SLK/R171: new SLK pics
Based on these pics, I'd order it without hesitation, as opposed to other "undisguised" or "official" pics like the ones that appeared in AutoWeek recently, which do NOT make me want to replace my 2001 SLK 320.

Trending Topics
Last edited by katika; May 15, 2003 at 03:56 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Guys, quit passing off wrong pics. This blue thing posted looks nothing like the test car spied being driven around. I'll hunt for those pics and post them here - just give me a moment. Oops, looks like I am having some trouble posting the images at this time. Look up the pics at autoweek.com - you'll see what I mean. This looks nothing like the spy shot.
I like this one too…
VivianLove, looking at your posted picture it sure looks a lot like the spy shot if you peel away the camouflage. Look at the profile of both cars and the front lower bumper and I think you, VivianLove, have the best pic of the real thing IMHO (are you sure that is not the real deal by the way - where is the pic from I wonder?)
I believe I got the picture from this forum.
The thing I don't like about the SLK is that it looks too much like a woman's car, small and cute.
The thing about a car that looks like a woman's car is that an eminently secure and confident man can buy it too :o
This isn't an issue of whether or not a man can buy the SLK. Regardless of how "secure" a man is, it still doesn't change the fact that the SLK looks like it was made for a woman. I can't stand the sight of tall guys trying to squeez into the SLK. I mean, why sacrifice comfort just so you can say "I drive a convertible benz"?
niiice, that doenst look anything like a womans car, shiaate, id drive that, looks mean. I heard they were putting the V8 in the amg model, that would be sweet.


