SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Need SL600/SL65 buying advice & prices
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,268
Likes: 253
This is not a car an mb dealer is interested in. Too old, too troubleful, hard to get rid of since most banks will not touch it either. The only way an mb dealer ends up with a car like this is if they got slapped with it on a trade in and got it for dirt cheap. My guess is they got it for less than 30k. If it doesn't sell off to the auction it goes and after fees they will break even on it.
Newbie
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
SL 65 AMG
Well, you bring up a couple good points that it is an older car for a dealer, and that most banks won't give a loan on a car that old. However, from what I have read on these forums, these cars aren't that much trouble. Most of them have very low miles for their age, and have been garaged and are well taken care of, simply because most of the owners have a good income. It seems to me that a car like this for low $30's is a good deal, if there isn't something really wrong with it. That's why I am so interested in this model in general, because you can wind up with a pile of power, technology, and panache for a very reasonable price. Plus, the bulk of the car's life should still be ahead of it.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 125
From: Atlanta Metro
Current: C217 V12TT AMG Previously: C55 AMG, SL65 AMG
Alright guys need more advice as I'm starting to narrow down (and my budget is getting cheaper; isn't it supposed to be the other way around? Start high go higher?). I'm contemplating whether I should bring the SL55 back onto the table. If I can find a good one, is this a smarter buy than the SL65 (I ask myself). Powerful hardtop convertible either way you look at it.
05 SL65 in NY, dealer:
- V12
- 55,000 miles
- Clean carfax, MB service records, 1 owner, southern car
- Unsure if it has pano roof
- No parktronic no distronic
- Nicer front bumper
- Would change burl wood to black birdseye or carbon fiber
- $36,500
- Plus shipping costs
- Plus dealer fees
- Plus tax
- The feeling of "too good to be true"
07 SL55 in FL, private:
- V8 S/C
- 67,000 miles
- More reliable? Maybe?
- Clean carfax, MB service records, 1 owner, southern car
- Has pano roof and parktronic
- No distronic
- Has carbon fiber interior
- Would change wheels to SL63 or SL65 wheels
- $37,900
- Would drive back to GA; no extra costs
- Has shift paddles and little extras
- ABC suspension and SBC brakes were upgraded in 07 supposedly to more reliable units?
- Minor upgrades to calipers, taillights, etc
Thanks for the opinions
05 SL65 in NY, dealer:
- V12
- 55,000 miles
- Clean carfax, MB service records, 1 owner, southern car
- Unsure if it has pano roof
- No parktronic no distronic
- Nicer front bumper
- Would change burl wood to black birdseye or carbon fiber
- $36,500
- Plus shipping costs
- Plus dealer fees
- Plus tax
- The feeling of "too good to be true"
07 SL55 in FL, private:
- V8 S/C
- 67,000 miles
- More reliable? Maybe?
- Clean carfax, MB service records, 1 owner, southern car
- Has pano roof and parktronic
- No distronic
- Has carbon fiber interior
- Would change wheels to SL63 or SL65 wheels
- $37,900
- Would drive back to GA; no extra costs
- Has shift paddles and little extras
- ABC suspension and SBC brakes were upgraded in 07 supposedly to more reliable units?
- Minor upgrades to calipers, taillights, etc
Thanks for the opinions
Last edited by Viper98912; Jan 20, 2014 at 04:21 PM.
Newbie
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
SL 65 AMG
You shouldn't have to pay tax for either vehicle when buying them, because they are both out of state. You will probably have to pay for in-state tax when licensing it or on property tax at year end (each state is different), but that would be the same for both vehicles. Not sure what dealer fees you are referring to, but I wouldn't accept any "extra" fees for anything. You should be able to talk the dealer down a bit on price, unless it is a brand new listing.
Personally, I vote for the SL65 just cause it has more power and panache, but that's me. Either would be great. I'm jealous. If you want someone to drive the SL65 down from NY, I can probably help you with that.
Personally, I vote for the SL65 just cause it has more power and panache, but that's me. Either would be great. I'm jealous. If you want someone to drive the SL65 down from NY, I can probably help you with that.
Super Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 930
Likes: 24
06 SL65AMG, 13 Tesla Model S 60kwh, 02 Jaguar S-Type 3.0, 12 S550 4 Matic, 07 E320 Bluetec, 06 LX470
If the car is around NYC, I wouldn't bother with all those stop and go traffic I'd question the transmission. I feel like the gears would be shredded and this is from my personal experience living and working in NYC for weeks at a time when I'm way from Wash. DC
Brakes and Ignition coils sound like they are just about due too, usually after 50k these parts start to go and your gonna be looking at 4k+ for brakes and 2.5k+ for Coils, that and the spark plugs would need to be changed so that's another 300-500
As for the SL55 I've always question FL cars since ppl in FL tend to drive exotics like Honda's and drive them hard all day.
If you have proof that brakes/coils are okay and this wasn't a NYC car then Id take the SL65, If not then I'd keep looking it seems you really want a 65 badly and I can tell you from experience I picked a 55 over a 65 and I regretted it, which is while later on in that same year I swapped to a 65, That or buy a warranty and swap the coil, when they go bad, But you will be facing a huge brake job bill. If you want to avoid maintenance cost as much, Get the 55 with a warranty and the brakes on the 55 are no where as bad as a 65
Brakes and Ignition coils sound like they are just about due too, usually after 50k these parts start to go and your gonna be looking at 4k+ for brakes and 2.5k+ for Coils, that and the spark plugs would need to be changed so that's another 300-500
As for the SL55 I've always question FL cars since ppl in FL tend to drive exotics like Honda's and drive them hard all day.
If you have proof that brakes/coils are okay and this wasn't a NYC car then Id take the SL65, If not then I'd keep looking it seems you really want a 65 badly and I can tell you from experience I picked a 55 over a 65 and I regretted it, which is while later on in that same year I swapped to a 65, That or buy a warranty and swap the coil, when they go bad, But you will be facing a huge brake job bill. If you want to avoid maintenance cost as much, Get the 55 with a warranty and the brakes on the 55 are no where as bad as a 65
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
2006 Scion XB, BMW 335D, Porsche 997TT, 1997 Jeep Wrangler, 1974 Vespa, 2011 Cayenne, Diamond DA40
In Georgia you will have to pay taxes either way. There is a handy calculator on the GA DOR web site at http://onlinemvd.dor.ga.gov/TAP/Welcome.aspx The 2005 SL65 and the 2007 SL55 are going to be real close tax wise.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 125
From: Atlanta Metro
Current: C217 V12TT AMG Previously: C55 AMG, SL65 AMG
In Georgia you will have to pay taxes either way. There is a handy calculator on the GA DOR web site at http://onlinemvd.dor.ga.gov/TAP/Welcome.aspx The 2005 SL65 and the 2007 SL55 are going to be real close tax wise.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 125
From: Atlanta Metro
Current: C217 V12TT AMG Previously: C55 AMG, SL65 AMG
You shouldn't have to pay tax for either vehicle when buying them, because they are both out of state. You will probably have to pay for in-state tax when licensing it or on property tax at year end (each state is different), but that would be the same for both vehicles. Not sure what dealer fees you are referring to, but I wouldn't accept any "extra" fees for anything. You should be able to talk the dealer down a bit on price, unless it is a brand new listing.
Personally, I vote for the SL65 just cause it has more power and panache, but that's me. Either would be great. I'm jealous. If you want someone to drive the SL65 down from NY, I can probably help you with that.
Personally, I vote for the SL65 just cause it has more power and panache, but that's me. Either would be great. I'm jealous. If you want someone to drive the SL65 down from NY, I can probably help you with that.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 125
From: Atlanta Metro
Current: C217 V12TT AMG Previously: C55 AMG, SL65 AMG
If the car is around NYC, I wouldn't bother with all those stop and go traffic I'd question the transmission. I feel like the gears would be shredded and this is from my personal experience living and working in NYC for weeks at a time when I'm way from Wash. DC
Brakes and Ignition coils sound like they are just about due too, usually after 50k these parts start to go and your gonna be looking at 4k+ for brakes and 2.5k+ for Coils, that and the spark plugs would need to be changed so that's another 300-500
As for the SL55 I've always question FL cars since ppl in FL tend to drive exotics like Honda's and drive them hard all day.
If you have proof that brakes/coils are okay and this wasn't a NYC car then Id take the SL65, If not then I'd keep looking it seems you really want a 65 badly and I can tell you from experience I picked a 55 over a 65 and I regretted it, which is while later on in that same year I swapped to a 65, That or buy a warranty and swap the coil, when they go bad, But you will be facing a huge brake job bill. If you want to avoid maintenance cost as much, Get the 55 with a warranty and the brakes on the 55 are no where as bad as a 65
Brakes and Ignition coils sound like they are just about due too, usually after 50k these parts start to go and your gonna be looking at 4k+ for brakes and 2.5k+ for Coils, that and the spark plugs would need to be changed so that's another 300-500
As for the SL55 I've always question FL cars since ppl in FL tend to drive exotics like Honda's and drive them hard all day.
If you have proof that brakes/coils are okay and this wasn't a NYC car then Id take the SL65, If not then I'd keep looking it seems you really want a 65 badly and I can tell you from experience I picked a 55 over a 65 and I regretted it, which is while later on in that same year I swapped to a 65, That or buy a warranty and swap the coil, when they go bad, But you will be facing a huge brake job bill. If you want to avoid maintenance cost as much, Get the 55 with a warranty and the brakes on the 55 are no where as bad as a 65
As much as I want an SL65, I mostly care about having an R230 AMG. I just find them to be such beautiful, amazing cars. 65, well 65 just because it's a rediculous car that they should've probably never made as a production, non-special (black) car. I do want a V12, but nothing says that can't be an S600 or Aston DBS in the future. So if in the short term, a more-reliable, slightly newer SL55 is available, it catches my eye too.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,882
Likes: 1,214
From: In my garage
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Newbie
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
SL 65 AMG
Well, most of what I have read about the SL65's from a maintenance issue standpoint are what I would consider minor issues. Brakes and coils are easy to change in the driveway with some basic tools, assuming you are willing to spin a wrench. I have read a few posts about ABC system issues, but those issues don't seem to be systemic. Are there any other common issues with the SL65?
Also, I understand that the SL65 has two-piece brake rotors, which means you can change just the rotor/friction part and not the hat. I can't image 4 bare rotor frictions would be that much, although I admit I don't currently have a link to buying them. EvoSport was supposedly selling a replacement rotor that allowed you to just replace the outer friction steel, but I can't seem to find a link that works. If you have to replace the 2-piece fronts, I see they are around $1,700 for aftermarket, but I saw a posting that said OEM is around $1,100. The rear aftermarket 2-piece is around $1,200. I would expect the front to go before the rear, but there is a good chance the rotors are still fine. It just depends a lot on how the car was driven.
Does anyone have a working link for buying just the rotor/friction steel for these brakes?
Also, I understand that the SL65 has two-piece brake rotors, which means you can change just the rotor/friction part and not the hat. I can't image 4 bare rotor frictions would be that much, although I admit I don't currently have a link to buying them. EvoSport was supposedly selling a replacement rotor that allowed you to just replace the outer friction steel, but I can't seem to find a link that works. If you have to replace the 2-piece fronts, I see they are around $1,700 for aftermarket, but I saw a posting that said OEM is around $1,100. The rear aftermarket 2-piece is around $1,200. I would expect the front to go before the rear, but there is a good chance the rotors are still fine. It just depends a lot on how the car was driven.
Does anyone have a working link for buying just the rotor/friction steel for these brakes?
Last edited by DASHIP; Jan 21, 2014 at 11:23 AM.
Super Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 930
Likes: 24
06 SL65AMG, 13 Tesla Model S 60kwh, 02 Jaguar S-Type 3.0, 12 S550 4 Matic, 07 E320 Bluetec, 06 LX470
Cause Evosport doesn't exist anymore, theres huge drama that went on in that company apparently, you would need to figure out how to get them from Brembo
Super Moderator
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 3,680
From: Land of 10,000 lakes
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
That is not correct either. Any MB V12 ( and many other brands) depreciates independent of reliability. This is well known and has nothing to do with the SL65. While we had a SL600, it was a 1000 times more reliable than our SL55. We bought that one new and it racked up about $25k in covered repairs in the first year alone. In the end all R230's have similar maintenance and repairs. Now any informed buyer will know what goes wrong with these. As was already pointed out in these posts, the age is less relevant than the service history. See what was replaced on the car already; if you are running on first gen parts, your risk will be higher. I loved our SL55, but IMHO, a SL65 is better in all ways but drive dynamics due to its heaver engine. But then all SL's are cruisers anyway...
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,882
Likes: 1,214
From: In my garage
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Sure, all/most MB's depreciate quickly but the ABC equipped cars seem to depreciate like a boulder sinks in water. It's just about straight down and doesn't stop until it hits the bottom.
Is this a bad thing. For a long term owner that buys new or nearly new, it's horrible. However, for the person wanting to buy a SL65 at 1/5 the cost of the car when it was new, it's awesome! That is, if you can turn a wrench or you have lots of money for maintenance and repairs, it's great.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 125
From: Atlanta Metro
Current: C217 V12TT AMG Previously: C55 AMG, SL65 AMG
Sigh, and of course, that's what also bugs me a little bit. Selling what I think has been a fairly reliable car for one that's potentially very unreliable.
Super Moderator
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 3,680
From: Land of 10,000 lakes
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
MB V12's have a terrible reputation for reliability. Now, is that warranted on the bi-turbo V12? Not exactly but on the previous NA V12.....absolutely! Save for the coil packs and the idler pulleys, the bi-turbo V12's are great engines. The V12 MB's depreciate very quickly due to the bad reputation especially in the S class. The 230 SL and 215 CL also depreciate very quickly due to all the issues with the car in general such as the ABC suspension. Sure, all/most MB's depreciate quickly but the ABC equipped cars seem to depreciate like a boulder sinks in water. It's just about straight down and doesn't stop until it hits the bottom. Is this a bad thing. For a long term owner that buys new or nearly new, it's horrible. However, for the person wanting to buy a SL65 at 1/5 the cost of the car when it was new, it's awesome! That is, if you can turn a wrench or you have lots of money for maintenance and repairs, it's great.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,882
Likes: 1,214
From: In my garage
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
I had a plethoria of ABC issues on my, at the time, two year old bi-turbo 600. I went through two tandem pumps, just about every ABC line, idler tensioners, coil packs, seat fan, and misc bits and pieces. Maybe the 65 was/is more reliable but the 600 sure the hell wasn't.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 125
From: Atlanta Metro
Current: C217 V12TT AMG Previously: C55 AMG, SL65 AMG
I think I'm going to pony up and wait for a good deal on an 07-08 SL65 since it has a few of the small extras that I like. Just need to wait a few months to get everything on track.
Newbie
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
SL 65 AMG
I am not very familiar with the changes that happened between years, except that there seems to have been some fairly major updates in '09 I think. When you say that '07 - '08 have a few extras, what are you referring to? Is there anywhere that has a list of all the changes between model years?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 32
From: Vancouver, BC
CLS55 AMG
Didn't really want to start a new thread, but it's kind of related... What do you guys think a 2007 SL55 with 90k miles is worth? I know the mileage is high, but it's got maintenance records for it's entire life, 90k Service B just completed. Would it be a good deal at $25k?
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
From: On a hill
2004 SL350
Gee, I find this thread depressing. If I read it as a newbie before buying an SL I wouldn't touch any model at all.
Over 20 years I've had five SL's - three of them were R129's.
Then I bought a 2003 SL600 and kept it for a couple of years. The idle pulley went but that was a few hours into the purchase, so the dealer took care of it. Nothing else went wrong after that, it was a dream car.
After a break with a 2003 Vanquish, couple of late model Bentley Continental GTs and a 2010 Range Rover, I bought a 2006 SL500 as a runaround. Now, a year later, 4,000kms and no issues.
Maybe it was luck? I like to think it was the brand. I had more ongoing problems with the low mileage Aston Martin than any of the SL's.
Like many here I lust after the SL65, but the maintenance costs seem extreme. Does all this really go so horribly wrong for an SL65?
Over 20 years I've had five SL's - three of them were R129's.
Then I bought a 2003 SL600 and kept it for a couple of years. The idle pulley went but that was a few hours into the purchase, so the dealer took care of it. Nothing else went wrong after that, it was a dream car.
After a break with a 2003 Vanquish, couple of late model Bentley Continental GTs and a 2010 Range Rover, I bought a 2006 SL500 as a runaround. Now, a year later, 4,000kms and no issues.
Maybe it was luck? I like to think it was the brand. I had more ongoing problems with the low mileage Aston Martin than any of the SL's.
Like many here I lust after the SL65, but the maintenance costs seem extreme. Does all this really go so horribly wrong for an SL65?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,882
Likes: 1,214
From: In my garage
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
How many miles did your SL 600 have? How many miles did you drive the car and how long did you own the car?
Having issues is a function of how many miles you drove and how long you had the car. The maintenance costs are directly proportional to mileage and time.
Having issues is a function of how many miles you drove and how long you had the car. The maintenance costs are directly proportional to mileage and time.
Super Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 930
Likes: 24
06 SL65AMG, 13 Tesla Model S 60kwh, 02 Jaguar S-Type 3.0, 12 S550 4 Matic, 07 E320 Bluetec, 06 LX470
Yes this issues are bound to happen, I already had to change the engine mounts, both coil packs go bad, an ABC pump, both my front struts, and my brakes, pse pump and so on all go out from the 50-60k range but it helps a lot when you get warranties on these cars, basically paid for almost everything except the brakes since those are wear items.
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 228
Likes: 2
ML63, ML320
Didn't really want to start a new thread, but it's kind of related... What do you guys think a 2007 SL55 with 90k miles is worth? I know the mileage is high, but it's got maintenance records for it's entire life, 90k Service B just completed. Would it be a good deal at $25k?
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
From: On a hill
2004 SL350
I now know why owners trade up every 2-3 years
