Sirius Reception Compared to XM
I tried installing a Sirius radio in my house where two existing XM receivers are placed. Sirius would not work in either of the two locations so I returned the hardware.
I feel that Sirius is the weak link here - not Mercedes. Having said this, I do wish Mercedes would do what Lexus does... Over a choice of XM *OR* Sirius in their cars.
Regards,
R.Meltz
Southern California



I found that a roof mounted antenna works better than hiding it in the grill or hood vent. There is an 8 or 9 second data buffer in the receiver, but it still looses rception for longer periods. Funny how it never seems to fail during advertising, but just let one of my favorite show tunes to come on and there is complete silence.
I like Sirius programming better than XM, but their signal delivery system needs a stronger bird in the sky. Both systems suffer from over compression making the MP3 sound like hifi.
The only Vehicle manufacturers that offer a choice of Satellite (XM/Serius) are those manufacturers that do not own a part of either satellite company. DCX & Ford are majority stockholders of Sirius, GM is a majority stockholder of XM, so they have assets to protect/promote in their Satellite operations. Other car manufacturers have no investment in either so they let you decide on which you want.
...Now I would really like MBUSA to provide OnSt@r service rather than MB's indifferent TeleAid.



