E55 Handling...stock vs 275/35 & 295/30
Stock:
Initial feel on both '05 and '06 cars was MASSIVE push. I drive this car very differently than I did my M3. On the M3, I literally matched the acceleration to my steering input to balance the car. In other words, the accelerator was used to steer the car while in the turn. For those that don't understand rear drives, just look up "lift throttle oversteer" for an example. Anyhow, the E55 has been a hard one for me to do these seat of the pants type moves with, so now I have learned to do as much of my braking as possible BEFORE the turn in. Then, I use the added power to catch back up on the exit and straight. The old days of me slipping inside of people on turns are over. The E is just not nimble enough to do that without going two to three wide in the turns. Last note, I had MASSIVE wheel spin when on it!!
Front (stock), Rear (275/35 PS2s):
Pushed even more (duh). However, the rear settled down a bit. I do not know if the PS2s last, but they seem like DRs compared to the Contis. The car launched MUCH better, but that is it.
Front (265/35), Rear (275/35): all 4 tires on 18X9 et39 wheels.
In this case, the fronts had 265/35 Contis and the rears had 275/35 PS2s. I was going for the balanced feel and was wondering if the rear setup even fits the front. It does. Very nicely, in fact. The steering got MUCH tighter and the push was minimized. This was the first time that i noticed any front body roll, so i must be getting stronger Gs. The rear was the same as before. Just OK.
Front (275/35), Rear (265/35): all 4 tires on 18X9 et39 wheels.
I focused on the front and tried to see if the 275 PS2s would fit. They did. No rubbing and an EXCELLENT fit all around. The rear rims on these cars go very nicely on the front. the et makes for a nicely tucked tire. The 275/35 PS2s are very nice up front. the feel is much sportier. The only option would be to get a fatter rim to stretch the tire walls a bit more for lateral G. Other than that, it is awesome. I stayed with this setup on the front.
Rear (295/30 PZero on 18X9.5 et29):
I got a pair of the CLS Style IV rims and tried the 295/30s. I figured go for the gusto!! This size is ALMOST perfect!! I wish it had a slightly larger et. Maybe a 35 vs the 29 it has. There is plenty of room on the inner side and up top. But, as the suspension compresses, there is only about a 1 credit card gap between the well and the tire. I was scared of body damage, so I took it slow. The tire does not come anywhere near the metal / plastic gap of the fender, so that is good. The only part that did "rub" were the rubber needles that stick out of the tires. I wore them off on the first hard drive. I heard nothing from the cabin, but the needles were gone after the ride and I had a gooey film on the fender lip. Since then, no problems. GREAT launches compared to the 265/35.
Summary: in the end, I think I will try to get the following setup:
I will stay with 18s, as I am into improving the lateral and not the straightline stability. I would prefer to go wider than taller. I will get PS2s all around plus I will get a pair of rears w/ DRs for drag fun.
Front:
275/35 on 18X9.5, et 40
Rear:
295/30 on 18X10, et35 for road rides
295/35 on 18X10, et35 for dragging
Next, I will look into larger sway bars and strut supports. I loved how the car stayed level on the stock Contis. i hope I can get it back to that with the added rubber.

Loren
I loved the look of the 20's but got tired of the ride and the 285/30's caused the wiggle.
I have to agree the PS2's are impressive had I seen your results a couple of weeks ago I might have gotten different size rubber, maybe for the next set!
So basically rear wheels fit the front and you went as big as 275/35 on the front with no problems at all.
I also have 275/35 BFG DR's for the rears and they are amazing even with brake torquing they do not spin at all.
Now all I need to do is find a nice set of 18x9 wheels that are light and will accept the TPMS sensors, and that look cool!




MPH@6100rpm
Suggestion..............Stock
1st...46.4...............48.3
2nd...76.1..............79.2
3rd...118.2.............123.1
4th...166.7.............174.6
5th...200.8.............209
Gets car to 200mph bang on with full delimit... should you ever need to do this of course....

So that sorts out the rears ... what would you suggest with stock rims for the fronts 255/35's?
Any thoughts ?
Loren's thread on this issue:
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...ght=295+wiggle
Trending Topics
Is it is the differential waggle that I have felt in other cars: This would happen even in a straight acceleration and you can simple feel the differential working. If this is the problem, then i do not mind or blame the tires. That is the car NOT handling the traction smoothly. I would hope that the LSD may help.
Another thing to keep in mind is that I stayed with 18" and kept the overall diameters (front and rear) almost stock. I have seen no attempts on here to simply go wider. Everyone seems to want the blink look and I want the rail feel. I do assume that much of the observations has to do with 19s and or 20s, or at least I hope so. i do know that my friends with 19s complain much more about it and they are running 285s.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The rear rims fitted with 275/35 PSs work well in the front. NO RUBBING. EVER. I driven the car VERY hard and it has at least 2cm at all corners.
295/30/18 DOES NOT RUB, if it is setup properly. This means taking great care to get the proper offset. Look under your E.
Again, all of this may be different than what your current dogma says, but I really do think it has to do with staying with the 18s.
At any rate, I've read loren's thread, but i am still a bit confused about the waggle.
The brake application makes the car lean to one side then the other, back and forth until hard acceleration has stopped. It is very annoying and really kills the rock solid feel of the car.
If someone else has a better or more correct explanation please provide it.

Loren
I am effectively stranded and am considering tossing the remaining three tires out to replace with something else, like 245/275/19 PS2 combination or even 255/285 in RE050A.
Speaking of fishtailing, I get it with all rear tire sizes, 265,275 and 285 when I kick down to FIRST- is the 295 "wiggle" any different?
Hell, I dunno...
Thanks for the help!!
As for the sensation you are describing, that again, sounds like the rear differential. The 295s would grip better and cause the diff to try to work harder to put the power down instead of just spinning. Actually, now that I think of it, it has only happenned to me in German cars. My M3 did it at launch and my friend's 993TT (track car) did it real bad with slicks on. He eventually upgraded the rear end and it cured it.
I wonder if we don't have a few different things going on here. If it is the differential waggle, then I do not blame the 295 tires. If that is not it, then I'd like to find it before I either hurt my car or decide to buy more 295s!!
Good luck with whatever you decide to do. Hope I helped a little here...
Last edited by Torquey55; Jun 26, 2006 at 10:57 PM.
The ESP light does not illuminate when the wiggle is happening, and I am not 100% sure my explanation is perfect, but my car now drives perfectly. I have also run BFG DR's on the stock wheels with no issues (275/35) so it is not a problem caused by excessive traction or poorly designed differentials. You may have a different problem because as soon as I put the 20's on I remembered the threads I had read about the "wiggle" and immediately knew what it was.
It happens under hard acceleration, you feel the rear of the car lean to one side then to the other oscillating back and forth until you ease up on the gas. It really sucks. If you take the rear wheel off you might see evidence of the sidewall slightly rubbing the inside of the wheel well, but you don't hear or feel it.
Try this from 30mph floor it up to 100mph if the rear moves left to right about .5 sec per side until you let up you have the wiggle and somewhere your tires are making contact.
I am not trying to be rude or beat a dead horse. I just really care about handling.
Here are a few figures to think about:
A few things to note when going from stock to my chosen sizes:
Front: I went from a 25.7 to a 25.6 inch diameter, or a difference of -1%.
Rear: I went from a 25.3 to a 25.0 inch diameter, or a difference of -1%.
Overall, the car height aspect is exactly -1% at all 4 corners. This is important, since all the ECU cares about is revs, not traction.
In contrast, note the MASSIVE difference caused by increasing ONLY the rim diameter (note, I am only comparing rear wheels / tires for now):
Going from an 18 to a 19 raises the differential by 5%
Going from a 19 to a 20 raises it another 5%
Overall, even 275/35/19s are 6% LARGER in diameter than the 295/30/18s that I am running!!
Last edited by jangy; Aug 6, 2006 at 12:50 PM.






