SL/R230: Installed Snow Performance Stage III MPG-MAX Boost Cooler kit
My local race shop, VooDoo Racing set it up and dialed it in. The software creates a delivery map based on boost and EFI signal from just a few easy to set start and full points you punch in. The fully standalone controller does not have to be wired into any diagnostic port or the ECU/ECM. The LCD Screen displays boost pressure, fuel injector duty cycle, as well as water-methanol injection percent. I placed the control unit in my glove box as I can't really watch it while driving.
The water-methanol injection goes right into the throttle body elbow and it is directly noticeable for power. We used the window washer reservoir to hold the water-methanol and the pump is right next to it as shown in the below picture. Car loves the reduce air temperature. Konrad at Speedriven is sending me a 93 and 100 octane tune to use with it. Both are uploadable using the MyGenius handheld unit. I can select the tune I want and upload them via the OBDII port.
Highly recommend both products and performance shops.
Last edited by ashutt; Oct 26, 2014 at 01:13 AM.
Hows your IATs now? Can you feel the power difference?
I have the snow performance stage 2 kit ready to install into my 04 s600, and want to know how you like meth on the v12tt so far?
Just got a few quick questions for you.
I just finished up my meth install this last week, and noticed a drop of boost due to meth injection. 2-3psi when meth is injecting.
My question to you is are you noticing any drop of boost or it's the same?
The map sensor in the 3rd picture you uploaded, does that get plugged into before the throttle body on your setup, or is it connected to the intake manifold port at the back?
Reason why I ask is I'm still on stock intercoolers on my S600, and I believe that's the map sensor that controls boost. Since I'm spraying meth after that map sensor which is taking it's boost reading from pass side intercooler, the huge temp difference cause lower boost, which in my case reduces power/boost but kills IAT like a nuke. My temps dropped from 120-140 to 60-66 degrees at WOT. Using just the blue -20F washer fluid for now. I'm thinking of relocating the source of boost for that map sensor after meth injection, to have it bring boost back up. Maybe i'll try to just plug it in to the back of the manifold for a test.
I pulled my meth injection fuse out and boost is back to normal. Car pulls a little harder with much hotter air but a little more boost. I logged as high as 215-221kpa intake manifold pressure, where's with meth 190-199kpa peak.
I've got Eurocharged ECU/TCU combo, so hoping to see if Jerry is willing to go aggressive on this setup with his tuning.
Here's a few pictures from my install.
I've used an extra grommet for the washer pump, drilled a same size hole in the lower part of the tank and the 1/4" nylon line for the meth system fit in nice and tight. No leaks and much easier then installing a fitting there.


W220 is much easier to setup then the R230. I'll be installing the same kit on my Sl600, unless I sell it and get an Sl65 to mod instead.

Nozzle placement
Last edited by NEMES1S; Mar 30, 2015 at 01:16 PM.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




Just got a few quick questions for you.
I just finished up my meth install this last week, and noticed a drop of boost due to meth injection. 2-3psi when meth is injecting.
My question to you is are you noticing any drop of boost or it's the same?
The map sensor in the 3rd picture you uploaded, does that get plugged into before the throttle body on your setup, or is it connected to the intake manifold port at the back?
Reason why I ask is I'm still on stock intercoolers on my S600, and I believe that's the map sensor that controls boost. Since I'm spraying meth after that map sensor which is taking it's boost reading from pass side intercooler, the huge temp difference cause lower boost, which in my case reduces power/boost but kills IAT like a nuke. My temps dropped from 120-140 to 60-66 degrees at WOT. Using just the blue -20F washer fluid for now. I'm thinking of relocating the source of boost for that map sensor after meth injection, to have it bring boost back up. Maybe i'll try to just plug it in to the back of the manifold for a test.
I pulled my meth injection fuse out and boost is back to normal. Car pulls a little harder with much hotter air but a little more boost. I logged as high as 215-221kpa intake manifold pressure, where's with meth 190-199kpa peak.
I've got Eurocharged ECU/TCU combo, so hoping to see if Jerry is willing to go aggressive on this setup with his tuning.
Here's a few pictures from my install.
I've used an extra grommet for the washer pump, drilled a same size hole in the lower part of the tank and the 1/4" nylon line for the meth system fit in nice and tight. No leaks and much easier then installing a fitting there.
W220 is much easier to setup then the R230. I'll be installing the same kit on my Sl600, unless I sell it and get an Sl65 to mod instead.
If Meth/water is injected between these two MAP sensors, its going to see a different air density. As per DUDMD post, it seems that it will reduce boost. MB have put these sensors before and after the throttle valve for one reason or another, so I don't think its possible to relocate the source.
Any ideas?
EDIT:
Thinking about it, the Meth/water injection will occur before both of those sensors, so not sure why DUDMD is seeing lower boost pressures?
Last edited by alexanderfoti; Sep 4, 2016 at 02:00 PM.
If Meth/water is injected between these two MAP sensors, its going to see a different air density. As per DUDMD post, it seems that it will reduce boost. MB have put these sensors before and after the throttle valve for one reason or another, so I don't think its possible to relocate the source.
Any ideas?
EDIT:
Thinking about it, the Meth/water injection will occur before both of those sensors, so not sure why DUDMD is seeing lower boost pressures?
My experience with water/meth injection on these cars has not been very positive so far. I've used it on most of my previous cars with great luck, but it seems to put extra stress on the coils. When my coil issues started, it would only do it if I had the water/meth kit activated. I thought at first it might be a distribution issue, so I built a spraybar inside the manifold, but that did not seem to help things. I intend to give it another shot with the spraybar once I get my ignition problems sorted out, but if it gives me even a hint of trouble I'll be pulling the kit out altogether. I don't think I need it now that I'm on E85 and have upgraded the heat exchanger and pumps.




My experience with water/meth injection on these cars has not been very positive so far. I've used it on most of my previous cars with great luck, but it seems to put extra stress on the coils. When my coil issues started, it would only do it if I had the water/meth kit activated. I thought at first it might be a distribution issue, so I built a spraybar inside the manifold, but that did not seem to help things. I intend to give it another shot with the spraybar once I get my ignition problems sorted out, but if it gives me even a hint of trouble I'll be pulling the kit out altogether. I don't think I need it now that I'm on E85 and have upgraded the heat exchanger and pumps.
That's a shame to hear that, as this would be easy way to get IAT's in check. Did wonders for my 215.
Do you remember how much water you where injecting? Its possible that the injection rate wasn't ramped up correctly with boost pressure and that it was quenching combustion?
That's a shame to hear that, as this would be easy way to get IAT's in check. Did wonders for my 215.
Do you remember how much water you where injecting? Its possible that the injection rate wasn't ramped up correctly with boost pressure and that it was quenching combustion?
The other thing people don't consider is that the evaporating water/methanol displace air in the manifold as well. So the theoretical density improvement isn't as big as you might think, and is largely dependent on how much of the spray actually vaporizes in the air as opposed to on a hot surface (throttle blade, manifold, port walls, back of the intake valve, etc).
I have been messing around with water injection for quite a long time, and have played with both really small and really large amounts, for the most part, without any trouble. It normally takes a LOT of water injection to cause an issue or stumble. I mean I've sprayed over 20gph through a 300hp engine with no trouble. I had what I consider a fairly conservative nozzle for this car at 12gph. When I went to a spray bar I used .5gph misting nozzles @ 1 per port...however, I've seen various flow charts put these at more around 1.7gph at the 200psi that my system runs at, so I may well be back up to that 20gph figure (but now have 12 very nicely distributed nozzles to do it instead of 1). In any case, I'm not anywhere near what should be the limits...20gph would be something like 40% of my fuel injection quantity which is on the very aggressive side, but within reason. I believe that 20-25% figure is ideal...but again, it depends on the setup and the goals.
I do not use any progressive controller because in my opinion the presently available mechanisms for doing so are terrible. I mean you're either pulsing a really really horrendously slow solenoid, or controlling pump duty cycle to effectively reduce your line pressure. Basically you're either pulsing the nozzle at something like 10x slower than your engine is spinning (which in my opinion could potentially give you terrible cycle to cycle variations) or you're dropping the line pressure resulting in poor atomization. Beyond that, the control scheme for them is terrible. The ones that use MAF frequency are probably the best in terms of matching engine load, but we don't have MAF sensors, so that's kind of out the window. You're stuck relying on TPS, or MAP, or RPM which individually don't necessarily correspond to the mass flow rate through the engine.
While I do love the idea of doing it progressively, I just haven't seen one I like. Ideally, they would just run off injector duty cycle and use actual fuel injectors (obviously alcohol rated ones with stainless guts). But mostly, I think it's something that only needs to be employed under maximum load anyway so my setup is just on an adjustable boost switch.




On my CL I had a devils own controller, which wasn't great, however it did work sufficiently.
It was a very basic progressive controller based on boost pressure. I had a 10GPH nozzle with 80/20 water/meth and it never bogged down and did a good deal to reduce intake air temps. I was running about 15psi boost on that setup as well.
I may experiment with a controller that only does full injection under full load (As you say). I did find that injection at too low rpm/loads caused hesitation and stumbling on the CL. I am going to inject just before the throttle body, at least then, if it doesn't work well, its trivial to remove the system.
I think the CL was more forgiving as it has a supercharger that generates full boost from very low RPM's
On my CL I had a devils own controller, which wasn't great, however it did work sufficiently.
It was a very basic progressive controller based on boost pressure. I had a 10GPH nozzle with 80/20 water/meth and it never bogged down and did a good deal to reduce intake air temps. I was running about 15psi boost on that setup as well.
I may experiment with a controller that only does full injection under full load (As you say). I did find that injection at too low rpm/loads caused hesitation and stumbling on the CL. I am going to inject just before the throttle body, at least then, if it doesn't work well, its trivial to remove the system.
I think the CL was more forgiving as it has a supercharger that generates full boost from very low RPM's
I feel like I should point out that the intake cooling is not the primary mechanism for increasing power, nor is it extra timing advance (as people see gains without having timing control as well). It's not 100% clear what exactly is although there are lots of theories. But I've seen testing where physical intercooling to the same resulting temperature resulted in twice the power gains that chemical intercooling alone (water/meth injection) did. Personally, I think it makes more of an impact in-cylinder by absorbing heat during the compression stroke thereby reducing parasitic losses. However, it appears that our ignition system may not be up to the task. Most probably due to the odd orientation of our intake valves to the spark plugs themselves, as I haven't had any trouble with direct port water/meth on my other car.




I feel like I should point out that the intake cooling is not the primary mechanism for increasing power, nor is it extra timing advance (as people see gains without having timing control as well). It's not 100% clear what exactly is although there are lots of theories. But I've seen testing where physical intercooling to the same resulting temperature resulted in twice the power gains that chemical intercooling alone (water/meth injection) did. Personally, I think it makes more of an impact in-cylinder by absorbing heat during the compression stroke thereby reducing parasitic losses. However, it appears that our ignition system may not be up to the task. Most probably due to the odd orientation of our intake valves to the spark plugs themselves, as I haven't had any trouble with direct port water/meth on my other car.
My primary goal for water/meth injection is not to gain power, but to keep the same power there, doing a long pull, IAT's wil climb past 70 deg, at which point the ECU will pull timing and boost therefore reducing power. If I can keep the IAT's under 70 with W/M injection then that would be ideal!
My primary goal for water/meth injection is not to gain power, but to keep the same power there, doing a long pull, IAT's wil climb past 70 deg, at which point the ECU will pull timing and boost therefore reducing power. If I can keep the IAT's under 70 with W/M injection then that would be ideal!
Is it safe to assume you are talking about keeping temps below 70 C? That's definitely within reason. If you meant F, however, I don't think you're going to get there with water/meth unless it's artificial. By that, I mean the boiling point of water with 15psi of boost is going to be around 250F/121C. So the further you get from that point, the less likely the water is to vaporize in the air as compared to on a hot surface somewhere. If that surface happens to be your intake temperature sensor, then it could read significantly artificially low as compared to the general temperature of the surrounding air. If you're wanting to cool to lower temps then you can try a higher percentage of methanol, which has a much lower boiling point, however it only has about half the cooling energy as well.




Is it safe to assume you are talking about keeping temps below 70 C? That's definitely within reason. If you meant F, however, I don't think you're going to get there with water/meth unless it's artificial. By that, I mean the boiling point of water with 15psi of boost is going to be around 250F/121C. So the further you get from that point, the less likely the water is to vaporize in the air as compared to on a hot surface somewhere. If that surface happens to be your intake temperature sensor, then it could read significantly artificially low as compared to the general temperature of the surrounding air. If you're wanting to cool to lower temps then you can try a higher percentage of methanol, which has a much lower boiling point, however it only has about half the cooling energy as well.
I had that issue on the CL, I ended up relocating the AIT sensor further away from the water injection nozzles. I still felt that they where too close though, as the AIT would go under ambient for a small period of time when injection started.
I think on the M275's the elbow before the throttle body is far enough away from the AIT sensor that this isn't a problem?
I mean as big of a supporter of E85 and water/meth injection and the likes as I am, I hate to see these outlandish claims about their performance that just don't make any sense mathematically (claims of 150 degree temp drops, etc). I mean for example let's do the math on what you can reasonably expect on your car...you can use that as a reality-check compared to your sensor reading. If you're talking 600hp worth of airflow on your setup, call it roughly 60lb/min. 10 gallons per hour of 80/20 would be something like 76 lbs/hr or 1.26 lb/min of water/meth injection. So your air to w/m ratio is 47.61:1. 80/20 has a vaporization cooling potential of 871 BTU/lb, or 18.29 BTUs available to act on each pound of air. 1 BTU will cool a pound of air 3-4 degrees F, so if we assume 100% vaporization in the charge air itself 54-73 degrees F, or 30-40 degrees C of max cooling potential. It's unlikely that you'll hit that target figure as a good portion will probably vaporize in contact with hot surfaces instead of directly in the air itself, so it's still kind of a guessing game, but if your intake temp readings exceed that much cooler than you'd expect to see without the water/meth then you'd know for sure that you're getting some artificially low numbers.




Agreed on the second part as well, they will have to be taken with a pinch of salt.










