Hamilton's Ego
From F1i -The tenuous relationship between McLaren teammates Fernando Alonso and Lewis Hamilton went beyond breaking point in Hungary. Championship leader and British rookie Hamilton admitted after winning in Budapest that the pair are now in the midst of a two-way code of silence. He said that just before the race, "I went round to the whole team and said, 'Come on, let's do this. Good luck'. There was only one person I didn't (speak to). "If I walk into the motor home and I see (Alonso) I will speak to him. "But I am not going to go looking for him to make him feel better." Alonso, 26, told Spanish radio Cadena SER that he was astonished not only by his teammate's foul-mouthed outburst on the radio with Ron Dennis on Saturday but at how Hamilton actually instigated the complaint to the stewards about the delayed qualifying pit stop. Alonso said: "We went to complain about ourselves. We were one and two in qualifying but it was one of the most surreal moments I have experienced in F1." Hamilton, however, denied asking the stewards to investigate the matter, despite members of the press finding him in conversation with one of the FIA representatives after qualifying. "I was downstairs and one of the stewards was there but we didn't really discuss it," he said.
I thought this year might be boring with out some great GP personalities (Villeneuve, MS and going back a bit Eddie Irvine) but I must say it's been pretty exciting on and off the track.
And if you thought this level of subversion was bad, you've forgotten the days of drivers crashing into each other at 150+ mph. And cars then weren't as safe as they are now.
Is Hamilton's ego/talent quotient higher than, say, Eddie Irvine's? Arguably, no (LH ego just as large, but bigger talent). Does it really matter? No. IMO.
From F1i -The tenuous relationship between McLaren teammates Fernando Alonso and Lewis Hamilton went beyond breaking point in Hungary. Championship leader and British rookie Hamilton admitted after winning in Budapest that the pair are now in the midst of a two-way code of silence. He said that just before the race, "I went round to the whole team and said, 'Come on, let's do this. Good luck'. There was only one person I didn't (speak to). "If I walk into the motor home and I see (Alonso) I will speak to him. "But I am not going to go looking for him to make him feel better." Alonso, 26, told Spanish radio Cadena SER that he was astonished not only by his teammate's foul-mouthed outburst on the radio with Ron Dennis on Saturday but at how Hamilton actually instigated the complaint to the stewards about the delayed qualifying pit stop. Alonso said: "We went to complain about ourselves. We were one and two in qualifying but it was one of the most surreal moments I have experienced in F1." Hamilton, however, denied asking the stewards to investigate the matter, despite members of the press finding him in conversation with one of the FIA representatives after qualifying. "I was downstairs and one of the stewards was there but we didn't really discuss it," he said.
I thought this year might be boring with out some great GP personalities (Villeneuve, MS and going back a bit Eddie Irvine) but I must say it's been pretty exciting on and off the track.
Unfortunately though, the truth of the matter is that history of the spor indicates that it takes selfishness to become a winner.
I just find that Hamilton is shooting the hand that feeds him. And that this instant success at this level has gone to his head, it's almost as if he has the red mist (talked about in all levels of motorsport) all the time, without thinking of a bigger picture
This might sound racist, it is NOT meant to be in the slightest, but it appears that while Ham is obviously a phenomenally talented and smooth driver (remember what Sir Jackie Stewart always said about this quality), his whole dad/bro/afro-american-race thing is starting to really wear thin and is a little overbearing, and glimses of his "real inner" character are starting to show through. MM and Dennis have made the dude whatever he his (just like Red Bull did for Speed....$55M is what I saw Peter Windsor add up what Red Bull spent on Scott Speed before it was totally flushed down). The dude needs to have a lot more respect for his team, the opp he has been given, MM and his incredible blessings....

but too often people who have sudden success forget and disavow those whose shoulders they have stoon on to even get there, w/o whom they would be nowhere. Of course, if anyone of us was 22 and suddenly had the record and limelight that Ham has.....what would we do???
This is not a defense of Ham, just some perspective. Ham s/ continue to act like he did after the first 2-3 races and take Kimi as a model of stoicism and never saying bad things about his team or managers. No matter what anyone says about Kimi, he is widely respected for never bad-mouthing his team, teammates or bestowing blame on anyone else; his humility is also most respectful.http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=40326
Trending Topics

The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Unfortunately though, the truth of the matter is that history of the spor indicates that it takes selfishness to become a winner.
I wouldn't expect the World Champion of lawn bowling or snooker to be a nice guy. Sure, he might be a nicer guy than your star footballer, but you get the point....
Not that any of us should excuse behaviour such as, say, M. Tyson's - in or outside the arena. But competitive sports is not a popularity contest (except to the extent that endorsments/sponsorships need to be attained/maintained).
That being said, it is a shame when prodigies destroy their careers through hubris, being/becoming a spoilt brat, losing focus, etc. It's a shame not so much because their antics offend our sensibilities, but because we lose the pleasure of seeing a great talent come to fruition.
$0.02
I just find that Hamilton is shooting the hand that feeds him. And that this instant success at this level has gone to his head, it's almost as if he has the red mist (talked about in all levels of motorsport) all the time, without thinking of a bigger picture
However, I do agree that (hopefully sooner rather than later) LH realizes it will take MS or Mika levels of professionalism to be really successful.
The days of "just get in the car and drive" are long gone, if they ever existed. Winning a WDC these days requires being a highly talented driver at the top of his game AND basically being a CEO of a small company. If you can't get the engineers, designers, technicians, mechanics, etc. to work with you, it won't matter how talented you are. And the team principals and sponsors will have a lot of say in how much of these resources are allocated to you.
MS did not win all his GPs and WDCs simply because he was the best driver of his era, but because he was also arguably the most professional and disciplined.
LH could conceivably win the WDC this year, but if that turns out to be his best year in F1, it will ultimately be regarded as a fluke.
This might sound racist, it is NOT meant to be in the slightest, but it appears that while Ham is obviously a phenomenally talented and smooth driver (remember what Sir Jackie Stewart always said about this quality), his whole dad/bro/afro-american-race thing is starting to really wear thin and is a little overbearing, and glimses of his "real inner" character are starting to show through. MM and Dennis have made the dude whatever he his (just like Red Bull did for Speed....$55M is what I saw Peter Windsor add up what Red Bull spent on Scott Speed before it was totally flushed down). The dude needs to have a lot more respect for his team, the opp he has been given, MM and his incredible blessings....

but too often people who have sudden success forget and disavow those whose shoulders they have stoon on to even get there, w/o whom they would be nowhere. Of course, if anyone of us was 22 and suddenly had the record and limelight that Ham has.....what would we do???
This is not a defense of Ham, just some perspective. Ham s/ continue to act like he did after the first 2-3 races and take Kimi as a model of stoicism and never saying bad things about his team or managers. No matter what anyone says about Kimi, he is widely respected for never bad-mouthing his team, teammates or bestowing blame on anyone else; his humility is also most respectful.
This might sound racist, it is NOT meant to be in the slightest, but it appears that while Ham is obviously a phenomenally talented and smooth driver (remember what Sir Jackie Stewart always said about this quality), his whole dad/bro/afro-american-race thing is starting to really wear thin and is a little overbearing, and glimses of his "real inner" character are starting to show through. MM and Dennis have made the dude whatever he his (just like Red Bull did for Speed....$55M is what I saw Peter Windsor add up what Red Bull spent on Scott Speed before it was totally flushed down). The dude needs to have a lot more respect for his team, the opp he has been given, MM and his incredible blessings....

but too often people who have sudden success forget and disavow those whose shoulders they have stoon on to even get there, w/o whom they would be nowhere. Of course, if anyone of us was 22 and suddenly had the record and limelight that Ham has.....what would we do???
This is not a defense of Ham, just some perspective. Ham s/ continue to act like he did after the first 2-3 races and take Kimi as a model of stoicism and never saying bad things about his team or managers. No matter what anyone says about Kimi, he is widely respected for never bad-mouthing his team, teammates or bestowing blame on anyone else; his humility is also most respectful.I thikn that would fit MS better then Kimi... sure kimi didnt bad mouth its team but true class was shown last year by MS in Japan where he lost the WDC-- you saw him going back to the pits to thank HIS team instead of going hay wire...




Let's remind ourselves how tough Senna was and his full-speed usage of pitt lane to set a lap record. After that one incident the speed limit was introduced.
F1 is not like working in a bank. There is no prize for coming to work.


See thats the thing ... thats the question... is hammy as good as the great ones that have come in our past ? the brits already think so because hes winning..but hes just in a winning car..... come to think of it... theirs not many brits in the hall of fame
Let's remind ourselves how tough Senna was and his full-speed usage of pitt lane to set a lap record. After that one incident the speed limit was introduced.
F1 is not like working in a bank. There is no prize for coming to work.
There's no question that he is a good driver but in F1 its universally accepted that 70% of the performance comes from the car/team and 30% the driver. In order to compare him with the other drivers on the grid (let alone Senna) he has to compete in the same or at least similarly performing car over time and on different tracks. Do you think for example that by placing him on a Williams, he will do better than Rosberg? How about Heidfelt, he continuously does well with an a proven to be inferior car, don't you think that he was going to do well or even better on a McLaren?
Regarding Senna; Senna proved himself time and time again to be a great driver, it took him 4 years driving for much inferior teams (Toleman, John Player Special), he still drove impressive enough to get him a seat to McLaren and win the championship. Furthermore, you can't really compare, the cars those days were much harder to control, had I believe more power, a lot worse tires, no electronic controls and poor aerodynamics. Michael Shumacher, wasn't a match back then for Senna and Prost. Luis hasn't even prove yet if he is better than Schumacher. Also, the drivers of that time didn't have the training aids that today's drivers have (i.e. simulators).
Finally, I believe that the most important thing for a driver is the psychology. Back then they knew that a crash (i.e. similar to any of the few that Hamilton had this year) could cost them their life!
There's no question that he is a good driver but in F1 its universally accepted that 70% of the performance comes from the car/team and 30% the driver. In order to compare him with the other drivers on the grid (let alone Senna) he has to compete in the same or at least similarly performing car over time and on different tracks. Do you think for example that by placing him on a Williams, he will do better than Rosberg? How about Heidfelt, he continuously does well with an a proven to be inferior car, don't you think that he was going to do well or even better on a McLaren?
Regarding Senna; Senna proved himself time and time again to be a great driver, it took him 4 years driving for much inferior teams (Toleman, John Player Special), he still drove impressive enough to get him a seat to McLaren and win the championship. Furthermore, you can't really compare, the cars those days were much harder to control, had I believe more power, a lot worse tires, no electronic controls and poor aerodynamics. Michael Shumacher, wasn't a match back then for Senna and Prost. Luis hasn't even prove yet if he is better than Schumacher. Also, the drivers of that time didn't have the training aids that today's drivers have (i.e. simulators).
Finally, I believe that the most important thing for a driver is the psychology. Back then they knew that a crash (i.e. similar to any of the few that Hamilton had this year) could cost them their life!
http://insider.speedtv.com/viewtopic.php?t=153609
Now, its hasn't been made clear if the delay at the pit-stop (insident you are referring to) it was only by Alonso's choice for being pissed at Hamilton or if there were other people involved from the team. It was said that it was Alonso's engineer that counted exactly the seconds of the delay needed to let him go. In addition to that, it was also said (not confirmed by the team) that Alonso was left to qualify with used prime tires instead of the option ones, so even though Hamilton wouldn't be able to get an extra lap, they thought that Alonso wouldn't be able to beat Hamilton's time! At the end he did.




Lewis has excellent line through corners and a cold manner in keeping his car at a steady pace through a lap. He doesnt have blistering fast laps and then slow ones (except when he rides slicks in the rain).
I see a lot of Senna in LH. Not the fire but certainly a lot of control. Keeping his engine running in the gravel was good but his control in the wet was pretty ordinary.
Last edited by benzmodz; Aug 10, 2007 at 09:40 AM.
http://insider.speedtv.com/viewtopic.php?t=153609
Now, its hasn't been made clear if the delay at the pit-stop (insident you are referring to) it was only by Alonso's choice for being pissed at Hamilton or if there were other people involved from the team. It was said that it was Alonso's engineer that counted exactly the seconds of the delay needed to let him go. In addition to that, it was also said (not confirmed by the team) that Alonso was left to qualify with used prime tires instead of the option ones, so even though Hamilton wouldn't be able to get an extra lap, they thought that Alonso wouldn't be able to beat Hamilton's time! At the end he did.
I know of all that too. If the whole shebang was orchestrated by Alonsos engineer McLaren has a big ego-problem on it`s hands and it needs to be solved. And i do not believe that Hamilton is the one to blame.
Last edited by erol/frost; Aug 10, 2007 at 03:17 PM.


