Complaining to MB Corporate




Thanks in advance.
For decades, I was the exclusive U.S. agent and importer for a German manufacturing company. I traveled to Germany every year. I loved the company and the German people in general, but they rarely—if EVER—will admit to being wrong about ANYTHING! They always have what they feel is a perfectly correct explanation for why they have done or not done something. I found that I was either going to do things their way or I wasn’t going to be their business partner.
I’m quite sure that the bottom line with MB will be something like “Our vehicles are the finest that exist.” The underlying and probably unsaid comment will be “Drive our vehicles or don’t, we couldn’t care less what you have to say about them.” A perfect example of this is their insistence that their sedans not be equipped with a jack & spare and that they purposely go out of their way to insure that there is no good place for an owner to store one, should they wish to. IMHO, pure, unadulterated PIGHEADEDNESS!

I'm afraid it needs to go from regions up, whether we like it or not. There would need to be many people sharing the same view (not saying the OP could not have one).
Would be interesting to hear more about the actual topic.
Bottom line—and if the gravity of the issue warrants it—get creative and follow non-standard channels if the official path leads nowhere.
I'm afraid it needs to go from regions up, whether we like it or not. There would need to be many people sharing the same view (not saying the OP could not have one).
Would be interesting to hear more about the actual topic.
https://time.com/3116424/daimler-vac...out-of-office/
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/17/one-...-vacation.html
https://www.fastcompany.com/3034699/...to-delete-them
Basically Daimler AG employees (well now Mercedes-Benz AG employees, the article was written prior to the name change) was offered an option to automatically delete emails received during their vacation to help with workload when they return.




Trending Topics

https://time.com/3116424/daimler-vac...out-of-office/
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/17/one-...-vacation.html
https://www.fastcompany.com/3034699/...to-delete-them
Basically Daimler AG employees (well now Mercedes-Benz AG employees, the article was written prior to the name change) was offered an option to automatically delete emails received during their vacation to help with workload when they return.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




Both companies have Mr Ola Källenius as chairman of the Board of Management.
Info are obtained in Google. I bet his secretary will screen all the emails and letters for him. So, you must get pass this screening first. Good luck.
His email address:- ola.kaellenius@daimler.com
Postal address:- Mercedesstraße 120, 70372 Stuttgart, Germany
https://group.mercedes-benz.com/comp...of-management/
Last edited by bishop64; Feb 7, 2022 at 03:15 AM.
Noise always helps.

The first source says:
When an email is sent, the program, which is called “Mail on Holiday,” issues a reply to the sender that the person is out of the office and that the email will be deleted, while also offering the contact information of another employee for pressing matters.
So the person sending the original email does get a response and is informed about the person who would be available but the email does not seem to be automatically forwarded. The person sending the original email needs to forward his/her email himself/herself. My mistake was to assume automatic forwarding, should have been straightforward since the automated response already had all the necessary information. The original email would get deleted from the inbox of the first address. That should be OK.
Perhaps the idea is that the person sending emails during vacation periods would reconsider if the issue is important enough to be sent to another person who would be available? A bit questionable.
The first source says:
When an email is sent, the program, which is called “Mail on Holiday,” issues a reply to the sender that the person is out of the office and that the email will be deleted, while also offering the contact information of another employee for pressing matters.
So the person sending the original email does get a response and is informed about the person who would be available but the email does not seem to be automatically forwarded. The person sending the original email needs to forward his/her email himself/herself. My mistake was to assume automatic forwarding, should have been straightforward since the automated response already had all the necessary information. The original email would get deleted from the inbox of the first address. That should be OK.
Perhaps the idea is that the person sending emails during vacation periods would reconsider if the issue is important enough to be sent to another person who would be available? A bit questionable.



