



































If you drive a C63, what is your annual household income (before taxes)?
If I was making $2M, would I be driving a C63, not that their is any wrong with the C63, as I own one. I just think that if I made that type of money, I would be driving something like a CL63 instead.
Or maybe something a little more exclusive or exotic, say perhaps a Ferrari 458 Italia. 




I can attest to this, as most of the people in the exclusive gated community drive simple cars, but trust they have their exotic/exclusive car sitting in the garage
I bet there probable needs to be some ajustment to the poll after the last few days of the market -----------
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
- Serious car enthusiasts are more likely to stretch themselves to get a performance car, so the ratio of their income to car price will tend to be lower than for non-enthusiasts and other types of cars. I've heard of enthusiasts spending as much on a car as their annual income.
- As the price of performance cars goes up, the average incomes of their owners will also tend to go up. Someone mentioned posting an income poll for E63 and S63 owners, and that would be an interesting way to test this hypothesis. Also, I posted this same poll in a Porsche 911 forum, and I did find the incomes from that poll to be considerably higher than for our C63 poll.
- Based on a book I read, the typical wealthy person isn't a car enthusiast and drives a "premium" car in the $50K price range, like an MB or BMW, but not AMG or M, and not a Porsche, Ferrari, Lambo, etc.
- Some wealthy people deliberately choose a less flashy car to keep a lower profile, but some obviously also say the heck with it and get Rolls, Bentleys, etc.
I think that the bottom line is that if someone is driving an expensive car (say well over $100K), they're probably doing well financially. In the extreme case, think Bugatti. In the case of more affordable cars, the owner probably isn't wealthy, but you can't tell for sure.
After tax 2 mil is about 1.3 mil. Two people with successful careers can easily attain that income.
Now live within those means. 2 70K cars. 1 Family wagon. Maybe a boat and a house worth about 2.5 mil. Tax, Kids, Daycare, retirement, college and maintenance on all of those and you are no longer that well off. A C63 is a good purchase for a 2 mil a year before tax income family. If you live within your means.
Now if you are making 2 mil on your own and don't have a wife,kids and home then your doing well and a C63 is below your means for sure.
Last edited by propain; Aug 9, 2011 at 05:07 PM.
After tax 2 mil is about 1.3 mil. Two people with successful careers can easily attain that income.
Now live within those means. 2 70K cars. 1 Family wagon. Maybe a boat and a house worth about 2.5 mil. Tax, Kids, Daycare, retirement, college and maintenance on all of those and you are no longer that well off. A C63 is a good purchase for a 2 mil a year before tax income family. If you live within your means.
Now if you are making 2 mil on your own and don't have a wife,kids and home then your doing well and a C63 is below your means for sure.
- Serious car enthusiasts are more likely to stretch themselves to get a performance car, so the ratio of their income to car price will tend to be lower than for non-enthusiasts and other types of cars. I've heard of enthusiasts spending as much on a car as their annual income.
- As the price of performance cars goes up, the average incomes of their owners will also tend to go up. Someone mentioned posting an income poll for E63 and S63 owners, and that would be an interesting way to test this hypothesis. Also, I posted this same poll in a Porsche 911 forum, and I did find the incomes from that poll to be considerably higher than for our C63 poll.
- Based on a book I read, the typical wealthy person isn't a car enthusiast and drives a "premium" car in the $50K price range, like an MB or BMW, but not AMG or M, and not a Porsche, Ferrari, Lambo, etc.
- Some wealthy people deliberately choose a less flashy car to keep a lower profile, but some obviously also say the heck with it and get Rolls, Bentleys, etc.
I think that the bottom line is that if someone is driving an expensive car (say well over $100K), they're probably doing well financially. In the extreme case, think Bugatti. In the case of more affordable cars, the owner probably isn't wealthy, but you can't tell for sure.
Just because A tends to move with B doesn't mean that B caused A to move...
Trying to determine the socio-economic position of an individual by looking at his car is like making a decision between the chicken or the egg...you've only got a 50% chance of being right.
Trying to determine the socio-economic position of an individual by looking at his car is like making a decision between the chicken or the egg...you've only got a 50% chance of being right.[/quote]
Sounds like a Prius driver--- Do you work for NPR??? Just kidding

Oh! I didn't read you Bio --- Maybe it's the NRA!
I guess it's hard to tell-- like income & Cars
Last edited by jim07; Aug 9, 2011 at 07:33 PM.

Oh! I didn't read you Bio --- Maybe it's the NRA!
I guess it's hard to tell-- like income & Cars[/QUOTE]
LMAO....
28K? Yeah, same here in NY depending on property size. 2.5 Mil can be up to 40K in taxes a year as well.
Last edited by propain; Aug 9, 2011 at 08:47 PM.
If you live like you make 2 mil the C63 along with the wife driving another 70K and the family wagon costing 70K its right where you should be.
Now many factors apply. If you make 2 mil and live in a small home and have no kids and are not married. Then yes, go get a lambo and enjoy!
Just because A tends to move with B doesn't mean that B caused A to move...
Trying to determine the socio-economic position of an individual by looking at his car is like making a decision between the chicken or the egg...you've only got a 50% chance of being right.
My point was that, as you get into increasingly expensive cars, it will be more likely that the driver has money. There aren't a lot guys driving a newish Ferrari or Lambo with a $100K income.
At the same time, when you get down to car prices lots of people can afford, you can't tell how much money the driver has. But the odds are that they're not rich (because only a small percentage of people are rich).
All of this means that the scatter plot probably has a wedge shape.
After tax 2 mil is about 1.3 mil. Two people with successful careers can easily attain that income.
Now live within those means. 2 70K cars. 1 Family wagon. Maybe a boat and a house worth about 2.5 mil. Tax, Kids, Daycare, retirement, college and maintenance on all of those and you are no longer that well off. A C63 is a good purchase for a 2 mil a year before tax income family. If you live within your means.
Now if you are making 2 mil on your own and don't have a wife,kids and home then your doing well and a C63 is below your means for sure.
I am in Hong Kong now, and everybody in the U.S. talks about how low taxes are in Hong Kong (15% max average rate), but no one here believes it. Overall, we don't pay much more in the U.S. because there are NO deductions in Hong Kong (other than a small exclusion for low wage earners and a small housing expense deduction). So the advertised rate isn't everything.
With regard to property taxes, there are none here, which is great, right? Not even close. US$28,000 will probably pay 3 to 4 month's rent on a decent 3-bedroom 1,200 sq. ft. apartment. Instead of property taxes, the government owns almost all the land and closely controls it in order to raise money through periodic land auctions.
The above rant, of course, ignores payroll taxes, which are high, but again the highly paid don't pay the whole way. SSI cuts off around $105,000 or so, I believe, which means that someone making $300,000 pays just 1/3 the average rate of someone making $25,000.
So if we are going to complain about taxes, at least recognize that the marginal rates don't mean much.






