Jaguar F Type SVR convertible vs AMG GT-C roadster
Last edited by mercdgl; Jan 14, 2019 at 03:48 PM.




Here is a 2016 comparo with the GTS coupe and many of the attributes still hold true...




The second reason that swayed me was when you open the hood on the SVR there is the supercharger clear to see. Problem is it is one of the strangest looking superchargers you could ever imagine and DOES NOT make the engine look good. Attached is a pic of the engine. IF you like that then great.........Strangely you can actually see four black ball and socket standoffs that a cover would attach to but on this car there is NO cover. Strange they put those standoffs on there for no reason.
Last edited by Katie22; Jan 17, 2019 at 06:26 AM.
Even in the pictures you attached, the wing on the Jag looks like it was a last thought addition, while the GTC has a concise design. At a quick glance, the profile of the Jag almost looks like a fancy Miata, and that's not good!
Trending Topics




Even in the pictures you attached, the wing on the Jag looks like it was a last thought addition, while the GTC has a concise design. At a quick glance, the profile of the Jag almost looks like a fancy Miata, and that's not good!
Last edited by benzbell; Jan 18, 2019 at 09:27 AM. Reason: text
The Best of Mercedes & AMG






Even in the pictures you attached, the wing on the Jag looks like it was a last thought addition, while the GTC has a concise design. At a quick glance, the profile of the Jag almost looks like a fancy Miata, and that's not good!


The AMG being under powered is way faster and I'm comparing my GTS not a GT C. They look better, better fit an finish, better sound IMO. Just a better car all around honestly. The only thing I liked about the Jag more is the comfort...



