SL-Class (R230) 2003 -- 2012: Discussion on the SL500, SL550, SL600

SL/R230: regular suspension instead of hydraulic on SL 55

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-30-2019, 02:06 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
goth's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 76
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2003 SL 500
regular suspension instead of hydraulic on SL 55

I am seriously considering upgrading to AMG and i wanted to ask the experts here about is this even a good idea to have replaced your hydraulic suspensions with regular suspensions and the advantage of having two catalytic convertors vs 4
here is the ad

https://www.ebay.com/itm/22330853566...torefresh=true

can you let me know what you guys think? thank you
Old 01-30-2019, 03:37 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
bobterry99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, unfortunately
Posts: 1,982
Received 387 Likes on 306 Posts
'09 S600, (2) R129 300SLs, '03 SL500, '03 SL55
Originally Posted by goth
I am seriously considering upgrading to AMG...
That eBay car has a suspension inferior to what you have now. Since it will significantly sacrifice ride quality and/or handling performance, I don't know why you could conceive of it as being an "upgrade".
Old 01-30-2019, 08:49 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
goth's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 76
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2003 SL 500
Originally Posted by bobterry99
That eBay car has a suspension inferior to what you have now. Since it will significantly sacrifice ride quality and/or handling performance, I don't know why you could conceive of it as being an "upgrade".
well i have the AMG sports package but now i want an sl 55
Old 01-30-2019, 09:00 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
bobterry99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, unfortunately
Posts: 1,982
Received 387 Likes on 306 Posts
'09 S600, (2) R129 300SLs, '03 SL500, '03 SL55
Originally Posted by goth
well i have the AMG sports package but now i want an sl 55
A few weeks ago I bought the 2014 remaster of Zep's Houses of the Holy. Something about it just doesn't sound right. One thing I noticed was that on Rain Song the vocal seemed shifted slightly to the right. I have to listen to it more, but for now I'd say I prefer the original issue of the CD.
Old 01-30-2019, 09:59 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,419
Received 1,001 Likes on 808 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Originally Posted by bobterry99
That eBay car has a suspension inferior to what you have now. Since it will significantly sacrifice ride quality and/or handling performance, I don't know why you could conceive of it as being an "upgrade".
Most that have done the shock/strut change would disagree just not sure the RMT system is the best choice.
Old 01-31-2019, 09:42 AM
  #6  
Banned
 
bobterry99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, unfortunately
Posts: 1,982
Received 387 Likes on 306 Posts
'09 S600, (2) R129 300SLs, '03 SL500, '03 SL55
To achieve greater agility modern fighter aircraft are inherently unstable in flight. Without computer control such a plane is unflyable and would crash.

Not dissimilarly, to achieve ride comfort the R230 suspension is extraordinarily compliant. Without computer control the car is still driveable, of course, but the handling is terrible.

The notion that a company can produce a suspension for the R230 that equals the comfort afforded by ABC would be patently absurd.
The following users liked this post:
m5zealot (02-13-2019)
Old 01-31-2019, 10:59 AM
  #7  
Member
 
57staff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
2008 CL550
I don't have any observations of a coilover conversion ride except what I read and hear. People who have done the changeover to coilovers comment that the car does handle better than with ABC. However, from what I understand, you lose the comfort and adaptability ABC affords to the ride. Basically, you can dial in the level of handling you want with a coil-over package and then you will only have that handling level until you change the setup. Now, changing that setup may be as simple as clicking the ride adjusters a few clicks to get the compliance you want but it is all manual and definitely not adaptable. From what I see in available coil-over packages, the SL 350 sway bar is not sufficient to provide you a flat ride plus it needs to be modified to clear the oil pan.

For me, I will keep my ABC until it fails catastrophically. Flush the system every year, rodeo, and run a finer filter element. ABC is very comfortable, especially on long drives, and I can drive it pretty hard in the curves and it does a great job keeping the car flat.
Old 01-31-2019, 03:38 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Frederick NL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,342
Received 216 Likes on 185 Posts
2005 R 230 SL350 (M112 3.7). Sold the 1966 W113 230SL recently
I have never seriously driven an ABC equipped R230. Taken aback by the cost of eventual failure and given the Euro option of a non-ABC SL350 I decided for just that. The car is totally smooth and comfy, nothing about the handling feels substandard. ABC is a superb idea which I’m sure delivers a superb ride. It’s reaction time inherently must be a tad slower than a fully mechanical suspension, which is undoubtedly compensated for by design. Bobterry - as a passenger I was given the opportunity to fly a Cessna Citation II (twin jet), and I was working hard on that joystick, trying to maintain a steady flight without autopilot (I was an experienced recr. glider pilot at the time). No resemblance at all with telling my SL350 where to go.

Last edited by Frederick NL; 01-31-2019 at 03:45 PM.
Old 01-31-2019, 05:02 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
bellwilliam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 37
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
2004 SL500 r230
Thinking an ABS car can out handle a properly setup coilover car is equally absurd as thinking coilover car can ride better than a ABC car. how many ABC type controlled race car do you see?
Old 01-31-2019, 08:00 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,419
Received 1,001 Likes on 808 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
SL65 Black ditched the ABC to improve handling, just saying.
The following users liked this post:
bellwilliam (02-01-2019)
Old 01-31-2019, 09:41 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Aussiesuede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 377
Received 105 Likes on 80 Posts
SL500
Here is a half hour video of someone removing the ABC system
and replacing it with Coilovers, sway bars, end links, and new pump.

And here is the same car on the road after the swap.
Old 02-01-2019, 02:10 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
bellwilliam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 37
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
2004 SL500 r230
it is a 30 minutes video, but it took him 4 long long days.
3.9 days were for sway bar install.
Old 02-01-2019, 06:01 AM
  #13  
Banned
 
bobterry99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, unfortunately
Posts: 1,982
Received 387 Likes on 306 Posts
'09 S600, (2) R129 300SLs, '03 SL500, '03 SL55
Originally Posted by bellwilliam
Thinking an ABS car can out handle a properly setup coilover car is equally absurd...
You've made a mistake. I never claimed ABC outhandles any or all conventional suspensions. Here's the relevant text you misunderstood (with emphasis): "Since it will significantly sacrifice ride quality and/or handling performance".
Old 02-01-2019, 10:27 AM
  #14  
Member
 
57staff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
2008 CL550
With coilovers, you have the choice of setting up the car for comfort or setting up the car for performance. Adjustable coilovers may allow you to adjust between drives, but you have to select a level of comfort or a level of performance.

The nice thing about ABC is you don't have to make that choice. These are heavy cars and ABC does a pretty good job of sorting out the handling in most situations. I've taken my SL up into the hills around LA and it has performed admirably if I don't push it too hard. Usually it's the brakes that give out before the ABC. Those with the P030 package have even better performance handling characteristics.

The real benefit I see with removing ABC and switching to coilovers is your get a couple hundred pounds of weight out of the car and you can do a better job of dialing in handling on the performance end of the spectrum. I believe this is what most people who have made the switch describe as the key benefit.
The following users liked this post:
m5zealot (02-13-2019)
Old 02-01-2019, 11:11 PM
  #15  
MBworld Guru
 
Rudeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,783
Received 999 Likes on 868 Posts
NO LONGER ACTIVE
I won't argue whether handling and ride are better or worse between ABC and non-ABC, but I will say that I like what ABC does for my car. There is a particular stretch of road I drive that has some dips and undulations. In the ABC-equipped SL, I go over it and feel just a minor dip. When I drive over it in other cars (pretty much every car we've ever owned plus various loaners and rentals), it's a very uncomfortable "wallowing". Going over it at 40mph+ can be quite harrowing. I've hit it at 50mph in the SL and barely noticed it. I see other cars ahead of me really jumping and swaying. I also like the "simulated skyhook" cornering. Yes, I know it's a "fake" experience, and it does not improve the skidpad speed, but it sure feels fun.
Old 02-13-2019, 05:21 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
TheSaint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
350 SL, R230 - 300 SL, R129 - 1964 Corvette Sting Ray Sport Coupe - Porsche 911 Twin Turbo (sold)
Smile

I did not want to have the problematic ABC suspension so i bought a Euro SL 350, R230 without the ABC suspension

Remember that Mercedes used adjustable coilovers on the SL Black Series
The following 2 users liked this post by TheSaint:
bellwilliam (02-13-2019), m5zealot (02-13-2019)
Old 02-13-2019, 05:52 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
m5zealot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Maricopa Arizona/San Diego California
Posts: 277
Received 76 Likes on 41 Posts
1988 BMW M5, 1989 BMW M3, 1979 Mercedes 450 SEL 6.9, 2006 SL55 AMG w/ P30 Performance Pack
Don't do it. The ABC system is an elegant and essential part of the car's engineering. I have driven two SL55's with coil overs and they rode like crap IMO. I put money aside to replace my entire system and about $9K later I have a new ABC that will hopefully last another 100K miles. My neighbor said it best, if you can't afford to fix it...maybe you should just light a match.... Kidding aside....this is just my opinion and no way putting down anyone who has a converted car. The trick is finding a kit that will work for you.

Last edited by m5zealot; 02-13-2019 at 05:57 PM.
Old 02-13-2019, 05:59 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
m5zealot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Maricopa Arizona/San Diego California
Posts: 277
Received 76 Likes on 41 Posts
1988 BMW M5, 1989 BMW M3, 1979 Mercedes 450 SEL 6.9, 2006 SL55 AMG w/ P30 Performance Pack
Originally Posted by 57staff
With coilovers, you have the choice of setting up the car for comfort or setting up the car for performance. Adjustable coilovers may allow you to adjust between drives, but you have to select a level of comfort or a level of performance.

The nice thing about ABC is you don't have to make that choice. These are heavy cars and ABC does a pretty good job of sorting out the handling in most situations. I've taken my SL up into the hills around LA and it has performed admirably if I don't push it too hard. Usually it's the brakes that give out before the ABC. Those with the P030 package have even better performance handling characteristics.

The real benefit I see with removing ABC and switching to coilovers is your get a couple hundred pounds of weight out of the car and you can do a better job of dialing in handling on the performance end of the spectrum. I believe this is what most people who have made the switch describe as the key benefit.
My car has the P30 Performance pack and is an amazing track monster out of the box. Well worth the $14,000.00 added cost to the MSRP.
Old 02-13-2019, 06:01 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Frederick NL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,342
Received 216 Likes on 185 Posts
2005 R 230 SL350 (M112 3.7). Sold the 1966 W113 230SL recently
Reference was made by The Saint to a Euro R230 that left the factory with coils. I made the same decision. I guess the black series has a dedicated set.
.
(radio plays ‘daddy took the t-bird away’, seems car-mood is everywhere)

Last edited by Frederick NL; 02-13-2019 at 06:05 PM.
Old 02-13-2019, 10:03 PM
  #20  
MBworld Guru
 
Rudeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,783
Received 999 Likes on 868 Posts
NO LONGER ACTIVE
It seems the standard suspension on the SL350 does a decent job. The car is lighter, and without the drag of the tandem pump, the V6 would perform better than with ABC.
Old 02-13-2019, 10:12 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 4,037
Received 992 Likes on 764 Posts
2003 CL 600
Aftermarket conversions are NOT the same as an SL350 or SL65BS suspension.

I've driven an SL65BS. Rides like ****. The main concern with them was weight. Same reason they deleted the folding top. ABC is the best possible combination for a street luxury/performance car, but it's heavy and expensive.

Active suspension is outlawed in most racing classes, or they would use it. The dynamic advantages are too strong not to.

I have CL and have had S classes, the heavier the car, the more you enjoy the ABC. Driving an airmatic w220 after an ABC one is night and day, the car feels heavy and loose on air, but it's soft. ABC has sharper bumps and such but totally defeats the heavy feel of the car, makes it so much more balanced and composed than a 5000lb yacht should be.
Old 02-15-2019, 12:44 AM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaazmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,970
Received 33 Likes on 31 Posts
2009 SL550 Roadster Diamond White, 2008 CLK550 Coupe Obsidian Black
Originally Posted by Rudeney
I won't argue whether handling and ride are better or worse between ABC and non-ABC, but I will say that I like what ABC does for my car. There is a particular stretch of road I drive that has some dips and undulations. In the ABC-equipped SL, I go over it and feel just a minor dip. When I drive over it in other cars (pretty much every car we've ever owned plus various loaners and rentals), it's a very uncomfortable "wallowing". Going over it at 40mph+ can be quite harrowing. I've hit it at 50mph in the SL and barely noticed it. I see other cars ahead of me really jumping and swaying. I also like the "simulated skyhook" cornering. Yes, I know it's a "fake" experience, and it does not improve the skidpad speed, but it sure feels fun.
I notice the exact same thing. There is a back road into the mountains and canyons in my area I take to get to the highway instead of the main road. There is a sharp dip and on the CLK if I go quickly though it I feel as though my stomach is coming up, but in the SL almost nothing.
Old 02-19-2019, 12:40 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
TheSaint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
350 SL, R230 - 300 SL, R129 - 1964 Corvette Sting Ray Sport Coupe - Porsche 911 Twin Turbo (sold)
Smile

Originally Posted by Frederick NL
Reference was made by The Saint to a Euro R230 that left the factory with coils. I made the same decision. I guess the black series has a dedicated set.
.
(radio plays ‘daddy took the t-bird away’, seems car-mood is everywhere)

I totally agree. If the ABC suspension was so great why did not Mercedes use the ABC suspension on the SL Black Series? What i find strange is that the ABC suspension does not have sway bars

Do not get me wrong i sure the ABC suspension is great as long you do not have any problems with it

Old 02-19-2019, 01:05 PM
  #24  
Banned
 
bobterry99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, unfortunately
Posts: 1,982
Received 387 Likes on 306 Posts
'09 S600, (2) R129 300SLs, '03 SL500, '03 SL55
Originally Posted by TheSaint
...why did not Mercedes use the ABC suspension on the SL Black Series?
Have you wondered why the Black doesn't have a folding top? Maybe that isn't so great?
Old 02-19-2019, 02:36 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
TheSaint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
350 SL, R230 - 300 SL, R129 - 1964 Corvette Sting Ray Sport Coupe - Porsche 911 Twin Turbo (sold)
Smile

No i have not wondered about it since i am pretty sure Mercedes want the SL65 AMG Black Series as stiff a possible.and as we know convertibles are not among the stiffest cars

But i have to say i am glad we all are different because if we all had the same opinion on things like cars it would be boring

I wanted a SL, R230 with regular shock absorbers, coil springs suspension and others want the ABC suspension. It is only a matter of what type of suspension you want on your car


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL/R230: regular suspension instead of hydraulic on SL 55



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:16 AM.