W213 AMG Discuss the W213 AMG - 2017 to present
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

E63 S Sedan vs Wagon ride harshness?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-07-2019, 01:24 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Kwilks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alpina B7 - Jeep Wrangler JL Moab
E63 S Sedan vs Wagon ride harshness?

I'm cross shopping M5, M5 comp, and E63 S. Yesterday I test drove the M5 standard and Comp, I found both to be a bit too harsh on moderately poor roads. A number of reviews of the E63 S Sedan have mentioned it has a very harsh ride as well. I started reading/viewing reviews on the E63 S Wagon and noticed some of those reviews say the ride is reasonably comfortable (in comfort setting of course) for the kind of car it is. A while back I drove the Panamera 4s and 4s Sports Turisomo back-to-back and the ride quality was nearly identical.

Does anyone have first hand knowledge of wether the E63 S Wagon drives less harshly than the Sedan?
Old 04-07-2019, 03:01 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto, Ont, Canda
Posts: 2,352
Received 667 Likes on 514 Posts
go fast grocery getter wagon
The ride harshness is also subject to tire pressure as well. Most of us here have settled down to whatever pressure that is suitable for their preference.
Old 04-07-2019, 03:01 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
sarrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 17
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
991S
Not a direct comparison, but my initial impressions on the E63 Wagon is that it rides a lot smoother than my prior 2018 M3 Competition package car.
Old 04-07-2019, 03:22 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
Foggy916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Dallas
Posts: 35
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
2019 E63S Wagon
Originally Posted by Kwilks
I'm cross shopping M5, M5 comp, and E63 S. Yesterday I test drove the M5 standard and Comp, I found both to be a bit too harsh on moderately poor roads. A number of reviews of the E63 S Sedan have mentioned it has a very harsh ride as well. I started reading/viewing reviews on the E63 S Wagon and noticed some of those reviews say the ride is reasonably comfortable (in comfort setting of course) for the kind of car it is. A while back I drove the Panamera 4s and 4s Sports Turisomo back-to-back and the ride quality was nearly identical.

Does anyone have first hand knowledge of wether the E63 S Wagon drives less harshly than the Sedan?
I drove all of those recently before I ordered my E63S wagon few weeks ago. Hate to tell you that if you find the M5 too harsh (that is if you had it in comfort suspension setting), you are shopping the wrong cars. I found that the M5 and 4S were slightly softer in comfort setting than the E63 but the E63 is WAAAAY more comfortable than my current car....M3 competition package. Oh, and the sedan and wagon drove the same to me.

Last edited by Foggy916; 04-07-2019 at 03:23 PM. Reason: forgot last sentence
Old 04-07-2019, 06:36 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
onesixeight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I've driven all of the cars mentioned and I have a '19 E63 Wagon... To me, the Panamera 4s with air suspension rides the best of the 3 models. Sport Turismo comes with air suspension standard if I'm not mistaken.

The M5 and even the Comp, rides better than the E63 sedan and wagon. While I agree the E63 wagon rides better than the sedan, it's still harsher for sharper bumps vs the M5/M5 Comp
Old 04-08-2019, 07:33 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
stealth.pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,429
Received 744 Likes on 486 Posts
2022 Mercedes EQS 580
Originally Posted by Kwilks
I'm cross shopping M5, M5 comp, and E63 S. Yesterday I test drove the M5 standard and Comp, I found both to be a bit too harsh on moderately poor roads. A number of reviews of the E63 S Sedan have mentioned it has a very harsh ride as well. I started reading/viewing reviews on the E63 S Wagon and noticed some of those reviews say the ride is reasonably comfortable (in comfort setting of course) for the kind of car it is. A while back I drove the Panamera 4s and 4s Sports Turisomo back-to-back and the ride quality was nearly identical.

Does anyone have first hand knowledge of wether the E63 S Wagon drives less harshly than the Sedan?
I have driven all three and I own the E63S. If I were to rank ride quality:
1) Porsche Panamera - best ride quality by a large margin.
2) BMW M5
3) Mercedes E63S

In my opinion the M5 has noticeably better ride quality than the E63S. The ride quality in my E63S is even worse than my 911 Turbo S. It is a car which really demand good roads. This is assuming all cars are on 20" wheels.

Last edited by stealth.pilot; 04-08-2019 at 07:36 AM.
Old 04-08-2019, 10:33 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Dunga's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 387
Received 109 Likes on 71 Posts
‘22 Ram Limited 4x4, '21 GLE63S, ‘14 Corvette Stingray
Originally Posted by stealth.pilot
I have driven all three and I own the E63S. If I were to rank ride quality:
1) Porsche Panamera - best ride quality by a large margin.
2) BMW M5
3) Mercedes E63S

In my opinion the M5 has noticeably better ride quality than the E63S. The ride quality in my E63S is even worse than my 911 Turbo S. It is a car which really demand good roads. This is assuming all cars are on 20" wheels.
Tried out sport and sport + for the first time last night. I found little difference in ride quality between the 3 levels, with comfort being almost indistinguishable from sport, and sport + being slightly harsher. We’re graced with some truly atrocious roads in northern Minnesota, think Detroit quality, and the car rides obviously a lot harder than my GLE63s.

I guess they they could have made comfort mode a little less bone breaking but ultimately I’m still happy since the whole package offsets the ride quality issue as far as I’m concerned.
The following users liked this post:
ldramg (04-22-2019)
Old 04-08-2019, 07:20 PM
  #8  
Member
 
Dagger9903's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 179
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Nissan
I think everyone should post their tire pressures and general road quality when opining on ride characteristics, it really makes a huge difference. Dealer put my tires at 51 all around recenlty, which btw is appropriate for a fully loaded (passenger and cargo) wagon going up to 180kmh, and the ride felt like concrete on local roads that need repaving (think 1-2 inch deep potholes and a lot of surface imperfections) roads.

I switched to 41 all around because there are normally 2-3 people in the car (1 or 2 of them being children), limited cargo, and nowhere near speed limits that high. The ride quality got noticeably better - more 'give' on potholes, less noise on road imperfections. It's not a luxury ride by any means, but significantly more livable.
Old 04-08-2019, 07:40 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Dunga's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 387
Received 109 Likes on 71 Posts
‘22 Ram Limited 4x4, '21 GLE63S, ‘14 Corvette Stingray
Originally Posted by Dagger9903
I think everyone should post their tire pressures and general road quality when opining on ride characteristics, it really makes a huge difference. Dealer put my tires at 51 all around recenlty, which btw is appropriate for a fully loaded (passenger and cargo) wagon going up to 180kmh, and the ride felt like concrete on local roads that need repaving (think 1-2 inch deep potholes and a lot of surface imperfections) roads.

I switched to 41 all around because there are normally 2-3 people in the car (1 or 2 of them being children), limited cargo, and nowhere near speed limits that high. The ride quality got noticeably better - more 'give' on potholes, less noise on road imperfections. It's not a luxury ride by any means, but significantly more livable.
Sure. I have pirelli sottozeros IIs 265 width all around in a square setup for my winter driving. Pressure at 42 PSI all around. We have some of the worst roads in the country in my city. On freeway and other city roads that aren’t as bad ride is fine. Yes this isn’t an S560.
Old 04-08-2019, 08:14 PM
  #10  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Kwilks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alpina B7 - Jeep Wrangler JL Moab
Thanks to all for your input. Today I drove the E63 S sedan and wagon and found both too be too harsh for my liking. Both were fantastic in so many ways, I preferred the wagon but it drove the same as the sedan. I ended up getting a Porsche Cayenne Turbo. Very different vehicle, but suited me better.
Old 04-08-2019, 09:11 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
24Hours's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NYC area
Posts: 551
Received 157 Likes on 104 Posts
2019 E63S wagon; 2016 Landrover Landmark
Originally Posted by Kwilks
Thanks to all for your input. Today I drove the E63 S sedan and wagon and found both too be too harsh for my liking. Both were fantastic in so many ways, I preferred the wagon but it drove the same as the sedan. I ended up getting a Porsche Cayenne Turbo. Very different vehicle, but suited me better.
Congrats on the Cayenne Turbo... I bet coming from the Alpina B7 makes all the cars you listed as too harsh (as someone pointed out earlier: wrong list to shop).

Enjoy.
Old 04-08-2019, 10:23 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Dunga's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 387
Received 109 Likes on 71 Posts
‘22 Ram Limited 4x4, '21 GLE63S, ‘14 Corvette Stingray
Enjoy buddy. A cayenne turbo is no joke and it’s all about what the best fit for you is. Cheers.
Old 04-09-2019, 08:56 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
V70cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 288
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
535XIT, E63S
Originally Posted by Dagger9903
I think everyone should post their tire pressures and general road quality when opining on ride characteristics, it really makes a huge difference. Dealer put my tires at 51 all around recenlty, which btw is appropriate for a fully loaded (passenger and cargo) wagon going up to 180kmh, and the ride felt like concrete on local roads that need repaving (think 1-2 inch deep potholes and a lot of surface imperfections) roads.

I switched to 41 all around because there are normally 2-3 people in the car (1 or 2 of them being children), limited cargo, and nowhere near speed limits that high. The ride quality got noticeably better - more 'give' on potholes, less noise on road imperfections. It's not a luxury ride by any means, but significantly more livable.
I am running 41 front and 38 rear, these are the pressures when warm, the cold temp is about 2 pounds less. The readings are based on the display from the car’s system. I find local city streets a little hash but highway quite nice.
Old 04-09-2019, 08:57 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
V70cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 288
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
535XIT, E63S
I own a e63 wagon.
Old 04-09-2019, 09:00 AM
  #15  
Member
 
E63guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 154
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
E 63 S Wagon
Originally Posted by Kwilks
Thanks to all for your input. Today I drove the E63 S sedan and wagon and found both too be too harsh for my liking. Both were fantastic in so many ways, I preferred the wagon but it drove the same as the sedan. I ended up getting a Porsche Cayenne Turbo. Very different vehicle, but suited me better.
Good luck with it! I went with the Panamera Turbo Sport Turismo. Agreed on the ride quality aspect btw.
Old 04-12-2019, 10:18 PM
  #16  
Member
 
CanuckE63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 111
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
RS7
I have a 4s sport turismo and recently drove an E63 wagon for fun. The Porsche suspension is way more supple and compliant over bumps imo. The wagon rides pretty harsh, but some people really like that. Also, road noise is much more noticeable in the Benz if that matters to you. Both are great vehicles, no wrong choice.
Old 04-12-2019, 11:16 PM
  #17  
Member
 
van_rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC, and sometimes AZ
Posts: 241
Received 31 Likes on 25 Posts
2015 E63S
AMG just can’t get suspension settings right. Ridiculous that anyone is even talking about ride comfort and noise in this class and price range of vehicles. Don’t expect it to be a Luxo barge but come on Mercedes, figure it out! When’s the last time anyone picked a car over Nurburgring times! OK rant over.

That said, AMG cars are exciting and sound fantastic!

back to my wine.....
The following users liked this post:
ldramg (04-22-2019)
Old 04-13-2019, 02:34 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Slugsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 389
Received 56 Likes on 39 Posts
E63 AMG Estate
Originally Posted by van_rider
AMG just can’t get suspension settings right. Ridiculous that anyone is even talking about ride comfort and noise in this class and price range of vehicles. Don’t expect it to be a Luxo barge but come on Mercedes, figure it out! When’s the last time anyone picked a car over Nurburgring times! OK rant over.

That said, AMG cars are exciting and sound fantastic!

back to my wine.....
Completely agree
Old 04-15-2019, 07:55 PM
  #19  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,411
Received 1,886 Likes on 1,323 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Originally Posted by stealth.pilot
I have driven all three and I own the E63S. If I were to rank ride quality:
1) Porsche Panamera - best ride quality by a large margin.
2) BMW M5
3) Mercedes E63S

In my opinion the M5 has noticeably better ride quality than the E63S. The ride quality in my E63S is even worse than my 911 Turbo S. It is a car which really demand good roads. This is assuming all cars are on 20" wheels.
ive gotten quite used to always riding my my 2014 e63S in S+ all the time ... will I be ok with the 2018+ e63S?
Old 04-15-2019, 07:57 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
V70cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 288
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
535XIT, E63S
On the highway it is great but on local streets it is a little hard. The car has a height adjustment and I wonder if lifting it at low speed will provide more travel length and a softer ride?
Old 04-16-2019, 01:41 AM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!

 
E634Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,622
Received 555 Likes on 381 Posts
2018 E63S AMG
I really don't find the ride all that bad, considering what the car is. Now I haven't driven the M5 or other cars for comparison purposes, but neither my nor my family find the ride jarring or unpleasant and they like riding in the E63 over our other vehicles.

That said, I did ride from the airport to my hotel in Rome yesterday in an S class and I could tell that the ride was smoother than my E63 right away, but I suspect I'd also notice an immediate difference in favor of the E63 if I was driving the S class and pushed it through a turn or two.
Old 04-16-2019, 03:14 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Dunga's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 387
Received 109 Likes on 71 Posts
‘22 Ram Limited 4x4, '21 GLE63S, ‘14 Corvette Stingray
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
ive gotten quite used to always riding my my 2014 e63S in S+ all the time ... will I be ok with the 2018+ e63S?
It’ll depend on the quality of your city roads. Go for a test drive and see for yourself.
Old 04-16-2019, 01:34 PM
  #23  
Super Member
 
jkob5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Houston
Posts: 669
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts
19 E63s
If you guys think the e63s rides harsh, you should ride a C63s. When I upgraded from C63s to E63s, I was actually a little concerned that everyone mentions how stiff the ride is. The ride on the e63s feels like a cloud compared to the C lol, it's all relative. It is a little harsh on bumps but still miles better than what I drove for 2 years.
Old 06-01-2019, 03:39 AM
  #24  
Member
 
VaserC63S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 239
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
2015 Range Rover Sport Autobiography; 2019 AMG E63S; 2021 Range Rover HSE Westminister
Originally Posted by jkob5
If you guys think the e63s rides harsh, you should ride a C63s. When I upgraded from C63s to E63s, I was actually a little concerned that everyone mentions how stiff the ride is. The ride on the e63s feels like a cloud compared to the C lol, it's all relative. It is a little harsh on bumps but still miles better than what I drove for 2 years.
100% with you. I love AMG but the cars do ride like crap. I thought I could live with the C63S Sedan but I was wrong and it’s the harshest of the lot. AMG claims the facelift models are more comfortable but I was uninterested. First thing I did was lower the tire pressure on the Dunlop’s it came with. That didn’t work. By 9,000 miles I was getting real tired of the car. The crashing and rattling ( poor build quality ) made the car not feel worth it at all for the price. I then experimented with the new Michelin A/S 3+ tires to see if all seasons would help. Fantastic tire. Car was night and day. Acceptable ride if still harsh as hell. I hated the rattling worse anyway. Didn’t help I had the drool worthy performance seats in that car.

So my E63S is riding on 42/39 front to rear and have the standard seats. Comfort mode in city and sport on the open roads feels just about right. I wouldn’t call it plus by any measure I would wish for softer comfort mode, but it’s good enough that my wife didn’t complain at all. AMG are lucky they didn’t loose me as a customer just based on ride quality but I can understand people not choosing them based on that alone. It should be simple as use less air pressure right? The build quality in the E63S is two classes above the C63S. That and everything is just that much better made swallowing the price pill to upgrade and get out if the C easier to deal with.
Old 06-01-2019, 03:55 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Slugsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 389
Received 56 Likes on 39 Posts
E63 AMG Estate
Completely agree re ride quality. What Mercedes were thinking is beyond me, it’s first and foremost a road car and it should be more compliant.

Having said that, I’ve just changed tyres from the Pirellis’s to GoodYear Eagle’s after a UK forum recommendation.

The difference in comfort is huge, my wife has instantly noticed the difference. It’s probably not quite a grippy and I wouldn’t use them on a track but for daily commute, the comfort factor has improved considerably.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: E63 S Sedan vs Wagon ride harshness?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 PM.