W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Your thoughts on the M-156 engine "class action" - any merit to it in your minds?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-01-2011, 03:07 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
lawguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Posts: 389
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Formerly: 2007 e63; 2012 GL450
Your thoughts on the M-156 engine "class action" - any merit to it in your minds?

Mates:


I havent heard anything more regarding the class action claims against MB for the alleged M156 engine defects in our W211 e63 cars. Being a lawyer, and understanding class action cases, I am not surprised, as these things take awhile. However, I also have not seen or heard much else in the way of public discussion on the merits amongst fellow MB owners and whatnot.

My question to each of you is how much stock do you put into these allegations – is it concerning to you with respect to your ownership of this car over the long haul? I have on ’07 with 34k miles, and CPO coverage through April, with 24 more months of extended warranty after that. I’m covered for the next 2.5 years. However, for any of you outside of the warranty period, does the allegation concern you?


I’m not a worry wart (well, not really), but have an opportunity to potentially sell my car for a fair price. At this point, I either want to let it go now, while its covered by CPO and will get a decent price (and a refund on the purchase price of the 24 month Extended Warranty), or I want to hold onto it and drive it for a long time. In weighing all the options, I wondered what all of you thought about the issue of the nodular iron camshafts being too soft to function properly with the steel valve lifters. I am NOT mechanically inclined whatsoever, so I don’t really know much about how serious a problem it might or could be.

What do you all think with the M-156 engine allegations?
Old 11-01-2011, 03:39 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jakpro1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
After first look I can only comment that counsel's bare no-merit conclusion was not an adequate substitute for petitioner's right to full appellate review or to satisfy the requirement of substantial equality and fair process, counsel must be an active advocate, not just an amicus curiae

For real though guys, to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. The constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots.

A judiciary independent of a king or executive alone, is a good thing; but independence of the will of the nation is a solecism















































































No f'in clue what I just typed........I copied it from the some Cali Supreme Court Document and threw in some Jefferson for spice

Last edited by Jakpro1; 11-01-2011 at 03:45 PM.
Old 11-01-2011, 03:41 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
E55Dimon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
E63S
Originally Posted by Jakpro1
After first look I can only comment that counsel's bare no-merit conclusion was not an adequate substitute for petitioner's right to full appellate review or to satisfy the requirement of substantial equality and fair process, counsel must be an active advocate, not just an amicus curiae







































No f'in clue what I just typed........I copied it from the some Cali Supreme Court Document

Old 11-01-2011, 03:51 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
JAA-CLK63AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 CLK63AMG CABROILET
Does this class action affect all M156 engines or just the ones installed in the E63? I have 2007 CLK63 Cabroilet. This is the first I have heard any potential problems regarding the M156 engine.
Old 11-01-2011, 04:00 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MRAMG1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 3,341
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
S600, GL450, Audi A5 Cab
It is for ALL vehicles with it.

ML, C, E, etc, etc

Just not enough failures, or even pictures of ANY failures for me to put stock in it. Good discussion over at tsoobzenb
Old 11-01-2011, 04:18 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
JAA-CLK63AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 CLK63AMG CABROILET
Thanks for info MRAMG1.
Old 11-01-2011, 04:28 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
lawguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Posts: 389
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Formerly: 2007 e63; 2012 GL450
Originally Posted by Jakpro1
No f'in clue what I just typed........I copied it from the some Cali Supreme Court Document and threw in some Jefferson for spice
Nicely done....I stared at it and thought "what the f*ck?"
Old 11-01-2011, 04:49 PM
  #8  
Super Member
 
NCE500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 E63, 2006 C55
Re: M156 Class Action

I've had my 2007 for 2.5 years; my miles are low, I'm currenly at 24K, but my engine, aside from an intake gasket leak, has been bullet proof.

If you look around the boards, about the only item that seems to pervasively afflict this engine is the intake gasket leak, mine needed this done 2 years ago, which is a 3 -4 labor hour job. Some C63 owners had cam sensor issues when their cars were new, I suspect that Mercedes got a bad batch of sensors from a supplier.

I think our engines are very well engineered and built and are more than o.k. reliability wise.

I'm going to keep my 07 a while longer, it is an outstanding all round Benz. Like you, I have 2 years of warranty remaining, but I do plan to sell it or trade it when I can get a reasonable price on a slightly used V8TT which is probably 18 months or so out.

In your case, sell it if you want something else, but I wouldn't due to concerns about the engine.
Old 11-01-2011, 07:48 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
jdeastbay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 E55 / 2008 E63
Originally Posted by lawguy
Nicely done....I stared at it and thought "what the f*ck?"

I'm still nursing a hangover from last night and doubled down on "what the f*ck?" Funny sheeott.
Old 11-01-2011, 07:55 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
citylightva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2007 E63, 2005 Dodge Ram Hemi
Very Nice Jak.!! :lol: I do call some BS on this as so many people have had no problems..!!
Old 11-01-2011, 08:08 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
_AMG_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63
This topic has been discussed countless times.
Old 11-01-2011, 08:59 PM
  #12  
Member
 
Pushing_Tin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2007 E63
Did you see this thread? https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...8-defects.html

I actually had a lenghty discussion with the lead lawyer. I can only assume that there is enough proof or a paper trail that lead that law firm to move forward. They are in the business to make money after all.
Old 11-01-2011, 10:23 PM
  #13  
Administrator

 
amdeutsch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: www.Traben-Trarbach.de
Posts: 15,720
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
MPG+ ROLFCOPTER
Originally Posted by Jakpro1
After first look I can only comment that counsel's bare no-merit conclusion was not an adequate substitute for petitioner's right to full appellate review or to satisfy the requirement of substantial equality and fair process, counsel must be an active advocate, not just an amicus curiae

For real though guys, to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. The constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots.

A judiciary independent of a king or executive alone, is a good thing; but independence of the will of the nation is a solecism


..........

No f'in clue what I just typed........I copied it from the some Cali Supreme Court Document and threw in some Jefferson for spice
C



Originally Posted by Pushing_Tin
Did you see this thread? https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...8-defects.html

I actually had a lenghty discussion with the lead lawyer. I can only assume that there is enough proof or a paper trail that lead that law firm to move forward. They are in the business to make money after all.

Tyro will for once in his life make $$$$$$$$ while the rest might get a $5 coupon towards services.

Old 11-01-2011, 10:27 PM
  #14  
Member
 
Pushing_Tin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2007 E63
Originally Posted by amdeutsch

Tyro will for once in his life make $$$$$$$$ while the rest might get a $5 coupon towards services.

Perhaps, but that's $5 more than when I started and it didn't cost me anything. Or, we all may all get an extended warranty if there was in fact a serious defect.
Old 11-02-2011, 08:56 AM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MRAMG1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 3,341
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
S600, GL450, Audi A5 Cab
Originally Posted by amdeutsch
:

Tyro will for once in his life make $$$$$$$$ while the rest might get a $5 coupon towards services.

Not that's funny
Old 11-02-2011, 01:56 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!

 
Yuille36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 6,008
Received 514 Likes on 431 Posts
07 E63 AMG, 10 C63 AMG, 07 E63 Designo, 07 E350, 09 C300, 07 C230
Really, there aren't many issues with the M156 besides oil consumption. I've heard very little cases of actual failure. I'm not worroed in the least bit about this suit. I've owned my E63 for just over 4 years, and my C63 for 1 1/2 years. No issues with either paltform.
Old 11-02-2011, 04:32 PM
  #17  
Super Member
 
infantry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
07 E63. 07 STi limited #606/800
66k Miles on my 07 E63, Not a single engine problem.

Axle boot needs to be replaced. Dealer wants to replace whole new axle because they don't sell just the boot. But I got a custom shop to get it replaced soon, hopefully all goes well.

Also I did have a leak by my front oil cooler hose, they replaced all the parts under warranty.

Also engine mounts. Under warranty.
Old 05-29-2018, 01:24 PM
  #18  
Super Member
 
xEryx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: PA
Posts: 874
Received 55 Likes on 51 Posts
2014 CLS63 S AMG
wrong post

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Your thoughts on the M-156 engine "class action" - any merit to it in your minds?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:13 AM.