Failed Injector on a M157
#1
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 292 Likes
on
241 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
Failed Injector on a M157
I was helping a friend out with his CLS63 this weekend. The car had a misfire on no 5 and was throwing a low fuel pressure code.
We check the railed pressure with DAS and it was within spec.
We also did a compression test via DAS and with a gauge, no 5 was at 60psi which very is low.
Injector for that cylinder would not respond to DAS when we tired to turn it off with the engine at idle.
So my question is if the injector has failed will it cause low compression in that cylinder as to where the combustion chamber pressure is being forced back into the fuel rail?
We check the railed pressure with DAS and it was within spec.
We also did a compression test via DAS and with a gauge, no 5 was at 60psi which very is low.
Injector for that cylinder would not respond to DAS when we tired to turn it off with the engine at idle.
So my question is if the injector has failed will it cause low compression in that cylinder as to where the combustion chamber pressure is being forced back into the fuel rail?
#2
Member
If that was the cause of the low compression on #5 that would be the best case and also easiest to remedy. However seems unlikely...
Could be if the injector failed open is that it's been dumping fuel into #5 and washed the walls and the ring seal has been compromised.
What did the #5 plug look like when you removed it to do the compression test, vs the other cylinders would be most useful?
What are the compression numbers on the other cylinders?
Can you smell any fuel from the dipstick?
Are you setup to do a leak down test?
-chris
Could be if the injector failed open is that it's been dumping fuel into #5 and washed the walls and the ring seal has been compromised.
What did the #5 plug look like when you removed it to do the compression test, vs the other cylinders would be most useful?
What are the compression numbers on the other cylinders?
Can you smell any fuel from the dipstick?
Are you setup to do a leak down test?
-chris
#3
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 292 Likes
on
241 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
Plug looked fine when compared to other cylinder
Compression in no 6 cylinder was 180 psi.
Washing the cylinders is also very possible.
We did not do a leak down, that would be the next best thing to do.
Not related but worth noting that on the M157 when you change injectors there is a 4 digit code on top of the injectors that has to be entered into the ECU coding via DAS in order for them to function correctly.
Compression in no 6 cylinder was 180 psi.
Washing the cylinders is also very possible.
We did not do a leak down, that would be the next best thing to do.
Not related but worth noting that on the M157 when you change injectors there is a 4 digit code on top of the injectors that has to be entered into the ECU coding via DAS in order for them to function correctly.
#4
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 292 Likes
on
241 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
Well now thinking about it the high pressure fuel pumps deliver a rail pressure higher that 180 psi so it may be hard for the compression to blow back into the rail.
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Well, sounds like Occam's Razor situation...low compression and misfire on one cyl....simplest answer is likely a dead cylinder. good luck, but I think the head is coming off whether its rings or valves.
Trending Topics
#11
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 292 Likes
on
241 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
Exhaust valves on no5 had damage.
I was speaking a few local MB techs and they said they have seen a lot of M278 with this issue. Likely cause is the proximity of the turbine housing (heat generated) to no1 and no5 cylinder.
I was speaking a few local MB techs and they said they have seen a lot of M278 with this issue. Likely cause is the proximity of the turbine housing (heat generated) to no1 and no5 cylinder.
Last edited by shardul; 09-06-2017 at 10:04 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Silverp30wagon (09-06-2017)
The following users liked this post:
Silverp30wagon (09-08-2017)
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Haven't seen a LOT of them, but we have had a few exhaust valve failures. It is usually the end cylinders too. I'm sure it's an exhaust reversion issue as you speculate.
I would think with the downpipes it would be better but the tune was probably very aggressive.
Curious if the car was ever tracked?
I would think with the downpipes it would be better but the tune was probably very aggressive.
Curious if the car was ever tracked?
#16
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 292 Likes
on
241 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
Haven't seen a LOT of them, but we have had a few exhaust valve failures. It is usually the end cylinders too. I'm sure it's an exhaust reversion issue as you speculate.
I would think with the downpipes it would be better but the tune was probably very aggressive.
Curious if the car was ever tracked?
I would think with the downpipes it would be better but the tune was probably very aggressive.
Curious if the car was ever tracked?
Maybe a good set of turbo blankets will help mitigate this issue.
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
It may be a valve guide or seat issue causing the valves to burn. I assume the exhaust valves are sodium filled, if not, an upgrade may be possible then.
#18
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 292 Likes
on
241 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
I was speaking to a Doug Wolff (if anyone follows him on IG, he knows a lot about these engines) he also said proximity of the turbos to no1 and no5 is causing the exhaust valves to get burnt.
#19
What would be the solution to this issue? Isn't there already a heat shield next to the turbos. How old was the coolant and oil when the issue occurred? My tuned 90k m157 hasn't had any of those problems yet. Also does he have turbo back downpipes? Hopefully the installer did not remove the heat shield.
#20
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 292 Likes
on
241 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
What would be the solution to this issue? Isn't there already a heat shield next to the turbos. How old was the coolant and oil when the issue occurred? My tuned 90k m157 hasn't had any of those problems yet. Also does he have turbo back downpipes? Hopefully the installer did not remove the heat shield.
I know that all M157 and M278 will not have this issue but we have seen a lot of them starting to develop this problem.
Who knows you car may be fine for another 90k miles.
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
I think it may be a guide issue that's not presenting until the valves burn. Similar to the LS7 issue, but less catastrophic. I've seen some 278s have valve problems on stock, untuned cars. Heat in that application shouldn't be an issue, or it would be in every car.
#23
.