Gustav has lost it!
F#@K him!! (ps Gustav, Ban Me too - EMMPWR )
F#@K him!! (ps Gustav, Ban Me too - EMMPWR )Why do you start these threads your trying to start another war and should be put in time out or banned
You also started another about the tranny in the m5....grow the **** up
This car has a confirmed 0-200 km/h of 13,8 s from a Swedish magazine with proffesional equipment, with winter tyres actually.
Equal to Gallardo and 996 TT with 510 HP.
A bit faster than Viper over 150 km/h. Remember, Viper and M5 have the same time on Nürburgring.
E55 AMG = well, you already know that
This car has a confirmed 0-200 km/h of 13,8 s from a Swedish magazine with proffesional equipment, with winter tyres actually.
Equal to Gallardo and 996 TT with 510 HP.
A bit faster than Viper over 150 km/h. Remember, Viper and M5 have the same time on Nürburgring.
E55 AMG = well, you already know that

Trending Topics
Did you notice the difference between a E39 M5 and the E60:
http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/sho...=video+e39+e60
The E39 had a new engine, I beleive we had S5 program, however it could have been S6.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
This doesn't mean I'm "PRO" M5 all of a sudden...I've always just been a fan of cars in general. When I get my M5 (hopefully in Sep) I'll take her to the track and see how if does against stock E55 and Spero's "monster" E55. At the end of the day, we all still go home friends not giving 2 *****s about "who's d!ck is bigger", because after all, this whole mess is about that basically, isn't it?
it's all about physics here..... mostly power to weight.... and most of the claims are not lining up.... unless your definition of killing the other car is losing....
or everyone you're racing can't drive... which I doubt...
Last edited by Fikse; Apr 23, 2005 at 08:58 AM.
That is why I doid not go to a drag strip. Also I did not want to abose the car with too many LC since the rearwheels were bad.
Also another variable is removed with rolling starts: the start. So I thought this was the best solution. Drag strips is not something for me and maybe not for the M5 either... I think it wil lshine even mroe in higher speeds, speeds that are acheived on autobahsn for example.
Gustav...as a previous and possible future owner of an M3 (the current bodystyle not the upcoming one) I have no ill will to the M division and respect them for engineering minds in terms of handling and track performance.
Good luck with your board...just stay even handed with your aggressive and inflammatory board members that you may have as you have with any cross posters from this board. Peace.
the M5 can't be that bad off the line can it? even it is, the MPH trap speed at the end of the 1/4 tells the real story..... with your claims, it should be pulling 120 MPH at the end...
That is why I doid not go to a drag strip. Also I did not want to abose the car with too many LC since the rearwheels were bad.
Also another variable is removed with rolling starts: the start. So I thought this was the best solution. Drag strips is not something for me and maybe not for the M5 either... I think it wil lshine even mroe in higher speeds, speeds that are acheived on autobahsn for example.
I have not claimed anything regarding quarter mile, I have claimed rolling start from 50 km/h and 100 km/H the M5 is even and maybe a bit faster at higher speeds than many of todays "sportscars".
Again... There is more than the quarter mile and that is what the M5 will be used for . It seems difficlut to get over the fact for soem people that there are other measurments than the average lengths between a US stoplight...
Is that not so in your country? How else would one achieve individuality, growth, etc. Would that be considered positive or a one way track. How can progress be realized with stagnation and/or thought/expression control?
I cannot see how the recent threads here in the E55 forum could be considered positive. If you are immature and like personal slander with no facts, then you might consider it positive.
I removed members from my site after they were engaged in discussions with personale attacks on other members. I strive for a positive climate, and whoever who does not like that is free to not join my site. Endless debates with members who refuse to see other posts and is in additoon to this behaving rude I see as contributos to my site.
I cannot see how the recent threads here in the E55 forum could be considered positive. If you are immature and like personal slander with no facts, then you might consider it positive.
I removed members from my site after they were engaged in discussions with personale attacks on other members. I strive for a positive climate, and whoever who does not like that is free to not join my site. Endless debates with members who refuse to see other posts and is in additoon to this behaving rude I see as contributos to my site.
This is not the first time you have made the above accusation, see below:
For the record, I am no longer banned on the M5 forum. NOW, for the last time- Please show one single word of any type of insult I posted on your board before you banned me. You've made the accusation, simply post it here and back it up. Good day.









