SL/R230: regular suspension instead of hydraulic on SL 55
#1
regular suspension instead of hydraulic on SL 55
I am seriously considering upgrading to AMG and i wanted to ask the experts here about is this even a good idea to have replaced your hydraulic suspensions with regular suspensions and the advantage of having two catalytic convertors vs 4
here is the ad
https://www.ebay.com/itm/22330853566...torefresh=true
can you let me know what you guys think? thank you
here is the ad
https://www.ebay.com/itm/22330853566...torefresh=true
can you let me know what you guys think? thank you
#2
Banned
#3
#4
Banned
A few weeks ago I bought the 2014 remaster of Zep's Houses of the Holy. Something about it just doesn't sound right. One thing I noticed was that on Rain Song the vocal seemed shifted slightly to the right. I have to listen to it more, but for now I'd say I prefer the original issue of the CD.
#6
Banned
To achieve greater agility modern fighter aircraft are inherently unstable in flight. Without computer control such a plane is unflyable and would crash.
Not dissimilarly, to achieve ride comfort the R230 suspension is extraordinarily compliant. Without computer control the car is still driveable, of course, but the handling is terrible.
The notion that a company can produce a suspension for the R230 that equals the comfort afforded by ABC would be patently absurd.
Not dissimilarly, to achieve ride comfort the R230 suspension is extraordinarily compliant. Without computer control the car is still driveable, of course, but the handling is terrible.
The notion that a company can produce a suspension for the R230 that equals the comfort afforded by ABC would be patently absurd.
The following users liked this post:
m5zealot (02-13-2019)
#7
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes
on
30 Posts
2008 CL550
I don't have any observations of a coilover conversion ride except what I read and hear. People who have done the changeover to coilovers comment that the car does handle better than with ABC. However, from what I understand, you lose the comfort and adaptability ABC affords to the ride. Basically, you can dial in the level of handling you want with a coil-over package and then you will only have that handling level until you change the setup. Now, changing that setup may be as simple as clicking the ride adjusters a few clicks to get the compliance you want but it is all manual and definitely not adaptable. From what I see in available coil-over packages, the SL 350 sway bar is not sufficient to provide you a flat ride plus it needs to be modified to clear the oil pan.
For me, I will keep my ABC until it fails catastrophically. Flush the system every year, rodeo, and run a finer filter element. ABC is very comfortable, especially on long drives, and I can drive it pretty hard in the curves and it does a great job keeping the car flat.
For me, I will keep my ABC until it fails catastrophically. Flush the system every year, rodeo, and run a finer filter element. ABC is very comfortable, especially on long drives, and I can drive it pretty hard in the curves and it does a great job keeping the car flat.
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,342
Received 216 Likes
on
185 Posts
2005 R 230 SL350 (M112 3.7). Sold the 1966 W113 230SL recently
I have never seriously driven an ABC equipped R230. Taken aback by the cost of eventual failure and given the Euro option of a non-ABC SL350 I decided for just that. The car is totally smooth and comfy, nothing about the handling feels substandard. ABC is a superb idea which I’m sure delivers a superb ride. It’s reaction time inherently must be a tad slower than a fully mechanical suspension, which is undoubtedly compensated for by design. Bobterry - as a passenger I was given the opportunity to fly a Cessna Citation II (twin jet), and I was working hard on that joystick, trying to maintain a steady flight without autopilot (I was an experienced recr. glider pilot at the time). No resemblance at all with telling my SL350 where to go.
Last edited by Frederick NL; 01-31-2019 at 03:45 PM.
#9
Thinking an ABS car can out handle a properly setup coilover car is equally absurd as thinking coilover car can ride better than a ABC car. how many ABC type controlled race car do you see?
The following users liked this post:
bellwilliam (02-01-2019)
#11
Senior Member
Here is a half hour video of someone removing the ABC system
and replacing it with Coilovers, sway bars, end links, and new pump.
And here is the same car on the road after the swap.
And here is the same car on the road after the swap.
#13
Banned
You've made a mistake. I never claimed ABC outhandles any or all conventional suspensions. Here's the relevant text you misunderstood (with emphasis): "Since it will significantly sacrifice ride quality and/or handling performance".
#14
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes
on
30 Posts
2008 CL550
With coilovers, you have the choice of setting up the car for comfort or setting up the car for performance. Adjustable coilovers may allow you to adjust between drives, but you have to select a level of comfort or a level of performance.
The nice thing about ABC is you don't have to make that choice. These are heavy cars and ABC does a pretty good job of sorting out the handling in most situations. I've taken my SL up into the hills around LA and it has performed admirably if I don't push it too hard. Usually it's the brakes that give out before the ABC. Those with the P030 package have even better performance handling characteristics.
The real benefit I see with removing ABC and switching to coilovers is your get a couple hundred pounds of weight out of the car and you can do a better job of dialing in handling on the performance end of the spectrum. I believe this is what most people who have made the switch describe as the key benefit.
The nice thing about ABC is you don't have to make that choice. These are heavy cars and ABC does a pretty good job of sorting out the handling in most situations. I've taken my SL up into the hills around LA and it has performed admirably if I don't push it too hard. Usually it's the brakes that give out before the ABC. Those with the P030 package have even better performance handling characteristics.
The real benefit I see with removing ABC and switching to coilovers is your get a couple hundred pounds of weight out of the car and you can do a better job of dialing in handling on the performance end of the spectrum. I believe this is what most people who have made the switch describe as the key benefit.
The following users liked this post:
m5zealot (02-13-2019)
#15
MBworld Guru
I won't argue whether handling and ride are better or worse between ABC and non-ABC, but I will say that I like what ABC does for my car. There is a particular stretch of road I drive that has some dips and undulations. In the ABC-equipped SL, I go over it and feel just a minor dip. When I drive over it in other cars (pretty much every car we've ever owned plus various loaners and rentals), it's a very uncomfortable "wallowing". Going over it at 40mph+ can be quite harrowing. I've hit it at 50mph in the SL and barely noticed it. I see other cars ahead of me really jumping and swaying. I also like the "simulated skyhook" cornering. Yes, I know it's a "fake" experience, and it does not improve the skidpad speed, but it sure feels fun.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
23 Posts
350 SL, R230 - 300 SL, R129 - 1964 Corvette Sting Ray Sport Coupe - Porsche 911 Twin Turbo (sold)
I did not want to have the problematic ABC suspension so i bought a Euro SL 350, R230 without the ABC suspension
Remember that Mercedes used adjustable coilovers on the SL Black Series
Remember that Mercedes used adjustable coilovers on the SL Black Series
The following 2 users liked this post by TheSaint:
bellwilliam (02-13-2019),
m5zealot (02-13-2019)
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Maricopa Arizona/San Diego California
Posts: 277
Received 76 Likes
on
41 Posts
1988 BMW M5, 1989 BMW M3, 1979 Mercedes 450 SEL 6.9, 2006 SL55 AMG w/ P30 Performance Pack
Don't do it. The ABC system is an elegant and essential part of the car's engineering. I have driven two SL55's with coil overs and they rode like crap IMO. I put money aside to replace my entire system and about $9K later I have a new ABC that will hopefully last another 100K miles. My neighbor said it best, if you can't afford to fix it...maybe you should just light a match.... Kidding aside....this is just my opinion and no way putting down anyone who has a converted car. The trick is finding a kit that will work for you.
Last edited by m5zealot; 02-13-2019 at 05:57 PM.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Maricopa Arizona/San Diego California
Posts: 277
Received 76 Likes
on
41 Posts
1988 BMW M5, 1989 BMW M3, 1979 Mercedes 450 SEL 6.9, 2006 SL55 AMG w/ P30 Performance Pack
With coilovers, you have the choice of setting up the car for comfort or setting up the car for performance. Adjustable coilovers may allow you to adjust between drives, but you have to select a level of comfort or a level of performance.
The nice thing about ABC is you don't have to make that choice. These are heavy cars and ABC does a pretty good job of sorting out the handling in most situations. I've taken my SL up into the hills around LA and it has performed admirably if I don't push it too hard. Usually it's the brakes that give out before the ABC. Those with the P030 package have even better performance handling characteristics.
The real benefit I see with removing ABC and switching to coilovers is your get a couple hundred pounds of weight out of the car and you can do a better job of dialing in handling on the performance end of the spectrum. I believe this is what most people who have made the switch describe as the key benefit.
The nice thing about ABC is you don't have to make that choice. These are heavy cars and ABC does a pretty good job of sorting out the handling in most situations. I've taken my SL up into the hills around LA and it has performed admirably if I don't push it too hard. Usually it's the brakes that give out before the ABC. Those with the P030 package have even better performance handling characteristics.
The real benefit I see with removing ABC and switching to coilovers is your get a couple hundred pounds of weight out of the car and you can do a better job of dialing in handling on the performance end of the spectrum. I believe this is what most people who have made the switch describe as the key benefit.
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,342
Received 216 Likes
on
185 Posts
2005 R 230 SL350 (M112 3.7). Sold the 1966 W113 230SL recently
Reference was made by The Saint to a Euro R230 that left the factory with coils. I made the same decision. I guess the black series has a dedicated set.
.
(radio plays ‘daddy took the t-bird away’, seems car-mood is everywhere)
.
(radio plays ‘daddy took the t-bird away’, seems car-mood is everywhere)
Last edited by Frederick NL; 02-13-2019 at 06:05 PM.
#20
MBworld Guru
It seems the standard suspension on the SL350 does a decent job. The car is lighter, and without the drag of the tandem pump, the V6 would perform better than with ABC.
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Aftermarket conversions are NOT the same as an SL350 or SL65BS suspension.
I've driven an SL65BS. Rides like ****. The main concern with them was weight. Same reason they deleted the folding top. ABC is the best possible combination for a street luxury/performance car, but it's heavy and expensive.
Active suspension is outlawed in most racing classes, or they would use it. The dynamic advantages are too strong not to.
I have CL and have had S classes, the heavier the car, the more you enjoy the ABC. Driving an airmatic w220 after an ABC one is night and day, the car feels heavy and loose on air, but it's soft. ABC has sharper bumps and such but totally defeats the heavy feel of the car, makes it so much more balanced and composed than a 5000lb yacht should be.
I've driven an SL65BS. Rides like ****. The main concern with them was weight. Same reason they deleted the folding top. ABC is the best possible combination for a street luxury/performance car, but it's heavy and expensive.
Active suspension is outlawed in most racing classes, or they would use it. The dynamic advantages are too strong not to.
I have CL and have had S classes, the heavier the car, the more you enjoy the ABC. Driving an airmatic w220 after an ABC one is night and day, the car feels heavy and loose on air, but it's soft. ABC has sharper bumps and such but totally defeats the heavy feel of the car, makes it so much more balanced and composed than a 5000lb yacht should be.
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
I won't argue whether handling and ride are better or worse between ABC and non-ABC, but I will say that I like what ABC does for my car. There is a particular stretch of road I drive that has some dips and undulations. In the ABC-equipped SL, I go over it and feel just a minor dip. When I drive over it in other cars (pretty much every car we've ever owned plus various loaners and rentals), it's a very uncomfortable "wallowing". Going over it at 40mph+ can be quite harrowing. I've hit it at 50mph in the SL and barely noticed it. I see other cars ahead of me really jumping and swaying. I also like the "simulated skyhook" cornering. Yes, I know it's a "fake" experience, and it does not improve the skidpad speed, but it sure feels fun.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
23 Posts
350 SL, R230 - 300 SL, R129 - 1964 Corvette Sting Ray Sport Coupe - Porsche 911 Twin Turbo (sold)
I totally agree. If the ABC suspension was so great why did not Mercedes use the ABC suspension on the SL Black Series? What i find strange is that the ABC suspension does not have sway bars
Do not get me wrong i sure the ABC suspension is great as long you do not have any problems with it
#24
Banned
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
23 Posts
350 SL, R230 - 300 SL, R129 - 1964 Corvette Sting Ray Sport Coupe - Porsche 911 Twin Turbo (sold)
No i have not wondered about it since i am pretty sure Mercedes want the SL65 AMG Black Series as stiff a possible.and as we know convertibles are not among the stiffest cars
But i have to say i am glad we all are different because if we all had the same opinion on things like cars it would be boring
I wanted a SL, R230 with regular shock absorbers, coil springs suspension and others want the ABC suspension. It is only a matter of what type of suspension you want on your car
But i have to say i am glad we all are different because if we all had the same opinion on things like cars it would be boring
I wanted a SL, R230 with regular shock absorbers, coil springs suspension and others want the ABC suspension. It is only a matter of what type of suspension you want on your car