GLC43 - Motor1.com review & criticisms
http://www.motor1.com/reviews/134659...c43-crossover/
The cons:
Calling the sound of the factory exhaust on this vehicle a "drone" is a little bit of a stretch. Is it audible? Yes. But that's what most AMG buyers want and expect from a performance tuned vehicle. Does is intrude on normal conversation, the sound system, etc? Not at all. If you've driven Lincoln town cars your whole life, you may find the exhaust note to be more than you're used to. I've you've driven any kind of performance car, or anything with an aftermarket exhaust, you'll most likely find the GLC43 hardly noticeable. IMO, the engineers did an exceptional job on the exhaust to keep it tame during relaxed driving, with just the right amount of sound when you're getting on it.
Same thing goes for the suspension. Yes, of course it is tuned stiffer than the GLC300, once again b/c AMG buyers want better handling and more communication/feel from the road. To say it rides "very stiffly" is ridiculous, even in the context of suvs. Both the base Macan and F Pace have at least as firm a ride as the GLC43, if not firmer. Again, it makes me think the author of this article is used to driving a crown vic or a lexus es or something.
Is the GLC43 perfect? Of course not. But I think it offers the perfect level of sport for someone looking for more excitement in their daily drive. And if you don't want those things, well then that's why the GLC300 exists.
Calling the sound of the factory exhaust on this vehicle a "drone" is a little bit of a stretch. Is it audible? Yes. But that's what most AMG buyers want and expect from a performance tuned vehicle. Does is intrude on normal conversation, the sound system, etc? Not at all. If you've driven Lincoln town cars your whole life, you may find the exhaust note to be more than you're used to. I've you've driven any kind of performance car, or anything with an aftermarket exhaust, you'll most likely find the GLC43 hardly noticeable. IMO, the engineers did an exceptional job on the exhaust to keep it tame during relaxed driving, with just the right amount of sound when you're getting on it.
Same thing goes for the suspension. Yes, of course it is tuned stiffer than the GLC300, once again b/c AMG buyers want better handling and more communication/feel from the road. To say it rides "very stiffly" is ridiculous, even in the context of suvs. Both the base Macan and F Pace have at least as firm a ride as the GLC43, if not firmer. Again, it makes me think the author of this article is used to driving a crown vic or a lexus es or something.
Is the GLC43 perfect? Of course not. But I think it offers the perfect level of sport for someone looking for more excitement in their daily drive. And if you don't want those things, well then that's why the GLC300 exists.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
http://www.motoring.com.au/mercedes-...arison-105841/
Imagine what "no one" will say tomorrow.
Sarcasm aside, plenty of different kinds of people buy AMGs. Otherwise there wouldn't be a "Comfort" setting. (Or an "Eco" mode for that matter.) Some people want it all. AMG is just like any other company: They want to make money, so they're going to broaden the appeal of the brand as much as they can. (Much to the disappointment of some enthusiasts, I'm sure.)
Is it bother me ? Not at all.
I have taken the GLC43 on a long road trip, I had the music on just enough to carry out a normal conversation with my wife and I hardly notice the exhaust noise when it's on the highway (maybe I didn't pay too much attention to it).
The suspension is a bit on the firm side even on comfort mode, which I blame it on the run flat tires.
Imagine what "no one" will say tomorrow.
Sarcasm aside, plenty of different kinds of people buy AMGs. Otherwise there wouldn't be a "Comfort" setting. (Or an "Eco" mode for that matter.) Some people want it all. AMG is just like any other company: They want to make money, so they're going to broaden the appeal of the brand as much as they can. (Much to the disappointment of some enthusiasts, I'm sure.)
Like you said before: The GLC43 isn't perfect. But right now it's the best option out there for me. I'm just using the power of the interwebs to get the notice of other people who have the same problem I do. Maybe collectively we'll be able to come up with a solution.
I don't have one yet. Mine isn't due to be built until mid-March. All my comments have been regarding the one GLC43 that my dealer had.
I don't have one yet. Mine isn't due to be built until mid-March. All my comments have been regarding the one GLC43 that my dealer had.
The new upcoming BMW X3 40i (non-msport) would probably address your needs pretty well. Even the current non m sport X3 35i would do it. Audi also offers a standard Q5 with the 3.0T engine, also along the lines of what you are talking about. Mercedes currently does not offer such a model in the GLC range.
Curious - given your complains about the GLC43 - why did you pass on the BMW and Audi for it?
Regardless, as I'm sure you already know, you can address your concerns when your GLC comes in with a trip to a custom exhaust shop and a -1 or -2 tire/wheel combo with non RFTs.
The idea that I can say I own an AMG was a factor as well.
I guess all I'm saying is that the pro's outweighed the cons.
(While I'm fantasizing: I'd replace the Benz 9-speed automatic with the ZF 8-speed.)
Curious - given your complains about the GLC43 - why did you pass on the BMW and Audi for it?
Audi Q5: I only test drove the 2.0T. (The 3.0T is rare in my neck of the woods.)
- Pros: I liked the exterior styling. It felt well built. Has a usable back seat. The 2.0T had decent acceleration and the transmission was smooth.
- Cons: The interior is a bit bland and the infotainment - even back in 2015 - felt a bit dated. Also: Everyone seemingly has one.
BMW X3: Ho boy...Okay, story time:
My friend and I walked in to the local BMW dealership and he asked to test drive a specific (CPO) 528i they'd advertised. We waited almost - no joke - 20 minutes because they "lost the keys". When they finally pulled it up, you could stand 10 feet away and see that it had been dinged and scratched in a bunch of places. Mind you, this was a CPO vehicle. Between the wait time and the condition of the vehicle, he was pretty disgusted and he turned it away without even test driving it.
Next, I asked to test drive a used X3. There was more waiting while they tried to find the keys. (WTF?) Salesguy finally pulls up a X3 28i xDrive. It was labeled as a CPO and I *think* it was a 2013. I like the shape of the X3, though I wish it had dual exhaust. Dark metallic blue exterior, beige interior. The cargo area had an abundance of scuff marks all over it. Looks like it had been used to transport tires or somesuch repeatedly. I sit in the drivers seat. I notice more scuff marks on the door and footwell. Carpet isn't in the best shape. I think to myself: "Did they even bother to clean this thing?!?" At this point, I couldn't help but notice the abundance of plastics used in the interior. Gauge cluster is pretty boring to look at. The whole thing felt cheap. Test drove it anyway to just get a feel for it. I heard several squeaks while going over potholes and such. I couldn't believe they were trying to sell this thing for the price they were asking. ($42k!) I remember walking away thinking "That's supposed to be a luxury car?!? For that price?!? F**k that!"
While I'm sure the BMW X3 40i would be a hoot to drive, you can hopefully see why I'm sour on BMW!
While I'm at it, I also test drove the following:
- Acura RDX - Despite what Honda/Acura thinks: Acura isn't a luxury brand. The RDX is not a luxury vehicle.
- Lexus NX200 - Engine engine sounds horrible when pressed. The NX200 had one thing that I wish the GLC had: The rear seats reclined!!
- Infinity QX50 - Dated interior. The back seat clearly wasn't designed for adults. I have no idea why they even put 4 doors on this thing. The trunk was practically non-existent too. Strong engine though.
- Porsche Macan S* - Great vehicle and it doesn't surprise me at all that 1) Porsche raised the MSRP up by ~$5k after the first year 2) It's still difficult to negotiate discounts. Porsche clearly prioritized driving dynamics over utility which is why I dismissed it. (For it's size, the front seats are too cozy and the back seats are even worse.)

I can understand where you are coming from.
Wanting "feel" through the chassis doesn't HAVE to mean crashiness on small road imperfections.... the very low profile run flats certainly exacerbate this characteristic..
Wanting a solid responsive powertrain doesn't have to mean poorly attenuated frequencies at highway cruising speeds.
I had these same issues with my S205 AMG... (chipped and exhausts added amongst other things).. ie I like engine noise but at the right rpm and frequencies..
I want good tight handing but not with zero ride..
To date I addressed the issues by switching the run flats to conventional summer performance tyres, and by adding copious dynamat to the interior of the vehicle to reduce crappy road noise, wind noise and the majority of the small drone which was present..
So after a little tweaking (okay stripping the interior of your car and rebuilding it is a little more than tweaking but... ) it is now pretty much exactly what I always wanted..
perhaps a little fettling will get you where you want to go to?






