Car and Driver Preview/ 2 Versions
March Issue:
Some interesting tidbits, wouldn't call them facts just yet as the GLK isn't in production, but the car mags are usually right about 90% of the time when the car is already in test mule form. There will be two different versions of the GLK, one an off road version and the other a strictly on road lowered version. There will be no diesel in the U.S. at the start of production. Instead it will use the same engines as the C class for which its based off of. A 3.0 228hp V6 and the 3.5 268 hp V6. It will use the same frame as the current (w204) C class including the same suspension just beefed up on the off road version. All versions will be 4matic and 7 speed automatic equipped. Estimated prices start at $35k for the base model and top off at $50k for a fully loaded GLK350. Nothing really new here other than the two different versions being offered and maybe the lack of the diesel, although I didn't really expect that to come to the states. |
Originally Posted by chilledbenz
(Post 2623158)
There will be no diesel in the U.S. at the start of production. Instead it will use the same engines as the C class for which its based off of. A 3.0 228hp V6 and the 3.5 268 hp V6.
|
Originally Posted by chilledbenz
There will be two different versions of the GLK, one an off road version and the other a strictly on road lowered version.
Originally Posted by chilledbenz
It will use the same frame as the current (w204) C class including the same suspension just beefed up on the off road version.
|
Oh, yes. No body-on-frame SUVs from any reputable manuafacturers any more.
|
Lol yeah, I'm old school and still refer to the word frame..but its a generic term anymore.
|
Originally Posted by lkchris
(Post 2628829)
Oh, yes. No body-on-frame SUVs from any reputable manuafacturers any more.
Three words Land Rover Defender, you don't get more reputable than those guys. |
Originally Posted by KiwiRobbie
(Post 2630523)
Three words Land Rover Defender, you don't get more reputable than those guys.
|
I used to sell Land Rovers they are not the maintenance pigs people tend to think they are, BMW sorted that out, plus the Defender is almost as unbreakable as a Toyota Hilux, another big plus the things are built to be repaired in the field by a squaddie with limited tools and generally bugger all ability.
|
Not to try and get into a shouting match, but my AAA magazine had Land Rover and Range Rover listed as number one and number three in service visits of new cars. A Porsche was second...and really of no surprize the E class was number five.
|
An onroad and offroad version? Sounds like VW Tiguan strategy to me. I still prefer the MLK concept.
|
Originally Posted by lkchris
(Post 2624490)
FWIW, the C300 is called C280 in all markets except the USA and the engine everywhere is 2.8 l.
Link to Australia specs: http://www2.mercedes-benz.com.au/con...an08%20RRP.pdf |
Land Rover
"Throwing bricks at a dead cow."
LR is as reliable as Lucas Electric and Ford Motor.('get a bicycle or stay home!) Off Road= (with the certainty of driving yourself home in the same vehicle you left in; with out being flatbedded in between for a two week stop at the Garage) Man, Unimog, Glendewagen, Toyota[Diesel landcruiser,Diesel 4 runner ,Diesel RAV 4,Diesel HiLux] |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands