MBWorld.org Forums

MBWorld.org Forums (https://mbworld.org/forums/)
-   W211 AMG (https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg-81/)
-   -   BEST TIMES: E55 w/ RENNTech Boost Kit (https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/62184-best-times-e55-w-renntech-boost-kit.html)

jambee888 03-02-2004 01:10 AM

BEST TIMES: E55 w/ RENNTech Boost Kit
 
I am here at a friend's house and we just finished some interesting runs on my fiancee's E55. Here's the average of the best 3 runs we had (11 runs total, until we got questioned by a cool cop :D ).

Temperature: 57 deg (registered on combi)
Time: 9:35PM
Timing Equipment: BELTRONICS Vector FX2
Tank: 1/8 full
Rear tire pressure: 21 psi
Road surface: asphalt


0-60 mph -> 4.87 sec (4.62 sec best)
1/8 mile -> 7.23 sec @ 101.7 mph (103.9 mph max)
1/4 mile -> 11.22 sec @ 127.4 mph (129.2 mph max)

Mods: High flow intake, Pulley kit, ECU, 91 octane fuel, modified exhaust.

FIXEDupW209 03-02-2004 01:17 AM

your 0-60 seems pretty slow for your 1/4 mile time. none the less, the 1/4 mile times are excelent. good job

ronnie0738 03-02-2004 01:37 AM

awesome times on 91 octane! :bow:

you need to go to the track and post slips!

JAYCL600 03-02-2004 02:33 AM

Congratulations...those are really impressive numbers...I would be interested in seeing your numbers from a real dragstrip also...just living vicariously.;)

Duane 03-04-2004 10:44 PM

Times sound great. My guess is they would be very different on a drag strip. It would take a lot more than those mods to get that car into the low 11's. My guess us it will be very hard to get under 12 on the strip.

ronnie0738 03-04-2004 10:54 PM

here's someone who did 11.8@118 at the strip, bone stock with drags. I think it's a low 11s car with these mods.

https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...threadid=60803

E55AMG99 03-04-2004 11:29 PM


Originally posted by ronnie0738
here's someone who did 11.8@118 at the strip, bone stock with drags. I think it's a low 11s car with these mods.

https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...threadid=60803

I think you'll find the car to be a little faster from 0-60 and a little slower in the 1/4 on the track. At least that's how it turned out with my G-Tech. My W210 E55 went .2 faster to 60 and .4 slower in the 1/4. My Denali was .1 faster to 60 and .2 slower in the 1/4.

Interesting numbers to say the least. What are your exhaust mods?

anerbe 03-05-2004 12:12 AM

i always questioned these personal performance meters......since they are based on acceleration forces, and them needing to be level.....do they account for squat? i'm sure that a car w/ a lot of weight transfer will have a more optimistic time since the angle will cause the unit to experience positive g's (forces pushing it to the rear). what do i know? just an idea.........

E55AMG99 03-05-2004 12:47 AM


Originally posted by anerbe
i always questioned these personal performance meters......since they are based on acceleration forces, and them needing to be level.....do they account for squat? i'm sure that a car w/ a lot of weight transfer will have a more optimistic time since the angle will cause the unit to experience positive g's (forces pushing it to the rear). what do i know? just an idea.........
That's probably why they differ from the track. They are very consistent however which makes them good for testng mods.

Duane 03-05-2004 12:54 AM

Ronnie could you post the actual time slip? TIA

Pbglas 03-05-2004 01:07 AM

Re: BEST TIMES: E55 w/ RENNTech Boost Kit
 

Originally posted by jambee888
I am here at a friend's house and we just finished some interesting runs on my fiancee's E55. Here's the average of the best 3 runs we had (11 runs total, until we got questioned by a cool cop :D ).

Temperature: 57 deg (registered on combi)
Time: 9:35PM
Timing Equipment: BELTRONICS Vector FX2
Tank: 1/8 full
Rear tire pressure: 21 psi
Road surface: asphalt


0-60 mph -> 4.87 sec (4.62 sec best)
1/8 mile -> 7.23 sec @ 101.7 mph (103.9 mph max)
1/4 mile -> 11.22 sec @ 127.4 mph (129.2 mph max)

Mods: High flow intake, Pulley kit, ECU, 91 octane fuel, modified exhaust.

2.35 secs from 60 to 101.7. That's phenominal! That is almost 1g at that high speed! How did it feel?

ronnie0738 03-05-2004 02:32 AM


Originally posted by Duane
Ronnie could you post the actual time slip? TIA
Sorry for the confusion, but it wasnt my car. If you look in the thread I linked, I asked for the slip but not reply yet.

stephens 03-05-2004 04:24 AM

The run was with a bell computer thingy. I don't think the results can be replicated on a drag strip.

Duane 03-05-2004 11:12 AM

I hate to call anyone a liar but that really sounds like a stretch. 911 turbos that are putting down 600 plus to the rear wheels,hoosiers and world champion driver Cort Wagner driving them are getting low 11's. Something smells fishy. My Buddy ran 12.2 in his sl55 with the same renntech upgrades. I cannot imagine the e55 is almost a second faster. Hey I would love to be proven wrong but I just would like to see some backup documentation.

BenzoBoi 03-05-2004 11:37 AM

Congrats on those times!~! I wonder what will happen if you put drags on those babies :bow: :bow: :bow:

E55BEAST 03-05-2004 01:06 PM

i ran an 11.80 bone stock with my e55 on radials. if i had the renn-tech ecu and pulley id prob run 11.4 at best with the same conditions. but WITH A 4.87 0-60 11.2 is almost impossible. mathamaticaly. and those computer things are never accurate cause when i used the g-tech thing i ran a 13.2 and a 11.9 take it to the track for accurate meashures

Duane 03-05-2004 03:17 PM

E55 Beast can you post the slip for the 11.80 run?

stephens 03-05-2004 03:44 PM


Originally posted by Duane
I hate to call anyone a liar but that really sounds like a stretch. 911 turbos that are putting down 600 plus to the rear wheels,hoosiers and world champion driver Cort Wagner driving them are getting low 11's. Something smells fishy. My Buddy ran 12.2 in his sl55 with the same renntech upgrades. I cannot imagine the e55 is almost a second faster. Hey I would love to be proven wrong but I just would like to see some backup documentation.
Duane
I agree that the 11.2 is not real, however the 11.8 maybe. The run was at 40 degrees F, almost freezing, with drag radials. If your friend was to take his SL55 out in replicated conditions, I think he would at least equal those figures. At 75 degrees the same car would be lucky to do a 12.2, even with drag slicks.

Duane 03-05-2004 03:59 PM

I still think 11.8 with those conditions would be a stretch. 11.2 no chance.

absent 03-05-2004 08:30 PM

Agree,with high 4's 0-60,getting E55 to below 12s in a quarter is physically impossible.(unless this car has something like 750hp)

jkrutch 03-05-2004 10:09 PM

Sorry, but I can't swallow the 60-100+ in under 3 seconds. No way, no how. That is race car fast, not E55 fast.

stephens 03-06-2004 12:10 AM


Originally posted by absent
Agree,with high 4's 0-60,getting E55 to below 12s in a quarter is physically impossible.(unless this car has something like 750hp)
Absent
With drag radials sub 12's is no problem from a car with pulley kit, even in 75 degree+ conditions. I ran a 12.2 with 19" Pilot Sports, climate control on, in 80 degree F conditions. This was with a faulty TPS and without the ECU being tuned properly.
I have got to go back, but am confident of an 11, even without drag radials on the standard 18" rims.

jambee888 03-06-2004 12:51 AM

Just take note that those figures were produced by an accelerometer device, not an actual drag time slip. Accuracy is obviously a question. It's all for reference.

stephens 03-06-2004 03:06 AM


Originally posted by jambee888
Just take note that those figures were produced by an accelerometer device, not an actual drag time slip. Accuracy is obviously a question. It's all for reference.
Yes, the numbers for the 1/4 are at least 1 second too fast for the street, even with extremely cold conditions boosting power. The debate has now moved on to it being impossible for an E55 to beat 12secs without 750hp, which is demonstrably wrong.

absent 03-06-2004 08:18 AM


Originally posted by stephens
Absent
With drag radials sub 12's is no problem from a car with pulley kit, even in 75 degree+ conditions. I ran a 12.2 with 19" Pilot Sports, climate control on, in 80 degree F conditions. This was with a faulty TPS and without the ECU being tuned properly.
I have got to go back, but am confident of an 11, even without drag radials on the standard 18" rims.

You misunderstood my post:
I said,it was impossible to get below 12 in a 1/4 mile if your launch
sucked(high 4's,in the example above at 4.8s 0-60)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:03 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands