MBWorld.org Forums

MBWorld.org Forums (https://mbworld.org/forums/)
-   S-Class (W222) (https://mbworld.org/forums/s-class-w222-178/)
-   -   2021 S Class (https://mbworld.org/forums/s-class-w222/687656-2021-s-class.html)

RJC 11-02-2017 12:52 AM

2021 S Class
 
https://www.motorauthority.com/news/...lass-spy-shots

hyperion667 11-03-2017 06:46 PM

A nice interior, sleeker....

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...820735549f.jpg

Wolfman 11-03-2017 08:16 PM


Originally Posted by hyperion667 (Post 7303309)

Hmmm. That’s an E-Class

2012 merc amg 11-04-2017 01:09 AM

Yes, that looks almost just like my 2018 E class interior. I doubt the S class will look like this.

RJC 11-04-2017 03:10 AM

This is the news here...

We’re expecting Mercedes to offer the next S-Class in multiple body lengths, from a short wheelbase right up to the extra-long Pullman. However, there’s a good chance the S-Class Coupe and Cabriolet will no longer be offered. Don’t be surprised if the void is filled with a Maybach offering.We should see the first prototypes wearing the actual body of the new S-Class in late 2018 or early 2019.

BenzV12 11-04-2017 04:16 AM

They did nothing but posted W222's pictures to fool people ?

RJC 11-04-2017 04:25 PM


Originally Posted by BenzV12 (Post 7303519)
They did nothing but posted W222's pictures to fool people ?

This is SOP... test mule (the new platform is covered with an existing body).

BenzV12 11-05-2017 01:44 AM


Originally Posted by RJC (Post 7303840)
This is SOP... test mule (the new platform is covered with an existing body).

That was what I first initially thought otherwise that would be a big flop :lol:
It's kinda odd considering seeing heavily camouflaged cars for to conceal upcoming cars ,recently BMW G12 7 Series ,they even used a zebra patterned to the facelift version

RJC 11-07-2017 12:57 PM

A bit more info on the W223 https://www.motor1.com/news/181628/2...s-class-spied/

MBS63AMG 11-08-2017 10:34 PM

Be honest guys (and gals), if you saw a 221 and a 222 side by side back in , say 1999, wouldn't you think the 221 was the more modern version car over the 222? Technology aside.

Wolfman 11-09-2017 12:03 AM


Originally Posted by MBS63AMG (Post 7307166)
Be honest guys (and gals), if you saw a 221 and a 222 side by side back in , say 1999, wouldn't you think the 221 was the more modern version car over the 222? Technology aside.

It’s all subjective...
think the W221 looks quite dated to me. Fender flares were a retro design for MB going back to the sixties. Not modern IMO.
Personally I find the W222 much more elegant and understated. Unfortunately, the MY18 headlight design is a step backwards.

BenzV12 11-09-2017 02:58 AM

W222 is more streamlined car . I like fender flares in the W221s but they make the car look older yet intimidating .I have never been a fan of pre facelift W221s either ,sorry

RJC 11-10-2017 06:20 PM

It will be interesting to see if the W223 has flares, but I doubt it will, unless perhaps they were very mild (I would imagine MB would not want it to resemble the 221 too much).

hyperion667 11-10-2017 08:30 PM

Those flares, as you say, really did distinguish the S class at that time, and still do, whenever I see one it's unmistakable, but I also noticed that in the pics

Streamliner 11-12-2017 01:29 AM


Originally Posted by hyperion667 (Post 7308769)
Those flares, as you say, really did distinguish the S class at that time, and still do, whenever I see one it's unmistakable, but I also noticed that in the pics

To me, the W221 was a striking car. Even today, when one goes by, I find myself watching it. I will say that I find the front end to look a bit dated now, but everything from there back is still stunning to me and I find it much more attractive than my 2015. Even with all that said, if I could order my 2018 with a late W221 Body, I’d do it in a heartbeat. I loved the flares, but I especially love the rear end. Don’t even get me started on the fact that the Panorama Roof was optional and there was a jack & spare nicely housed under the trunk floor, where EVERY road going Sedan should have them.:)

MBS63AMG 11-12-2017 09:40 AM


Originally Posted by Streamliner (Post 7309560)
To me, the W221 was a striking car. Even today, when one goes by, I find myself watching it. I will say that I find the front end to look a bit dated now, but everything from there back is still stunning to me and I find it much more attractive than my 2015. Even with all that said, if I could order my 2018 with a late W221 Body, I’d do it in a heartbeat. I loved the flares, but I especially love the rear end. Don’t even get me started on the fact that the Panorama Roof was optional and there was a jack & spare nicely housed under the trunk floor, where EVERY road going Sedan should have them.:)

I totally agree. The 221 with 222 headlights and 222 technology updates would be my perfect car, post facelift of course. As another member said, 2007-2009 (which I had) was not as nice looking as the refreshed taillights on the 221 ('10 and up).

Wolfman 11-12-2017 12:41 PM


Originally Posted by MBS63AMG (Post 7309695)
I totally agree. The 221 with 222 headlights and 222 technology updates would be my perfect car, post facelift of course. As another member said, 2007-2009 (which I had) was not as nice looking as the refreshed taillights on the 221 ('10 and up).

I keep seeing those tail light comments of the W221 and wonder; is this just looking at a car standing someplace or when driving behind one during the daytime or nighttime. Reason I am asking is that to me, the facelifted W221 taillights much better than the predecessors when parked, but the actual LED lighting at night and when braking is absolutely horrid. I understand that LED tech was new at the time, but the lighting itself looks like its straight out of a LEGO box. Again, not the tail light shape and plastic but when these things light up.

W222 is just a million times more elegant when on, braking and even during the daytime (old video but still illustrates the lighting design - clearly not as cool as the new OLED S-Class coupe lights :) )


Compared to this:
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...c0cdd2e4ca.jpg

Streamliner 11-12-2017 02:39 PM

I know that my feelings about the looks of the 221 vs. 222 are based entirely on daytime appearance. I never really noticed how the lights appear at night. Good point, Wolf.

RJC 11-13-2017 12:56 PM

Regarding the very cool looking OLED taillights on the new coupe, they can be cockpit configurable in other countries, just not for us.

Jason B 12-21-2017 01:25 PM

https://cdn.drivemag.net/media/defau...-005-8358.jpeg

https://cdn.drivemag.net/media/defau...-008-8150.jpeg

https://cdn.drivemag.net/media/defau...-001-7519.jpeg

More here:

https://drivemag.com/news/2020-merce...irst-spy-shots


1bad540 12-21-2017 01:44 PM

so a 222 w bolt on side flares=223? LOL

Jason B 12-21-2017 03:26 PM


Originally Posted by 1bad540 (Post 7340561)
so a 222 w bolt on side flares=223? LOL

Lol! Rumor is the car is widened chassis and suspension, but the shell is a w222 for testing.

Jason B 02-17-2018 12:15 AM

Some more pics:

http://mercedesblog.com/new-mercedes...ever-pictures/

For the first time, the S-Class will be based on the new rear-wheel drive platform MRA II, because the current model W222 is still based on the further development of the old W221 platform.

Jason B 09-20-2018 01:45 AM

THis thing seriously needs to get some bigger fenders. Looks too feminine.

https://www.automobilemag.com/news/i...es-s-class-4-2

BenzV12 09-20-2018 08:06 AM

You're right , not everyone likes fender flares though but I like them


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:21 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands