S-Class (W222) 2014-2020

2014 S Class Revealed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-26-2013, 09:21 PM
  #51  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cookstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2005 ML350, 2008 GL320, 2013 Gl350
Originally Posted by nyca
So the V8 option is there for you. But alot of buyers would get those cars with V6 power, especially older buyers.
unless there is a huge price reduction I don't think the majority of American buyers will go for it (gas is dirt cheap in the States compared to Europe or Canada), Canada is a different story we LOVE Diesels and V6 engines.
For example in the U.S the GL350 accounts for 20-30% of sale whereas in Canada is makes up 80-90% of the sales.

Something about a V6 in a S-class bothers me, I dont want the same engine they put into a $45,000 C-class in my $130,000+ S-class, I am all for fuel economy and I have had two Diesels back to back but the S-class is a different story. I can live with a smaller engine in my family hauler as the wife drives it and it would make no difference if it has 240 hp or 550hp but not in a S-class.
Old 03-26-2013, 09:57 PM
  #52  
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
K-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Some awesome S-Class photos in that article linked. Those classics are gorgeous of course but to me the W126 is the pinnacle of more relatively modern S-Classes. That car has a soul. Bruno Sacco was on point with Mercedes design back in the day.













Old 03-28-2013, 03:11 AM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
Joyride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Winnipeg, MB Canada
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'13 MB GL350 BLUETEC, '10 MB E63 AMG, '95 MB S600, '84 MB 380 SEL
Originally Posted by cookstar
unless there is a huge price reduction I don't think the majority of American buyers will go for it (gas is dirt cheap in the States compared to Europe or Canada), Canada is a different story we LOVE Diesels and V6 engines.
For example in the U.S the GL350 accounts for 20-30% of sale whereas in Canada is makes up 80-90% of the sales.

Something about a V6 in a S-class bothers me, I dont want the same engine they put into a $45,000 C-class in my $130,000+ S-class, I am all for fuel economy and I have had two Diesels back to back but the S-class is a different story. I can live with a smaller engine in my family hauler as the wife drives it and it would make no difference if it has 240 hp or 550hp but not in a S-class.
Agree with your point of view. I so wish they would make the V8 Diesel engine available. I was always hoping they would make it available for the GL, like Europe used to have. Audi still makes a V8 diesel which is available in their A8 if I'm not mistaken, but that is for Europe as well.
Old 04-05-2013, 09:14 PM
  #54  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
nyca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Twin turbo 335 HP twin turbo V6 coming to the S (I imagine its new entry level slotting below the V8, nobody buys the current hybrid), and the E (E550 goes away) as reported in this month's Automobile magazine. Some buyers might not opt for it, but MB is crazy to just give away an entire sales segment to Audi and BMW here that has lower cost offerings because they have a charged V6 available.

Last edited by nyca; 04-05-2013 at 09:17 PM.
Old 04-05-2013, 09:20 PM
  #55  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CoolBDPhenom03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 4,026
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Vivid Racing '09 C63 AMG
I saw an S400 hybrid...once...
Old 04-06-2013, 12:00 AM
  #56  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cookstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2005 ML350, 2008 GL320, 2013 Gl350
The new Porsche Panarama diesel will have 300 hp vs the 240hp MB has now and most likely will make it to North America, MB will probably follow suit in couple years.
Old 04-06-2013, 06:24 AM
  #57  
MBWorld God!

 
hyperion667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: 39.515509, -111.549668
Posts: 30,567
Received 3,351 Likes on 2,807 Posts
2012 CLS63
...and cost 45% more money
Old 04-08-2013, 06:07 PM
  #58  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bensitto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 1,336
Received 31 Likes on 25 Posts
S550, R350, GL550, ML63 AMG
Love the new look, it's missing a couple of key features that truely make it an S-Class: wider fenders over the front and rear wheels like the W221, and the ability to seat 3 in the back. Looks like this would be the CL or CLS interior...

Other than that I love what they did with the detail and craftsmanship in the interior. Needs aluminum sport pedals as a factory option! Can't wait to see one later this year!
Old 04-08-2013, 07:18 PM
  #59  
Super Member
 
ajm0623's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 589
Received 119 Likes on 68 Posts
‘16 g550; '20 s560; '15 targa4s
you will be able to fit three in the back seat here in the usa. unless you order one of the rear seat packages that will be offered. me thinks the majority of the cars imported into the usa will be the base backseat variant long wheel base which will allow for three people - just like the current 221 chassis.
Old 04-08-2013, 08:41 PM
  #60  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MBNUT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 4,081
Received 938 Likes on 685 Posts
2010 E350 4Matic
Originally Posted by bensitto
Love the new look, it's missing a couple of key features that truely make it an S-Class: wider fenders over the front and rear wheels like the W221!
I like the W221 but this car's looks have it all over the W211 particularly the elimination of the fender bulges.
Old 04-22-2013, 11:12 AM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
AshleyAlissa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fort Myers
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E420
Latest Photos of the new S-Class, this time in white.

http://www.emercedesbenz.com/autos/m...ised-in-white/

Old 04-22-2013, 09:54 PM
  #62  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
nyca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
It may be a better car, but the exterior is so plain looking. The W221 was so distinctive.
Old 04-22-2013, 09:59 PM
  #63  
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
K-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
I just think it looks so disjointed. I feel like M-B have a group of 20 designers who do things they think is "cool" in a singular context, and never even talk with one another to create one distinct holistic vibe. The facelift E-Class is the worst showing of this, and the S isn't much better, IMO.

Scribbly lines everywhere, no cohesion, just a bunch of random thoughts pieced together. M-B's design team has lost all harmony thus eliminating that minimalistic, clean and precise design idiom which made the brand so famous. Audi now does clean and minimalistic, which used to be M-B's trademark, and although I'm not an Audi fan, it's working wonders for them as they gain major inroads especially into the "youth" market that M-B so clearly desperately wants, yet goes about in such a detatched manner (and in a very panderingly way with brash design traits IMO usually reserved for Asian car manufacturers).
Old 04-23-2013, 01:33 PM
  #64  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C280 Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Saratoga Springs, New York & Sarasota, Florida.
Posts: 3,462
Received 407 Likes on 336 Posts
MB’s
Originally Posted by AshleyAlissa
Latest Photos of the new S-Class, this time in white.

http://www.emercedesbenz.com/autos/m...ised-in-white/

Looks beautiful! I like it Ill take one in AMG Package please
Old 04-23-2013, 02:39 PM
  #65  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cookstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2005 ML350, 2008 GL320, 2013 Gl350
Originally Posted by K-A
I just think it looks so disjointed. I feel like M-B have a group of 20 designers who do things they think is "cool" in a singular context, and never even talk with one another to create one distinct holistic vibe. The facelift E-Class is the worst showing of this, and the S isn't much better, IMO.

Scribbly lines everywhere, no cohesion, just a bunch of random thoughts pieced together. M-B's design team has lost all harmony thus eliminating that minimalistic, clean and precise design idiom which made the brand so famous. Audi now does clean and minimalistic, which used to be M-B's trademark, and although I'm not an Audi fan, it's working wonders for them as they gain major inroads especially into the "youth" market that M-B so clearly desperately wants, yet goes about in such a detatched manner (and in a very panderingly way with brash design traits IMO usually reserved for Asian car manufacturers).
the facelifted E-class is much better than the car that came out in 2010, the S-class 2014 MY looks great but is more of a evolution than revolution, why mess with something that did great? Audi's all look the same in 2013-2014, the $30,000 A3 looks very similar to the $200,000 S8 W12, this is not my opinion only, quick search on you-tube will tell you the same thing.
Old 04-23-2013, 02:57 PM
  #66  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sam9187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
Received 85 Likes on 70 Posts
2014 S550 - SOLD, 2014 GL550 - SOLD, 2014 GL63 AMG, 2015 S63 AMG Sedan, 2015 S63 AMG Coupe
Originally Posted by C280 Sport
Looks beautiful! I like it Ill take one in AMG Package please
+1
Old 04-23-2013, 03:55 PM
  #67  
Senior Member
 
boylston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston and SWFlorida
Posts: 371
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
2022 GLC300 white, 2021 Taycan RWD silver
The white car appears to be a short wheelbase. The LWB will have much more presence, although I may prefer the proportions of the short wheelbase. The SWB rear passenger door and window have a slope which evokes the Maybach 57, it is lost on the LWB.
Old 04-23-2013, 11:27 PM
  #68  
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
K-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Originally Posted by cookstar
the facelifted E-class is much better than the car that came out in 2010, the S-class 2014 MY looks great but is more of a evolution than revolution, why mess with something that did great? Audi's all look the same in 2013-2014, the $30,000 A3 looks very similar to the $200,000 S8 W12, this is not my opinion only, quick search on you-tube will tell you the same thing.
I drove the facelfited E-Class and can tell you firsthand that fundamentally it's not much different than the pre-facelift. It is, however, still improved and further refined, which is expected. The interior carries the same IMO somewhat crude here and there materials, however adds a higher perceived quality and a slight bit of nicer materials to richen the ambiance up. The exterior, however, IMO is the opposite, as I feel it lacks refinement compared to the pre-facelift due to how disjoined it is via carrying 2 polar opposite design languages within one car (soft new bumpers/front which contrast the comparatively upright, boxy, super angular core of the car, as well as an awkward straight line right under the main character line which goes nowhere, due to being an "about-face" modification of the Ponton fender which they obviously deemed a mistake), which now simply doesn't make sense in the profile.

As for the W222, it certainly can grow on me, maybe a lot. I just hate the ill-matched dropping line on the side, which tries to ruin what could have been a very pure, simple and timeless design with little questions.
Old 04-24-2013, 08:56 AM
  #69  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cookstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2005 ML350, 2008 GL320, 2013 Gl350
Originally Posted by K-A
I drove the facelfited E-Class and can tell you firsthand that fundamentally it's not much different than the pre-facelift. It is, however, still improved and further refined, which is expected. The interior carries the same IMO somewhat crude here and there materials, however adds a higher perceived quality and a slight bit of nicer materials to richen the ambiance up. The exterior, however, IMO is the opposite, as I feel it lacks refinement compared to the pre-facelift due to how disjoined it is via carrying 2 polar opposite design languages within one car (soft new bumpers/front which contrast the comparatively upright, boxy, super angular core of the car, as well as an awkward straight line right under the main character line which goes nowhere, due to being an "about-face" modification of the Ponton fender which they obviously deemed a mistake), which now simply doesn't make sense in the profile.

As for the W222, it certainly can grow on me, maybe a lot. I just hate the ill-matched dropping line on the side, which tries to ruin what could have been a very pure, simple and timeless design with little questions.
I agree with your comment about the front and back bumpers, its the same thing with the ML, the rear bumper does not look like it belongs there.
Old 04-26-2013, 06:49 PM
  #70  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
zam2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SoCal OC
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
S, GL, Escalade ESV, my shoes
Originally Posted by cookstar
the facelifted E-class is much better than the car that came out in 2010, the S-class 2014 MY looks great but is more of a evolution than revolution, why mess with something that did great? Audi's all look the same in 2013-2014, the $30,000 A3 looks very similar to the $200,000 S8 W12, this is not my opinion only, quick search on you-tube will tell you the same thing.
Couldn't agree more. In term of outside look, the 2014 E W212 class looks like a mess, especially the AMG version (look). It looks very disconnected.

Not that impressed with the outside look of the new W222 either. Look pretty weak.

Plenty of review & magazines have commented on how the CLS and SL are not as beautiful as the previous ones, so look like there's a trend here ?
Old 04-26-2013, 11:56 PM
  #71  
Junior Member
 
2008CL63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 19
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 CL63; 2007 R63; 1996 993 C4S; 2014.5 Range Rover LWB
Originally Posted by cookstar
thats quite interesting, I have never in my life seen 3 people in the back of the S-class.
Did it many times ... kids ... nights out with friends ... when the parents visit. Of course this experience lead me to get rid of the S55 and purchase a CL63 and an R63 ... ;-)
Old 04-28-2013, 07:16 PM
  #72  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Viper98912's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Atlanta Metro
Posts: 2,939
Received 84 Likes on 70 Posts
Current: C217 V12TT AMG Previously: C55 AMG, SL65 AMG
I also agree that most of MB's recent exterior designs are looking awful. The CLS has grown on me, and the GL looks alright. But aside from that everything else looks terrible.
Old 04-30-2013, 01:29 AM
  #73  
Super Moderator

 
Wolfman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 9,984
Received 3,171 Likes on 1,977 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
Originally Posted by Viper98912
I also agree that most of MB's recent exterior designs are looking awful. The CLS has grown on me, and the GL looks alright. But aside from that everything else looks terrible.
The SL is taking some time to getting used to. It's a much better car than the old one but the R230 just looked pretty from any angle.

That said, I was surprised to see how "aged" the 2003-2008 front fascia looked when parked next to the new one.

The new S-Class does look better than the current one from any angle IMO. Can't wait to see the AMG

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2014 S Class Revealed



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 AM.