*** 25.2 mpg on the highway for C63. What's your best mpg? ***
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
*** 25.2 mpg on the highway for C63. What's your best mpg? ***
I have noticed that C63's have better than advertised fuel economy during hwy driving. I also have noticed that city driving produces more fuel efficient numbers than 12 mpg.
My car averaged 25.2 mpg last night on the freeway. My average speed (mph) was 73-74 mph. My total trip was approximately 48 miles.
My car has BMC filters, ROW box tops, no carbons, and Hankook rear tires. Everything else is stock (except for the door pins ).
This thread is meant to be lighthearted and fun. Who can show the best fuel economy for our pollution machines?
But, this thread is also meant to be serious. "Why" you ask? Because, if I'm getting 6.2 mpg better fuel economy than what is advertised for this car, driving at 73-74 mph, which isn't exactly the optimal speed to maximize fuel economy, then I'm mad about three things:
1) Did this car really need a gas guzzler tax?
2) With all the "need for green" talk, fears about carbon emissions (lame carbon filters), energy independence!!!, I can drive my car in a way that gets 6.2 mpg better fuel economy than what is advertised.
3) If carbon filters must be installed by the factory, then why aren't better flowing air filters a requirement as well?
Final question: Has anyone that drives a C63 gotten better than 25.2 mpg with stock paper filters and the carbon filters in place.
My car averaged 25.2 mpg last night on the freeway. My average speed (mph) was 73-74 mph. My total trip was approximately 48 miles.
My car has BMC filters, ROW box tops, no carbons, and Hankook rear tires. Everything else is stock (except for the door pins ).
This thread is meant to be lighthearted and fun. Who can show the best fuel economy for our pollution machines?
But, this thread is also meant to be serious. "Why" you ask? Because, if I'm getting 6.2 mpg better fuel economy than what is advertised for this car, driving at 73-74 mph, which isn't exactly the optimal speed to maximize fuel economy, then I'm mad about three things:
1) Did this car really need a gas guzzler tax?
2) With all the "need for green" talk, fears about carbon emissions (lame carbon filters), energy independence!!!, I can drive my car in a way that gets 6.2 mpg better fuel economy than what is advertised.
3) If carbon filters must be installed by the factory, then why aren't better flowing air filters a requirement as well?
Final question: Has anyone that drives a C63 gotten better than 25.2 mpg with stock paper filters and the carbon filters in place.
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,493
Received 431 Likes
on
354 Posts
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
My best average for a "Full Tank" is 20.403 MPUSG.
My Average for 6246 kilometers (3881 miles) is 7.66 K/L; 13.05 L/100K; 21.64 MPCanG and 18.02 MPUSG.
I don't bother with anything less than an average per fill up.
My DIC tells me I have done 6262 Kilometers and average 12.5L/100K. That equals 8.0 K/L; 22.60 MPCanG and 18.41 MPUSG. So the DIC is pretty close but reading a little high probably because of rounding.
I drive in C mode most of the time and let the car select the gear as you can probably tell.
My Average for 6246 kilometers (3881 miles) is 7.66 K/L; 13.05 L/100K; 21.64 MPCanG and 18.02 MPUSG.
I don't bother with anything less than an average per fill up.
My DIC tells me I have done 6262 Kilometers and average 12.5L/100K. That equals 8.0 K/L; 22.60 MPCanG and 18.41 MPUSG. So the DIC is pretty close but reading a little high probably because of rounding.
I drive in C mode most of the time and let the car select the gear as you can probably tell.
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Thanks for the informative post, Mort.
I understand that a full tank is an average all to itself. But, it's amazing how much more fuel efficiency is available in these cars than commonly known.
It has to do with where you're driving and how you're driving. That's why a full tank average is important but it cannot reflect pure hwy driving because you will always enter and exit a freeway at some point, either to reach your destination or visit a gas station.
My full tank averages obviously are not anywhere near 25.2 mpg. But, I can attain that average and more (by lowering my speed) on the freeway.
I understand that a full tank is an average all to itself. But, it's amazing how much more fuel efficiency is available in these cars than commonly known.
It has to do with where you're driving and how you're driving. That's why a full tank average is important but it cannot reflect pure hwy driving because you will always enter and exit a freeway at some point, either to reach your destination or visit a gas station.
My full tank averages obviously are not anywhere near 25.2 mpg. But, I can attain that average and more (by lowering my speed) on the freeway.
Last edited by SonnyakaPig; 11-29-2010 at 05:48 PM.
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2012 CTS-V
Before the headers I use to get 22 to 23 mpg on the highway.
The drive down to Atco after my header install I got about
20 mpg. Driving about 70 to 80 mph.
It's the city driving the kills me, especially with the extra power
and sound from the headers. I can't help but want to hear
this beast scream every chance I get.
The drive down to Atco after my header install I got about
20 mpg. Driving about 70 to 80 mph.
It's the city driving the kills me, especially with the extra power
and sound from the headers. I can't help but want to hear
this beast scream every chance I get.
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Before the headers I use to get 22 to 23 mpg on the highway.
The drive down to Atco after my header install I got about
20 mpg. Driving about 70 to 80 mph.
It's the city driving the kills me, especially with the extra power
and sound from the headers. I can't help but want to hear
this beast scream every chance I get.
The drive down to Atco after my header install I got about
20 mpg. Driving about 70 to 80 mph.
It's the city driving the kills me, especially with the extra power
and sound from the headers. I can't help but want to hear
this beast scream every chance I get.
I agree, it's hard to keep the foot out of the gas with this N/A car. It just wants to pull for you, but it drinks a lot of fuel when you drive to feed it. haha
Trending Topics
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
This is fantastic news to my ears!! I still remember when I first picked up the car and saw only 16 miles per gallon on the highway at 70. Thankgod it can actually get some decent numbers.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
The point I was trying to make (and I admit it was confusing) was that charcoal filters are mandated for pollution control because like you said "reverse emissions."
So, my point is that perhaps high flow air filters can help this car acheive better mpg. If so, shouldn't that also be mandated.
But, I'm seeing from other members here, based on their experience, that the air filter theory may not hold true.
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
I believe there are more differences between the three transmission modes than shift speed and the gears that the car will take off from.
The maps feel very different from Sport to Comfort. And because like you said, Sport and Manual will start from 1st, so the rpm pickup is quicker.
Just my opinion.
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
I would say Sport or Manual will consume more gas than Comfort.
I believe there are more differences between the three transmission modes than shift speed and the gears that the car will take off from.
The maps feel very different from Sport to Comfort. And because like you said, Sport and Manual will start from 1st, so the rpm pickup is quicker.
Just my opinion.
I believe there are more differences between the three transmission modes than shift speed and the gears that the car will take off from.
The maps feel very different from Sport to Comfort. And because like you said, Sport and Manual will start from 1st, so the rpm pickup is quicker.
Just my opinion.
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'14 911S (garage queen) '13 X3 (family hauler)
I'm confused--what is this MPG you speak of
this is just a pleasure car for me so MPG is a complete non-issue for me and my daily driver is another huge V8 Ford F-150 (luckily I'm able to expense all of my fuel for work)--I've never been one to care about MPGs and thankfully by the time gasoline is really expensive here in the US, I'll have plenty of plug-in sports cars, etc. to choose from--thanks greenies! Pedal to the medal for me, pump that CO baby! God, I just miss those styrofoam McDonald containers, they were so much fun to throw out the window while driving
this is just a pleasure car for me so MPG is a complete non-issue for me and my daily driver is another huge V8 Ford F-150 (luckily I'm able to expense all of my fuel for work)--I've never been one to care about MPGs and thankfully by the time gasoline is really expensive here in the US, I'll have plenty of plug-in sports cars, etc. to choose from--thanks greenies! Pedal to the medal for me, pump that CO baby! God, I just miss those styrofoam McDonald containers, they were so much fun to throw out the window while driving
#21
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 Mercedes Benz C63 AMG, 2011 BMW X5///M
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
I'm confused--what is this MPG you speak of
this is just a pleasure car for me so MPG is a complete non-issue for me and my daily driver is another huge V8 Ford F-150 (luckily I'm able to expense all of my fuel for work)--I've never been one to care about MPGs and thankfully by the time gasoline is really expensive here in the US, I'll have plenty of plug-in sports cars, etc. to choose from--thanks greenies! Pedal to the medal for me, pump that CO baby! God, I just miss those styrofoam McDonald containers, they were so much fun to throw out the window while driving
this is just a pleasure car for me so MPG is a complete non-issue for me and my daily driver is another huge V8 Ford F-150 (luckily I'm able to expense all of my fuel for work)--I've never been one to care about MPGs and thankfully by the time gasoline is really expensive here in the US, I'll have plenty of plug-in sports cars, etc. to choose from--thanks greenies! Pedal to the medal for me, pump that CO baby! God, I just miss those styrofoam McDonald containers, they were so much fun to throw out the window while driving
#24
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Philly
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2009 c63
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!