![]() |
BMW's New V8TT-Vastly Underrated
http://blogs.edmunds.com/roadtests/2...hotopanel..2.*
A new 750i made 391rwhp on a Dynojet and the engine is rated at 400hp SAE. If that dyno is accurate this engine should be rated at 450+hp at the crank. That factory rating is just :crazy: Tom |
Originally Posted by TMC M5
(Post 3497004)
http://blogs.edmunds.com/roadtests/2...hotopanel..2.*
A new 750i made 391rwhp on a Dynojet and the engine is rated at 400hp SAE. If that dyno is accurate this engine should be rated at 450+hp at the crank. That factory rating is just :crazy: Tom |
FI FTMFW period.
|
Meanwhile back at the German Greenpeace headquarters.
Look guys, we built a car that looks like Karl Benz's!!! Come on AMG!!!! Getting harder and harder to resist switchin teams!!! http://www.emercedesbenz.com/Images/...__1W_0953S.jpg |
Why switchin, Jack? You've got 570whp already... lol. Not enough for you?
Woo hoo... more F/I choices out there in the future... |
13.5 is pretty quick too. IIRC that's what the E46 M3 did stock.
|
Originally Posted by prodigymb
(Post 3497156)
13.5 is pretty quick too. IIRC that's what the E46 M3 did stock.
Tom |
What do you guys think about a SC setup vs. Bi-Turbos ?
|
Originally Posted by AZIPOD
(Post 3497191)
What do you guys think about a SC setup vs. Bi-Turbos ?
|
Why not both!!! The old Lancia Delta S4 rally car was both...turbocharged and supercharged. The supercharger engaged at low-RPMs and a clutch switched it off at higher RPMs to be only the turbocharger from that point on.
Tom |
They sat turbos are for top-end while SC is for low-end grunt. More recently, BMW have been using smaller bi-turbos to help eliminate turbo lag and to produce low end grunt. I'm not hearing any complaints about their top end power either.
It'll be interesting if we ever see Bi-Turbos in our V8s. |
Impressive performance w/potential for quite a bit more from the tuners. I wonder if the next M5 will have a unique block or will feature a tuned version of this motor.
|
Originally Posted by AZIPOD
(Post 3497332)
They sat turbos are for top-end while SC is for low-end grunt. More recently, BMW have been using smaller bi-turbos to help eliminate turbo lag and to produce low end grunt. I'm not hearing any complaints about their top end power either.
It'll be interesting if we ever see Bi-Turbos in our V8s. |
Another OT thread that has nothing to do with W211s.
I SMOKED one this morning by the way, so they can't be too underrated since I only have 69hp more...... |
Originally Posted by Thericker
(Post 3497724)
Twin Turbo's in right set-up do both LOW-end + High-end, the V12TT as well as countless other smaller displacement engines have gobs of Torque off idle @ 1600-1800 rpm's on up! the lil' 335 V6 has great low end but runs out of breath up around 120+mph due to small turbo's:y
|
Originally Posted by jangy
(Post 3497765)
Another OT thread that has nothing to do with W211s.
I SMOKED one this morning by the way, so they can't be too underrated since I only have 69hp more...... Tom |
The Mercedes was almost as quick as the more powerful (and heavier) BMW—5.3 seconds to 60 mph versus 5.2 Its still only slightly faster than the 360hp s550, I thought it would be a bit faster with nearly 100rwhp more. And its not weight either cause the 750li is only ~120 pounds heavier. |
What about MB's V12TT, the 5.5 and 6.0 AMG ones, they are underrated as well. I see many members having "Sunday built" power numbers. :)
|
Originally Posted by E55AMGFan
(Post 3497785)
335i I6. ;) The V12 TT rules all, all hail earth rotating torque! :D
|
Originally Posted by E55AMGFan
(Post 3497799)
What about MB's V12TT, the 5.5 and 6.0 AMG ones, they are underrated as well. I see many members having "Sunday built" power numbers. :)
The article above addresses that issue. They claim that car manufacturers heat soak the engine on turbo cars before bench testing it's horsepower rating on an engine dyno. That is why they claim that turbo cars perform better than expected on a chassis dyno...because how many owners heat soak their turbo engine before doing a pull on the dyno?..... tom |
Originally Posted by TMC M5
(Post 3497791)
But your car weighs about 500lbs less... did he challenge you?
Tom Are they supposed to be fast? |
Did you say supercharged turbo....
How about an sti with an AMG supercharger!!!!!!!!!!! http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k2...1099/photo.jpg |
Originally Posted by TMC M5
(Post 3497829)
The article above addresses that issue. They claim that car manufacturers heat soak the engine on turbo cars before bench testing it's horsepower rating on an engine dyno. That is why they claim that turbo cars perform better than expected on a chassis dyno...because how many owners heat soak their turbo engine before doing a pull on the dyno?.....
tom |
Jangy, was it a brand new 2010 750il? Of course it's not going to be faster than you, it has less power and torque, and much more weight, but I would have to imagine that it isn't slow, I think with a chip these things will get to be pretty damn fast. Just wait till they put it in a 550i with a 6 speed stick! :bow:
|
I was at my old Bmw dealership yesterday saing hello to couple of friends that work there and one of them is the superviser. He was telling me that every single 750 that was sold came back b/c after 1500 miles half the motor dint worked. He said that it's the biggest p.o.s builed by Bmw. :nix:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:29 PM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands