R63 AMG (W251) 2007 - 2013 Discuss the R63 AMG.

R63 vs ML63

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-22-2006, 07:28 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
AMGBOY1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
CLS55AMG-MKB, R500
R63 vs ML63

What do you guys think? I put all my money on the R63 smokin the ML. The R will leave the ML in the dust?

Last edited by AMGBOY1; 05-23-2006 at 01:20 PM.
Old 05-22-2006, 11:53 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ted Baldwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
300ce
Originally Posted by AMGBOY1
I put all my money on the R63 smokin the ML. The R will leave the ML in the dust.
.........and your basis for saying this is............?


Ted
Old 05-23-2006, 02:51 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 290 Likes on 203 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
I can't see that, the R is bigger and heavier than the ML so the ML63 should be faster. The R63 is likely going to be the first AMG product to ever outright flop around on the market. I can't see much demand for it consider the sluggish sales of the R350/500.

M
Old 05-25-2006, 08:51 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
AMGBOY1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
CLS55AMG-MKB, R500
the R is more airodienamic though
Old 05-26-2006, 12:28 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
medici78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
'03 G500, '13 G63, '17 GLS63,
I'm with Germancar1. The market has proven to be very receptive to $80K SUV's. $80K minivans on the other hand...
At the local M-B dealer, any time I asked a couple salesmen about the R-Class, the typical response was one of frustration. They are damn near impossible to sell.
Old 06-07-2006, 11:04 PM
  #6  
Almost a Member!
 
K_Sport Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1999 W202 C230 Kompressor Sport
Originally Posted by AMGBOY1
the R is more airodienamic though
aerodynamic. and the R series is the ugliest MB ever made.
Old 06-21-2006, 02:42 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
I think R is a lil heavier?
Old 06-23-2006, 01:48 AM
  #8  
Super Member
 
FlyByNight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
05 E55
Originally Posted by medici78
I'm with Germancar1. The market has proven to be very receptive to $80K SUV's. $80K minivans on the other hand...
At the local M-B dealer, any time I asked a couple salesmen about the R-Class, the typical response was one of frustration. They are damn near impossible to sell.
I love that. Because when I get one, I'll will have

1) A car that the wife can drive... and when I have to use the family car, it will at least be fun with the 63 engine in it and
2) It will be really cool to have 4 wheel drive attached to an AMG engine, finally, and
3) Everyone and their mother has a damn ML, which I think are about as creative as a block of ice. Jesus, Montero's have owned that shape since the 80s.
4) People will love it, or hate it... either way, they won't have it or see many of them and it will probably kick their own cars butt anyway.
5) I can haul a ton of crap without having a car jacked up off the ground! I have a lifted H2, so that's appealing.

I think that if people stood back and looked at the R class and really thought about it, they'd soon realize that it is a CLS with a big old A$S on it. Seriously. The shape and the design are all CLS born in the front end. Look at the windows, the angles, etc.

That's why its also controversial and people love it or hate it, just like the CLS. I've seen two... just TWO CLSs I've liked. Slammed and blacked out with body kits, and I can finally tolerate them. That said, the R class doesn't thrill me either.

HOWEVER, with a child on the way, I've been ordered to acquire a minivan.

The R63 is for guys like me... its the most outrageous mini van in history. Ugly or not, I'm in... and if I must drive a mini van, I'll still be loving it.

And ugly or not, just imagine the looks on the faces of those that mess with you... well worth it...

That's just my 2 cents.

Any word on pricing yet?



Loren
Old 06-28-2006, 02:55 PM
  #9  
Almost a Member!
 
K_Sport Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1999 W202 C230 Kompressor Sport
Originally Posted by Loren
I think that if people stood back and looked at the R class and really thought about it, they'd soon realize that it is a CLS with a big old A$S on it.
well, really it's just a Chrysler Pacifica made even uglier than thought possible. why not wait for the GL? They're probably going to be about the same price, much more manly, and considerably less hideous! just my 2¢ good luck with the car hunt, and congrats on the baby!
Old 06-29-2006, 07:51 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South Orange County, CA
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
4 wheels
Originally Posted by K_Sport Driver
well, really it's just a Chrysler Pacifica made even uglier than thought possible. why not wait for the GL? They're probably going to be about the same price, much more manly, and considerably less hideous! just my 2¢ good luck with the car hunt, and congrats on the baby!

Have you done your research? The R does not have one bolt or screw in common with the Pacifica. They ride on different chasis and are entirely different from one another.
Old 06-29-2006, 08:37 PM
  #11  
Almost a Member!
 
K_Sport Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1999 W202 C230 Kompressor Sport
honestly, i don't really care. it's the same class vehicle, a minivan/SUV hybrid, they're both made by daimler chrysler, they're both hideous. what else matters? the motor? it's like the people who put V8's in dodge caravans. yeah, it's neat, but who really gives a ****? it's still a minivan.
Old 07-01-2006, 04:53 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Soon2bMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 C300W4 Sport, 2006 Honda CBR600F4i
Anyone order an ML63 yet?
Old 08-09-2006, 05:05 AM
  #13  
Almost a Member!
 
Dj Euro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Soon2bMB
Anyone order an ML63 yet?
yeah i have one on order ... and i think that th r class is basicly an attempt for the dodge magnum, i think with some work that car can be a killer , its not realy a minivan its more like a wagon
Old 08-09-2006, 05:38 AM
  #14  
ON PROBATION
 
ClayJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am doing the ML63, the R63, and the GL63....

I will post what I think of each as I take delivery.

Old 08-09-2006, 07:08 AM
  #15  
Member
 
Modeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Saudi Arabia
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ML55
i think the goal of the R was to appeal to a family oriented market that has no luxurious/powerful alternatives to the average minivan... (though in my opinion why go for a minivan when u can go for an SUV that has the same space and looks cooooooler.. much coooooooler, the kids can learn to get into the suv, get used to a nonsliding door... and you have, in most trucks, more space in the back) and the R class also targets limo services n transportation for VIPs that are used by hotels, celebs, etc. ... but instead of that... why not just introduce a lower GL, or a GL with limo seats, for easy entry etc. ... i don't see the R sales generating high numbers, let alone the R63.

oh yeah..i think the ML would corooooz past the R cuz it is smaller and lighter... i'd definitely go with an ML or a GL over the R. (if only the GL looked nicer from the side... i hate it from the sides, ok with the rear, and in love with the front).
Old 08-09-2006, 04:02 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
slk320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 491
Received 81 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by ClayJ
I am doing the ML63, the R63, and the GL63....

I will post what I think of each as I take delivery.


Old 08-09-2006, 06:43 PM
  #17  
ON PROBATION
 
gangrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ft. Laud
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Parents-06s500-just sold,06CLS55-K4,2006 R350
0-60mph is identical in both the ML and R

Weight: ML-2880
R-2950 ML wins

Horses: ML-510
R-510 equal

torque(Nm):
ML-630@5200
R-630@5200 equal

I think the ML has the advantage, but only barely
Old 08-09-2006, 08:09 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
transferred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
Originally Posted by K_Sport Driver
honestly, i don't really care. it's the same class vehicle, a minivan/SUV hybrid, they're both made by daimler chrysler, they're both hideous. what else matters? the motor? it's like the people who put V8's in dodge caravans. yeah, it's neat, but who really gives a ****? it's still a minivan.
Ooh, ever heard of the green eyed monster?.Don't tell me you wouldn't swap your car for an ML63? I don't like the R63 at all, but the ML is perfect for those who live in cold climates or out in the sticks.
Old 08-10-2006, 02:40 AM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AndrewAZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BMW FTW
Originally Posted by AMGBOY1
the R is more airodienamic though
Not by much... R C/D .31
ML C/D .34

A C/D of .34 is equal to a Ferrari F40 and the new Z06 vett..

Also note the C/D listed are for base models not the AMG ones, AMG might actually increase C/D to improve high speed stability and handling... For instances most race cars run a higher C/D ranging from .5-over 1 depending on the type of car and race track.

But on a 0-100 race brute force and light weight win..
Old 08-10-2006, 03:37 AM
  #20  
Almost a Member!
 
Dj Euro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AndrewAZ

Also note the C/D listed are for base models not the AMG ones, AMG might actually increase C/D to improve high speed stability and handling..

But on a 0-100 race brute force and light weight win..
thats what the amg site says
Old 08-13-2006, 02:49 PM
  #21  
Super Member
 
Dogshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55
Originally Posted by ClayJ
I am doing the ML63, the R63, and the GL63....

I will post what I think of each as I take deliverply.


please say we aren't doing this again....
Old 01-23-2007, 10:36 PM
  #22  
Newbie
 
benzbuilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is no GL63 planned, and I can assure that the R (251) is on its own platform but built side by side the ML (164). Also there is a short wheel base R and its performance is slightly better than the long wheel base. However you'll never buy one in north america as they are all shipped over seas! Also the shorter wheel base looks better. As far as performance drive trains are exactly the same the weight ratio is the factor therefore the M has the edge.
Old 01-25-2007, 09:39 PM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Blue_Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: OC, CA
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
215
Actually the GL 63 is coming out, and sooner than you think.
Old 01-25-2007, 10:22 PM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SoCalCLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,974
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2017 W205 C43 AMG
Originally Posted by ClayJ
I am doing the ML63, the R63, and the GL63....

I will post what I think of each as I take delivery.

It's January 2007 - Have you taken delivery yet??
Old 01-26-2007, 04:16 PM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CynCarvin32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Mercedes Benz
Originally Posted by K_Sport Driver
honestly, i don't really care. it's the same class vehicle, a minivan/SUV hybrid, they're both made by daimler chrysler, they're both hideous. what else matters? the motor? it's like the people who put V8's in dodge caravans. yeah, it's neat, but who really gives a ****? it's still a minivan.
If you drove one you would change your tune. It drive FAR better than any ML ever could for 2 reasons. First it sits about 3 inches lower and second of all it has a much longer wheelbase and that give the R an amazingly controlled ride.

I know that the R350 that we have for driving around on a daily basis is a fantastic car. It is ugly and I will say that openly but from a driving and passenger's point of view the R class has theML beat in every way.

With Airmatic set to sport the R class actually can be thrown around very quickly. The steering rack is a bit slow but thats what it has in common with the ML...

I must defend the car becasue anytime I throw that car though and interchange or around an on-ramp I say to my self... I am driving a mini-van... and I am smiling? YIKES.

The R63 i bet is the far quicker car around the ring any day. Its just physics.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: R63 vs ML63



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 PM.