C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: If you drive a C63, what is your annual household income (before taxes)?
Under $50K
17
5.67%
$50K to $100K
49
16.33%
$100K to $150K
62
20.67%
$150K to $200K
44
14.67%
$200K to $250K
28
9.33%
$250K to $300K
23
7.67%
$300K to $400K
12
4.00%
$400K to $500K
17
5.67%
$500K to $750K
9
3.00%
$750K to $1M
9
3.00%
$1M to $2M
6
2.00%
Over $2M
24
8.00%
Voters: 300. You may not vote on this poll

If you drive a C63, what is your annual household income (before taxes)?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 03:02 PM
  #26  
BAD430BENZ's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 6
360 Modena TT
Originally Posted by jsc1234
i get $25 a week.
me too....cutting lawns is getting old
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 03:54 PM
  #27  
IAA-C63's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 1
'11 C63, '22 GLS 63, Porsches, M3, M4
Originally Posted by Yuille36
I just think that some people may have exaggerated, about their income that's all. If I was making $2M, would I be driving a C63, not that their is any wrong with the C63, as I own one. I just think that if I made that type of money, I would be driving something like a CL63 instead. Or maybe something a little more exclusive or exotic, say perhaps a Ferrari 458 Italia. That's all I'm saying.
You may be right, though a lot of wealthy people prefer to have a less flashy car, plus they may have other nice cars additional to their C63.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 04:35 PM
  #28  
Yuille36's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
Veteran: Marine Corps
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,020
Likes: 532
From: Alexandria, VA
07 E63 AMG, 10 C63 AMG, 07 E63 Designo, 07 E350, 09 C300, 07 C230
Originally Posted by IAA-C63
You may be right, though a lot of wealthy people prefer to have a less flashy car, plus they may have other nice cars additional to their C63.
True so very true. I have a rich cousin that had over the years; Ferrari's, Porsche's, Audi's, and Mercedes, now he just drives a Bentley

I can attest to this, as most of the people in the exclusive gated community drive simple cars, but trust they have their exotic/exclusive car sitting in the garage
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 04:48 PM
  #29  
Cylinder Head's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,760
Likes: 594
From: Seattle
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Most popular car among millionaires is a Loncoln Town Car.

That being said, this thread sucks.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 05:58 PM
  #30  
IAA-C63's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 1
'11 C63, '22 GLS 63, Porsches, M3, M4
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
Most popular car among millionaires is a Loncoln Town Car.

That being said, this thread sucks.
If the thread doesn't interest you, just move to the next one. Everyone doesn't have to be interested in every thread.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 06:10 PM
  #31  
JarZ's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Union County, NJ
Magnum SRT8 + Magnum R/T
Originally Posted by IAA-C63
You may be right, though a lot of wealthy people prefer to have a less flashy car, plus they may have other nice cars additional to their C63.
Totally correct. I know a guy who owns buildings in NYC (brownstones) and drives an Acura TSX from 05. My father in law has some wealthy friends and they all drive non-flashy cars.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 06:17 PM
  #32  
betrezra's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 68
From: Texas
C63 507 AMG DA Car #19
I doubt there is a correlation between wealthly people and driving bland cars.
I know many wealthy folks with good taste in cars.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 07:35 PM
  #33  
jim07's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
09 c63 p30 mars red
Yea, money and nice cars don't always go together. I know Mr. Butts of H.E.B. gorcery chain (billionaire+) He and his wife drive a Buick LeSabre and a old one at that. Its all about being a car guy or not. I would be more like Jay Leno if if I were a Billionaire.

I bet there probable needs to be some ajustment to the poll after the last few days of the market -----------
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 10:54 PM
  #34  
IAA-C63's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 1
'11 C63, '22 GLS 63, Porsches, M3, M4
My thoughts on the relationship between car choice and wealth:

- Serious car enthusiasts are more likely to stretch themselves to get a performance car, so the ratio of their income to car price will tend to be lower than for non-enthusiasts and other types of cars. I've heard of enthusiasts spending as much on a car as their annual income.

- As the price of performance cars goes up, the average incomes of their owners will also tend to go up. Someone mentioned posting an income poll for E63 and S63 owners, and that would be an interesting way to test this hypothesis. Also, I posted this same poll in a Porsche 911 forum, and I did find the incomes from that poll to be considerably higher than for our C63 poll.

- Based on a book I read, the typical wealthy person isn't a car enthusiast and drives a "premium" car in the $50K price range, like an MB or BMW, but not AMG or M, and not a Porsche, Ferrari, Lambo, etc.

- Some wealthy people deliberately choose a less flashy car to keep a lower profile, but some obviously also say the heck with it and get Rolls, Bentleys, etc.

I think that the bottom line is that if someone is driving an expensive car (say well over $100K), they're probably doing well financially. In the extreme case, think Bugatti. In the case of more affordable cars, the owner probably isn't wealthy, but you can't tell for sure.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 10:57 PM
  #35  
IAA-C63's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 1
'11 C63, '22 GLS 63, Porsches, M3, M4
Originally Posted by jim07
I would be more like Jay Leno if if I were a Billionaire.
Me too, it would be nice to have that kind of variety.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 04:37 PM
  #36  
pdjafari's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: DC
10 C63
2M is the highest? I'm offended...chump change
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 05:00 PM
  #37  
propain's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
Funny what some people feel is a lot of money. I guess it depends on where you live.

After tax 2 mil is about 1.3 mil. Two people with successful careers can easily attain that income.

Now live within those means. 2 70K cars. 1 Family wagon. Maybe a boat and a house worth about 2.5 mil. Tax, Kids, Daycare, retirement, college and maintenance on all of those and you are no longer that well off. A C63 is a good purchase for a 2 mil a year before tax income family. If you live within your means.

Now if you are making 2 mil on your own and don't have a wife,kids and home then your doing well and a C63 is below your means for sure.

Last edited by propain; Aug 9, 2011 at 05:07 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 05:16 PM
  #38  
PGT's Avatar
PGT
Super Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 684
Likes: 1
From: Leesburg, VA
2014 E550 4Matic with P1/LED/Pano
Originally Posted by pdjafari
2M is the highest? I'm offended...chump change
please to be explaining what you do to earn that money!





cuz I want to sign up.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 07:12 PM
  #39  
SMP's Avatar
SMP
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 21
CLK63 Black Series
Originally Posted by propain
Funny what some people feel is a lot of money. I guess it depends on where you live.

After tax 2 mil is about 1.3 mil. Two people with successful careers can easily attain that income.

Now live within those means. 2 70K cars. 1 Family wagon. Maybe a boat and a house worth about 2.5 mil. Tax, Kids, Daycare, retirement, college and maintenance on all of those and you are no longer that well off. A C63 is a good purchase for a 2 mil a year before tax income family. If you live within your means.

Now if you are making 2 mil on your own and don't have a wife,kids and home then your doing well and a C63 is below your means for sure.
I wish that would be the case ..... Federal and State income tax combined in California is 46%. Also, here in California, that $2.5M home will cost you about $28K/year in property tax alone.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 07:18 PM
  #40  
AMGTTV8's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 7
From: Orlando, FL
2026 AMG GT63 Pro
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
That being said, this thread sucks.
So does your attitude.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 07:22 PM
  #41  
AMGTTV8's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 7
From: Orlando, FL
2026 AMG GT63 Pro
Originally Posted by IAA-C63
My thoughts on the relationship between car choice and wealth:

- Serious car enthusiasts are more likely to stretch themselves to get a performance car, so the ratio of their income to car price will tend to be lower than for non-enthusiasts and other types of cars. I've heard of enthusiasts spending as much on a car as their annual income.

- As the price of performance cars goes up, the average incomes of their owners will also tend to go up. Someone mentioned posting an income poll for E63 and S63 owners, and that would be an interesting way to test this hypothesis. Also, I posted this same poll in a Porsche 911 forum, and I did find the incomes from that poll to be considerably higher than for our C63 poll.

- Based on a book I read, the typical wealthy person isn't a car enthusiast and drives a "premium" car in the $50K price range, like an MB or BMW, but not AMG or M, and not a Porsche, Ferrari, Lambo, etc.

- Some wealthy people deliberately choose a less flashy car to keep a lower profile, but some obviously also say the heck with it and get Rolls, Bentleys, etc.

I think that the bottom line is that if someone is driving an expensive car (say well over $100K), they're probably doing well financially. In the extreme case, think Bugatti. In the case of more affordable cars, the owner probably isn't wealthy, but you can't tell for sure.
I'd say that correlation and causation are two very different things and need to work together in order for there to be any relevance to the matter...

Just because A tends to move with B doesn't mean that B caused A to move...

Trying to determine the socio-economic position of an individual by looking at his car is like making a decision between the chicken or the egg...you've only got a 50% chance of being right.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 07:29 PM
  #42  
jim07's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
09 c63 p30 mars red
Just because A tends to move with B doesn't mean that B caused A to move...

Trying to determine the socio-economic position of an individual by looking at his car is like making a decision between the chicken or the egg...you've only got a 50% chance of being right.[/quote]

Sounds like a Prius driver--- Do you work for NPR??? Just kidding

Oh! I didn't read you Bio --- Maybe it's the NRA!

I guess it's hard to tell-- like income & Cars

Last edited by jim07; Aug 9, 2011 at 07:33 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 08:09 PM
  #43  
AMGTTV8's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 7
From: Orlando, FL
2026 AMG GT63 Pro
Originally Posted by jim07
Just because A tends to move with B doesn't mean that B caused A to move...

Trying to determine the socio-economic position of an individual by looking at his car is like making a decision between the chicken or the egg...you've only got a 50% chance of being right.
Sounds like a Prius driver--- Do you work for NPR??? Just kidding

Oh! I didn't read you Bio --- Maybe it's the NRA!

I guess it's hard to tell-- like income & Cars[/QUOTE]

LMAO....
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 08:43 PM
  #44  
propain's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
Originally Posted by SMP
I wish that would be the case ..... Federal and State income tax combined in California is 46%. Also, here in California, that $2.5M home will cost you about $28K/year in property tax alone.
Yup, I wasnt including state tax. In New York its about that. 35% fed and 8% State. Cali goes to 11% for over 1 mil income. Sucks.


28K? Yeah, same here in NY depending on property size. 2.5 Mil can be up to 40K in taxes a year as well.

Last edited by propain; Aug 9, 2011 at 08:47 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 09:07 PM
  #45  
SMP's Avatar
SMP
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 21
CLK63 Black Series
Originally Posted by propain
Yup, I wasnt including state tax. In New York its about that. 35% fed and 8% State. Cali goes to 11% for over 1 mil income. Sucks.


28K? Yeah, same here in NY depending on property size. 2.5 Mil can be up to 40K in taxes a year as well.
Don't forget social security,medicare and CA SDI/SUI tax ..... and half the money is gone
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 10:38 PM
  #46  
propain's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
Originally Posted by SMP
Don't forget social security,medicare and CA SDI/SUI tax ..... and half the money is gone
Exactly. That's my point. 2 mil combined income is not as much as people think.

If you live like you make 2 mil the C63 along with the wife driving another 70K and the family wagon costing 70K its right where you should be.


Now many factors apply. If you make 2 mil and live in a small home and have no kids and are not married. Then yes, go get a lambo and enjoy!
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2011 | 11:59 PM
  #47  
IAA-C63's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 1
'11 C63, '22 GLS 63, Porsches, M3, M4
Originally Posted by WWMIndy
I'd say that correlation and causation are two very different things and need to work together in order for there to be any relevance to the matter...

Just because A tends to move with B doesn't mean that B caused A to move...

Trying to determine the socio-economic position of an individual by looking at his car is like making a decision between the chicken or the egg...you've only got a 50% chance of being right.
I agree that correlation doesn't necessarily mean causation, and of course this standard maxim applies generally, not just for this poll.

My point was that, as you get into increasingly expensive cars, it will be more likely that the driver has money. There aren't a lot guys driving a newish Ferrari or Lambo with a $100K income.

At the same time, when you get down to car prices lots of people can afford, you can't tell how much money the driver has. But the odds are that they're not rich (because only a small percentage of people are rich).

All of this means that the scatter plot probably has a wedge shape.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 12:09 AM
  #48  
IAA-C63's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 1
'11 C63, '22 GLS 63, Porsches, M3, M4
Originally Posted by propain
Funny what some people feel is a lot of money. I guess it depends on where you live.

After tax 2 mil is about 1.3 mil. Two people with successful careers can easily attain that income.

Now live within those means. 2 70K cars. 1 Family wagon. Maybe a boat and a house worth about 2.5 mil. Tax, Kids, Daycare, retirement, college and maintenance on all of those and you are no longer that well off. A C63 is a good purchase for a 2 mil a year before tax income family. If you live within your means.

Now if you are making 2 mil on your own and don't have a wife,kids and home then your doing well and a C63 is below your means for sure.
"Easy" for a couple to make $2M? $2M isn't "a lot of money"? Seriously? The median income in our poll is about a tenth of that. And reduce that by another half for the median US household.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 03:22 AM
  #49  
iKai's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
2012 C63 Coupe P31
2 mill isnt really hard to make in a year if you have your mind set on it and the situation you are in allows it to happen.. without revealing identities, i know for a fact that people i know and work with can make 2 mill easily in about 2 or 3 months. one person i know of owns one of the biggest and cleanest modern coal refineries in north eastern china and he only owns a c63, porsche design edition 3 cayenne gts, and a toyota fj cruiser.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 04:02 AM
  #50  
ATL_MB's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong/Charlotte
2010 C63
Originally Posted by SMP
I wish that would be the case ..... Federal and State income tax combined in California is 46%. Also, here in California, that $2.5M home will cost you about $28K/year in property tax alone.
Not to take this thread even further off course (although it was stupid to begin with), but anybody paying anything close to the federal marginal rate is an ***-clown idiot. I am well into the highest U.S. tax rate, and pay about 18% average income tax. That is typical. I remember an article about V.P. Cheney making over $14 million a year while in office and paying right at 15%, because almost everything he made was dividends, which is taxed at 15%.

I am in Hong Kong now, and everybody in the U.S. talks about how low taxes are in Hong Kong (15% max average rate), but no one here believes it. Overall, we don't pay much more in the U.S. because there are NO deductions in Hong Kong (other than a small exclusion for low wage earners and a small housing expense deduction). So the advertised rate isn't everything.

With regard to property taxes, there are none here, which is great, right? Not even close. US$28,000 will probably pay 3 to 4 month's rent on a decent 3-bedroom 1,200 sq. ft. apartment. Instead of property taxes, the government owns almost all the land and closely controls it in order to raise money through periodic land auctions.

The above rant, of course, ignores payroll taxes, which are high, but again the highly paid don't pay the whole way. SSI cuts off around $105,000 or so, I believe, which means that someone making $300,000 pays just 1/3 the average rate of someone making $25,000.

So if we are going to complain about taxes, at least recognize that the marginal rates don't mean much.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:35 PM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE