E-Class (W213) 2016 - 2023

New E slow selling, dealers discounting, read this.....

Old 10-30-2016, 12:03 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
NYC-Style's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 332
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Corvette/2017 E-300
Just test drove the E this week and I was surprised how much it did get up and go...especially when I put it into sport mode. I'm looking to trade in my '15 C-400 and after driving the E...the engine is a non-factor.
Old 10-30-2016, 12:37 PM
  #52  
Junior Member
 
Lazarus Long's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
GLK 350 4 Matic
Lack of power is only part of the story, refinement is also a big reason. 4 bangers aren't as smooth as a 6, and much less smooth than an 8. I won't buy a car that sounds like a lawn mower. 4 bangers are fine in a Honda Civic or a Toyota Corolla. Not in a luxury Mercedes.
The following users liked this post:
a100steaksauce (10-30-2016)
Old 10-30-2016, 02:11 PM
  #53  
Super Member
 
shortspark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: East part of Texas
Posts: 615
Received 34 Likes on 28 Posts
2017 CLS550
Originally Posted by Lazarus Long
Lack of power is only part of the story, refinement is also a big reason. 4 bangers aren't as smooth as a 6, and much less smooth than an 8. I won't buy a car that sounds like a lawn mower. 4 bangers are fine in a Honda Civic or a Toyota Corolla. Not in a luxury Mercedes.
I bought a new car a few weeks ago and during the process I test drove an E class. What you said (and what I have said earlier in this thread) is precisely the reason I had to move from the E class to the CLS550 - and I have never looked back! This CLS is the most fun I have had in 50 years of driving cars, except perhaps for my 1972 Firebird Formula stick - but that, in part, I may have to attribute to youthful abandon!
Old 10-30-2016, 02:42 PM
  #54  
Super Member
 
a100steaksauce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 635
Received 32 Likes on 25 Posts
W218
Originally Posted by Lazarus Long
Lack of power is only part of the story, refinement is also a big reason. 4 bangers aren't as smooth as a 6, and much less smooth than an 8. I won't buy a car that sounds like a lawn mower. 4 bangers are fine in a Honda Civic or a Toyota Corolla. Not in a luxury Mercedes.
What's crazy is those Civic's and Corolla's in city driving will have an advantage over the big body baby motor E class.
Old 10-30-2016, 03:44 PM
  #55  
Super Member
 
ngerstman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
2016 Audi S8 Plus/ 2011 Mercedes e550 4Matic//Gone:1985 500SEL/2000 e320 4Matic/ 2001 e55 Kleeman
Originally Posted by NYC-Style
Just test drove the E this week and I was surprised how much it did get up and go...especially when I put it into sport mode. I'm looking to trade in my '15 C-400 and after driving the E...the engine is a non-factor.
I wouldn't do it. You'll miss the bigger engine let alone going to a much smaller engine in a larger car. Get an e43 or wait for more engine options in the e. Regards. Ned.
Old 10-30-2016, 03:54 PM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
mjsbenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida & New Jersey
Posts: 344
Received 44 Likes on 33 Posts
2017 E300 4matic Sport
Originally Posted by Lazarus Long
Lack of power is only part of the story, refinement is also a big reason. 4 bangers aren't as smooth as a 6, and much less smooth than an 8. I won't buy a car that sounds like a lawn mower. 4 bangers are fine in a Honda Civic or a Toyota Corolla. Not in a luxury Mercedes.

Not sure how you can compare the engine in the new E to a Civic/Corolla.

The comparison of the E212 6 cylinder (as my old 2015 E350) to the new the E needs a little more analysis. Torque is the same with the two engines but with the E212, the torque of 273 comes on after 4K RPMs while the E213 4 cylinder has 273 torque at 1300 RPMs. That is a huge difference.

Bottom line is counting the number of cylinders (and hp) is only part of the equation.

Full disclosure....I just ordered a new E300 after lots of seat time with the engine.

Last edited by mjsbenz; 10-30-2016 at 03:56 PM.
Old 10-30-2016, 04:04 PM
  #57  
Super Member
 
ngerstman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
2016 Audi S8 Plus/ 2011 Mercedes e550 4Matic//Gone:1985 500SEL/2000 e320 4Matic/ 2001 e55 Kleeman
Originally Posted by mjsbenz
Not sure how you can compare the engine in the new E to a Civic/Corolla.

The comparison of the E212 6 cylinder (as my old 2015 E350) to the new the E needs a little more analysis. Torque is the same with the two engines but with the E212, the torque of 273 comes on after 4K RPMs while the E213 4 cylinder has 273 torque at 1300 RPMs. That is a huge difference.

Bottom line is counting the number of cylinders (and hp) is only part of the equation.

Full disclosure....I just ordered a new E300 after lots of seat time with the engine.
The smaller engine had to come with compromises versus the 6. They geared it to be quick off the line but the 6 will wipe it on highway passing power and general smoothness and perhaps longevity. Given the decision to go with that engine as base, I guess they went with right tradeoff, but who wants tradeoffs in a $60,000 car. Thanks. Regards. Ned.
Old 10-30-2016, 05:31 PM
  #58  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
joshg1001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 0
Received 84 Likes on 68 Posts
2017 E300
Its really funny how long this discussion continues to carry on.

Yes, ideally, the E should have more than a 4 cyl 240hp engine. but this is what we have to work with. We can argue endlessly about whether it is enough power (which it should be in every day driving) or whether such engine should be allowed in a luxury car at this price point. Those who can deal with it will buy it regardless. Those who can't, you have other options available to do you. Let's just leave it at that instead of saying the same thing over and over again.
Old 10-30-2016, 06:40 PM
  #59  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,401
Received 1,883 Likes on 1,320 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Originally Posted by joshg1001
Its really funny how long this discussion continues to carry on.

Yes, ideally, the E should have more than a 4 cyl 240hp engine. but this is what we have to work with. We can argue endlessly about whether it is enough power (which it should be in every day driving) or whether such engine should be allowed in a luxury car at this price point. Those who can deal with it will buy it regardless. Those who can't, you have other options available to do you. Let's just leave it at that instead ofsaying the same thing over and over again.
Because to the guy showing up in five minutes... it's a new discussion to him

do you know how many thousands of rants there are on eco auto-start-stop? Each person starting the thread thinks he is the first to rant about it lol

and discussion is good ... and bending over and accepting a pos four banger is not good
Old 10-30-2016, 08:15 PM
  #60  
Super Member
 
PaulE550's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 842
Received 61 Likes on 54 Posts
2015 E550 Coupe
Originally Posted by PeterUbers

and discussion is good ... and bending over and accepting a pos four banger is not good
+1
Old 10-30-2016, 09:46 PM
  #61  
Super Member
 
ngerstman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
2016 Audi S8 Plus/ 2011 Mercedes e550 4Matic//Gone:1985 500SEL/2000 e320 4Matic/ 2001 e55 Kleeman
Originally Posted by PaulE550
+1
Obviously I share this general sentiment. But what do you do if you need to buy a car now and can't or don't want to pay up for the e43? Do you buy the long in the tooth BMW or Audi? I suppose with the Mercedes you at least get a current state of the art vehicle with a gorgeous interior with an engine that we all agree could be better but is at least geared to perform in the low end rather well. We should all be furious with Mercedes for not at least offering a 6 along side the 4. So are we all supposed to protest and take our business elsewhere, including those of us who have been pushed to buy the e43 like me? I would have been perfectly happy with a new 2017 e350 sport for $65,000 loaded. I think we have been getting a bit unkind. Sorry. Regards. Ned.
Old 10-31-2016, 12:54 AM
  #62  
Junior Member
 
Lazarus Long's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
GLK 350 4 Matic
Originally Posted by ngerstman

Obviously I share this general sentiment. But what do you do if you need to buy a car now and can't or don't want to pay up for the e43? Do you buy the long in the tooth BMW or Audi? I suppose with the Mercedes you at least get a current state of the art vehicle with a gorgeous interior with an engine that we all agree could be better but is at least geared to perform in the low end rather well. We should all be furious with Mercedes for not at least offering a 6 along side the 4. So are we all supposed to protest and take our business elsewhere, including those of us who have been pushed to buy the e43 like me? I would have been perfectly happy with a new 2017 e350 sport for $65,000 loaded. I think we have been getting a bit unkind. Sorry. Regards. Ned.
Define 'need'. Is it 'need', or 'want'?

I bought a CPO 15 GLK 350 in January. I looked at a GLC and passed because I won't pay that kind of money for a 4 banger. Toys or 'state of the art' is irrelevant to me. I'm more interested in performance.

I was looking at an E550 back in 2011, when it still had the excellent NA V8. Didn't get around to it and missed the boat when it was downsized and turboed. Still kicking myself for not getting a Merc with the NA V8 when they were more reasonably priced. Or the Jag XF when the base engine was a 5.0 V8.

My GLK replaces a 97 Chevy Tahoe, with a 350 V8. I'm keeping it though. When the rest of the world is stuck with dreary 4 bangers, I'll still have my V8.

I bought my Tahoe new in 97. I didn't 'need' the GLK. I 'wanted' a new car with a decent engine before they were gone. I'll keep the GLK until something better comes along. Which is unlikely. I hope to keep it for a long time.

And yes, I will, and did, pick a 'long in the tooth' model rather than the newest in order to get the better engine.

The turbo 4 has a slight torque advantage because it hits the peak sooner, but it isn't a very big advantage. The v6 torque curve is very flat and has no turbo lag. The GLC is slower than the GLK in every performance test I've seen, and the same for new vs old E.
Old 10-31-2016, 11:01 AM
  #63  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 289 Likes on 202 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
This is the correct article:

http://www.autonews.com/article/2016...ncentives-down


M
Old 10-31-2016, 11:24 AM
  #64  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
pamiboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,306
Received 39 Likes on 34 Posts
E 350
There is nothing like "need to buy a car soon". You can always do monthly rentals for cars till you get one you want. You can also test different cars while you are renting and settle on one for longer time if you prefer it. The monthly payments will definitely be less than a payment for a Mercedes and you can always return the car when you finally get your car.

The article posted by M is precisely the reason we should wait before buying the E300. If sales are up they won't feel the need to offer anything new engine wise. Mind you that there is only a small fraction of people who are on this forum complaining. The vast majority are completely oblivious and would simply buy an MB because it's an MB.
Therefore it is in our interest to complain to MB in a way that they listen (the best way is to stop buying until they have what we want).
Old 10-31-2016, 11:29 AM
  #65  
Super Member
 
ngerstman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
2016 Audi S8 Plus/ 2011 Mercedes e550 4Matic//Gone:1985 500SEL/2000 e320 4Matic/ 2001 e55 Kleeman
Originally Posted by Lazarus Long
Define 'need'. Is it 'need', or 'want'?

I bought a CPO 15 GLK 350 in January. I looked at a GLC and passed because I won't pay that kind of money for a 4 banger. Toys or 'state of the art' is irrelevant to me. I'm more interested in performance.

I was looking at an E550 back in 2011, when it still had the excellent NA V8. Didn't get around to it and missed the boat when it was downsized and turboed. Still kicking myself for not getting a Merc with the NA V8 when they were more reasonably priced. Or the Jag XF when the base engine was a 5.0 V8.

My GLK replaces a 97 Chevy Tahoe, with a 350 V8. I'm keeping it though. When the rest of the world is stuck with dreary 4 bangers, I'll still have my V8.

I bought my Tahoe new in 97. I didn't 'need' the GLK. I 'wanted' a new car with a decent engine before they were gone. I'll keep the GLK until something better comes along. Which is unlikely. I hope to keep it for a long time.

And yes, I will, and did, pick a 'long in the tooth' model rather than the newest in order to get the better engine.

The turbo 4 has a slight torque advantage because it hits the peak sooner, but it isn't a very big advantage. The v6 torque curve is very flat and has no turbo lag. The GLC is slower than the GLK in every performance test I've seen, and the same for new vs old E.
I meant need, as in your lease is up and time to move on or you totaled your car or I just moved to the burbs and need a car. There are many people in that situation, so what's a buyer to do? The new e is stunning in most respects save Mercedes horrible decision to not offer a basic 6 along side the 4. Many will bite the bullet and buy the new e, but I would agree with you, if you don't "need" to, you could hold off and see what a year down the road brings. Thanks. Regards. Ned.
Old 10-31-2016, 12:16 PM
  #66  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
listerone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,121
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
2018 BMW 540d
From what I've seen and heard I'd be very tempted by the W213 except for the fact that there's no diesel.For me,no diesel = no W213.
Old 10-31-2016, 12:23 PM
  #67  
Senior Member
 
mjsbenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida & New Jersey
Posts: 344
Received 44 Likes on 33 Posts
2017 E300 4matic Sport
Originally Posted by ngerstman
I meant need, as in your lease is up and time to move on or you totaled your car or I just moved to the burbs and need a car. There are many people in that situation, so what's a buyer to do? The new e is stunning in most respects save Mercedes horrible decision to not offer a basic 6 along side the 4. Many will bite the bullet and buy the new e, but I would agree with you, if you don't "need" to, you could hold off and see what a year down the road brings. Thanks. Regards. Ned.

Ned....you are making an assumption that when I (or anyone) ordered an E300, I am settling and accepting "Mercedes horrible decision to not offer a basic 6..."

I may be in the minority but I am not settling. Whether it had my old E350 motor or the new E300 either motor would not change my expectations and driving style. If I was coming from a E550 (the E400 was not much better than the E350) or AMG E63, and I thought powering through some mountain roads in a 2 ton family sedan is fun, then I would have purchased the S550. The CLS 550 would never be on my radar. I prefer the 650xi.

Before ordering the new E300, I had 175 miles of seat time in a loaner for 4 days and that was a nice extended test drive. The car drove great; technology was impressive and the performance from a seat of the pants basis, feels no different than my 2015 E350 which was not a high performer.

Welcome to the new world of driving turbo 4s. It is just fine.

Last edited by mjsbenz; 10-31-2016 at 02:24 PM.
The following users liked this post:
MDMercedesGuy (10-31-2016)
Old 10-31-2016, 12:54 PM
  #68  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,401
Received 1,883 Likes on 1,320 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
The new Benz inline 6 variety will be impressive... 2017-2018 will be gray times for new car shoppers in the market for the e class as you will be limited on options between a four banger and a pricey e43 turbo six
Old 10-31-2016, 01:53 PM
  #69  
Senior Member
 
NYC-Style's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 332
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Corvette/2017 E-300
All great points...now to get back to the original post. Has anyone that's purchased been given any discounts from the dealership?? I'm well aware of the USAA discounts but has anyone been able to negotiate any more than that?? I'm looking to buy soon and the dealer is currently looking for a car for me....everything they have on the lot is in the natural wood grain...I'd prefer the burl walnut...
Old 10-31-2016, 02:26 PM
  #70  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MDMercedesGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germantown, MD/Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 1,351
Received 87 Likes on 60 Posts
2024 GLS450
Originally Posted by mjsbenz
Welcome to the new world of driving turbo 4s. It is just fine.
Bingo.

There are those of us who won't own a V6. I could not be more thrilled by Mercedes bringing the 4 cylinder over in the E - like the rest of the world.

Americans need to get rid of this obsession with displacement and needless waste. In Germany you see E220s doing 125MPH on the autobahn and dragging trailers around. You don't hear them needlessly complaining about a lack of power.

The car hits 60 in 6.5ish seconds and is vastly quieter than the prior E350 with a lower torque peak and flatter torque curve than that engine. There is not a driving situation one will find themselves in legally in the US where that engine would not be more than sufficient.
Old 10-31-2016, 02:52 PM
  #71  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ua549's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 4,175
Received 770 Likes on 608 Posts
.
Originally Posted by MDMercedesGuy
Bingo.
.
.
.
There is not a driving situation one will find themselves in legally in the US where that engine would not be more than sufficient.
Except passing on a very busy two lane road where 50 mph to 70 mph acceleration times are critical. That is where the E300's lack of power fails.
Old 10-31-2016, 03:30 PM
  #72  
Super Member
 
ngerstman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
2016 Audi S8 Plus/ 2011 Mercedes e550 4Matic//Gone:1985 500SEL/2000 e320 4Matic/ 2001 e55 Kleeman
Originally Posted by mjsbenz
Ned....you are making an assumption that when I (or anyone) ordered an E300, I am settling and accepting "Mercedes horrible decision to not offer a basic 6..."

I may be in the minority but I am not settling. Whether it had my old E350 motor or the new E300 either motor would not change my expectations and driving style. If I was coming from a E550 (the E400 was not much better than the E350) or AMG E63, and I thought powering through some mountain roads in a 2 ton family sedan is fun, then I would have purchased the S550. The CLS 550 would never be on my radar. I prefer the 650xi.

Before ordering the new E300, I had 175 miles of seat time in a loaner for 4 days and that was a nice extended test drive. The car drove great; technology was impressive and the performance from a seat of the pants basis, feels no different than my 2015 E350 which was not a high performer.

Welcome to the new world of driving turbo 4s. It is just fine.
Can't argue with you, you drove it for a bunch of days in I'm sure all sorts of circumstances and found the car not wanting. It is no doubt the most most impressive interior ever in this class of auto! Hopefully all the technology doesn't get in the way and is intuitive to use. The nature of these forums is that they attract auto enthusiasts who at times can act like spoiled, entitled jerks, including me, that for some reason feel the need for speed, hence my 2011 e550. Did I need it no but I got it. I'm sure the e300 is just fine but obviously the need for speed entailed crowd here is disappointed and just throwing a hissy fit. We'll get over it eventually. Enjoy the e! Regards. Ned.
Old 10-31-2016, 04:00 PM
  #73  
Senior Member
 
axhoaxho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 336
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by NYC-Style
All great points...now to get back to the original post. Has anyone that's purchased been given any discounts from the dealership?? I'm well aware of the USAA discounts but has anyone been able to negotiate any more than that?? I'm looking to buy soon and the dealer is currently looking for a car for me....everything they have on the lot is in the natural wood grain...I'd prefer the burl walnut...
Since the E300 (P3) we ordered is on the boat now (ETA mid-November to dealer), we assume there is a batch of E300's on the same boat as well. When they arrive, hopefully there will be more E300's at the lot, and dealers will offer deals to move them (around the Winter Sales Event timeframe.)

For the longest time, there was a delay of the head-up display production on the P3 package (hence some early E300's had the Q3 package, which was P3 minus head-up, etc.) Hope the production catches up, and more cars will arrive soon.
The following users liked this post:
NYC-Style (10-31-2016)
Old 10-31-2016, 04:00 PM
  #74  
Member
 
LAC300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 104
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
2018 E400W4 Sedan Luxury Trim
deleate
Old 10-31-2016, 04:21 PM
  #75  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MDMercedesGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germantown, MD/Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 1,351
Received 87 Likes on 60 Posts
2024 GLS450
Originally Posted by ua549
Except passing on a very busy two lane road where 50 mph to 70 mph acceleration times are critical. That is where the E300's lack of power fails.
If you put yourself in a situation where this car does not have the power you need, you need to evaluate whether the car or your driving style is the problem.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: New E slow selling, dealers discounting, read this.....



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 PM.