I'm new here
02-09-2003 | 02:00 AM
#5
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
98' C280
I put 18" AMG Mono II wheels with Falken 451 225/40 tires, Bilstein sport shocks, H&R springs, and Hella Xenon lights on my car.
PS: people here are so friendly! I like that!!!
PS: people here are so friendly! I like that!!!
Last edited by lufamily; 02-12-2003 at 11:50 PM.
02-09-2003 | 02:18 AM
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
1998 C230
Question:
Did you have to roll your fenders to prevent rubbing with those 18 inchers
What color are your xenons? white/blue/purple ?
I was thinking about getting the 5200k ones by hella.
If its possible, could you post a pic with your xenons on at night?
Did you have to roll your fenders to prevent rubbing with those 18 inchers
What color are your xenons? white/blue/purple ?
I was thinking about getting the 5200k ones by hella.
If its possible, could you post a pic with your xenons on at night?
Trending Topics
02-11-2003 | 08:26 AM
#12
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
98' C280
I did not roll the fender on my C, but there is no rubbing with those 18" wheels since I install them.
I put Hella 6000k, and it seems on color white . However, I will post my pic ASAP. Thank you your pics!
I put Hella 6000k, and it seems on color white . However, I will post my pic ASAP. Thank you your pics!
02-13-2003 | 04:19 AM
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
1996 C36 AMG, 1995 Volvo 850 Turbowagon
so one pic for each post...why didn't i think of that ....j/k. so that's what 18" monoblocks looks on a w202...i always thought the c36 17" monoblocks looked awfully small with the huge wheel gaps (the car is actually taller than a stock c280 with 17" monoblocks only).
nic pics
....j/k. so that's what 18" monoblocks looks on a w202...i always thought the c36 17" monoblocks looked awfully small with the huge wheel gaps (the car is actually taller than a stock c280 with 17" monoblocks only).nic pics
02-13-2003 | 07:14 AM
#23
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
98' C280
Originally posted by Rincewind
Hmm, thats not a correct beam pattern in that last pic is it? Can anyone who knows, judge from that pic?
Hmm, thats not a correct beam pattern in that last pic is it? Can anyone who knows, judge from that pic?
The beam pattern on the car is correct because I did not change any setting on the factory lamps. The reason is I took the picture from side of the car. From the different angle might cause misunderstanding.
02-13-2003 | 07:24 AM
#24
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
98' C280
Originally posted by steve s
so one pic for each post...why didn't i think of that ....j/k. so that's what 18" monoblocks looks on a w202...i always thought the c36 17" monoblocks looked awfully small with the huge wheel gaps (the car is actually taller than a stock c280 with 17" monoblocks only).
nic pics
so one pic for each post...why didn't i think of that
....j/k. so that's what 18" monoblocks looks on a w202...i always thought the c36 17" monoblocks looked awfully small with the huge wheel gaps (the car is actually taller than a stock c280 with 17" monoblocks only).nic pics
02-13-2003 | 11:10 PM
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
1998 C230
enable the tag then close the tag
ignore the spaces I have between each character. I have to write it like this or the msg board will think I am actually putting picture tags.
[ img ] www.mypictures.com/pics/c280c.jpg [ /img ]
[ img ] www.mypictures.com/pics/c280a.jpg [ /img ]
[ img ] www.mypictures.com/pics/c280b.jpg [ /img ]
ignore the spaces I have between each character. I have to write it like this or the msg board will think I am actually putting picture tags.
[ img ] www.mypictures.com/pics/c280c.jpg [ /img ]
[ img ] www.mypictures.com/pics/c280a.jpg [ /img ]
[ img ] www.mypictures.com/pics/c280b.jpg [ /img ]
