M278 and M157, these are your potential turbo boost leak points




Last edited by Ultrakla$$ic; Jun 26, 2024 at 06:30 PM.
For my ML the part # is 166-430-20-29. Yours might be 221-430-34-29 ??
Last edited by jcarsnz; Jun 27, 2024 at 01:28 AM. Reason: ah, it's a 2012 S550




I could simply monitor tank pressure while driving around. There should be a PID for that.
If you have the EVAP PID, take a look at it, it will be good to know.
My best improvement is after the oil solenoid defeat and all 4 new oxygen sensors. New oxygen sensors give me more instant engine response than before, in fact its better than
back in 2018 when I first bought the car used, with 10,000KM only. Tranny oil change per 20,000KM or 2 years was another reason my tranny response very fast for a slow by design a 7G+ is.
For EVAP and Oil Vapor aka PCV matters, my system is super healthy. I monitor my crankcase pressure once in a while. Its a good fast way to read PCV system overall health.
You can get a differential gauge to read crankcase pressure, it is a low cost tool.
https://mbworld.org/forums/e-class-w...sure-test.html
I am glad the vacuum/PCV hose your replace have made such a difference.
It is not a surprise though, if your M157 engine is standard not tuned, the torque is already so very strong at low RPM.
Lets use the non-performance package graph. Look at the torque from low RPM to a mere 2,500 RPM is already peak 800 Nm.
Too bad we can't see below 1,500 RPM, no data provided.
Under 2,000 RPM is where you probably use the power band most often in a non spirited driving or mild spirited driving.
If zero boost leak or none un-metered air escaping/entering the engine, this RPM region is the driveability region you can feel the most difference because the steep torque rise is 1,500 to 2,500 RPM.
......
My engine is a city tuned engine by MB, it is a family sedan and not a sport sedan.
At a mere 1,400 RPM my torque already peaked at 480 Nm.
And my city being king of creeping traffic jam and even highway is so packed and average speed so slow at 50MPH or slower, my engine is practically living under 1,350 RPM most of the time.
Thus the beauty and health of my current engine response for throttle to tranny modulation is such a wonderful asset.
Pulling WOT 1 to 3rd gear is not a good test for driveability, that is for power. Able to drop to lower gears direct ( example 7th to 4th ) with very light throttle modulation in E tranny mode and super smooth,
while engine is at 1,300 RPM is a thing of beauty and that is a true driveability. for my use case.
Take your time and see what more you can inspect for your engine intake system to have it perform its best.
I assume your car is approx 10 years old now. Them plastic stuff on our engines is getting older, crispier and their o-ring are no more prime and soft.
.
Last edited by S-Prihadi; Jun 27, 2024 at 10:54 AM. Reason: typo
Ordered the hose with 2 check valves https://www.fcpeuro.com/products/mer...s-212430052964
My vacuum check valve was damaged, replacing 2 more check valves in 212430052964 makes total sense.
Last edited by san40; Jun 30, 2024 at 05:40 PM. Reason: tags
Ordered the hose with 2 check valves https://www.fcpeuro.com/products/mer...s-212430052964
My vacuum check valve was damaged, replacing 2 more check valves in 212430052964 makes total sense.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG








Also there is no fat part shown to resemble any check valve.
https://www.ebay.ca/p/25062986897
This is going to be used for my oil solenoid to protect the disconnected plugs.
I visually inspected my oil drip pan and housing and the integrity of the rubber seals currently on my car and they all looked fine but I just want to reassure myself by putting on fresh components.
Cuz MERCEDES..
Last edited by Ultrakla$$ic; Jul 8, 2024 at 06:23 PM.
I do see and hear the intercooler pump cycling fluid, highway cruising iat at 69-72, but missing close to 10mph or so is huge
Last edited by Mojo20032004; Jul 10, 2024 at 04:18 PM.




.
to test all the mentioned check-valves in this thread.
However, if you boost leak is from hose clamp, or any rubber air hose, or leaking intake manifold seal, that is tougher to troubleshoot.
To test you boost solenoid Y77/1, you can read here , post #10 : https://mbworld.org/forums/e-class-w...ml#post8995704
You need a decent scanner or Xentry, aside from vacuum test kit.
https://www.amazon.com/Mityvac-MITMV...78&sr=8-2&th=1
.
to test all the mentioned check-valves in this thread.
However, if you boost leak is from hose clamp, or any rubber air hose, or leaking intake manifold seal, that is tougher to troubleshoot.
To test you boost solenoid Y77/1, you can read here , post #10 : https://mbworld.org/forums/e-class-w...ml#post8995704
You need a decent scanner or Xentry, aside from vacuum test kit.

the valve on the end (plugs to vacuum pump) looks "new" to me, the one in the middle is either different or damaged: its not a flat disk, but dish-like AND with dimples. Unless dimples are by design, its a sign of high pressure/wear. Somebody else open yours

It might be placebo, but hesitation and RPMs oscillation on low/medium load between 2k and 3k seems to be gone.. Will be testing more, but unfortunately without "scientific" tools





By right a healthy diagram should not be distorted to that extend, I mean making those dimples.
When new the red diagram are simple flat piece. Its nice to see the diagram is actually that thick. compared to the one at the vacuum pump for turbo boost solenoid.
Thank you for the tear-down, I like it.




.
Funny enough I bought this which is NOT for my engine, simply because I need to cannibalize the fittings. MB stop making the vacuum hose for my brake booster. because my car is Right Hand Drive and E400 ,
of which these two facts made the sales volume so small, MB simply could not be bothered.

.





the valve on the end (plugs to vacuum pump) looks "new" to me, the one in the middle is either different or damaged: its not a flat disk, but dish-like AND with dimples. Unless dimples are by design, its a sign of high pressure/wear. Somebody else open yours
It might be placebo, but hesitation and RPMs oscillation on low/medium load between 2k and 3k seems to be gone.. Will be testing more, but unfortunately without "scientific" tools



