W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

77mm vs 84mm pulley, is it worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-06-2016, 05:33 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
EMFAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 187
Received 24 Likes on 22 Posts
2014 ML63 AMG, 2012 McLaren MP4-12C, 1999 GMC Sierra, 1994 Chevy Astro, 1990 Honda CRX
77mm vs 84mm pulley, is it worth it?

I currently have a stock pulley but I'm looking at going to a 77mm clutched pulley. Here's where the tricky part comes in. The pulley itself costs $100 more to get the 77mm, then you also have to spend another $400 on a heat exchanger. So, total cost of doing to a 77 vs an 84 is literally double. I know the heat exchanger does offer benefits regardless, but is it really worth double the money for what is gained? It's not a dyno car, or a track car, or a drag car (though I do want to do WannaGoFast sometime).
Old 12-06-2016, 10:40 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
carguyshu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Kansas
Posts: 952
Received 125 Likes on 95 Posts
2003 E55, 2003 SL55, 2014 CLS63, 2018 q50 Redsport, 1968 Camaro SS, 1999 Trans am Firehawk
read this

http://www.mbclub.co.uk/forums/amg-l...dyno-test.html

You will pick up a lot of low end torque and with the way the cars already have issues with traction the power increase would be better off up top. The smaller pulley creates more boost, but the supercharger decreases efficiency the faster you spin it, which leads to more heat.
Old 12-06-2016, 10:54 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
EMFAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 187
Received 24 Likes on 22 Posts
2014 ML63 AMG, 2012 McLaren MP4-12C, 1999 GMC Sierra, 1994 Chevy Astro, 1990 Honda CRX
I should clarify a little more on what I'm after. I see the dyno numbers, that isn't my interest. I know what the graphs mean, and that shows why I should do one to start with. Where my interest lies is, one option is $400, the other option is $1,000. Is the butt dyno gain worth it for over double the price? I'm talking about true subjective driving. Is the fun factor worth the extra money?
Old 12-07-2016, 12:43 AM
  #4  
Super Member
 
BlackHammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 789
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts
2006 E55
I don't believe there is a real $400 option"...

77mm not worth it for a whole bunch of reasons.

Agree with the other responder on traction and heat. If you have the "mod bug" but want to be smart here are a few options...

1). 84mm - $400
2). Split cooling
3). Custom Tune - $500

be done with it and enjoy it...

or

1). Split cooling
2) Meth Unjection ($1,000)
3). Everything else stock

Either way (IMHO) you will need to increase your budget.

In stock form the cars had heat/traction issues.

TK

Last edited by BlackHammer; 12-07-2016 at 12:48 AM.
Old 12-07-2016, 09:05 AM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
 
EMFAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 187
Received 24 Likes on 22 Posts
2014 ML63 AMG, 2012 McLaren MP4-12C, 1999 GMC Sierra, 1994 Chevy Astro, 1990 Honda CRX
I'm already tuned and split cooled. I agree heat is an issue, which is why I bring it up because going the 77mm route I have to do a heat exchanger as well. The 84 I can get away with not doing it but wouldn't hurt.
Old 12-07-2016, 09:53 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HeissRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 4,429
Received 60 Likes on 42 Posts
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
IMO, the HE is not something you want to put off. Getting heat out of these motors is highly important.
Old 12-07-2016, 11:21 AM
  #7  
Super Member
 
carguyshu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Kansas
Posts: 952
Received 125 Likes on 95 Posts
2003 E55, 2003 SL55, 2014 CLS63, 2018 q50 Redsport, 1968 Camaro SS, 1999 Trans am Firehawk
in fairness you should really upgrade the heat exchanger even if you are keeping everything stock and even if you are just doing the 83. The 77 to really work with any efficiency is going to require not only the heat exchanger but probly also a trunk tank. The 77 will work fine for maybe 1 short romp, but other than that it will be slower vs an 83 if you don't have tons of cooling
Old 12-07-2016, 11:39 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
lseguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 329
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
2005 c230
Ive been contemplating this quite a bit lately. But after reading this thread:

https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...ed-my-car.html

My conclusions:
- Stock pulley has potential to fail, if not inspected regularly/caught when cracks occur
- aftermarket upper pulley has even higher failure rate
- Aftermarket upper necessitates a scatter shield for protection
- aftermarket upper requires larger pump and an aftermarket heat exchanger


All of the above for a street car never tracked..

not worth it to me.

Will stick with the EC tune and thats it


Just my thoughts.
Old 12-07-2016, 12:40 PM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
EMFAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 187
Received 24 Likes on 22 Posts
2014 ML63 AMG, 2012 McLaren MP4-12C, 1999 GMC Sierra, 1994 Chevy Astro, 1990 Honda CRX
Originally Posted by HeissRod
IMO, the HE is not something you want to put off. Getting heat out of these motors is highly important.
Being winter time I can definitely wait on the HE. I got the car February of this year and the IC pump needed replaced which I only knew because I checked how quickly AIT's dropped. It didn't drive any differently after I replaced it. I never saw AIT's above 70 F till the end of March. If I went 77mm I'd do it right away, but I was thinking about maybe doing it anyway around May or June when it starts getting pretty hot. Only once have I found the car to be gutless, when it was a little over 100 degrees and very high humidity. (heat index was like, 115 or 119).

Originally Posted by lseguy
Ive been contemplating this quite a bit lately. But after reading this thread:

https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...ed-my-car.html

My conclusions:
- Stock pulley has potential to fail, if not inspected regularly/caught when cracks occur
- aftermarket upper pulley has even higher failure rate
- Aftermarket upper necessitates a scatter shield for protection
- aftermarket upper requires larger pump and an aftermarket heat exchanger


All of the above for a street car never tracked..

not worth it to me.

Will stick with the EC tune and thats it


Just my thoughts.
When dealing with any type of modification, I'm accepting potential failure. I also know that if 1,000 cars change something and 1 has a problem as a result, odds are still in my favor. I wouldn't let an isolated incident determine everything.
Old 12-07-2016, 12:41 PM
  #10  
Member
Thread Starter
 
EMFAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 187
Received 24 Likes on 22 Posts
2014 ML63 AMG, 2012 McLaren MP4-12C, 1999 GMC Sierra, 1994 Chevy Astro, 1990 Honda CRX
Originally Posted by carguyshu
in fairness you should really upgrade the heat exchanger even if you are keeping everything stock and even if you are just doing the 83. The 77 to really work with any efficiency is going to require not only the heat exchanger but probly also a trunk tank. The 77 will work fine for maybe 1 short romp, but other than that it will be slower vs an 83 if you don't have tons of cooling
So you think even with upgraded cooling, the efficiency is so poor it just simply won't cool off fast enough to be useful?
Old 12-07-2016, 02:56 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
SilverStrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
05 E55, 07 ML500
There is a fine line between too much boost(heat) and pulling timing which will make you slower and not enough boost. You definitely need a larger heat exchanger, split cooling without it won't do that much.. If I were going with a 77 I would at the very least put a truck tank in as well or go with meth. I have a 168 crank and 83 upper which equates to around 186-188 crank. If you add headers it will help with the cooling as well. Cooling is really the most important item on these cars.. My set up is right on. Just enough boost without too much heat.. Good luck.
Old 12-07-2016, 04:02 PM
  #12  
Member
 
MB RUSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northeast
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
2004 E55 AMG sold 2012 E550
Originally Posted by SilverStrk
There is a fine line between too much boost(heat) and pulling timing which will make you slower and not enough boost. You definitely need a larger heat exchanger, split cooling without it won't do that much.. If I were going with a 77 I would at the very least put a truck tank in as well or go with meth. I have a 168 crank and 83 upper which equates to around 186-188 crank. If you add headers it will help with the cooling as well. Cooling is really the most important item on these cars.. My set up is right on. Just enough boost without too much heat.. Good luck.


What Silverstrk is telling you is very accurate. Cooling will make or break you. It is possible the car will run stronger with the stock supercharger pulley due to lower IAT's The higher the outside temps and the longer the pulls the worse it gets. The cooling is barely adequate w/ no mods when outside temps get higher. when outside air temps go up IAT's go up timing is pulled. For anything like a 1/2 mile wanna go fast event you will need a trunk tank with plenty of ice even for an 84 mm. Enjoy it stock once you start the mods it does not stop. I have a used 84mm with under 1200 miles. PM if you want it.
Old 12-07-2016, 04:04 PM
  #13  
Member
Thread Starter
 
EMFAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 187
Received 24 Likes on 22 Posts
2014 ML63 AMG, 2012 McLaren MP4-12C, 1999 GMC Sierra, 1994 Chevy Astro, 1990 Honda CRX
Originally Posted by SilverStrk
There is a fine line between too much boost(heat) and pulling timing which will make you slower and not enough boost. You definitely need a larger heat exchanger, split cooling without it won't do that much.. If I were going with a 77 I would at the very least put a truck tank in as well or go with meth. I have a 168 crank and 83 upper which equates to around 186-188 crank. If you add headers it will help with the cooling as well. Cooling is really the most important item on these cars.. My set up is right on. Just enough boost without too much heat.. Good luck.
Is this a daily driver with no race or track time? Headers are on the to-do list but a ways down the list in life's bit picture.

So would you say the best course of action is the 84mm and a heat exchanger (down the line) vs a 77mm and heat exchanger now as a result of the 77mm may not outperform the 84mm after a short period of time of driving?
Old 12-07-2016, 04:56 PM
  #14  
Super Member
 
SilverStrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
05 E55, 07 ML500
Daily driver and she is a true sleeper with many road kills to her name. No track. You NEED the larger H/E. Do this immediately, then put the 84 on and see how it feels. Make sure your pump is running strong, if you question it at all put a new bosch 010 on as well. Header Really help with heat as it expels it much more quickly than the stock manifolds, which I might add are a Real restriction on this car. I have MBH and they are works of art. PM Shardul for the pulley and H/E, he even has a buy on headers right now, don't know the quality but it's a Real good price for long tubes. Good luck..
Old 12-07-2016, 05:04 PM
  #15  
Member
Thread Starter
 
EMFAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 187
Received 24 Likes on 22 Posts
2014 ML63 AMG, 2012 McLaren MP4-12C, 1999 GMC Sierra, 1994 Chevy Astro, 1990 Honda CRX
Originally Posted by SilverStrk
Daily driver and she is a true sleeper with many road kills to her name. No track. You NEED the larger H/E. Do this immediately, then put the 84 on and see how it feels. Make sure your pump is running strong, if you question it at all put a new bosch 010 on as well. Header Really help with heat as it expels it much more quickly than the stock manifolds, which I might add are a Real restriction on this car. I have MBH and they are works of art. PM Shardul for the pulley and H/E, he even has a buy on headers right now, don't know the quality but it's a Real good price for long tubes. Good luck..
The first thing I did a week after buying the car was put a brand new 010 on it, the one on it was dead. I've been in contact with Shardul about the pulley, I've been investigating HE's and which one is best for an 05 without "the bulge". I'm positive headers will be a budget buster right now. I ordered new wheels yesterday and I suspect I'll see a difference with those too.
The following users liked this post:
HeissRod (12-08-2016)
Old 12-07-2016, 07:34 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
lseguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 329
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
2005 c230
Originally Posted by EMFAudio
Being winter time I can definitely wait on the HE. I got the car February of this year and the IC pump needed replaced which I only knew because I checked how quickly AIT's dropped. It didn't drive any differently after I replaced it. I never saw AIT's above 70 F till the end of March. If I went 77mm I'd do it right away, but I was thinking about maybe doing it anyway around May or June when it starts getting pretty hot. Only once have I found the car to be gutless, when it was a little over 100 degrees and very high humidity. (heat index was like, 115 or 119).



When dealing with any type of modification, I'm accepting potential failure. I also know that if 1,000 cars change something and 1 has a problem as a result, odds are still in my favor. I wouldn't let an isolated incident determine everything.
understood, but based on the contents of that entire thread, it's not isolated. (aftermarket SC pulleys exploding). Im not saying every single one fails, but common sense says that there is a higher chance of aftermarket, smaller SC pulleys failing than stock. And without notable cooling mods, an 84mm may even end up getting you slower performance than pure stock/pure stock with a tune
Old 12-08-2016, 09:27 AM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Rocman8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,139
Received 74 Likes on 70 Posts
E55
Why are headers way down the list? Just scrap the pulley idea and put headers on.
Old 12-08-2016, 09:43 AM
  #18  
Super Member
 
carguyshu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Kansas
Posts: 952
Received 125 Likes on 95 Posts
2003 E55, 2003 SL55, 2014 CLS63, 2018 q50 Redsport, 1968 Camaro SS, 1999 Trans am Firehawk
Originally Posted by lseguy
understood, but based on the contents of that entire thread, it's not isolated. (aftermarket SC pulleys exploding). Im not saying every single one fails, but common sense says that there is a higher chance of aftermarket, smaller SC pulleys failing than stock. And without notable cooling mods, an 84mm may even end up getting you slower performance than pure stock/pure stock with a tune
the higher rate of failure on the pulley was on the old design which had different rivets and springs. The updated version has a much lower failure rate. BTW you can buy a pulley much cheaper form DTK and rivet it to your stock clutch and it will then have the stock reliability.
Old 12-08-2016, 09:50 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
lseguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 329
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
2005 c230
oh, what about a belt wrap kit. Is that a must with any from of SC pulley change?
Old 12-08-2016, 10:18 AM
  #20  
Member
Thread Starter
 
EMFAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 187
Received 24 Likes on 22 Posts
2014 ML63 AMG, 2012 McLaren MP4-12C, 1999 GMC Sierra, 1994 Chevy Astro, 1990 Honda CRX
Originally Posted by Rocman8
Why are headers way down the list? Just scrap the pulley idea and put headers on.
The $3,000 is why. If I can get the same or greater result for 1/6 of the price, it doesn't make sense.

Originally Posted by lseguy
oh, what about a belt wrap kit. Is that a must with any from of SC pulley change?
Already did that.
Old 12-08-2016, 10:24 AM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Rocman8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,139
Received 74 Likes on 70 Posts
E55
Originally Posted by EMFAudio
The $3,000 is why. If I can get the same or greater result for 1/6 of the price, it doesn't make sense.



Already did that.
Doesn't have to be $3000 especially for a daily driver. EC or Kleeman mid length is perfect and way less money.
Old 12-08-2016, 10:43 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
WideRide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Northeast
Posts: 270
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
2005 E55 | 1968 Road Runner
Wideride

Originally Posted by Rocman8
Doesn't have to be $3000 especially for a daily driver. EC or Kleeman mid length is perfect and way less money.
+1 on this. You will gain probably 35+whp from mids. First mod I did. Very noticeable difference immediately.
Old 12-08-2016, 10:57 AM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HeissRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 4,429
Received 60 Likes on 42 Posts
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by EMFAudio
I've been investigating HE's and which one is best for an 05 without "the bulge".
PLM. It's the only one to offer mounting brackets for the cooler that mounts underneath the HE.
Old 12-08-2016, 12:14 PM
  #24  
Member
Thread Starter
 
EMFAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 187
Received 24 Likes on 22 Posts
2014 ML63 AMG, 2012 McLaren MP4-12C, 1999 GMC Sierra, 1994 Chevy Astro, 1990 Honda CRX
Originally Posted by Rocman8
Doesn't have to be $3000 especially for a daily driver. EC or Kleeman mid length is perfect and way less money.
The only issue with doing Eurocharged or Kleeman is it's not completely bolt on. The midpipes have to be welded, and those can't be welded in till the headers are on, which means the exhaust shop has to put the headers on and weld it up unless I trailer the car there, which I'm not doing. So, I lose labor savings, and cost goes beyond the headers themselves.

Originally Posted by WideRide
+1 on this. You will gain probably 35+whp from mids. First mod I did. Very noticeable difference immediately.
What differences exactly? I know often headers can lose bottom end torque (not that I have a shortage of it) and often don't really become effective till after 3k RPM which isn't where most of my driving is.

Originally Posted by HeissRod
PLM. It's the only one to offer mounting brackets for the cooler that mounts underneath the HE.
I did catch onto that after some digging, and I emailed them to find out they will match the price of FTP's, FYI.
Old 12-08-2016, 12:17 PM
  #25  
Member
 
210lvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 168
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
2004 E55
Kleeman headers. Fabberge mid pipes. True bolt on.

no sense pumping more air in when you can't get it out...


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 77mm vs 84mm pulley, is it worth it?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:49 AM.