SL/R230: VG1 Conductor Plate Removal




Car is not downshifting or manual overide working.
I did get a shop who says they "should" be able to code it tomorrow. We'll see.
If this works I'm gold.




The Shop Tech called me to ask some questions.
Turns out this particular car, an 04 wants not only the TCU replaced but the entire valve body. That's why I got locked out of the SDS. He showed me the screen. That's what his screen showed. The car was requiring a valve body swap when changing the conductor plate.
So; my query is IF I can resolder the broken connections on my original board, Could you fool the main ECU into believing the replacement is the original? Or send the rebuilt virginized board back and buy a new MB blank with no guaranty it''ll still ask for a valve body. OR do I just just buy another valve body and just finish out coding of the replacement?
The tech was an MB rep and was going to put in a call to his old regional service rep he is friends with
This going to take some technical background searches.




The tech said there was a catagory for plate and valve body replacements. Would it be worth a shot and try that ?
The tech showed me the screen shot and I think it possibly could be because of a simple mis match of reading and stored info. If you look at the one screen that says if you have sensor error you can go forward with encoding. But the first thing the tech mentioned was they wiped all the error codes before starting the whole encoding process So at this point I'm not sure if they can "lie to the system" or hook up my old board and hang it off the car and re create the old tcu error codes the DAS is looking for, to agree the board has failed and only it needs replacing
c
Last edited by Hary Gahtoe; Jul 30, 2017 at 12:13 AM.
. With the 722.9, the TCU and also the AGS (gearshift module) now require SCN coding and a mismatch will cause the ECU to shutdown. And the R230 doesn't have an ELS anyhow. Of course they aren't really trying to protect us from car the typical smash-n-grab thieves, but from the cartels that grab cars and ship them overseas.
moretech




As as to my particular situation, I'm going to talk to the tech about the rebuilt plates compatibility (IF they can force an encoding process) to see if there's possibility of incompatibility or shift program issues after initializing it.
Last edited by Hary Gahtoe; Aug 16, 2017 at 11:57 PM. Reason: Updated info




He contacted his old regional MB service rep and brainstormed a solution.
My particular car was a very early 722.9 production model and yes MB dictated a valve body in conjunction with an updated new conductor plate to remedy a trans repair. Problem solved now the car up shifts,downshifts decel hold and firm manual shifts.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




After installing the rebuilt virginized plate myself all I get is 1-2-3.
Realizing I'm not able to code it I Find a service shop near me that can actually try to diagnose situations The service tech (who was a prior MB Star tech)at the shop says the car isn't accepting the board and later gets info that MB is telling the car via the diagnosis screen it (the board)needs to be updated and must be matched with a corresponding valve body.
Well after the shock wears off it makes typical German sense why it wouldn't let me finish coding the trans myself and where it stopped coding the TCU and I agree with replacing both parts
The MB area service rep said early production run 722.9's had a high failure rate and after autopsies it was noted the units were only effective after both were replaced as a retrofit. I have no idea of a cutoff date or assembly line correction period on the 7G's.
Trans now works great and they gave me a 18 month warranty.




After I took it home, we went for several 50-75 mi blasts. I put it thru some real tough tests. Passed with flying colors. I went back and gave the service tech a healthy, well deserved tip


