C class in still a C class and it sits a Class below and equally equipped E Class. In the same way that a E class is a Class below the S class... And yes... any BMW will always be a Class below MB.
The upcoming new generation 7 series is a disgrace when you try to compare it the S class. I have a very strong feeling that the new W213 will put the next gen 7 Series to shame.
03-06-2015, 01:00 PM
#70
MBWorld Fanatic!
This is a very dumb thing to post.
The fact that your loaded C400 costs more than a no option E350... LMAO.
How about you try to find a loaded E400 and tell us what is the price difference between that and your C400.
Anyway I do agree that a new, modern, and updated C class with a warranty is much better that a old, outdated E class without a Warranty.
But at the end of the day, a C class in still a C class and it sits a Class below and equally equipped E Class. In the same way that a E class is a Class below the S class... And yes... any BMW will always be a Class below MB.
The upcoming new generation 7 series is a disgrace when you try to compare it the S class. I have a very strong feeling that the new W213 will put the next gen 7 Series to shame.
The fact that your loaded C400 costs more than a no option E350... LMAO.
How about you try to find a loaded E400 and tell us what is the price difference between that and your C400.
Anyway I do agree that a new, modern, and updated C class with a warranty is much better that a old, outdated E class without a Warranty.
But at the end of the day, a C class in still a C class and it sits a Class below and equally equipped E Class. In the same way that a E class is a Class below the S class... And yes... any BMW will always be a Class below MB.
The upcoming new generation 7 series is a disgrace when you try to compare it the S class. I have a very strong feeling that the new W213 will put the next gen 7 Series to shame.
03-06-2015, 03:30 PM
#71
Senior Member
so to sum it up: this topic is filled with opinions from e class drivers who are butt hurt that their ancient car is not only being replaced by a new E within the next year, but also hurt that the new C is better and more refined than their E.
so far ive only read miniscule, and quite frankly ridiculous comparisons of the C vs E. so the E is more "rigid" or "rides better" than the c? is that the best you can do? the c has a better interior by a nautical mile. full panoramic roof, the latest design language, burmester sound system, interior ambient lighting, 3 inch increase in leg room, the latest tech, newest version of Comand, far more fuel efficient, etc. but i dont see anybody talking about that. wonder why..
and i love when people make fun of the C's "ipad screen" when their E class has a screen the size of a thermostat display. actually if you wanna call the C class screen an "ipad" then i think its only fitting we call the E class screen an "ipod". ancient, discontinued, old, low res, small, and replaced by something newer and better. Sounds familiar. screen aside, the antique interior of the E class is so dated at this point that i would feel "old" sitting in one. in fact i did sit in one before deciding on the C and it was not even a contest in my opinion. oh and for the record my new C was more expensive than a 2014 E, so dont even give me the whole "you're just mad because you cant afford it" spiel.
ill admit that a basic, bone dry w205 C class isnt anything to drool about, but try spending a week in a c400 with almost all interior options, pano roof, leather seats, etc. and then hop into an ancient E class and tell me which is better. i hope "being more rigid" is a strong enough selling point for you, because thats probably the only thing that it beats the new w205 at.
i have a friend who drives a 2012 7 series and he admits my c400 interior is much nicer than his car in every way. car and driver also recently awarded the new c class with the title of "best interior under $60,000".
moral of the story is you should form your own opinion by going to the dealership and seeing for yourself.
so far ive only read miniscule, and quite frankly ridiculous comparisons of the C vs E. so the E is more "rigid" or "rides better" than the c? is that the best you can do? the c has a better interior by a nautical mile. full panoramic roof, the latest design language, burmester sound system, interior ambient lighting, 3 inch increase in leg room, the latest tech, newest version of Comand, far more fuel efficient, etc. but i dont see anybody talking about that. wonder why..
and i love when people make fun of the C's "ipad screen" when their E class has a screen the size of a thermostat display. actually if you wanna call the C class screen an "ipad" then i think its only fitting we call the E class screen an "ipod". ancient, discontinued, old, low res, small, and replaced by something newer and better. Sounds familiar. screen aside, the antique interior of the E class is so dated at this point that i would feel "old" sitting in one. in fact i did sit in one before deciding on the C and it was not even a contest in my opinion. oh and for the record my new C was more expensive than a 2014 E, so dont even give me the whole "you're just mad because you cant afford it" spiel.
ill admit that a basic, bone dry w205 C class isnt anything to drool about, but try spending a week in a c400 with almost all interior options, pano roof, leather seats, etc. and then hop into an ancient E class and tell me which is better. i hope "being more rigid" is a strong enough selling point for you, because thats probably the only thing that it beats the new w205 at.
i have a friend who drives a 2012 7 series and he admits my c400 interior is much nicer than his car in every way. car and driver also recently awarded the new c class with the title of "best interior under $60,000".
moral of the story is you should form your own opinion by going to the dealership and seeing for yourself.
I drove a C300 the other day and was very impressed. The interior is very modern and a complete departure from the W204. The "iPad" screen may not be to everyone's taste, but it was very nice to have a decent large screen. The new navigation system was excellent, and the graphics etc. are light years ahead of the W212 implementation.
I agree that the "full" panoramic roof is excellent, and I loved the clever use of the interior space for the back seats. There is virtually no shelf behind the seats. Rear legroom seems good.
The 4 cylinder engine was commendably quiet, and overall sound deadening was good.
A few complaints: the ride was harsh, and would become annoying long term. The space for the driver's legs is narrow, and gets progressively narrower closer to the pedals. The quality of materials isn't quite as good as I expected. They look good though.
Based on this evidence, the W213 could be a fabulous car.
03-06-2015, 03:36 PM
#72
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Southeastern USA
Posts: 2,572
Received 143 Likes
on
102 Posts
2010 E350 Luxury Sedan, Engine 272 (V6)
A comparably equipped "E" will cost more than a "C." If it didn't, DAG and MBUSA would go bankrupt as the "E" costs more to build.
As for the infotainment screen, it is not the size that is the problem, but that it is stuck on as opposed to being made an integral part of the dash. DAG did this as a cost saving feature, not to be modern or up to date or for any other reason.
As for the infotainment screen, it is not the size that is the problem, but that it is stuck on as opposed to being made an integral part of the dash. DAG did this as a cost saving feature, not to be modern or up to date or for any other reason.
03-06-2015, 03:50 PM
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2013 ML 550, CLK63 AMG, 2012 E350 4MATIC
so to sum it up: this topic is filled with opinions from e class drivers who are butt hurt that their ancient car is not only being replaced by a new E within the next year, but also hurt that the new C is better and more refined than their E.
so far ive only read miniscule, and quite frankly ridiculous comparisons of the C vs E. so the E is more "rigid" or "rides better" than the c? is that the best you can do? the c has a better interior by a nautical mile. full panoramic roof, the latest design language, burmester sound system, interior ambient lighting, 3 inch increase in leg room, the latest tech, newest version of Comand, far more fuel efficient, etc. but i dont see anybody talking about that. wonder why..
and i love when people make fun of the C's "ipad screen" when their E class has a screen the size of a thermostat display. actually if you wanna call the C class screen an "ipad" then i think its only fitting we call the E class screen an "ipod". ancient, discontinued, old, low res, small, and replaced by something newer and better. Sounds familiar. screen aside, the antique interior of the E class is so dated at this point that i would feel "old" sitting in one. in fact i did sit in one before deciding on the C and it was not even a contest in my opinion. oh and for the record my new C was more expensive than a 2014 E, so dont even give me the whole "you're just mad because you cant afford it" spiel.
ill admit that a basic, bone dry w205 C class isnt anything to drool about, but try spending a week in a c400 with almost all interior options, pano roof, leather seats, etc. and then hop into an ancient E class and tell me which is better. i hope "being more rigid" is a strong enough selling point for you, because thats probably the only thing that it beats the new w205 at.
i have a friend who drives a 2012 7 series and he admits my c400 interior is much nicer than his car in every way. car and driver also recently awarded the new c class with the title of "best interior under $60,000".
moral of the story is you should form your own opinion by going to the dealership and seeing for yourself.
so far ive only read miniscule, and quite frankly ridiculous comparisons of the C vs E. so the E is more "rigid" or "rides better" than the c? is that the best you can do? the c has a better interior by a nautical mile. full panoramic roof, the latest design language, burmester sound system, interior ambient lighting, 3 inch increase in leg room, the latest tech, newest version of Comand, far more fuel efficient, etc. but i dont see anybody talking about that. wonder why..
and i love when people make fun of the C's "ipad screen" when their E class has a screen the size of a thermostat display. actually if you wanna call the C class screen an "ipad" then i think its only fitting we call the E class screen an "ipod". ancient, discontinued, old, low res, small, and replaced by something newer and better. Sounds familiar. screen aside, the antique interior of the E class is so dated at this point that i would feel "old" sitting in one. in fact i did sit in one before deciding on the C and it was not even a contest in my opinion. oh and for the record my new C was more expensive than a 2014 E, so dont even give me the whole "you're just mad because you cant afford it" spiel.
ill admit that a basic, bone dry w205 C class isnt anything to drool about, but try spending a week in a c400 with almost all interior options, pano roof, leather seats, etc. and then hop into an ancient E class and tell me which is better. i hope "being more rigid" is a strong enough selling point for you, because thats probably the only thing that it beats the new w205 at.
i have a friend who drives a 2012 7 series and he admits my c400 interior is much nicer than his car in every way. car and driver also recently awarded the new c class with the title of "best interior under $60,000".
moral of the story is you should form your own opinion by going to the dealership and seeing for yourself.
03-06-2015, 05:04 PM
#74
MBWorld Fanatic!
He said vib was at complete stops, which is what I'm noticing in my C300 loaner and in my case it's for sure the ECO STOP/start
Maybe, but the vibration he felt could simply be fact that he was driving a 4cyl car.
The reason why ultra luxury cars have V8/10/12s is not only for power its also for comfort.
When sitting at a stop the time between the 4 engine ignitions will be more noticeable to someone who is used to 6 or more.
I don't think ECO has anything to do with any perceived vibration.
ECO only cuts the engine off when stopped and that's all it does. ECO slows the rate of fuel injection when you accelerate and the transmission will always seek the higher gear. It will not and should not have any effect on how the engine runs.
The reason why ultra luxury cars have V8/10/12s is not only for power its also for comfort.
When sitting at a stop the time between the 4 engine ignitions will be more noticeable to someone who is used to 6 or more.
I don't think ECO has anything to do with any perceived vibration.
ECO only cuts the engine off when stopped and that's all it does. ECO slows the rate of fuel injection when you accelerate and the transmission will always seek the higher gear. It will not and should not have any effect on how the engine runs.
03-06-2015, 05:11 PM
#75
MBWorld Fanatic!
And I'll follow up by saying that after 5 days in the new C, I can not wait to get my ancient 2010 E back. If they offered up a straight up trade, I would quickly, and I mean quickly decline...just got the call from the dealer now it's Monday to get my car back. Oh well it's good to have a loaner even if it is a cute lil C class. My wife and her friends love it!!
