MY ENGINE WENT KA BOOOOOOMMM !!!
[/QUOTE]Let's all reserve judgment until further evidence is revealed. Can a moderator/admin please explain why x SPY x's posts were deleted? Was he also banned? Thank you.
[/QUOTE]
I agree we should reserve judgment. However, I respect Loco 55's position that he believes its the tune. Again, if what he says is true, then I dare say a lot of us will be avoiding LET / EC. However, MBVert stepped in responding very strongly that its the tune based on his knowledge and his review of the situation. Ok, so what lead to that conclusion? What was the raw data or evidence? The fact that the car was fine before the tune?
I agree posts should not be deleted. That is not a good thing.
But, people have opined that it’s the tune or that it’s obvious it’s the tune. I am not a mechanic or tuner. However, I do want to know what the evidence is that shows it’s the tune and only the tune. The posted pics? Posted pics show detonation....ok, so what caused the detonation? MBVert says its the tune. Ok, so what data, proof shows it’s the tune that caused the engine to go down?
Last edited by jcjmw; Mar 21, 2010 at 05:02 AM.
Lots of very informative things and just as much BS.
I have a 05 E55. I had an LET tune performed 5 months ago. My car runs like a BEAST. I get about 8 Mpg. I AM A SATISFIED CUSTOMER.
We build billion dollar space shuttles that fly into outer space. Decades of research and development by the smartest guys on the planet, LITERALLY. The most expensive materials, latest technology, and of course, rocket fuel!
And the reality is that even though the resources used in the development of the space shuttle are EPIC in proportion to an E55 tune, we still manage to blow one up every couple of years.
I guess what I'm trying to say is, IS MY SH-T GONNA BLOW UP???

Loco, sorry to hear about your car. I will wish you a speedy recovery and look forward to seeing you bragging about drag times!
Am I too assume that you came to that conclusion based on your review of the pics of the engine posted in this thread? Or, based on your personal review of the engine? I ask b/c would you not also need to review the ECU or the tune from the ECU to determine that its the tune that caused the improper A/F and Timing?
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Your posts are both thoughtful and reasonable. It seems that you're viewing the ECU as a component (e.g. a single block in a wall, if the wall falls down, do we know it was THAT block?). Perhaps instead think of the ECU as the conductor of the orchestra, or the brain in your body telling everything what to do.
Of course, in the end, LOCO's failure was a mechanical one... in cases like these, they all are. Why was it THAT cylinder? Maybe it was slightly weaker than the others, maybe some other issue, who knows.
I mentioned earlier that we cannot yet conclude that the tune was definitively the cause - we may never know with enough certainty to please everyone, which is fine because people are entitled to their own opinions.
Logically, to me, it makes sense to suspect the tune - due to the markedly increased output post-tune, coupled with the drastically shortened longevity post-tune. As this was a custom-tune, one would expect each situation to be unique. Maybe the tuner had never tuned a car modified quite like LOCO's, maybe was having a bad day, maybe was rushed to get it all done - or maybe none of those things. Who knows? Sounds like we won't get any more from EC's side, which is a shame - but I understand their position.
Tuners who custom-tune previously tuned vehicles are in a tough spot. On one hand, they want to increase hp/tq to give some objective data to the client showing "hey, look what we got you with our tune" - on the other hand, what if they finish the pre-tune run, and observe that the tune is already pretty optimal, and revising it toward a more-aggressive nature is ill advised? Do they say "hey, your tune is good - here's your money back, minus the dyno time"? While that might be the most prudent course of action, I've never heard of it occurring.
Anyway, let's wait and see what additional information and/or data is given by LOCO or his mechanic, once they have it compiled. From there, we can better-form our opinions on the matter.
Your posts are both thoughtful and reasonable. It seems that you're viewing the ECU as a component (e.g. a single block in a wall, if the wall falls down, do we know it was THAT block?). Perhaps instead think of the ECU as the conductor of the orchestra, or the brain in your body telling everything what to do.
Of course, in the end, LOCO's failure was a mechanical one... in cases like these, they all are. Why was it THAT cylinder? Maybe it was slightly weaker than the others, maybe some other issue, who knows.
I mentioned earlier that we cannot yet conclude that the tune was definitively the cause - we may never know with enough certainty to please everyone, which is fine because people are entitled to their own opinions.
Logically, to me, it makes sense to suspect the tune - due to the markedly increased output post-tune, coupled with the drastically shortened longevity post-tune. As this was a custom-tune, one would expect each situation to be unique. Maybe the tuner had never tuned a car modified quite like LOCO's, maybe was having a bad day, maybe was rushed to get it all done - or maybe none of those things. Who knows? Sounds like we won't get any more from EC's side, which is a shame - but I understand their position.
Tuners who custom-tune previously tuned vehicles are in a tough spot. On one hand, they want to increase hp/tq to give some objective data to the client showing "hey, look what we got you with our tune" - on the other hand, what if they finish the pre-tune run, and observe that the tune is already pretty optimal, and revising it toward a more-aggressive nature is ill advised? Do they say "hey, your tune is good - here's your money back, minus the dyno time"? While that might be the most prudent course of action, I've never heard of it occurring.
Anyway, let's wait and see what additional information and/or data is given by LOCO or his mechanic, once they have it compiled. From there, we can better-form our opinions on the matter.
My E500 had one of the World famous EuroElites (EvoTech) tunes on it. Before they strapped it down, Wayne told me that if they couldn't get any more from it, safely, I would only owe the shop for the dyno time.
Last edited by Benz-O-Rama; Mar 21, 2010 at 12:13 PM.
You say that you do not have a dog in this fight, "so to speak." Either you do or you don't. If you would, please clarify.
Also, do you know the other two newbies that posted to this thread?
Lots of very informative things and just as much BS.
I have a 05 E55. I had an LET tune performed 5 months ago. My car runs like a BEAST. I get about 8 Mpg. I AM A SATISFIED CUSTOMER.
We build billion dollar space shuttles that fly into outer space. Decades of research and development by the smartest guys on the planet, LITERALLY. The most expensive materials, latest technology, and of course, rocket fuel!
And the reality is that even though the resources used in the development of the space shuttle are EPIC in proportion to an E55 tune, we still manage to blow one up every couple of years.
I guess what I'm trying to say is, IS MY SH-T GONNA BLOW UP???

Loco, sorry to hear about your car. I will wish you a speedy recovery and look forward to seeing you bragging about drag times!
Your posts are both thoughtful and reasonable. It seems that you're viewing the ECU as a component (e.g. a single block in a wall, if the wall falls down, do we know it was THAT block?). Perhaps instead think of the ECU as the conductor of the orchestra, or the brain in your body telling everything what to do.
Of course, in the end, LOCO's failure was a mechanical one... in cases like these, they all are. Why was it THAT cylinder? Maybe it was slightly weaker than the others, maybe some other issue, who knows.
I mentioned earlier that we cannot yet conclude that the tune was definitively the cause - we may never know with enough certainty to please everyone, which is fine because people are entitled to their own opinions.
Logically, to me, it makes sense to suspect the tune - due to the markedly increased output post-tune, coupled with the drastically shortened longevity post-tune. As this was a custom-tune, one would expect each situation to be unique. Maybe the tuner had never tuned a car modified quite like LOCO's, maybe was having a bad day, maybe was rushed to get it all done - or maybe none of those things. Who knows? Sounds like we won't get any more from EC's side, which is a shame - but I understand their position.
Tuners who custom-tune previously tuned vehicles are in a tough spot. On one hand, they want to increase hp/tq to give some objective data to the client showing "hey, look what we got you with our tune" - on the other hand, what if they finish the pre-tune run, and observe that the tune is already pretty optimal, and revising it toward a more-aggressive nature is ill advised? Do they say "hey, your tune is good - here's your money back, minus the dyno time"? While that might be the most prudent course of action, I've never heard of it occurring.
Anyway, let's wait and see what additional information and/or data is given by LOCO or his mechanic, once they have it compiled. From there, we can better-form our opinions on the matter.
I understand that there is still some info missing here that you guys are still asking for so you can go and make your decision on whether believing it was caused by the tune or not, We do have all 16 plugs someone has asked for and will have the files pulled...
Just so all of you know it is not cheap to disassemble an engine..FYI it has cost me around $2,000 just in towing the car from shop to shop and the taking apart of the motor just to show some pictures when my main focus is to get her running again.
I am pretty sure EUROCHARGED has my TTM tune and EUROCHARGED tables just like they posted for "BLACK BENZ"

It would be very helpful for EUROCHARGED and the MB world community if they post these here so that you guys can go on with your lives just like i did...I mean we have not seen anything but their opinion on the matter and no facts!
Not trying to be argumentative, and obviously EC isn't running a charity - I would expect them to do everything possible to gain a new client and earn their fees.
Are you trying to get us banned?
MVERT can you explain what this means or how it is read..
well simply because my mechanic and his partner were banned and they dont know why!!!
x spy x posts deleted then kicked out!! way to help the community MBWORLD!!!
Last edited by 930chas; Mar 21, 2010 at 03:54 PM.
Last edited by 930chas; Mar 21, 2010 at 04:07 PM.








