Almost bald tires in 8000 miles - warranty claim or not?
my CPO is only 8000 miles old since purchase. yet the rear tires are now close to bald. The longitudinal treads are still there but the horizontal treads are completely gone. Does this qualify as a warranty claim? (I have run flats with 240 tread rating)
|
8000 miles sounds low. Get your alignment and balancing checked. If they are off then you can create a claim against the dealer as they should have this checked at sale.
|
Why would your tires be under warranty on a used car? Did they guarantee they were new or a certain mileage usage?
|
Some state laws require minimum depth of tread that dealers are supposed to provide on used cars, but I believe it is pretty low (like 2/32"). A MB CPO car may be more like 5/32". If you bought the car with minimum tread depth, you are on your own. My dealer replaced all of my tires with new when I bought it as a CPO car. Doesn't hurt to ask.
|
Originally Posted by JALLEN4
(Post 7209295)
Why would your tires be under warranty on a used car? Did they guarantee they were new or a certain mileage usage?
|
If they installed new tires for you, then for sure I would be back at the dealership complaining. They will probably complain to the tire manufacturer anyway and they will end up eating the cost. I'm sure they will work with you.
|
Originally Posted by KEY08
(Post 7209495)
If they installed new tires for you, then for sure I would be back at the dealership complaining. They will probably complain to the tire manufacturer anyway and they will end up eating the cost. I'm sure they will work with you.
I agree as CPO Process includes new tires |
What's the warranty on the tire? Typically for RWD applications it's half the normal amount although 8k is pretty low. A treadwear rating of only 240 is pretty low though, maybe only 20k. Run flats are also horrible from a ride aspect.
|
Originally Posted by cetialpha5
(Post 7209526)
What's the warranty on the tire? Typically for RWD applications it's half the normal amount although 8k is pretty low. A treadwear rating of only 240 is pretty low though, maybe only 20k. Run flats are also horrible from a ride aspect.
|
Do you have a donut spare? That's what some people do, get a donut spare and go with regular tires. The ride is better on regular tires, run flats are known for a harsh ride.
|
Which E comes with run-flats as OEM? Never heard of that...
|
Originally Posted by SD-14E550CAB
(Post 7209822)
Which E comes with run-flats as OEM? Never heard of that...
|
CPO has a minimum of 8/32nds tread requirement. For them to be that worn is excessive, but driving and conditions play a part and 240 treadwear is a sticky tire, seems a bit excessive for a diesel E class but it's not gonna be a long lasting tire.
Not warranty though, not even on a new car will the tires be warranty. CPO covers less than new car warranty. |
w212 tires
Originally Posted by ItalianJoe1
(Post 7209915)
CPO has a minimum of 8/32nds tread requirement. For them to be that worn is excessive, but driving and conditions play a part and 240 treadwear is a sticky tire, seems a bit excessive for a diesel E class but it's not gonna be a long lasting tire.
Not warranty though, not even on a new car will the tires be warranty. CPO covers less than new car warranty. |
Originally Posted by mellonc
(Post 7209681)
that's why i'm hesitating. if they honored the warranty they would probably give me another set of run-flats........ should I just bite bullet and replace with new regular tires?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:34 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands