C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

2015 C63 AMG Unofficial Pics & Specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-19-2013, 02:49 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
bmoney12's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2019 Audi TT RS, 2020 BMW X3M Competition
I read the below a while back.

http://www.worldcarfans.com/113031255052/
Old 06-19-2013, 03:17 PM
  #27  
Member
 
plague's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 Polar White C63 AMG
Originally Posted by _timothy
all I know is that it better have more power than cts-v and shelby gt500.
It wont. The high power figures are those cars' main selling points. Its getting to the point that all cars in this class have a ton of power, all have enough that is for sure. Who cares if the c63 doesnt have more, hell I hope it stays under the cts v and mustang range so that not everyone wants to buy one due power surpassing of the other two by the c63. Keep the mustang types in their mustangs. Either way its going to make 480+ so that it is above the 204 c63 with the ppp package and probably slightly over 507hp in order to top the oncoming 507 edition. These are just my concepts but who knows. You drive a c63 even if it comes factory with less hp than competitors bc you like the class of it, the superior build quality and tasteful interior, the respect for amg and the performance they craft, the beauty of the car while being aggressive and race inspired while still practical and beautiful
Old 06-19-2013, 04:22 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Hotsoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Morristown, NJ and Philly
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Current: Cadillac CTS-V (V2), Chevy Cruze Past: E55k
I read the below a while back.

Okay, thanks. That sucks. The more competition the better.
Old 06-19-2013, 10:25 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
TTA850's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2015 E63S AMG & 2013 GLK350
Originally Posted by plague
You drive a c63 even if it comes factory with less hp than competitors bc you like the class of it, the superior build quality and tasteful interior, the respect for amg and the performance they craft, the beauty of the car while being aggressive and race inspired while still practical and beautiful
Yes and no, I drive it because of all those things (except for the less power thing, that's just silly) AND because it comes with 481hp, 0-60 <4 seconds, and high 11 second 1/4 mile. If it came with 400hp and no ability to get it close to or over 500 I would be shopping elsewhere. Think about the C55 and CLK55 (which I owned), they were treated as second class to the Kompressor's until the 63 motor was installed in '07/'08, then people took notice. To stay relevant the next C63 should have at least 500hp, either standard or optional.
Old 06-19-2013, 10:45 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Hotsoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Morristown, NJ and Philly
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Current: Cadillac CTS-V (V2), Chevy Cruze Past: E55k
Yes and no, I drive it because of all those things (except for the less power thing, that's just silly) AND because it comes with 481hp, 0-60 <4 seconds, and high 11 second 1/4 mile. If it came with 400hp and no ability to get it close to or over 500 I would be shopping elsewhere. Think about the C55 and CLK55 (which I owned), they were treated as second class to the Kompressor's until the 63 motor was installed in '07/'08, then people took notice. To stay relevant the next C63 should have at least 500hp, either standard or optional.
I agree. I think the TT 4.0 in the next C63 will be around 480hp stock and maybe the PP version will take that power to 515 or so.
Old 06-19-2013, 10:52 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Hotsoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Morristown, NJ and Philly
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Current: Cadillac CTS-V (V2), Chevy Cruze Past: E55k
Also I must say that I am very impressed with the performance of the 2012/13 C63s. If the Hi-po version of that car can run 11.9 @ 118-119 stock then the 2015 4matic version will probably run mid 11.6 @ 121-123 stock. That's super impressive if you ask me. The E63 is now a low 11 second car at probably 125-127 mph stock.
Old 06-19-2013, 10:57 PM
  #32  
Member
 
plague's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 Polar White C63 AMG
Originally Posted by TTA850
Yes and no, I drive it because of all those things (except for the less power thing, that's just silly) AND because it comes with 481hp, 0-60 <4 seconds, and high 11 second 1/4 mile. If it came with 400hp and no ability to get it close to or over 500 I would be shopping elsewhere. Think about the C55 and CLK55 (which I owned), they were treated as second class to the Kompressor's until the 63 motor was installed in '07/'08, then people took notice. To stay relevant the next C63 should have at least 500hp, either standard or optional.
Well yes I drive it for the performance of course. Otherwise I wouldnt, but the other mentioned reasons help distinguish it from a mustang or cts. Personally I cannot stand cadillacs. I hope and believe that the 2015 will come it around 515hp.
Old 08-11-2013, 02:02 AM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C63newdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Hotsoss
As a car enthusiast I am excited about any performance car make regardless of whether it's an import or a domestic brand. With that being said, how excited are you about the upcoming C63 AMG? Will you buy this car is it comes with 4Matic only. As most of you probably already know, the upcoming C63 will come with a twin turbo 4.0 V8 that is said to be basically two A45 AMG 2.0T motors merged together. By looking at the kind of performance Audi is getting out of their 4.0TT engine I have no reason to not believe AMG will not only match, but exceed that performance.

Check out the link: http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1...ter-v-8-report


Copy & Pasted from Motorauthority below:
Just as its rivals downsize to high-performance fours and sixes, AMG is reportedly working on a brand new V-8, albeit one smaller than we’re used to seeing from the official tuner to Mercedes-Benz.

The new engine is said to be a turbocharged 4.0-liter V-8, destined for the upcoming 2015 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG as well as a new SLC sports car.

According to Autocar, the engine is a further development of the new turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder developed by AMG for its future compact car range. In the upcoming A45 AMG and CLA45 AMG models, this 2.0-liter mill will deliver more than 330 horsepower and 295 pound-feet of torque.

The 4.0-liter V-8, meanwhile, should deliver more than 450 horsepower in its base form. Higher states of tune could see the engine pumping out closer to 600 horses!

It will replace the current naturally-aspirated 5.5-liter V-8 found in the SLK55 AMG in AMG’s future, turbocharged engine hierarchy: the 2.0-liter forms the base and is followed by this new 4.0-liter V-8. Further up the ladder is the 5.5-liter V-8 and 6.0-liter V-12 found in a number of current AMG models.

Sadly, it looks like AMG's venerable 6.2-liter V-8 (pictured above) is on its way out.

If the report proves accurate, look for the 4.0-liter V-8 to debut in the 2015 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG due out next year.
Your "idea/comment" about the new 4.0 V8 being like two A45 AMG "put together" is the most absurd thing I ever heard. The two engines are absolutely different in every way, even the way they can be mounted.

typically the 4 cyl would be mounted side ways and the V8s are mounted longitudinal (straight). No, the 4.0 V8 will not be anything near "two" 2.0 CLA45 AMG put together. The only thing even close is just the displacement figure, nothing more
Old 08-11-2013, 10:45 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Hotsoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Morristown, NJ and Philly
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Current: Cadillac CTS-V (V2), Chevy Cruze Past: E55k
Your "idea/comment" about the new 4.0 V8 being like two A45 AMG "put together" is the most absurd thing I ever heard. The two engines are absolutely different in every way, even the way they can be mounted.
Your right and i should not have been so literal about that. I was just making the point that the bhp output of the 4.0 TT will be similar to two 2.0 T merged together. I know 4 cylinders engines only come in inline configuration and this V8 is in a V configuration. Now that I said that, can I get my engine/car talk card back? Lol
Old 08-11-2013, 12:21 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
fly2nite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Dallas
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'13 C63C
Originally Posted by Hotsoss
Now that I said that, can I get my engine/car talk card back? Lol
You can borrow mine, I never use it out of fear of getting slammed by an accidental wording error.
Old 08-11-2013, 12:25 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Hotsoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Morristown, NJ and Philly
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Current: Cadillac CTS-V (V2), Chevy Cruze Past: E55k
Lol
Old 08-11-2013, 06:28 PM
  #37  
Super Member
 
Bardman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C63 AMG 507 Edition
Originally Posted by Hotsoss
A stock 2015 C63 will not come anywhere near that power stock. With that being said, it will probably match or exceed the performance of a stock V2, especially if it has all wheel drive.
I saw an interview with an amg guy where he ruled out 4wd for the c63. He said the c63 was more aggressive and therefore 4wd was not appropriate.
Old 08-11-2013, 07:53 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Hotsoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Morristown, NJ and Philly
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Current: Cadillac CTS-V (V2), Chevy Cruze Past: E55k
Originally Posted by Bardman
I saw an interview with an amg guy where he ruled out 4wd for the c63. He said the c63 was more aggressive and therefore 4wd was not appropriate.
Well if that is true then that will be unfortunate. It should at least be an option.
Old 08-11-2013, 11:15 PM
  #39  
Super Member
 
Bardman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C63 AMG 507 Edition
Originally Posted by Hotsoss
Well if that is true then that will be unfortunate. It should at least be an option.
I'll try and track down the interview. Will be later tonight my time.
Old 08-12-2013, 12:31 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Hotsoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Morristown, NJ and Philly
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Current: Cadillac CTS-V (V2), Chevy Cruze Past: E55k
Originally Posted by Bardman
I'll try and track down the interview. Will be later tonight my time.
Ok, cool.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2015 C63 AMG Unofficial Pics & Specs



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 PM.