M-Class (W166) Produced 2012-2015

Next Year, the M-Class Will Become the GLE-Class

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-27-2014, 07:40 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
DShiekhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Next Year, the M-Class Will Become the GLE-Class



Early next year, Mercedes-Benz will lift more than just the face of its third-generation M-Class SUV. It will also lift off the "ML" badge and replace it with one that reads "GLE."

The automaker is going to change the rig's identity as part of an attempt to make its vehicle portfolio a little more understandable to buyers.

Read the rest on the MBWorld homepage.
Old 08-29-2014, 04:58 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Rascally Wabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2010 Mercedes GLK 350, 2001 BMW Z3 3.0 Roadster, 1997 Cherokee XJ
Makes sense to me but my largest concern is the redesign of the GLK/GLC for 2016. Realise the shape of the current GLA is in response to the Porsche Macan but I hope MB will not greatly change the new GLC from the GLK. Just finished a comparo of similar sized diesel powered vehicles from European manufacturers. The current GLK is slightly smaller & more fuel efficient plus the way MB allows a customer to add options imo is much better than the others. Last but not least is the more boxy shape on the current GLK which is one big reason why we chose the GLK. Please, no jelly bean shape (Lexus RX350 & other Asian manufacturer offerings) please for the GLC!
Old 09-01-2014, 06:23 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
nipsip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
ml350
IMO, there is enough confusion for a non MB person without changing the name of a whole class of SUV. Now there will be the GLK and the GLE and the GLS. Why not GS, GM and GL?

That's small, medium and large.
Old 09-10-2014, 11:45 AM
  #4  
Newbie
 
blzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 ML 350 BlueTec, 2013 GLK 250, 2014 E 250
I own 2 of the 2.1 4 cylinder diesels. Good engines for lighter vehicles. I also own a ML 350 6 cylinder diesel.
There is no way I would purchase or recommend a ML 250.

MY replacement for my ML 350 will be a Porsche, Audi, or BMW diesel.

Name the vehicles anything, but don't put the 2.1 4 cylinder in a 5000 lb vehicle. Stupid.

Last edited by blzer; 09-10-2014 at 11:47 AM.
Old 09-10-2014, 03:33 PM
  #5  
Member
 
stas2007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2013 ML
Originally Posted by nipsip
IMO, there is enough confusion for a non MB person without changing the name of a whole class of SUV. Now there will be the GLK and the GLE and the GLS. Why not GS, GM and GL?

That's small, medium and large.
Its not that bad compared to BMW, they now have 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 series and half of them are offered in sedan, coupe and wagon.
Old 11-13-2014, 02:00 AM
  #6  
Member
 
Subatomic Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Calgary
Posts: 204
Received 52 Likes on 24 Posts
GLE63S 2016
Naming convention is confusing and inconsistent. Now, it is going to become confusing and even more inconsistent. But at the end of the day, it doesn't matter. I shopped by website photos anyways, and did not pay much attention to the name of the vehicle. Every car company has a confusing naming convention. It just doesn't matter.
Old 11-13-2014, 08:08 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
schorert1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2013 ML 550, CLK63 AMG, 2012 E350 4MATIC
Originally Posted by Rascally Wabbit
Makes sense to me but my largest concern is the redesign of the GLK/GLC for 2016. Realise the shape of the current GLA is in response to the Porsche Macan but I hope MB will not greatly change the new GLC from the GLK. Just finished a comparo of similar sized diesel powered vehicles from European manufacturers. The current GLK is slightly smaller & more fuel efficient plus the way MB allows a customer to add options imo is much better than the others. Last but not least is the more boxy shape on the current GLK which is one big reason why we chose the GLK. Please, no jelly bean shape (Lexus RX350 & other Asian manufacturer offerings) please for the GLC!

well I'm sure by now you've seen the spy shots of the GLC and the boxy shape is definitely gone.
it will be interesting to see what engine offerings there are, BT, v6 and the v8 amg somewhere in the mid 400's for hp.
Old 11-13-2014, 08:55 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
nipsip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
ml350
Originally Posted by schorert1
well I'm sure by now you've seen the spy shots of the GLC and the boxy shape is definitely gone.
it will be interesting to see what engine offerings there are, BT, v6 and the v8 amg somewhere in the mid 400's for hp.
No 3.5L diesel, the best engine ever put in that car.
Old 11-13-2014, 09:22 AM
  #9  
Member
 
Subatomic Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Calgary
Posts: 204
Received 52 Likes on 24 Posts
GLE63S 2016
There is definitely a push for lower power, lower torque vehicles as a result of law in the USA that punish manufacturers for low fuel efficiency. This is short-sighted, because a larger vehicle that transports more people can be often much more fuel efficient than an army of small vehicles that transport very few people. But it's all about what passes the "sniff test" to political lobbyists (who fly private jets to Washington anyways). I'm more of an admirer of high power, high torque vehicles with a large road presence than the opposite - things with mass that do well in collisions. I've seen way too many tin cans with "favourable crash ratings" cause misery to the people inside them who believed the marketing garbage.
Old 11-13-2014, 09:25 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
schorert1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2013 ML 550, CLK63 AMG, 2012 E350 4MATIC
Originally Posted by Subatomic Power
Naming convention is confusing and inconsistent. Now, it is going to become confusing and even more inconsistent. But at the end of the day, it doesn't matter. I shopped by website photos anyways, and did not pay much attention to the name of the vehicle. Every car company has a confusing naming convention. It just doesn't matter.
This is definitely LESS confusing, having the SUV models match their corresponding sedan. I believe the GL becomes the GLS...and the G stands alone.
Old 11-13-2014, 09:45 AM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
nipsip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
ml350


Even Google likes the GLE
Old 11-13-2014, 12:43 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
schorert1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2013 ML 550, CLK63 AMG, 2012 E350 4MATIC
Originally Posted by Subatomic Power
There is definitely a push for lower power, lower torque vehicles as a result of law in the USA that punish manufacturers for low fuel efficiency. This is short-sighted, because a larger vehicle that transports more people can be often much more fuel efficient than an army of small vehicles that transport very few people. But it's all about what passes the "sniff test" to political lobbyists (who fly private jets to Washington anyways). I'm more of an admirer of high power, high torque vehicles with a large road presence than the opposite - things with mass that do well in collisions. I've seen way too many tin cans with "favourable crash ratings" cause misery to the people inside them who believed the marketing garbage.
Ah, this is inaccurate, as MB has made it clear that their displacement downsizing is due to EU laws and not USA's weaker standards. The mothballing of normally aspirated v-8's and v-12's from AMG was directly a result of these tougher european regs.

http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/****...-tougher-still

Last edited by schorert1; 11-13-2014 at 12:46 PM.
Old 11-15-2014, 07:19 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
ChuckinTucson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Posts: 468
Received 30 Likes on 20 Posts
2012 S63, 2013 E350 Bluetec
In addition to changing the SUV designations, they are changing the SLK to SLC. Also, dropping the "Bluetec" badge on diesels and "Hybrid" badge on hybrids. What would have been a ML250 Bluetec, will now be badged GLE250d. An E400 Hybrid will become E400h.
Old 11-15-2014, 08:43 PM
  #14  
Member
 
Subatomic Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Calgary
Posts: 204
Received 52 Likes on 24 Posts
GLE63S 2016
So the ML550 will be the GLE550g? Or are they killing the 550? I heard that they are going with a 400 (V6) in USA, but that they are keeping a V8 in the new ML series for Canada that is not an AMG.
Old 11-17-2014, 10:45 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
schorert1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2013 ML 550, CLK63 AMG, 2012 E350 4MATIC
Originally Posted by Subatomic Power
So the ML550 will be the GLE550g? Or are they killing the 550? I heard that they are going with a 400 (V6) in USA, but that they are keeping a V8 in the new ML series for Canada that is not an AMG.
You'll have to search around for it, but it was recently announced that there will be NO more non-amg v-8's. (this may be 2016 or 2017?). All v8's and v-12's will be lower displacement and have hp boosted by turbos. smaller displacement for production models is an EU requirement, so maybe making all higher displacement motors "performance shop" motors is a workaround?

The GT is going to come in two v-8 flavors...The GT and the GT-S, the black series will likely be the v-12. I lose interest by the end of the article, but it actually sounds like they'll have two different cylinder bores for the v-8's.
I would be fantastically happy with the 450hp GT as opposed to the 500hp GT-S...I may end up going even lower in hp with something like a porsche cayman GTS for better drive-ability.
driving the 475hp clk63 has convinced me that while I love the exhaust note, and the sliding, and the way the tires grind off, and the acceleration...it's far too blunt an instrument for casual driving.

http://blog.caranddriver.com/in-dept...o-twin-turbos/
Old 11-18-2014, 07:20 PM
  #16  
Junior Member
 
TxBenzIn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 36
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
SL500
So if I have a 2015 ML350, can I order the updated badging? Sounds like the ML changes in 2015

http://www.emercedesbenz.com/autos/m...nward/#gallery
Old 11-19-2014, 12:41 AM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
ColoML550's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Littleton Colorado
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ML550
Originally Posted by schorert1
...I would be fantastically happy with the 450hp GT as opposed to the 500hp GT-S...I may end up going even lower in hp…"

Exactly why I went with the 550 as opposed to the AMG. Still get the rush of power but with better gas milage and I get the "Sleeper" Ute.
Old 12-09-2014, 05:48 PM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
BillD1953's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 30
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
2015 ML 350 4matic
Originally Posted by blzer
I own 2 of the 2.1 4 cylinder diesels. Good engines for lighter vehicles. I also own a ML 350 6 cylinder diesel.
There is no way I would purchase or recommend a ML 250.

MY replacement for my ML 350 will be a Porsche, Audi, or BMW diesel.

Name the vehicles anything, but don't put the 2.1 4 cylinder in a 5000 lb vehicle. Stupid.
I understand MB is being pushed by EPA regs but bolting the 4 banger cdi in the ML over the 3.0 v6 cdi is a BIG mistake
Old 12-09-2014, 10:51 PM
  #19  
Member
 
Subatomic Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Calgary
Posts: 204
Received 52 Likes on 24 Posts
GLE63S 2016
Originally Posted by BillD1953
I understand MB is being pushed by EPA regs but bolting the 4 banger cdi in the ML over the 3.0 v6 cdi is a BIG mistake
It is difficult to replace true power with smoke and mirror tricks of torque that is supplied by smaller engines. Nothing can really replace the raw power of a V8 engine. Loading 4 people in a "high horsepower" 4 banger quickly reveals the "smoke and mirrors" of this new trend to the romancing of the uninspiring in terms of engine performance.

The only exception is the new Volvo XC90 with the electric assist on the tiny gas engine. Huge horsepower and torque in the vehicle.....can't wait to see if MB one day tries to one up that.

In the mean time, I am hugely impressed by the gas mileage of my ML550. It actually gets better mileage reportedly than the ML400 with the V6!
Old 12-10-2014, 12:50 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MDMercedesGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germantown, MD/Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 1,351
Received 87 Likes on 60 Posts
2024 GLS450
I'm hugely impressed by all of these armchair journalists who haven't driven an ML250 commenting on it.
Old 12-10-2014, 01:29 PM
  #21  
Out Of Control!!
 
N_Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Charlotte NC area
Posts: 11,809
Received 316 Likes on 265 Posts
2007 W211 E350 4Matic / 2008 X164 GL320 CDI
Is the GLE a rebadged ML, or an "E"-"GT" using BMW-esk nomenclature?
Old 12-10-2014, 03:24 PM
  #22  
Super Member
 
hutch300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 838
Received 101 Likes on 50 Posts
2022 GLE450
Originally Posted by MDMercedesGuy
I'm hugely impressed by all of these armchair journalists who haven't driven an ML250 commenting on it.
Old 12-10-2014, 04:38 PM
  #23  
Member
 
Kaasmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ml350 bluetec
Possibly the ML 250 will have pedals inside to help the driver cycle up steep hills.
Old 12-10-2014, 09:02 PM
  #24  
Junior Member
 
Taymar16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2015 ML 350 Gas(Polar White). 2015 ML 350 gas(Lunar Blue). 68 mustang
Originally Posted by N_Jay
Is the GLE a rebadged ML, or an "E"-"GT" using BMW-esk nomenclature?
Correct, There will be two models:

GLE (W166)
GLE Coupe (C292)
Old 12-10-2014, 09:34 PM
  #25  
Member
 
Subatomic Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Calgary
Posts: 204
Received 52 Likes on 24 Posts
GLE63S 2016
Originally Posted by Kaasmann
Possibly the ML 250 will have pedals inside to help the driver cycle up steep hills.
Ha! Ha! That's funny! MB finally caved to the insane demands of the inadvertently emasculated tree huggers by making a Fred Flintstone vehicle for them! Likely just to satisfy the USA fleet mpg requirements. Another reason to love being a Canadian! We tend to enjoy the indiscernible droning diatribes of the environmentalist nutbars as they fade into the deep satisfying throaty roar of our V8 engines.....


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Next Year, the M-Class Will Become the GLE-Class



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:42 AM.