6.2l vs. 5.5 biturbo
05-16-2013, 05:46 PM
#27
MBWorld Fanatic!
Not that it weighs to much into the discussion, but are there any weight savings from the 6.2L to the 5.5L engine? In other words, is handling better in the 5.5L E63 vs the 6.2L E63?
08-31-2013, 03:00 AM
#30
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fla. Snowbird.
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Porsche 911 Turbo S 2014! E63S 14, Audi S8 13, CLS63 12, E550 12, C63 09, all tuned
I just traded a E63 2010 M156 for E 63 S 2014 with M157.
After buying a CLS 63 2012 with M157 the E 63 with M156 feel slow.
Look at the stock dyno sheets for M156/M157 and compare.
After buying a CLS 63 2012 with M157 the E 63 with M156 feel slow.
Look at the stock dyno sheets for M156/M157 and compare.
08-31-2013, 01:43 PM
#31
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Venice Florida
Posts: 4,458
Received 653 Likes
on
511 Posts
2018 S560 and 2019 E450 Wagon.
I believe the 157's are more fuel efficient too. I'm really liking my TT 157, very fast, sounds great and not bad on gas at all considering it's power, much better than the CTS-V I traded in for this car.
08-31-2013, 03:04 PM
#32
MBWorld Fanatic!
hardly would call it it more fuel efficient, yeah maybe one more mpg.....but who cares
its actually my most economical car
2006 denali 13mpg
1985 mercs 500 sel, 12-13
its actually my most economical car
2006 denali 13mpg
1985 mercs 500 sel, 12-13
