240M3SRT's moddified intake manifolds available! Gain +32HP, +25TQ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CL 600
240M3SRT's moddified intake manifolds available! Gain +32HP, +25TQ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am making my modified manifolds available to the public. I gained +32 HP and +25 TQ with them.
The manifolds look basically stock and retain the factory sleeper look. Why do these make more power? The factory runners taper down to a restrictive 1.25x1.50 opening, i replace that with beefy 2.5" runners.
Want a set for yourself? $750+shipping. A $300 additional core charge will be available for those who want limited down time. When i receive your good useable cores i refund the $300. 2 week turn around time from when i receive your stock manifolds.
Each manifold is made by hand so they will vary slightly.
The manifolds look basically stock and retain the factory sleeper look. Why do these make more power? The factory runners taper down to a restrictive 1.25x1.50 opening, i replace that with beefy 2.5" runners.
Want a set for yourself? $750+shipping. A $300 additional core charge will be available for those who want limited down time. When i receive your good useable cores i refund the $300. 2 week turn around time from when i receive your stock manifolds.
Each manifold is made by hand so they will vary slightly.
Last edited by 240M3SRT; 10-21-2008 at 11:03 AM.
#2
I am making my modified manifolds available to the public. I gained +32 HP and +25 TQ with them.
The manifolds look basically stock and retain the factory sleeper look. Why do these make more power? The factory runners taper down to a restrictive 1.25x1.50 opening, i replace that with beefy 2.5" runners.
Want a set for yourself? $750+shipping. A $300 additional core charge will be available for those who want limited down time. When i receive your good useable cores i refund the $300. 2 week turn around time from when i receive your stock manifolds.
Each manifold is made by hand so they will vary slightly.
The manifolds look basically stock and retain the factory sleeper look. Why do these make more power? The factory runners taper down to a restrictive 1.25x1.50 opening, i replace that with beefy 2.5" runners.
Want a set for yourself? $750+shipping. A $300 additional core charge will be available for those who want limited down time. When i receive your good useable cores i refund the $300. 2 week turn around time from when i receive your stock manifolds.
Each manifold is made by hand so they will vary slightly.
Photos and will they fit a C32 with our tight spaces??? Remember, we have a LOT less room than you guys on the SRTs
#3
SPONSOR
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Houston/ Austin /Toronto / UAE / Minneapolis / Orlando /Cincinnati
Posts: 5,459
Received 149 Likes
on
109 Posts
Eurocharged Performance ML63 and TT lambo
was this on a stock car or a modded car.....dyno results?
I would just assume that I wouldn't get much out of it on my beast...
is this rwhp or crank?
I would just assume that I wouldn't get much out of it on my beast...
is this rwhp or crank?
Trending Topics
#9
So, these are being advertised for a C32 or a SRT-6??? Have you any 1. Photos 2. Dyno Charts? Before and after? 3. Ever put one on a C32 (I think I know the answer on this one??) The reason I ask is that I am running a Code/LET intake which takes a LOT of room in our bay?
I'd love to get something like this that gives those kinds of numbers. That's better than a tune??
Last edited by Newzchspy; 10-20-2008 at 07:05 PM.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
[/B]
So, these are being advertised for a C32 or a SRT-6??? Have you any 1. Photos 2. Dyno Charts? Before and after? 3. Ever put one on a C32 (I think I know the answer on this one??) The reason I ask is that I am running a Code/LET intake which takes a LOT of room in our bay?
I'd love to get something like this that gives those kinds of numbers. That's better than a tune??
So, these are being advertised for a C32 or a SRT-6??? Have you any 1. Photos 2. Dyno Charts? Before and after? 3. Ever put one on a C32 (I think I know the answer on this one??) The reason I ask is that I am running a Code/LET intake which takes a LOT of room in our bay?
I'd love to get something like this that gives those kinds of numbers. That's better than a tune??
EDIT: 240M3SRT, congrats on your sponsorship status
#12
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Santa Barbara & Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C32, Cobra, 700hp Vespa
I put a set on my car today. The stock intake does fit, although it definitely pushes up the drivers side coupling quite a bit. Its tight, but it fits. Mine were made to work with the Code3 spacers, so the fit was better than the stock plenums. Initial thoughts are, made no difference in power. I will get the car on the dyno and do some before and afters on the same day with the same mods, hopefully on Thursday or Saturday. I am also going to try them out on the dual pulley car Wednesday night, which might yield some nice numbers considering the amount of boost that car will be making. To me, this mod would make more sense with a y-pipe that has been increased in size to match the larger plenums. I am sure additional tuning might help, so I will consider that as well. As far as the work itself, its not terrible. The welds are decent. The driver side plenum is pretty frankenstein looking, as the tube is created with 8 sections welded together for the tight radius. This seems like it could be easily replicated with less sections. That plenum also could have been cleaned up a lot better on the inside. All in all, I think there is potential. As most of you know, I am pretty strict when it comes to testing, so I will run them through the paces for sure and report back.
#13
I put a set on my car today. The stock intake does fit, although it definitely pushes up the drivers side coupling quite a bit. Its tight, but it fits. Mine were made to work with the Code3 spacers, so the fit was better than the stock plenums. Initial thoughts are, made no difference in power. I will get the car on the dyno and do some before and afters on the same day with the same mods, hopefully on Thursday or Saturday. I am also going to try them out on the dual pulley car Wednesday night, which might yield some nice numbers considering the amount of boost that car will be making. To me, this mod would make more sense with a y-pipe that has been increased in size to match the larger plenums. I am sure additional tuning might help, so I will consider that as well. As far as the work itself, its not terrible. The welds are decent. The driver side plenum is pretty frankenstein looking, as the tube is created with 8 sections welded together for the tight radius. This seems like it could be easily replicated with less sections. That plenum also could have been cleaned up a lot better on the inside. All in all, I think there is potential. As most of you know, I am pretty strict when it comes to testing, so I will run them through the paces for sure and report back.
Just so we are clear!! Brandon, are these yours or did you order some for spec purposes or evaluation? I am chomping at the bit for these as I am sure Jake would like a set as well.
#14
SPONSOR
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Houston/ Austin /Toronto / UAE / Minneapolis / Orlando /Cincinnati
Posts: 5,459
Received 149 Likes
on
109 Posts
Eurocharged Performance ML63 and TT lambo
Brandon also made a good point about the spacers. I know myself and others have various styles of phenelic from either LET or Code3, and I am curious to see if there are any fit issues...expecially with the big **** LET intake..
Could you post some measurements/pics from stock difference to yours?
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
I put a set on my car today. The stock intake does fit, although it definitely pushes up the drivers side coupling quite a bit. Its tight, but it fits. Mine were made to work with the Code3 spacers, so the fit was better than the stock plenums. Initial thoughts are, made no difference in power. I will get the car on the dyno and do some before and afters on the same day with the same mods, hopefully on Thursday or Saturday. I am also going to try them out on the dual pulley car Wednesday night, which might yield some nice numbers considering the amount of boost that car will be making. To me, this mod would make more sense with a y-pipe that has been increased in size to match the larger plenums. I am sure additional tuning might help, so I will consider that as well. As far as the work itself, its not terrible. The welds are decent. The driver side plenum is pretty frankenstein looking, as the tube is created with 8 sections welded together for the tight radius. This seems like it could be easily replicated with less sections. That plenum also could have been cleaned up a lot better on the inside. All in all, I think there is potential. As most of you know, I am pretty strict when it comes to testing, so I will run them through the paces for sure and report back.
#16
Super Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
03 C32 gone, 06 CLS55, 16 Tesla X
I have copied the spec and currently have a set on my car. Current set up is Code3 pulley/intake + custom intake and this modified manifold. Seriously, I was expecting some gains, but the result was nothing. No, I did not gain anything from this setup.. I have to double check again to make sure I do not have any leak, but at this point I do not gain anything.. This setup may work (not sure) on higher boost (combo pulley) and ECU tune.
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
I have copied the spec and currently have a set on my car. Current set up is Code3 pulley/intake + custom intake and this modified manifold. Seriously, I was expecting some gains, but the result was nothing. No, I did not gain anything from this setup.. I have to double check again to make sure I do not have any leak, but at this point I do not gain anything.. This setup may work (not sure) on higher boost (combo pulley) and ECU tune.
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Anyone with a M112K running non-stock intake manifolds need to have their ECU tune tweaked to take advantage of them... at least, that seems to be the consensus among those who've done this.
#19
I have copied the spec and currently have a set on my car. Current set up is Code3 pulley/intake + custom intake and this modified manifold. Seriously, I was expecting some gains, but the result was nothing. No, I did not gain anything from this setup.. I have to double check again to make sure I do not have any leak, but at this point I do not gain anything.. This setup may work (not sure) on higher boost (combo pulley) and ECU tune.
#21
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dunellen, NJ
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Chrysler Crossfire
We installed a set of manifolds from another company on a car and without a tune they actually lost power. With a tune is where you will see the gains.
And LET has one for the application.
And LET has one for the application.
Last edited by TVT_DESIGN; 10-23-2008 at 10:39 AM. Reason: Somebody cried about it.
#22
I have copied the spec and currently have a set on my car. Current set up is Code3 pulley/intake + custom intake and this modified manifold. Seriously, I was expecting some gains, but the result was nothing. No, I did not gain anything from this setup.. I have to double check again to make sure I do not have any leak, but at this point I do not gain anything.. This setup may work (not sure) on higher boost (combo pulley) and ECU tune.
#23
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 Crossfire SRT6
Who's car was that? I only thought MD and Rob had the mani's on at the shootout, and both of them ran 11.90's. They both had the new tune from InMotion for the mani's also. I have the same tune and ran a 12.02 with stock mani's, to my knowledge the first batch of 4 were being finished this week, as I'm still waiting for mine. The 2 sets they were running were still not the finished product. They were the prototypes. This tune is specific for the mani's.
Cruzinquick
#24
Super Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
03 C32 gone, 06 CLS55, 16 Tesla X
Yes, all are done on G-Tech device; compare many 60mph, 1/4mile runs and dyno graphs. Do not quote me on how accurate this device is to the real world. But I use it to see if my car makes any different after each mod.
I am not trying to blash anyone here. It's just my own experience. You can do this mod yourself and have your own experience.
I am not trying to blash anyone here. It's just my own experience. You can do this mod yourself and have your own experience.
#25
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CL 600
I have copied the spec and currently have a set on my car. Current set up is Code3 pulley/intake + custom intake and this modified manifold. Seriously, I was expecting some gains, but the result was nothing. No, I did not gain anything from this setup.. I have to double check again to make sure I do not have any leak, but at this point I do not gain anything.. This setup may work (not sure) on higher boost (combo pulley) and ECU tune.
Maybe your copy of my design wasnt quite as accurate as what you had hoped for.
Can you please provide pictures of your "version"...?