MBWorld.org Forums

MBWorld.org Forums (https://mbworld.org/forums/)
-   GLK-Class (X204) (https://mbworld.org/forums/glk-class-x204-94/)
-   -   Passive Air Restrictor? (https://mbworld.org/forums/glk-class-x204/683945-passive-air-restrictor.html)

dbr9tifosi 09-28-2017 01:26 PM

Passive Air Restrictor?
 
1 Attachment(s)
Is this injection molded structure (red) in front of the air intake a passive air restrictor?

If I remove a section of it, would horsepower increase (theoretically) or would the ECU compensate for the change in intake and performance remains the same.

bop11 09-29-2017 09:13 AM

Possibly a flow director to help ram air. MB would not want to spend money to install a part to reduce power and efficiency. If they could do without it they would. Restricting air flow by the addition of more parts at an added cost has never been a method to improve gas millage.

cergun 06-14-2018 12:36 PM

I thought it was to prevent rain water getting in to the intake.

CarbonKevinYWG 06-14-2018 12:56 PM


Originally Posted by cergun (Post 7478800)
I thought it was to prevent rain water getting in to the intake.

Ding ding ding, we have a winner!

That geometry is definitely meant to separate water from intake air.

Also, it's not even close to the only inlet path for intake air, so you shouldn't think in terms of "ALL of my engine's air has to get through these ten tiny slots".

There's nothing to be gained by removing material from that area, and there's a lot of potential harm to be caused. Put down the Dremel.

Google Image search for "hydrolock piston", you'll see why water separation is kind of a good thing to have.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands