Coupe/Roadster
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Jaguar F Type SVR convertible vs AMG GT-C roadster

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-14-2019, 03:44 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
mercdgl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 18
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2013 SLK55 AMG (sold)
Jaguar F Type SVR convertible vs AMG GT-C roadster

Anyone cross shop the Jaguar F Type SVR convertible vs the AMG GT-C roadster or care to comment on your respective likes and dislikes?

Last edited by mercdgl; 01-14-2019 at 03:48 PM.
Old 01-14-2019, 03:50 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
mercdgl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 18
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2013 SLK55 AMG (sold)
Pictures.

Old 01-14-2019, 04:20 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
wrs488's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 24
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
amg gt c roadster
My wife was going to do that but there were no convertibles at our dealership. My preference would be the MB just on looks alone.
Old 01-14-2019, 06:10 PM
  #4  
Super Moderator

 
Wolfman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 9,984
Received 3,171 Likes on 1,977 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
It is striking just how much better the AMG looks, even with the red soft top. I have never minded the looks of the F-type and love the sound but that thing is downright ugly.

Here is a 2016 comparo with the GTS coupe and many of the attributes still hold true...
The following users liked this post:
wrs488 (01-14-2019)
Old 01-14-2019, 07:50 PM
  #5  
Super Member
 
MalibuScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Santa Monica Mountains
Posts: 950
Received 663 Likes on 349 Posts
2020 GTA; 2022 Audi e-tron GT, 2022 Ford F-150; 1926 Rolls-Royce Springfield 40/50 Playboy roadster
Jag looks clunky. GT looks sleek.
Old 01-17-2019, 06:21 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
Katie22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Florida
Posts: 951
Received 520 Likes on 286 Posts
18 AMG GTC and 22 F150 Limited. Past owner 16 Maybach, 17 Brabus Smartcar, 06 Ford E150, and 22 G70
On our short list of cars to buy when we brought the GTC was a F type SVR convertible. Both cars are awesome but two big things really sold me on the GTC. I watched a video on youtube where the gts (if I recall) was beating the svr over and over again on a road course. Mind you the svr has all wheel drive and more power! Point is I think the GT has far newer technology.

The second reason that swayed me was when you open the hood on the SVR there is the supercharger clear to see. Problem is it is one of the strangest looking superchargers you could ever imagine and DOES NOT make the engine look good. Attached is a pic of the engine. IF you like that then great.........Strangely you can actually see four black ball and socket standoffs that a cover would attach to but on this car there is NO cover. Strange they put those standoffs on there for no reason.

Last edited by Katie22; 01-17-2019 at 06:26 AM.
Old 01-18-2019, 01:25 AM
  #7  
Member
 
mvb3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 171
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
S63 , AMG GTC '18
I remember seeing some videos on YouTube matching both cars, and while they compete in a similar price point, the Jag loses in most things. The interior is dated, the sound feels "forced" and it doesn't have the road presence of the GTC. The minus point for the GT-line is the infotainment screen, it does look like a mini iPad attached to the dashboard.
Even in the pictures you attached, the wing on the Jag looks like it was a last thought addition, while the GTC has a concise design. At a quick glance, the profile of the Jag almost looks like a fancy Miata, and that's not good!
Old 01-18-2019, 09:25 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
benzbell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,454
Received 864 Likes on 450 Posts
2020 Huracan EVO AWD - 2022 GLE 63 S Coupe - 2023 C63 S Coupe -
Originally Posted by mvb3
I remember seeing some videos on YouTube matching both cars, and while they compete in a similar price point, the Jag loses in most things. The interior is dated, the sound feels "forced" and it doesn't have the road presence of the GTC. The minus point for the GT-line is the infotainment screen, it does look like a mini iPad attached to the dashboard.
Even in the pictures you attached, the wing on the Jag looks like it was a last thought addition, while the GTC has a concise design. At a quick glance, the profile of the Jag almost looks like a fancy Miata, and that's not good!
Agreed. At first glance to me, it looks like a Japanese car with an after market aero kit on it. Like something from one of the earlier "Fast and Furious" movies. Wing looks like they ordered it from JC Whitney - lol.

Last edited by benzbell; 01-18-2019 at 09:27 AM. Reason: text
Old 01-19-2019, 07:21 AM
  #9  
Member
 
carnut1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: PA
Posts: 192
Received 71 Likes on 54 Posts
Corvette C8 997S, Jeep Grand Cherokee Summit Reserve BMW 750 S560 Coupe
I had one, it is on my 10 worst cars I have ever owned list. Terrible, lifeless, numb steering feel, fake noise, it is way too heavy, does not handle that well, and the blind spots (I had a coupe) are really bad. I drove it for 800 miles, then gave it to my girlfriend, she gave it back told me that it looks good but that's about it. She ended up with a 718 Cayman S.
Old 01-19-2019, 09:50 AM
  #10  
Member
 
mvb3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 171
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
S63 , AMG GTC '18
Talking

Originally Posted by carnut1
I drove it for 800 miles, then gave it to my girlfriend, she gave it back told me that it looks good but that's about it. She ended up with a 718 Cayman S.
I call that an upgrade :-D

Old 01-19-2019, 01:50 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
AtTheGlen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 74
Received 34 Likes on 16 Posts
2021 Porsche 911 Turbo S Cpe (992); 2023 Taycan GTS sedan
Guess I'm not the only one.

Originally Posted by mvb3
I remember seeing some videos on YouTube matching both cars, and while they compete in a similar price point, the Jag loses in most things. The interior is dated, the sound feels "forced" and it doesn't have the road presence of the GTC. The minus point for the GT-line is the infotainment screen, it does look like a mini iPad attached to the dashboard.
Even in the pictures you attached, the wing on the Jag looks like it was a last thought addition, while the GTC has a concise design. At a quick glance, the profile of the Jag almost looks like a fancy Miata, and that's not good!
Here in SoCal when a I see a Jag convertible in the distance it's usually with the top down and inevitably, I think it's a Miata, although the Miata is a much cleaner design and terrific as a modern-day MGB or TR6 or Datsun 2000. I think the AMG GT/GTC roadsters look great! The Jag F-Types especially the SVRs are nowhere near the original XK cars.
Old 01-19-2019, 05:48 PM
  #12  
Super Member
 
surfah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 556
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
2018 AMG GTS, 2015 911 GT3, 2017 E300, 2014 X3 35i
British Miata, good description.
Old 01-19-2019, 07:52 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C280 Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Saratoga Springs, New York & Sarasota, Florida.
Posts: 3,462
Received 408 Likes on 336 Posts
MB’s
Just based on looks the AMG GT is a winner.
Old 01-19-2019, 08:03 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cnterline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Long Island New York
Posts: 1,910
Received 165 Likes on 103 Posts
2003 SL55,2020 GTC ,2017 GTS sold ,2002 G500 Sold,2003 SL500 Sold,
Ugh. Ricer
Old 01-21-2019, 07:38 AM
  #15  
Member
 
carnut1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: PA
Posts: 192
Received 71 Likes on 54 Posts
Corvette C8 997S, Jeep Grand Cherokee Summit Reserve BMW 750 S560 Coupe
I went by to say hello to the folks (and visit my car in storage there) at Algar Ferrari, and I saw this. I could not resist and I bought it on the spot (my 4th Maserati), it is a 2013 MC version, with every option the car had in that year. Original stick was over 160K and it is in like new condition, they sold it to me for mid 40's. I would rather have this old dinosaur than the F type any day. Already have things on the way to enhance it. The sound this thing makes is just amazing, and unlike the F type, it is real.
Old 01-21-2019, 07:43 AM
  #16  
Member
 
mvb3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 171
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
S63 , AMG GTC '18
Congrats, nice looking car and what a bargain! Very few cars sound like a Maserati, I just wish they weren't so lazy with bringing out a new model, it's been ages... and calling facelift a new model doesn't count. I agree, 2013 Maserati GT MC > F Type.
Old 01-22-2019, 04:27 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
nstanford99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2017 AMG GTS
now owning both, I didnt have an SVR but an R with ceramics.........AMG > Jag and it ain't close lol

The AMG being under powered is way faster and I'm comparing my GTS not a GT C. They look better, better fit an finish, better sound IMO. Just a better car all around honestly. The only thing I liked about the Jag more is the comfort...
Old 01-23-2019, 10:31 AM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
Ken Doo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Carmel, CA
Posts: 42
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
AMG GTS, AMG E63S, GLC300
When I was shopping for cars, the AMG GTS, Jaguar F-type, and Porsche were on the short-list. The folks at the local Jaguar dealership in Monterey/SandCity would not even acknowledge my presence, though I was in the dealership and inside of the car inside the showroom. Bye. AMG purchase made that much easier. And in retrospect, the AMG was indeed the better decision.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Jaguar F Type SVR convertible vs AMG GT-C roadster



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:21 AM.