C55 vs S4 vs M3 vs Subaru Sti
My buddy with the C55 ran 14.408 @ 158.
Did you see my other buddy with the silver E46 M3. he ran 14.2 @ 163. I have run 13.7 @ 165 at Wesbank. Go to their website & you'll see the results.
BTW, I didn't come because my car is currently at a tuner getting MOD
IFIED. See you guys next week when i hop to break by best time of 13.71.
M&M
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South Africa
Vehicle I drive: E46 M3
Posts: 99
On Sunday all 4 of us will be at Wesbank Raceway starting at 5pm to test some 1/4 mile runs. It would be nice to have a C32 as well.
M&M is offline Reply With Quote
than when he learned that Dracco will be there this m&m f uck does not show up
and posts BS as an excuse. Didn't you know ahead of time about your phony "mod" job so you will not be there?? Give us another dumb excuse, moron.
And oh, what did Car & Driver get in the last M3 they tested, a six-speed manual in their May 2004 article? Oh, yes...a 4.8 second 0-60, and a 13.6 @ 105...hmmm.
Btw, is this article why you didn't you show up at the SA meet?
Improviz
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Vehicle I drive: CLK55 AMG
Posts: 422
This (M&M) guy is a waste of time...he used to do the same thing on the Audiworld S4 forum:
i.e., he would come in, post a data point, and argue a position until someone came along and posted evidence which proved his original point was wrong...at which point he'd change the argument, the same as he's doing here.
Amen to this.
are you afraid you'll get called BS even from your fellow Bimmer owner or those that once had a Bimmer like me.
You see, you went & spoilt it now. I was trying so hard to stay off the topic of "mine is faster than yours".
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
You see, you went & spoilt it now. I was trying so hard to stay off the topic of "mine is faster than yours".
So here's a video of us "non-friends" messing around:
http://www.jumbopc.co.za/skidpan.avi
The only thing Dracco confirmed is that he did not SEE you because you were not there, I guess you got flat tire on your tricycle. I wish a few dudes from a nearby township would catch your sorry *** and beat all that BS out of you.
I'm sure there's a valid explanantion so I'm just asking.
And oh, what did Car & Driver get in the last M3 they tested, a six-speed manual in their May 2004 article? Oh, yes...a 4.8 second 0-60, and a 13.6 @ 105...hmmm.
Btw, is this article why you didn't you show up at the SA meet?
I bet ur gonna ignore this post as well like u do best

Car & Driver:
0-60 in 4.5 & 1/4 mile in 13.1 for M3 (as seen above)
0-60 in 4.7 & 1/4 mile in 13.3 for C55
R&T got 4.7 & 13.3 @ 106.8 for the M3
They got 5.0 & 13.5 @ 106.6 for the C55
Here's Europe's biggest mag test:
http://www.einszweidrei.de/mercedes/c55amg2004-1.htm
Motorart V 8
Hubraum 5439 ccm
Aufladung Sauger
PS - UMin 367 PS - 5750/Min
Nm - UMin 510 Nm - 4000/Min
Motorlage/Antrieb Frontmotor/Heck
Gänge/Schaltung 5/Automatik
Test in ams 07/2004
Gewicht 1660 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,9 s
0 - 100 km/h 5,3 s
0 - 120 km/h 7,2 s
0 - 130 km/h 8,2 s
0 - 140 km/h 9,3 s
0 - 160 km/h 11,7 s
0 - 180 km/h 15,0 s
0 - 200 km/h 18,8 s
400 m, stehender Start 13,5 s
Vmax 250 km/h
100 - 0 km/h (kalt) 42 m
100 - 0 km/h (warm) 43 m
Slalom 18 m 63,0 km/h
ISO Ausweichtest 137,0 km/h
Testverbrauch 14,1 L/SB
Testwagenpreis 69.229 Euro
And here's the M3 test by the same mag:
http://www.einszweidrei.de/bmw/m32003-2.htm
Motorart R 6
Hubraum 3246 ccm
Aufladung Sauger
PS - UMin 343 PS - 7900/Min
Nm - UMin 365 Nm - 4900/Min
Motorlage/Antrieb Frontmotor/Heck
Gänge/Schaltung 6/manuell
Test in ams 1/2003
Gewicht 1570 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,5 s
0 - 100 km/h 4,8 s
0 - 120 km/h 6,5 s
0 - 140 km/h 8,5 s
0 - 160 km/h 10,9 s
0 - 180 km/h 13,7 s
0 - 200 km/h 16,8 s
Vmax 250 km/h
100 - 0 km/h (kalt) 35,7 m
100 - 0 km/h (warm) 35,7 m
Slalom 18 m 66,8 km/h
ISO Ausweichtest 135,2 km/h
Testverbrauch 12,5 L/SP
Grundpreis 54.000 Euro
The M3 was 2 seconds quicker to 125mph!
I don't know about you guys, but an unbiased person looking at this from the outside (or people who have seen my video) might just think that an M3 is quicker. What say you guys? Worldwide conspiracy ala X-files?
I am trying to stay off this topic because each person has their own biased opinion, but you guys keep bringing it up.
not as knowledgable as you saying torque means jack in a race
there u go again, changing direction. That must hv took you ages to do your so-called google search. Never in my posts I said the M3 wasn't quicker in some comparisons.
The argument was never about which car was faster, it was the way you approached this forum and not putting up a balanced argument. Just look back to the kill stories thread you started and follow the entire post
once again I ask you the simple question (which you have failed to answer), Do you admit ur totally wrong in saying 100% of all car mags tested the M3 quicker?
Last edited by Jon200; Oct 19, 2004 at 10:44 AM.
Give some credit to AMG as you have for your M3 as BOTH cars are great cars!
Also, I checked C&D and in a recent article (Sept. '04) they wrote this about the M3...
"...—but still slower than the last M3 we tested ["Compact Adrenaline-Delivery Systems," May 2003], which met those marks in 4.8 and 13.6 at 105"
Link: http://www.caranddriver.com/article....&page_number=1
So that article you posted above was with an M3 back in 2001? Wouldn't you conclude that the tests they run now, especially the one I just quoted would be a lot more accurate? Thus, making the C55 quicker.
Nick
PS What does the M3 Auto do 0-60 and 1/4 mile? To me, that's an apples to apples comparison. Hey M&M, how da like dem apples (in a Boston accent)...hahahahahaha j/k Good Will Hunting!
But would like to call a truce & stop posting these stats. I'd rather we each enjot our respective cars & stop slitting hairs over a few tenths. I'm just very excited about the mods I'm doing.
Also ran against a m3 red one good chap beat the m3 with the c32 but only because the poor reaction time of the m3 . when the c55 ran against him he got hes act together and well the m beat the c55 on one run and the c55 beat him on the second run best time the c55 got was 14.4 something .
remmember we are at 5000 or 6000 above sea level .
The only excuse I have is that I put shel raceing fuel in the c32 that morning 102 octane , wanted some extra oomf but in reality the car actualy got worse then better , put 20 liters in the tank and well had to ride it out .
today i put the normal unleaded v power shell back in and well i think the car is better , will be there again on sunday with the standerd fuel the best time weve got is 14.4 with the c32 .
I think soon im going to start working on the merc in my tuning shop Merc here isnt helping and well they can keep there motor plan .Im sure that with the proper mods the power we can generate out the c32 should be extreme.[
I have attached a scan of one of the slips from sun .
6b94 is my c32.
Sa192 was a 328 beamer i think
Last edited by Dracco121; Oct 19, 2004 at 09:47 PM.
I have some ideas on the C32 & altitude. Did you use Shell 102 leaded? Because that will affect your O2 sensors & catts. Rather comw with me & the C55 on Wednesdays to Kyalami to get 102 unleaded.
Also, you need to let the car adapt. Your car will run much better with the higher octane. On our pump fuel the C32 does not develop the boost it does ar sea-level. We have seen this on the dyno. In fact at this elevation the C32 makes LESS power & only slightly more torque as an M3 on the wheels.
S do you want me to post my Wesbank timeslip or did the C55 guy tell you about me?
Last edited by M&M; Oct 20, 2004 at 02:56 AM.
Good news is i just odrderd the renntech pulley system from the states .
can wait to get it here , ill install it my self at the shop sounds simple to do.
do you think that just 20l of the petrol would have messed up the cat ?
will you come to westbank this weekend ?
I do have semi-slicks but don't run them anymore. My best with the semi's was 13.54 & with the street tyres (Toyo T1-S) 13.71.
When I raced both C55's we did standing starts & rolling runs & I was quicker in all the rolliong runs. Here's my slip from Wesbank:







