|
Installed! 245/30 and 285/25 on 20s
i feel like is should have gone 255/35 285/30 and probably would have been good. Thoughts??https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...d8487928d.jpeghttps://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...acdb10335.jpeg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...224f190920.png https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...a9bf043c3f.png https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...c625b0eb8c.png |
no comment
|
it doesn't look bad, i think going 245/35 and 285/30 would look good keeping stock ride height
|
that is exactly same specs as mine.
Looks good but profile is very low. Not very comfy I am also looking into 19" and i want it to be meaty look. As i need performance. |
Originally Posted by SGTzAMG
(Post 7453488)
it doesn't look bad, i think going 245/35 and 285/30 would look good keeping stock ride height
Anyone wanna buy a set of tires? Lolol |
Originally Posted by kajtek1
(Post 7453468)
no comment
i think you just did lol |
Rubber band man!
|
Originally Posted by prestonhendu
(Post 7453562)
i think you just did lol That was the moment where I figure out less words is more. I made similar topic in the past http://www.benzworld.org/forums/gene...out-22-mb.html W212 seem to generate a group of owners who do that to their cars. I read European forum, where not only cars get low-profile wheels, but are drastically lowered as well, so the owners carry stack of wood planks in the trunk to get on some driveways. Bottom line, this is wasting perfectly good car and making it unusable for normal driving. The only thing I don't know how many of such owners bought the car for their own earned money. |
Originally Posted by KEY08
(Post 7453584)
Rubber band man!
Whats your setup? I cant tell from your signature pic. If I didn't buy them from such a horrible company I would try to return them for more rubber :hammer: |
Originally Posted by kajtek1
(Post 7453597)
YEAH :)
That was the moment where I figure out less words is more. I made similar topic in the past http://www.benzworld.org/forums/gene...out-22-mb.html W212 seem to generate a group of owners who do that to their cars. I read European forum, where not only cars get low-profile wheels, but are drastically lowered as well, so the owners carry stack of wood planks in the trunk to get on some driveways. Bottom line, this is wasting perfectly good car and making it unusable for normal driving. The only thing I don't know how many of such owners bought the car for their own earned money. |
Originally Posted by cocobeex
(Post 7453496)
that is exactly same specs as mine.
Looks good but profile is very low. Not very comfy I am also looking into 19" and i want it to be meaty look. As i need performance. |
Originally Posted by prestonhendu
(Post 7453622)
Shut up :violent:
Whats your setup? I cant tell from your signature pic. If I didn't buy them from such a horrible company I would try to return them for more rubber :hammer: |
Very Nice!!
|
1 Attachment(s)
Some of you guys would really hate japanese car culture.
Attachment 441212 It's all about expression of self. If you want to run 20s, run 20s. Some people want 16s with 55 sidewall, whatever. Don't judge, it's not your car. You keep doing you man. |
Originally Posted by Peachy
(Post 7453984)
Some of you guys would really hate japanese car culture.
https://i.imgur.com/tQctMoz.jpg It's all about expression of self. If you want to run 20s, run 20s. Some people want 16s with 55 sidewall, whatever. Don't judge, it's not your car. You keep doing you man. |
Originally Posted by prestonhendu
(Post 7453368)
i feel like is should have gone 255/35 285/30 and probably would have been good. Thoughts?? |
Originally Posted by Gee_115
(Post 7454677)
Rears look really stretched. That looks like one very uncomfortable ride.
As as far as the stretch, there is a trade off with sidewall height if I go 295 in the rear. I’m probably going to move to 30 sidewall and I don’t think that’s possible with a 295. Not sure of the calc off hand to know the sidewall loss. |
Originally Posted by prestonhendu
(Post 7453368)
i feel like is should have gone 255/35 285/30 and probably would have been good. Thoughts??https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...d8487928d.jpeghttps://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...acdb10335.jpeg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...224f190920.png https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...a9bf043c3f.png https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...c625b0eb8c.png |
Originally Posted by silverbu11et
(Post 7456206)
That's a nice setup. I have a pre-facelift e550 4matic.. running staggered (235/35/19 fronts and 275/30/19 - 8.5/9.5). If i were to switch to 235/45/19 and 265/40/19, think I'd have any rubbing issues? I assume my overall diameter might be close to yours. do you experience any rubbing?
|
Did anyone end up trying the 245-35-20/285-30-20 combo?
|
Originally Posted by 93srvman
(Post 7712078)
Did anyone end up trying the 245-35-20/285-30-20 combo?
|
Originally Posted by prestonhendu
(Post 7712110)
I did. I gouged the front tire from the tires on this thread so I went with 245/35 and 285/30. My front rubs on dips and bumps. I’m probably going back to 245/30 or possibly 255 once I look at calculations.
|
Originally Posted by 93srvman
(Post 7712078)
Did anyone end up trying the 245-35-20/285-30-20 combo?
245/40-18 3.9in 12.9in 25.7in 80.8in 784 0.0% 245/30-20 2.9in 12.9in 25.8in 81.0in 782 0.3% 285/25-20 2.8in 12.8in 25.6in 80.5in 788 -0.4% |
Originally Posted by 93srvman
(Post 7712116)
Assuming you still have the same rims, what offset are they?
|
Originally Posted by cocobeex
(Post 7712122)
my summer set up just like that.
No issue. |
Originally Posted by 93srvman
(Post 7712177)
Excellent - This is good news! Airmatic as well? lowered? Do you know the specs on your rims?
245/40-18 3.9in 12.9in 25.7in 80.8in 784 0.0% 245/30-20 2.9in 12.9in 25.8in 81.0in 782 0.3% 285/25-20 2.8in 12.8in 25.6in 80.5in 788 -0.4% |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands