Chasray

Is the high end burmeister that much better. Than e sndard burmeister on the S model

Roowah

I wouldn't call the Burmester system in the GLC high end. In fact, there aren't any Burmester parts inside it. From what I gather, it's an improvement over the stock system, and yes the speaker covers look very nice, but I would rate the sound performance as mediocre at best. No equalizer, just basic bass, treble, mid range adjustments, and some basic surround sound settings (front, back, all). My last car had an HK system that I think was better and had more sound stage options.

AverageGuy

I agree with Roowah, it's not high end. However, it is way better than the base system (but I don't know if the cost justifies the price) You could put something way better in. I've read where someone ripped out the Burmeister system and it uses the same components as the base system. I've read it's in the programming, maybe a better amp, not sure though. I can tell you that the Burmeister system is better in the GLE350 which I had as a loaner recently, maybe an additional subwoofer or something, just sounded a lot better.

For the cost though, it may be better just to use aftermarket, probably a whole lot better sound for less money.

yavor

Chrisk03

Thanks for confirming the settings info, I was looking for an equalizer and/or at least additional sub settings...guess not. I'm not an audiophile, so the system is fine for me and is what it is at this point, especially with the fancy grills. HA.

Here's the webpage for the GLC.... https://www.burmester.de/en/automoti...-benz/glc.html

PS. It's BurMESTER, NOT BurMEISTER...

fabbrisd1

Well... Burmester add's tweets to the mirro triangles on a A front pillars - adds "center" front speaker in the top of the dash - and adds additional/larger "woofer" in front - and "adds rear "center" speaker.

In comparision the "standard" system does a decent job holding up it owns in comparison to the Burmester...I too like the HK a bit better because of 7logic wider front soundfield in the HK... both the standard and upgraded Burmester really shine better with better quality imput... most Sirius channels suck quality wise now..HD FM can be not bad... Bluetooth depends on the quality of the source/phone more than anything else..

Tylbran

mike7ee

If you're looking for better than standard audio equality for a low price, it's good.
If you're looking for a high end Burmester system, you won't find it for this $800 upgrade.

A Burmester audio system upgrade on a Porsche costs $7,500...so it's best to be realistic about what you're getting.

Carmbos

I decided not to upgrade the speakers, and having had loaners with the Burmester speakers, I can say it's a lot better. You can't put these in after market with Mercedes. Depending on how much the upgrade is, I might consider doing it. I'm not 18 anymore, so I don't feel the need to blast the stereo, so I am good with the standar.

waisoserious

I think the standard sucks. I have the standard. Ive never heard the burmester. But the standard is awful. However I not keen to pay for retrofitting it which I heard costs around 3k-4k. Id rather just keep the money and spend it on my next car.

Gee Spoolin

I think OP is referring to the upgraded sound system as offered only for the S-class, which is an option that costs a whopping $6,000 give or take

Unlike the "lowly" GLC's which come standard with a generic stereo, the S-class is equipped with Burnmester as standard equipment. Burmester High End is a whole another level of audio greatness. I had the chance to experience this upgraded system, and could tell that the sound is more dynamic and crisp with my untrained ears. Definitely has that 3D surround sound feel to it without being artificial or overly dramatic. And then you get this cool but somewhat gimmicky tweeters that spin out as you start the car, and of course more metal speaker grilles for beautification

Not sure if it's worth it, but I guess the extra cost shouldn't be an issue when you are of the S-class demographics.

taphil

Agreed. It's a good upgrade for $850. Better and easier decision to make than having only the base option vs. a $4000 high end option.

CaptainJack

I did the upgrade to my GLC and love it. I'm at the age when, as someone else said, I don't blast my stereo that much any more,
but I do listen to symphony music alot(my how tastes have changed)and the upgrade is wonderful.
I used to own nightclubs back in the day and when we were tuning the sound system, I would use one track to test with; Money for Nothing
by Dire Straights. We are talking about systems with thousands of watts of power, servo driven subs, etc. It was a song that I knew very well
and would test the system properly. I know sound reproduction both live and recorded, hell my theater room is THX 9.1.4, so I'm still into this.
When I picked up the car, while still at the dealership, I tweaked the sound settings a bit and on the way home I fired up that
song with the volume at "11", and all I can say is "WOW".
I don't know what an S with the upgrade would sound like, but for us mere mortals, the upgrade on the GLC is WELL worth the money if you enjoy quality sound
reproduction.
The sound upgrade and the LED headlights are the best money I've spent on a car in my lifetime.
Jack

hyperion667

Oh man did they change their name??

Roowah

Good to hear from someone with the Burmester system that has experience in sound tuning. I'm curious on what settings you prefer for bass, treble, midrange, fade, and surround sound setting (front, back, or all seats)?

CasemLuke

Ha @CaptainJack -- I wanted to ask you the same question... what are your settings? I haphazardly adjust mine -- depending on what sounds good...

wmc021

Totally agree

waisoserious

How much did it cost you?

CaptainJack

The sound upgrade? I think it was $850, worth every penny in my opinion.
Some of the comments on this thread would suggest it isn't worth it, that the sound
isn't that good. I have no idea what they are comparing the GLC upgraded sound system to,
but as I said before, for us mere mortals, the upgrade is well worth the money.

hyperion667

The 3D in my car is aweswome

Roowah

Hey CapainJack, from an earlier thread, I was curious what are your audio settings?

Chrisk03

+1

I have Surround on for ALL seats, but everything else settings-wise is set at "0". I usually add a few/couple for treble, MAYBE 1 for bass, and a couple to the rear for fader, but haven't done yet. Would love to know from more of an "audiophile" what their settings are too.

hifivoice

I compared the sound systems in the show room. The differences are not very immense, but definitely noticeable, and to me they were relevant enough to choose for the Burmester. Especially the treble on the standard systems sounds "scratchy", the Burmester a lot more refined. In general, I think the deep bass is overdone, the fundamental region is missing, the mid is too prominent, and the treble is way too loud. So I fiddled with the equalizer, turning back the mid and especially the treble quite some. The surround sound enables the tweeters in the back, changing the timbre not to its benefits, so I leave those off. Furthermore, I put the sound stage a bit forward, which makes it more dynamic and timbre wise more correct.

CaptainJack

Sorry for the delay, Treble +1, Mid +1 and Bass +3. Balance +2 to right side of car and Fade is -1 to back.
I've always been of the opinion that sound engineers know what they are doing and mix a song accordingly. My
adjustments are minor to account for changes in my hearing(I'm 64). I'm the only one in the car 90% of the time.
Like I said, great sound system for the bucks.
Jack

ACN

The upgraded soubd system for the glc is a joke. Save your $850, add an additional $200-$1000(depending on what you want) and go aftermarket installation.

We spent $1500 and it's awesome. The problem with glc and most car manufacturers is the lack of mid range speakers. All they install now is high range tweeters. So tot add custom 8" will cost you more money.