would you chose GLS550 or GL63?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
would you chose GLS550 or GL63?
background: New GLS63 was pretty amazing on a test drive. So was the new GLS550. I have never driven a GL63 (2013-2016). I own a 13' GL450
I really like having our GL and would like to upgrade soon. Thing is, the leases on GLSs (aside from the 450s) are so unattractive that purchasing becomes more appealing.
So, if I'm going to buy a year old GLS550, it makes sense to cross shop a 2-4 year old GL63.
Simple question: Which car has the better suspension? The GLS550 w/the new adaptive dampening is firm but luxurious and you can add the active curve if you like (although no one does). It was impressive. However, I find that the halo cars - the AMGs and BMW M cars actually use higher spec suspension items to achieve the best of both worlds. IMHO an X5M while stiffer than a X5 5.0 sport, actually rides better - more solid, slightly more velvety as it sucks up imperfections (Also the Ms don't have runflat tires....). I noticed this firm, solid yet satisfying ride quality in the E63, and slightly on the GLS63 test drive (as you can imagine, the exhaust note dominated the experience).
So which car has the more successful suspension? The GL63 or the GLS550 with the new dynamic select ADS?
Thanks for any feedback.
DRP
I really like having our GL and would like to upgrade soon. Thing is, the leases on GLSs (aside from the 450s) are so unattractive that purchasing becomes more appealing.
So, if I'm going to buy a year old GLS550, it makes sense to cross shop a 2-4 year old GL63.
Simple question: Which car has the better suspension? The GLS550 w/the new adaptive dampening is firm but luxurious and you can add the active curve if you like (although no one does). It was impressive. However, I find that the halo cars - the AMGs and BMW M cars actually use higher spec suspension items to achieve the best of both worlds. IMHO an X5M while stiffer than a X5 5.0 sport, actually rides better - more solid, slightly more velvety as it sucks up imperfections (Also the Ms don't have runflat tires....). I noticed this firm, solid yet satisfying ride quality in the E63, and slightly on the GLS63 test drive (as you can imagine, the exhaust note dominated the experience).
So which car has the more successful suspension? The GL63 or the GLS550 with the new dynamic select ADS?
Thanks for any feedback.
DRP
Last edited by BigJob13; 10-12-2017 at 09:58 AM.
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,943
Received 214 Likes
on
169 Posts
2012 Volt - 2005 E55 - 2011 G55 - 2013 GL63
We picked 550 over 63. We didn’t see the cost benefit of spending more to go 63 and both felt just as quick. Will be adding downpipes and tune to the 550 over the next few weeks.
As for active curve, it was the only was we would pick one and it’s standard on all 63. Suspension wise didn’t notice anything. But selecting from Sport to Comf makes a big diff esp running 22s. Have a few sections of road we switch to Comf for but otherwise ride on sport.
#3
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,411
Received 1,886 Likes
on
1,323 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Does the 63 use an mct?
i would want a TC on my GLS over an MCT
i would want a TC on my GLS over an MCT
#4
Senior Member
background: New GLS63 was pretty amazing on a test drive. So was the new GLS550. I have never driven a GL63 (2013-2016). I own a 13' GL450
I really like having our GL and would like to upgrade soon. Thing is, the leases on GLSs (aside from the 450s) are so unattractive that purchasing becomes more appealing.
So, if I'm going to buy a year old GLS550, it makes sense to cross shop a 2-4 year old GL63.
Simple question: Which car has the better suspension? The GLS550 w/the new adaptive dampening is firm but luxurious and you can add the active curve if you like (although no one does). It was impressive. However, I find that the halo cars - the AMGs and BMW M cars actually use higher spec suspension items to achieve the best of both worlds. IMHO an X5M while stiffer than a X5 5.0 sport, actually rides better - more solid, slightly more velvety as it sucks up imperfections (Also the Ms don't have runflat tires....). I noticed this firm, solid yet satisfying ride quality in the E63, and slightly on the GLS63 test drive (as you can imagine, the exhaust note dominated the experience).
So which car has the more successful suspension? The GL63 or the GLS550 with the new dynamic select ADS?
Thanks for any feedback.
DRP
I really like having our GL and would like to upgrade soon. Thing is, the leases on GLSs (aside from the 450s) are so unattractive that purchasing becomes more appealing.
So, if I'm going to buy a year old GLS550, it makes sense to cross shop a 2-4 year old GL63.
Simple question: Which car has the better suspension? The GLS550 w/the new adaptive dampening is firm but luxurious and you can add the active curve if you like (although no one does). It was impressive. However, I find that the halo cars - the AMGs and BMW M cars actually use higher spec suspension items to achieve the best of both worlds. IMHO an X5M while stiffer than a X5 5.0 sport, actually rides better - more solid, slightly more velvety as it sucks up imperfections (Also the Ms don't have runflat tires....). I noticed this firm, solid yet satisfying ride quality in the E63, and slightly on the GLS63 test drive (as you can imagine, the exhaust note dominated the experience).
So which car has the more successful suspension? The GL63 or the GLS550 with the new dynamic select ADS?
Thanks for any feedback.
DRP
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
lowered?
We picked 550 over 63. We didn’t see the cost benefit of spending more to go 63 and both felt just as quick. Will be adding downpipes and tune to the 550 over the next few weeks.
As for active curve, it was the only was we would pick one and it’s standard on all 63. Suspension wise didn’t notice anything. But selecting from Sport to Comf makes a big diff esp running 22s. Have a few sections of road we switch to Comf for but otherwise ride on sport.