Notices
W218 CLS63, 2011 to present.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

803HP CLS63

 
Old 09-25-2012, 04:20 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
dbasons55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 938
Received 47 Likes on 26 Posts
803HP CLS63

Hi, my tuner just got off the dyno and sent me some pictures of his car with a dyno sheet, this is interesting he has the same set up as my car exactly except that he wanted to get a dyno with STOCK EXHAUST and CATS, he first took his car to a dynojet but unfortunately he had too much wheel spin with 5 people trying to keep her steady and 160lbs in the trunk so he dynoed his car on a SuperFlow dyno, 803HP on the crank and 706WHP wanted to share this info with you guys as soon as i got it on my email, this is stage 3 that is offered by those guys
Attached Thumbnails 803HP CLS63-foto-1.jpg   803HP CLS63-foto.jpg   803HP CLS63-scan_pic0001neu.jpg  

Last edited by dbasons55; 09-25-2012 at 04:24 PM.
dbasons55 is offline  
Old 09-25-2012, 06:31 PM
  #2  
Member
 
fn3423's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 227
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 CLS63 AMG 030
That is some serious WHP!
After hearing so much about your car, I was thinking the Stage 3 would have been a little more or maybe I was hoping it would have been more. All said it is very impressive.
Looking forward to seeing your dyno report.
fn3423 is offline  
Old 09-25-2012, 07:59 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
vdubpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: OC
Posts: 6,059
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
i drive them all, fast and hard
lie detector , LOL

so who is your tuner, where at, and whats stage 3 incorporate
vdubpower is offline  
Old 09-25-2012, 11:49 PM
  #4  
Member
 
kohjul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
WOWWWWW!!! that is some crazzyyyy nummberrrss mannn.... do u use the same tune too or u still using the brabus piggyback?
kohjul is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 12:58 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
2005 modded E55K , C218 CLS63TT PP Edition1
not a lie, the tuning company name is written on 1 of the pictures in red.

his car is fast and strong.

i have a strong tune and aggressive, i am sure he will smoke me. LOL.

congrats mohamed, i know you are in the 800+hp league.

LOL im @ 700hp. and happy with it.
Ali_E55 is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 01:07 AM
  #6  
Super Moderator
 
BenzoBoi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 11,664
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
W221


+1 on what's included in the Stage 3 package.

BenzoBoi is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 01:07 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Jspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore/Central London UK
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E63 biturbo
Nice torque! Did u upgrade your transmission too?
Jspeed is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 02:32 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
vdubpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: OC
Posts: 6,059
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
i drive them all, fast and hard
commenting on the name of the dyno.....mashallah, now u guys need to race
vdubpower is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 02:37 AM
  #9  
Super Member
 
Karl901's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fla. Snowbird.
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Porsche 911 Turbo S 2014! E63S 14, Audi S8 13, CLS63 12, E550 12, C63 09, all tuned
If they put larger turbos in stage 3 of who ever the tuner is, then I may believe the dyno is correct. Otherwise they are smoking dope.
Karl901 is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 04:47 AM
  #10  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Denver
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
Did anybody notice how wrong the numerical values are on that dynosheet?

Crank: 803, Wheel: 706

803-706= 97 which equates to %12 drivetrain loss.

There is absolutely no way in the world that the new 2012 CLS63 with the bi-turbo engine accounts for only %12 drivetrain loss. The new AMG MCT 7 gear Speedshift uses a wet startup clutch which is known to absorb more power from the engine. I do not recall any Mercedes having a %12 drivetrain loss. Please correct me if I am wrong.

Why is this tuner using a superflow dyno? the numbers on Superflows can be manipulated to read just about whatever the operated wants!
Superflow dynos have been known to not give repeatable numbers and give a a huge gap between runs at the same time. unlike dynojets, where it is designed to give good repeatable numbers and you can't minpulate it.

I'm not saying the CLS is not powerful, it could be more or less powerful, but the dynosheet you posted above is completely false. Any real dyno operater would agree with me.

Last edited by M156Beast; 09-26-2012 at 04:49 AM.
M156Beast is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 06:24 AM
  #11  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
dbasons55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 938
Received 47 Likes on 26 Posts
my tuner went with superflow cuz the wheel barrel is larger and provides better contact and therefor less wheelspin if its accurate or not thats something else, thats a total different story, many dynos can be adjusted and can read differently regardless of that what would be the difference, anyways show me evidence of false reading please, dont just say that this is BS and ask for some operator to justify your answer.
dbasons55 is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 07:27 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Denver
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by dbasons55 View Post
show me evidence of false reading please, dont just say that this is BS and ask for some operator to justify your answer.
I just did sir. The %12 drivetrain loss from the dynosheet you posted is FALSE. There is no way a CLS63 with the M157 engine accounts for %12 drivetrain loss, especially a tuned one .

One other thing, you mentioned that the CLS above is without an Exhust. That means you car is more powerful,right?

Tell me, how is that your Tune/Exhust/Upgraded turbo Digitech CLS63 loses to a Tune/Exhust only PP-Performance CLS63 making 720 on the crank on a Dyno Maha?

It was mentioned at this thread by a PP-Performance employee In this thread:

https://mbworld.org/forums/ml55-amg-...rformance.html

I did not notice this and I just read it, more proof that the numbers you posted are BS.

Last edited by M156Beast; 09-26-2012 at 07:58 AM.
M156Beast is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 07:46 AM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Maverick1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,150
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Vath ML63 Brabus C63 SL63 CLK63BS C63BS
20% driveteain loss is pretty standard. I too don't understand this meager drive train loss estimate.
Maverick1975 is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 08:36 AM
  #14  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
dbasons55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 938
Received 47 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by M156Beast View Post
I just did sir. The %12 drivetrain loss from the dynosheet you posted is FALSE. There is no way a CLS63 with the M157 engine accounts for %12 drivetrain loss, especially a tuned one .

One other thing, you mentioned that the CLS above is without an Exhust. That means you car is more powerful,right?

Tell me, how is that your Tune/Exhust/Upgraded turbo Digitech CLS63 loses to a Tune/Exhust only PP-Performance CLS63 making 720 on the crank on a Dyno Maha?

It was mentioned at this thread by a PP-Performance employee In this thread:

https://mbworld.org/forums/ml55-amg-...rformance.html

I did not notice this and I just read it, more proof that the numbers you posted are BS.
Listen kiddo it seems you haven't got your facts right! True that ppp got a good tune from the base line of GAD just like they do best, steal other people hard work! Plus why didn't you mention that the ppp CLS63 was tuned by Digitec prior it going to the thieves? You forgot to add that the car has intercooler radiator! Or are the guys at PPP to dumb to know what a radiator is by the way just for your info the ML63 you posted has bigger GAD turbos fitted by DigiTec so don't give all the credit to your PPP (plus JP guaranteed he didn't touch the car) so that's a dyno run only, and you can call upon your fellows at PPP and I am ready to record a race for you to know whose is quicker! By the way I was jump started by PPP CLS63 and as I was pulling away he hit the breaks! that's not a loss that is chickening out by ppp! You call them again and ask them who got a better time and trap at Yas Drag me or ppp!
dbasons55 is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 10:10 AM
  #15  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Denver
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by dbasons55 View Post
Listen kiddo it seems you haven't got your facts right! True that ppp got a good tune from the base line of GAD just like they do best, steal other people hard work! Plus why didn't you mention that the ppp CLS63 was tuned by Digitec prior it going to the thieves? You forgot to add that the car has intercooler radiator! Or are the guys at PPP to dumb to know what a radiator is by the way just for your info the ML63 you posted has bigger GAD turbos fitted by DigiTec so don't give all the credit to your PPP (plus JP guaranteed he didn't touch the car) so that's a dyno run only, and you can call upon your fellows at PPP and I am ready to record a race for you to know whose is quicker! By the way I was jump started by PPP CLS63 and as I was pulling away he hit the breaks! that's not a loss that is chickening out by ppp! You call them again and ask them who got a better time and trap at Yas Drag me or ppp!
That actually doesn't prove the dynosheet you posted is correct, it actually justifies against it


Thats great news. In addition, i difd not know that particular PPP CLS was initially a GAD car, How would I? I just heard it from you. I wonder though why a GAD customer switched to another tuner???Regardless of what you posted whether its true or not about PPP, you did mention that the the ML63 had turbos from your tuner as well. That ML63 made 730 on the crank, and not 800.

I don't care about PPP. Obviously you have issues with them ( hey they did beat you). There is also a zero chance of me calling them. You did mention that you weren't able to pull on him early, which is actually my point. That you are not making 800+ ( 100 plus over them). He had the initial jump? Hey your the one with the bigger turbos and intercooler, it shouldn't be a problem, right?

I'm not trying to argue with you over nothing. I think you just proved to yourself that there is no way that CLS above is making 800HP

Last edited by M156Beast; 09-26-2012 at 10:23 AM.
M156Beast is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 11:44 AM
  #16  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
dbasons55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 938
Received 47 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by M156Beast View Post
That actually doesn't prove the dynosheet you posted is correct, it actually justifies against it


Thats great news. In addition, i difd not know that particular PPP CLS was initially a GAD car, How would I? I just heard it from you. I wonder though why a GAD customer switched to another tuner???Regardless of what you posted whether its true or not about PPP, you did mention that the the ML63 had turbos from your tuner as well. That ML63 made 730 on the crank, and not 800.

I don't care about PPP. Obviously you have issues with them ( hey they did beat you). There is also a zero chance of me calling them. You did mention that you weren't able to pull on him early, which is actually my point. That you are not making 800+ ( 100 plus over them). He had the initial jump? Hey your the one with the bigger turbos and intercooler, it shouldn't be a problem, right?

I'm not trying to argue with you over nothing. I think you just proved to yourself that there is no way that CLS above is making 800HP
Listen you don't know nothing, you can read that I have mentioned I have the same set up but not the same tune, actually I am getting my car tuned this Friday, same with the ML63 (that's why it pulled 730hp cuz ppp don't know how to get the rest of the missing 70hp ) for your info I did pull on him although he jump started me I know my friend in the CLS63 PPP knows that fact so back off on something you don't know nothing about, as I said again go ask whoever told you to give you the Yas Drag results. And about the SuperFlow Dyno it is one of the best dynos please go do your research or show me something that those dynos read false!
dbasons55 is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 06:36 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
AmmarYasirA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W219 CLS63
LOL, Dbason-why is it that every time you post something people gotta hate? haha. I believe you though.
AmmarYasirA is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 07:07 PM
  #18  
Member
 
shawnha's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS63 PP, XFR
Wow Nice!!
shawnha is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 07:55 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
vdubpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: OC
Posts: 6,059
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
i drive them all, fast and hard
dyno , shmyno, put it on the street and lets see it race
vdubpower is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 09:08 PM
  #20  
Out Of Control!!
 
hyperion667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 21,648
Received 736 Likes on 713 Posts
2012 CLS63
what does minpulate mean?
hyperion667 is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 10:15 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
tgoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'13 GT-R AMS Alpha 9+, CLA45, E55
I wanna see what she traps in the 1/4.
tgoss is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 11:19 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by dbasons55 View Post
Hi, my tuner just got off the dyno and sent me some pictures of his car with a dyno sheet, this is interesting he has the same set up as my car exactly except that he wanted to get a dyno with STOCK EXHAUST and CATS, he first took his car to a dynojet but unfortunately he had too much wheel spin with 5 people trying to keep her steady and 160lbs in the trunk so he dynoed his car on a SuperFlow dyno, 803HP on the crank and 706WHP wanted to share this info with you guys as soon as i got it on my email, this is stage 3 that is offered by those guys
Question, did your friend use (5) people + 160 lbs in trunk on SuperFlow Dyno too?
Thericker is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 11:22 PM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Yo bud....

Originally Posted by tgoss View Post
I wanna see what she traps in the 1/4.
I'll be in LA Beverly Hills in the evening on Mon 1st, anychance to meet up n get a ride in GTR
Thericker is offline  
Old 09-27-2012, 01:39 AM
  #24  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Denver
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by dbasons55 View Post
Listen you don't know nothing, you can read that I have mentioned I have the same set up but not the same tune, actually I am getting my car tuned this Friday, same with the ML63 (that's why it pulled 730hp cuz ppp don't know how to get the rest of the missing 70hp ) for your info I did pull on him although he jump started me I know my friend in the CLS63 PPP knows that fact so back off on something you don't know nothing about, as I said again go ask whoever told you to give you the Yas Drag results. And about the SuperFlow Dyno it is one of the best dynos please go do your research or show me something that those dynos read false!

Dbason,

I took the time and called PP-Performance. I had a good friendly talk with them on the phone. They are truly welcoming. The race between you and the PPP CLS63 according to them did not happen as you state. I was told that actually you got the jump and they still overtook you!

I was also told, which actually make sense, the GAD CLS had tuning issues. GAD couldn't solve it and so your friend was the one that went to PP-Performance to solve his issue. They solved his issue and he is very happy with his tune from what I understood.

Anyway, the reason that I called was because you told me to ask them about your ET at the drag. I was actually expecting a monsterous ET from the way you were speaking and I was actually shocked that you tapped a best of 11.7, at one run you tapped 12. The same day a PP-Performance C63 with tune/headers was tapping 11.8.

Now explain to me, how is it that a Tune only CLS63 biturbo from Renntech taps 11.1 while your CLS with Tune/Exhust/larger turbos/intercooler tapping an 11.7?

My whole argument was about the false dynosheet you posted. From your ET at the drag, looks like there is no way you are making near 800.

It appears that GAD is a joke and PP-Performance own them, which has you very pissed. Maybe it's time to switch your tune, just like your friend did?

Keep posting dynosheets from your tuner showing 803 at the crank and 706 at the wheel with a %12 drivetrain loss. Don't think that it is going to be credibale. It is actually laughable and makes no sense. Any German tuner, especially when tuning a a bi-turbo would use a standard Bosche Dyno, like MAHA Dyno, not some superflow dyno. Do some research and you will find that Supeflow dynos are not accurate

Last edited by M156Beast; 09-27-2012 at 02:12 AM.
M156Beast is offline  
Old 09-27-2012, 02:43 AM
  #25  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
dbasons55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 938
Received 47 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by M156Beast View Post
Dbason,

I took the time and called PP-Performance. I had a good friendly talk with them on the phone. They are truly welcoming. The race between you and the PPP CLS63 according to them did not happen as you state. I was told that actually you got the jump and they still overtook you!

I was also told, which actually make sense, the GAD CLS had tuning issues. GAD couldn't solve it and so your friend was the one that went to PP-Performance to solve his issue. They solved his issue and he is very happy with his tune from what I understood.

Anyway, the reason that I called was because you told me to ask them about your ET at the drag. I was actually expecting a monsterous ET from the way you were speaking and I was actually shocked that you tapped a best of 11.7, at one run you tapped 12. The same day a PP-Performance C63 with tune/headers was tapping 11.8.

Now explain to me, how is it that a Tune only CLS63 biturbo from Renntech taps 11.1 while your CLS with Tune/Exhust/larger turbos/intercooler tapping an 11.7?

My whole argument was about the false dynosheet you posted. From your ET at the drag, looks like there is no way you are making near 800.

It appears that GAD is a joke and PP-Performance own them, which has you very pissed. Maybe it's time to switch your tune, just like your friend did?

Keep posting dynosheets from your tuner showing 803 at the crank and 706 at the wheel with a %12 drivetrain loss. Don't think that it is going to be credibale. It is actually laughable and makes no sense. Any German tuner, especially when tuning a a bi-turbo would use a standard Bosche Dyno, like MAHA Dyno, not some superflow dyno. Do some research and you will find that Supeflow dynos are not accurate
The best way to prove me wrong since you or no one else here have seen the friendly race we had you are welcome anytime to contact me and get as many cameras as you want and we can do a race and see how that PPP is faster than my car and let everyone here see it! By the way I got 11.6 at 204KM your PPP CLS63 best was 11.89 at 198KM, both of our car ran on the same tire setup and same conditions! Don't bring out there best records in the winter and put them against my humble first time run in the worst conditions! Please put in mind that that was my FIRST time running a car in a drag strip, let's wait for my tune + DR's and we will run there again.
dbasons55 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 803HP CLS63


Contact Us - About Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

© 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: