The cls63S is truly a unicorn ... I've maybe seen one?
|
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
(Post 6881426)
The cls63S is truly a unicorn ... I've maybe seen one?
|
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
(Post 6881401)
And I can at least tell a 3 series apart from a 5 series and an a4 from an a6...
Cmon Mercedes ... |
My garage space is limited and the E is 4" shorter than the CLS
|
Also the E is more practical for a DD
|
Also I would've wanted a tenorite grey CLS63S and seems like the only one in that colour was bought by another member on a different forum I'm on so I settled for the E.
Even in the E class the E63S there's very few with any options so no point in spending £50k - £60k unless it's fully loaded. |
Originally Posted by SilveRT8
(Post 6881482)
My garage space is limited and the E is 4" shorter than the CLS
|
Looks and the five seats in the E class. Drove them both, appreciated them both, but kept going back to the E63. I have two car seats in my ride most of the time, making the middle seat unusable, so probably wouldn't use that as criteria next time.
If I had to make this choice again, I'd go E63 for round 2. Will be interesting to see what the next iterations of the four door coupes look like. New Panamera looks stunning. |
Originally Posted by Ralcbah
(Post 6881940)
New Panamera looks stunning.
|
Obviously looks are subjective but line up a CLS63 next to an E63 and 8 out of 10 pedestrians will tell you the CLS is the appearance winner. That being said, the E63 is the overall champ. I actually enjoyed my previous E55 much more than the W218 CLS.
|
What do you mean? I did buy a CLS63........Wait..you guys don't have CLS's? I've been living a lie!
|
Because I found a bad ass Renntech tuned e63 wagon.
|
interesting thread
|
New panamera looks way better and finally something I could see buying
|
Face lifted CLS...nuff said:love:
sit in one at night turn it on and see the magic light show in front of the car:p::love::ladysman: It might also sound better, as exhaust parts are not the same. If history is to repeat itself, the previous gen cls55 sounded way better then the E55k. True story :) |
Originally Posted by Stereolab42
(Post 6880670)
Because the CLS63 is at least 10 grand more...
LOL at least someone is honest. I'd rather have a CLS63 over E63 anyday, but the facelifts were out of my price range and I did not want the pre-facelift. |
Originally Posted by Rock
(Post 6882060)
Obviously looks are subjective but line up a CLS63 next to an E63 and 8 out of 10 pedestrians will tell you the CLS is the appearance winner. That being said, the E63 is the overall champ. I actually enjoyed my previous E55 much more than the W218 CLS.
I NEVER get looks for my wagon unless it's car guys asking "is that an AMG WAGON?" |
Originally Posted by kponti
(Post 6881354)
Exactly!
I thought I had never seen a w213 in person right up to walking past one |
Originally Posted by 1809
(Post 6882899)
It's getting to the point where the only way to distinguish the new C-, E-, and S-class models from each other is to bust out the tape measure. I'm also disliking the dilution of the AMG brand, but that's another forum topic.
The first four photos are different AMG models. The last two are non AMG cars. Good luck telling what Mercedes is coming at you. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...ac44bbb33a.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...a3e575aecf.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...552afffea6.jpg https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...d2f8237886.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...ceb7026f1d.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...43b5bf772f.jpg |
Originally Posted by Rock
(Post 6882955)
The first four photos are different AMG models. The last two are non AMG cars. Good luck telling what Mercedes is coming at you.
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...ac44bbb33a.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...a3e575aecf.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...552afffea6.jpg https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...d2f8237886.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...ceb7026f1d.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...43b5bf772f.jpg Excellent post! :y |
Originally Posted by Rock
(Post 6882955)
The first four photos are different AMG models. The last two are non AMG cars. Good luck telling what Mercedes is coming at you.
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...ac44bbb33a.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...a3e575aecf.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...552afffea6.jpg https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...d2f8237886.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...ceb7026f1d.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbw...43b5bf772f.jpg |
I actually went to the dealer to buy a cls 63 that was advertised with only 1100 miles. Then I saw they had my E63 with a bit more miles (1,800) and Renntech tuning and headers. It took me about 10 minutes to go with the E even though I paid more for it: aside from the rear seat space, it looks more stealthy and undertstated, and more butch at the same time.
As I was considering the two the salesman suggested the cls was more of an old man's car...maybe I am getting old but I think it looks pretty good too. |
I also wanted command 4.5 which I think was offered in the face lifted model but didn't like the tablet looking screen. Not sure when LED lighting was introduced but that was a preference as well.
|
Originally Posted by AG6
(Post 6883779)
didn't like the tablet looking screen
|
tablet screen looks like an aftermarket add-on that should pivot/slide away into dash.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:10 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands