Check Engine Tip for MB owners
In the North East, I used to fill my 2000 MB S430 with 93 octane gas. All NorthEast pumps use MTBE in their gas.
When I got to California, I discovered that most pumps only have 91 octane at best and that my Check Engine light comes on. After the gas level would drop to 3/4, it would go off. The local pumps also use MTBE.
Here's the interesting news however. I have tried this many times and it is absolutely not a coincidence that when I fillup at a "76" gas station, the Check Engine does not come on. They use Ethanol rather than MTBE. I do not work or have any relationship with this company. In fact, I had never heard of them till I got here.
So to all MB owners out there, try and find a brand of gas that does not use MTBE...
Secondly, what's the difference between Ethanol and MTBE.
Is the Mercedes engine is designed for Ethanol ? I thought Ethanol is a different kind of gasoline that is used in Indy Cart racing and not for regular engines !
Thanks
Almost all gas stations sell gas with MTBE. "76" seems to be the only exception I know off. I am also not very happy that I cannot easily get 93 octane here in California, especially given that we pay so much for gas anyway.
By the way, does the check engine light in your MB also sporadically switch on?
Regards,
Vikram
So far, I haven't got that problem: Check engine light turns on. However, the ABS + ESP system didn't work. It took them 3 days to get the part and fix the car.
Oh, by the way, for gasoline, I use Mobil or Shell.
Thanks
don't want to get all environmental californian on you but mtbe is a horrible thing. completely destroys our drinking water. i really never cared about "these environemtal issues" before, until i lived in a country where it was too late for environmental measures. DON'T USE MTBE OXYGENAED GAS.
I agree that MTBE is terrible on the environment and the car. Right now, I only know off "76" gas stations selling gas which is MTBE free.
If anyone knows of other brands, please let us in on the secret as I am unable to find "76" gas stations everytime I am travelling someplace new.
93 octane, is your car programmed for that? all mercedes are designed to run best on 91 octane.
don't want to get all environmental californian on you but mtbe is a horrible thing. completely destroys our drinking water. i really never cared about "these environemtal issues" before, until i lived in a country where it was too late for environmental measures. DON'T USE MTBE OXYGENAED GAS.
NP
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
However, the trick is to find gas that is oxygenated using Ethanol rather than MTBE.
that MTBE stuff is an ecological nightmare. yes the epa did admit a few years back that MTBE is a poison and we were using to "clean" up the air. this MTBE stuff destroys our groundwater supply.
DON"T USE MTBE OXYGENATED GAS.
-stepping off soapbox-
MTBE has become an important groundwater contaminant because of its mobility, persistence, and potential toxicity. It enters groundwater primarily from the underground storage tanks at gas stations, which leak more commonly than you might think. The use of MTBE has become controversial, due primarily to issues with contaminated groundwater supplies.
California has banned the use of MTBE, effective 31 December 2002. I do not know what will replace it, so please post if you do.
(1) Ethanol which is ideal because it does not pollute the groundwater. However, ethanol is expensive, so we will have to see if this is the preferred substitute for MTBE.
(2) ETBE (ethyl tertiary butyl ether)
(3) TAME (tertiary amyl methyl ether)
(4) TBA (tertiary butyl alcohol)
(2), (3), and (4), will pollute the groundwater just like MTBE. They are cheap, so I have a bad feeling that gas refineries might go for these instead of ethanol. Phasing out MTBE could bring out the evils of ETBE, TAME, and TBA.
It is quite interesting and correct that Unocal 76 uses ethanol to oxygenate their gas (they seem to be the only one). I'm filling up on ethanol gas at Unocal now because there has been reports of MTBE gas damaging fuel systems...maybe ethanol gas won't do the same, and the idea of not polluting our groundwater is an added benefit (trust me, I'm no environmentalist, so this is not my main reason for switching over).
1) Ethanol has less available energy per unit volume than unformulated gasoline, and so reduces fuel economy in a small way. I don't use ethanol-formulated gasoline, but a friend says he can see a decrease of one or two MPG when he does.
2) Ethanol is not quite as green as many people make out. The source touted as having the most environmental benefits is biomass, typically the non-consumable part of cereal or corn crops. If a farmer can sell this part of the crop he or she probably will. In the alternative, this part of the crop is ususally plowed back into the ground where it helps maintain soil structure and fertility.
In cars with oxygen sensors, the emissions circuitry responds to oxygenates in the fuel by enriching the mixture, lowering fuel economy in the process. How much it does so is a function of programming by the manufacturer, and it would be interesting to know some generalities about how MB has calibrated the fuel and emissions systems to cope with MTBE.
Ethanol doesn't contaminate the groundwater. That's green enough for me. The drinking water is bad enough in CA, there's no need to make it worse with MTBE or it's relatives.
Given that, the whole idea is flawed. I pollute less per gallon (or so the EPS claims), but I have to burn more over the same distance. Is this the New Math?



