C63 transmission power
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
C63 transmission power
yo 63 folks,
I wanted to know how much tourqe can the 63 transmission really handle?. some tuner told me (im not gonna say who right now) that the transmission has been tested and can handle up to 1000 HP and 1000 NM (someone from MB gave him this information ). I dont want to say that he is lying or anything like that. I just want to know is there proof of this? has there really been tests on the transmission from AMG up to that power peak? if you guys really know anything, Please provide a website.
F.Y.I. Brabus worked on an ML 63 and equipped twin turbos on the engine that produce over 800 NM. Now the question is, did they modify the transmission? or did they keep it as it was and just tuned it?
I wanted to know how much tourqe can the 63 transmission really handle?. some tuner told me (im not gonna say who right now) that the transmission has been tested and can handle up to 1000 HP and 1000 NM (someone from MB gave him this information ). I dont want to say that he is lying or anything like that. I just want to know is there proof of this? has there really been tests on the transmission from AMG up to that power peak? if you guys really know anything, Please provide a website.
F.Y.I. Brabus worked on an ML 63 and equipped twin turbos on the engine that produce over 800 NM. Now the question is, did they modify the transmission? or did they keep it as it was and just tuned it?
#2
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
you can find the ML project at brabus.com under performance enhancments for the ML 63. Read over it, they dont mention anything about modifying the transmission and the engine produces 850 NM. A dyno sheet is available
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
The 722.9 transmission cant handle more then 560 ft lbs. (760Nm) Anything after that, the clutch starts slipping.
I know the E55 transmissions can hold alot of power.
Im sure the Brabus ML's have beefed up transmissions to hold all that power.
I know the E55 transmissions can hold alot of power.
Im sure the Brabus ML's have beefed up transmissions to hold all that power.
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
This should help in answering both questions, on the 5.5 and 6.3. Interesting read, it will educate you tremendously. http://www.marcusfitzhugh.com/CLK/63.html
And for the record Brabus rebuilds the entire drive train to handle the massive HP and torque numbers, they have too.
Ask yourself why hasn't AMG put the 7 speed tranny in the SL65 Black Series and SLR Mclaren? So am I calling that Tuner a liar, hell yeah.
And for the record Brabus rebuilds the entire drive train to handle the massive HP and torque numbers, they have too.
Ask yourself why hasn't AMG put the 7 speed tranny in the SL65 Black Series and SLR Mclaren? So am I calling that Tuner a liar, hell yeah.
Last edited by Yuille36; 02-22-2011 at 02:54 PM.
#7
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
This should help in answering both questions, on the 5.5 and 6.3. Interesting read, it will educate you tremendously. http://www.marcusfitzhugh.com/CLK/63.html
And for the record Brabus rebuilds the entire drive train to handle the massive HP and torque numbers, they have too.
Ask yourself why hasn't AMG put the 7 speed tranny in the SL65 Black Series and SLR Mclaren? So am I calling that Tuner a liar, hell yeah.
And for the record Brabus rebuilds the entire drive train to handle the massive HP and torque numbers, they have too.
Ask yourself why hasn't AMG put the 7 speed tranny in the SL65 Black Series and SLR Mclaren? So am I calling that Tuner a liar, hell yeah.
I dont think you can equip the 63 transmission in an SLR or Sl 65 , due to that those engines are not compatible with 7-speed. Especially the SL 65 which power can exceed the 1000 NM (which the 63 transmission cant handle)
Trending Topics
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
jacob 502,
Okay, after doing some research on my own, I admit that I was wrong 800 NM is 590 ft lbs, although on the high side, the tranny is capable of handling it. What I was trying to convey is the fact that AMG doesn't install the 7 speed in the SL65 Black Series because the tranny is incapable of handling the HP and torque number that this car puts all, that 's all. And I consulted with my friend Jack, who is a AMG Master tech and instructor for AMG. And he said that it can handle it, but when you get into the 600 torque numbers not so much, without beefing it up.
Okay, after doing some research on my own, I admit that I was wrong 800 NM is 590 ft lbs, although on the high side, the tranny is capable of handling it. What I was trying to convey is the fact that AMG doesn't install the 7 speed in the SL65 Black Series because the tranny is incapable of handling the HP and torque number that this car puts all, that 's all. And I consulted with my friend Jack, who is a AMG Master tech and instructor for AMG. And he said that it can handle it, but when you get into the 600 torque numbers not so much, without beefing it up.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Africa
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2008 C63 AMG
This is a question I have always asked. What is the true limits of the gearbox?
I also had a tuner tell me it was good for 900+ nm but did not believe him.
Over the years and after breaking a flex plate I have come to this conclusion:
The 722 gearbox is good for high nm numbers provided you keep stock limiters in place, meaning that in 1st, 2nd and on gear changes the power being put down will be limited by ECU/TCU.
This would mean that a car with a 722 gearbox making excessive amounts more power than stock either from NOS or charger will not be a suited to 1/4 runs but more to freeway/top end runs with limiters still in place.
Just my 2cents, maybe the experts can shed more light on this topic.
I also had a tuner tell me it was good for 900+ nm but did not believe him.
Over the years and after breaking a flex plate I have come to this conclusion:
The 722 gearbox is good for high nm numbers provided you keep stock limiters in place, meaning that in 1st, 2nd and on gear changes the power being put down will be limited by ECU/TCU.
This would mean that a car with a 722 gearbox making excessive amounts more power than stock either from NOS or charger will not be a suited to 1/4 runs but more to freeway/top end runs with limiters still in place.
Just my 2cents, maybe the experts can shed more light on this topic.
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
This should help in answering both questions, on the 5.5 and 6.3. Interesting read, it will educate you tremendously. http://www.marcusfitzhugh.com/CLK/63.html
And for the record Brabus rebuilds the entire drive train to handle the massive HP and torque numbers, they have too.
Ask yourself why hasn't AMG put the 7 speed tranny in the SL65 Black Series and SLR Mclaren? So am I calling that Tuner a liar, hell yeah.
And for the record Brabus rebuilds the entire drive train to handle the massive HP and torque numbers, they have too.
Ask yourself why hasn't AMG put the 7 speed tranny in the SL65 Black Series and SLR Mclaren? So am I calling that Tuner a liar, hell yeah.
#17
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Actually they did. but they are all in the middle-east. I've seen one Dubai. I dont know if there are any in the USA. There was also one in the show room in Abu-Dhabi, but dont ask about price
Last edited by jacob502; 02-23-2011 at 12:03 AM.
#20
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
jacob 502,
Okay, after doing some research on my own, I admit that I was wrong 800 NM is 590 ft lbs, although on the high side, the tranny is capable of handling it. What I was trying to convey is the fact that AMG doesn't install the 7 speed in the SL65 Black Series because the tranny is incapable of handling the HP and torque number that this car puts all, that 's all. And I consulted with my friend Jack, who is a AMG Master tech and instructor for AMG. And he said that it can handle it, but when you get into the 600 torque numbers not so much, without beefing it up.
Okay, after doing some research on my own, I admit that I was wrong 800 NM is 590 ft lbs, although on the high side, the tranny is capable of handling it. What I was trying to convey is the fact that AMG doesn't install the 7 speed in the SL65 Black Series because the tranny is incapable of handling the HP and torque number that this car puts all, that 's all. And I consulted with my friend Jack, who is a AMG Master tech and instructor for AMG. And he said that it can handle it, but when you get into the 600 torque numbers not so much, without beefing it up.
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
I'm pretty sure the 722.9 has gone through a few iterations since it was first introduced. At first, the 722.6 was kept in all V8's and Kompressors due to the fact that they weren't sure if the 722.9 could handle the torque. I believe the SLK55 was the first high power V8 that they placed the 722.9 in, and the rest was history. As almost all MB's now have the 722.9, I'm pretty sure they can handle a significant amount now compared to when they were first introduced.
How much is the question....
How much is the question....
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
the reason they say it cant handle the torque is it cant handle abuse with that level of torque.... they need to make the drivetrain able to withstand abbuse from burnouts adn break torques from idiots without having to fix things while under warranty... and yes the 7 speed would not handle 800 lbs/ft of torque abbuse...but it would easily handle it if driven normally... I have seen porsche 944 turbo transmissions which are rated to 400 lbs/ft taking a twin turbo ls1s 850 ft/lbs at the wheels without any issues.... as long as he stays away from 4000 rom clutch drops and abbusive burnouts/break torques... and that 7 speed is alot better built than that 944 tranny....